Like a Virgin? The Controversial Account of Mary, Mother of Jesus

Like a Virgin? The Controversial Account of Mary, Mother of Jesus


The Virgin Mary, mother of Jesus, is one of the key symbols of Christianity and a woman whose cult changed the world. However, she may be one of the most misunderstood biblical people. According to some researchers, the famous story of a woman who had never had sexual contact with a man yet gave birth was caused by a mistake in the translation of ancient text.

The Virgin Mary is well known from the Bible, but there are not too many pieces of archaeological evidence about her life. Through the centuries, the story of the woman whose real name was Miriam, has changed the world. Her greatest claim to fame was delivering a boy named Joshua, who became known as Jesus. As the Holy Mother in Christianity, she was described as a symbol of purity and humbleness.

Differing Stories About Mary, Mother of Jesus

The famous story from the Bible says that Miriam (Mary) was a young, perhaps single, lady who met an angel and discovered by a message from God that she would give birth to his son. However, the Toledot Yeshu , an ancient Jewish book, presents a very different version of this story.

‘Annunciation’ (1489-1490) by Sandro Botticelli. ( Public Domain )

The unknown Jewish writers claim that Miriam was married to a man named John, but met a Roman soldier named Tiberius Pantera (sometimes spelled Panthera or Pandera). She fell in love and betrayed John with the Roman warrior. When John discovered the lovers, she was already pregnant and John decided to divorce her.

Tiberius took the name Josephus and created a family with Miriam and their little son Joshua (Jesus). The boy was famous for completing all sorts of miracles, which he had learned from the old masters. Some of his abilities were said to be: walking on water, changing water into wine, and many more. But the scandalous story of Miriam and the two men may explain why some felt it was better if she was called ''the virgin''.

Jesus, Mary, and Joseph . ( DeVon /Adobe Stock)

Translations Revealing the Truth

The biggest misunderstanding in the Virgin Mary’s story comes from a mistake in translation. It is common for translations to be based on former translations and the meaning behind words is often decoded by specialists in specific languages. Moreover, many translations were made of this story based on dictionaries created by specialists in Latin - which is the key to the mystery behind the word ''virgin''.

The word ''virgin'' comes from the Latin ''virgo'', which means ''maiden'' or a sexually inexperienced woman. This word was the basis for the stories about Mary as a woman who had never had intercourse with a man.

However, historically the term virgin meant ''one-in-herself'' - a woman who didn't need a man. It didn't necessarily mean that she didn't have one, however. This interpretation better represents a woman who was independent, financially free, mentally strong, and not overly dependent on her lover or partner.

Woodcut illustration of the zodiac sign Virgo used by Alexander and Samuel Weissenhorn of Ingolstadt.

Woodcut illustration of the zodiac sign Virgo used by Alexander and Samuel Weissenhorn of Ingolstadt. ( POP/CC BY 2.0 )

In ancient times, women were sometimes believed to be very strongly attached or even mentally addicted to their first sexual partner. Therefore, to avoid this problem, an ancient society of the Mediterranean area (and also other parts of the Middle East and Persia) decided to create a custom which became a part of religious ceremonies.

It was once common for women in these locations to go to the temples of Ishtar or Aphrodite, for example, to have sexual intercourse with the priest. They could never meet again, but this act, which was seemingly approved of by the goddess of the temple, allowed the woman to avoid becoming too attached to her lover. The visit in the temple was usually a suggestion given by her family and it was not seen as a betrayal or scandal.

Fragment of a stone plaque from the temple of Ishtar as known as Inanna – goddess of love, beauty, sex, desire, fertility 2500 BC. (Xenophon / CC BY-SA 3.0 )

However, researchers also suggest that the word virgin could be applied by ancient societies to women who were independent in different fields. It is possible that Mary could have been autonomous in other ways, but neither the Bible nor other texts delve into this idea.

The Virgin Mary is a Symbol for Many Things

Mary became a symbol for many things, including the famous Ark of the Covenant . As the specialists from the website Catholic Bible 101 explain:

''The Old Testament Ark of the Covenant contained three items – The Word of God in the form of stone tablets (the 10 Commandments), manna (bread) from Heaven, and the rod of Aaron that resprouted and came back to life (Hebrews 9:4).  Just so, the womb of the Blessed Virgin Mary contained Jesus Christ – The living Word of God (John 1:1), the bread of life (John 6:48), and the ruler with a rod of iron who also came back to life (Rev.12:5). At the Annunciation of Mary, Gabriel told her that the power of the most high would “overshadow” her (Luke 1:35).  The term “overshadow” is significant, because it was also used to refer to the cherubim “overshadowing” the mercy seat of the Ark of the Covenant (Hebrews 9:5).  The Ark was made with pure gold (Exodus 4ff), and was very holy, which parallels the Catholic teaching that Mary is also pure and holy.  The Ark of the Covenant was so holy, that no ordinary person could even touch it.  Uzzah reached out to steady it, and was instantly struck dead (2 Samuel 6:7).''

Moses and Joshua in the Tabernacle, bowing before the Ark, (1896-1902) By James Tissot.

