The Virgin Mary, mother of Jesus, is one of the key symbols of Christianity and a woman whose cult changed the world. However, she may be one of the most misunderstood biblical people. According to some researchers, the famous story of a woman who had never had sexual contact with a man yet gave birth was caused by a mistake in the translation of ancient text.
The Virgin Mary is well known from the Bible, but there are not too many pieces of archaeological evidence about her life. Through the centuries, the story of the woman whose real name was Miriam, has changed the world. Her greatest claim to fame was delivering a boy named Joshua, who became known as Jesus. As the Holy Mother in Christianity, she was described as a symbol of purity and humbleness.
Differing Stories About Mary, Mother of Jesus
The famous story from the Bible says that Miriam (Mary) was a young, perhaps single, lady who met an angel and discovered by a message from God that she would give birth to his son. However, the Toledot Yeshu, an ancient Jewish book, presents a very different version of this story.
- An Empty Tomb and a Site Full of Faith: Where Was the Virgin Mary Buried?
- Japanese Wooden Statue Weeps, Sheds Blood, and Performs Miracles
- Vestal Virgins: The Pious Maidens of Ancient Rome

‘Annunciation’ (1489-1490) by Sandro Botticelli. (Public Domain)
The unknown Jewish writers claim that Miriam was married to a man named John, but met a Roman soldier named Tiberius Pantera (sometimes spelled Panthera or Pandera). She fell in love and betrayed John with the Roman warrior. When John discovered the lovers, she was already pregnant and John decided to divorce her.
Tiberius took the name Josephus and created a family with Miriam and their little son Joshua (Jesus). The boy was famous for completing all sorts of miracles, which he had learned from the old masters. Some of his abilities were said to be: walking on water, changing water into wine, and many more. But the scandalous story of Miriam and the two men may explain why some felt it was better if she was called ''the virgin''.

Jesus, Mary, and Joseph. (DeVon /Adobe Stock)
Translations Revealing the Truth
The biggest misunderstanding in the Virgin Mary’s story comes from a mistake in translation. It is common for translations to be based on former translations and the meaning behind words is often decoded by specialists in specific languages. Moreover, many translations were made of this story based on dictionaries created by specialists in Latin - which is the key to the mystery behind the word ''virgin''.
The word ''virgin'' comes from the Latin ''virgo'', which means ''maiden'' or a sexually inexperienced woman. This word was the basis for the stories about Mary as a woman who had never had intercourse with a man.
However, historically the term virgin meant ''one-in-herself'' - a woman who didn't need a man. It didn't necessarily mean that she didn't have one, however. This interpretation better represents a woman who was independent, financially free, mentally strong, and not overly dependent on her lover or partner.

Woodcut illustration of the zodiac sign Virgo used by Alexander and Samuel Weissenhorn of Ingolstadt. (POP/CC BY 2.0)
In ancient times, women were sometimes believed to be very strongly attached or even mentally addicted to their first sexual partner. Therefore, to avoid this problem, an ancient society of the Mediterranean area (and also other parts of the Middle East and Persia) decided to create a custom which became a part of religious ceremonies.
It was once common for women in these locations to go to the temples of Ishtar or Aphrodite, for example, to have sexual intercourse with the priest. They could never meet again, but this act, which was seemingly approved of by the goddess of the temple, allowed the woman to avoid becoming too attached to her lover. The visit in the temple was usually a suggestion given by her family and it was not seen as a betrayal or scandal.

Fragment of a stone plaque from the temple of Ishtar as known as Inanna – goddess of love, beauty, sex, desire, fertility 2500 BC. (Xenophon / CC BY-SA 3.0)
However, researchers also suggest that the word virgin could be applied by ancient societies to women who were independent in different fields. It is possible that Mary could have been autonomous in other