Moses and Joshua in the Tabernacle, bowing before the Ark, (1896-1902) By James Tissot. ( Public Domain )

These suggestions support the idea that Mary was depicted as a symbolic holy vessel, which brought Jesus to life. But it also became the beginning of an interesting story. It may be nothing to do with being inexperienced as a sexual lover.

Mary could have been called a virgin because of her charisma, strength, and power to support her son. Ancient people living in the Middle East during her lifetime didn't see virginity in the same way as the Romans did , for example.

The Virgin Mary from the Ghent Altarpiece – called “The adoration of the lamb” (1432) by Jan van Eyck.

The Virgin Mary from the Ghent Altarpiece – called “The adoration of the lamb” (1432) by Jan van Eyck. ( Public Domain )

Is Mary Really Holy?

Over the centuries, some priests and bishops have wondered if Christians should worship Mary, the mother of Jesus. Perhaps they were aware of the mistake which appeared in the translations of the early texts, but felt that there was nothing they could do to change that error.

However, this doesn't change Mary’s position in history. Some maintain that the stories in the Bible cannot be read as real historical accounts, but as symbolic legends. This idea creates even more debate between religious people and some researchers. Nonetheless, as time passes by and new discussions reveal more about her, the story of Mary becomes even more fascinating.

Pavia, Italy. 2017/11/11. Painting of the Coronation of the Virgin Mary. XIV century. Currently in the Castello Visconteo (Visconteo castle). ( Adam Ján Figeľ /Adobe Stock)

Top Image: Verona - Coronation of Virgin Mary scene . Source: Renáta Sedmáková /Adobe Stock

By Natalia Klimczak


W. Eichelberger, Kobieta bez winy I wstydu, 2015.

The Blessed Virgin Mary, available at:

Should we worship Mary, available at:

Toledot Yeshu, available at:


Your comment is the first I have read saying that Jesus had a Roman Lover. Some believe that Mary's child was the result of a rape by a roman soldier. The rather wholesale rape of Jewish women by the ruling Romans is at least part of the reason that Jewishness (probably not the word I need) is passed through matriarchal lineage.

Mr. Jeffrey Lewis, It would be nice to have a day or a month, a year or a decade well I am still living to not have to hear certain members of Christian Sects voice their hatred by finger pointing and placing blame for the crucifixion of their Lord and Saviour onto others The same goes for placing blame on Judas. You misplace your blame if you are having to place any blame at all.

Your God you would have us believe is all knowing etc etc. There for whatever if anything transpired would be according to – how do you people put it “God’s plan “.

Besides, if Jesus died for your sins, then you are the blame. It would be nice if you people would stop using your God, your Lord, your Saviour as a scapegoat for your behaviour, your sins.

Without Judas there would not have been an arrest. No arrest,
no trail, conviction, sentencing nor any crucifixion. No crucifixion, no resurrection. No resurrection, no Lord and Saviour, no one dying for ‘your sins’.

Your Lord and Saviour, was put to death as he was deemed a threat to the then powers that be. Today’s psycho babble that would equate to ‘the rule of law’. This threat would have been seen as someone trying to incite a revolution, an usurper to the rule of law, to disturbing the ‘peace’. Under today’s understanding mumble jumble he would have been seen as a terrorist.

So if you need to place blame, place it where it belongs, onto the shoulders of your God.

Now if you are a member of the Roman Catholic Church. Please explain the following

Your Caeser/Pope is INFALLIBLE is he not? Pope Benedict XVI, did he not in his “Jesus of Nazareth” use a biblical and theological analysis in explaining why the Jewish people are not to be blamed.

For 6 decades the Church has taught that they were not ‘collectively responsible’. The ‘Nostra Aetate’ of 1965 states that Christ’s death could not be attributed to the Jewish people at the time or today.

“The Jewish people must never again be blamed for crucifixion”.

Amen Brother, I couldn't have said it better myself. Adding to it though I've recently seen a documentary showing that this story of Pantera being the adulterous father of Jesus comes out of the Talmud and is with out evidence as is most of the Talmud, and basically used to slander the Christian Messianic dogma. Jewish Rabbi's HATE Jesus and tear him down as often as possible-still, after over 2k years since they crucified him along with Pontious Pilot. Also the term "Virgin" in the Greek can mean just a "Young" woman-in those days it was ASSUMED that if a woman was unmarried she was a virgin because if she wasn't they would have stoned her for sure before Joseph's Betrothal. Also Mary's blood line was very well documented and there is evidence that she was groomed in the Temple as a vestal virgin due to her Davidic royal blood line. So the whole Roman Soldier story doesn't hold water and I really doubt Jesus's Uncle, Joseph of Arimathia, changed from a Pagan Roman Soldier to a member of the Sanhedrin in Jesus's lifetime. I think their is more likely hood or evidence towards Mary Magdalene marrying Jesus than being disgruntled bastard child or Tiberious Pantera.

Yep. This article is stretching it beyond all rational justification. Probably either from ignorance or desire to discredit Christianity.

Than you for this article. It makes so MUCH MORE SENSE than any other biblical account. I wish the whole bible would be re-translated.


Next article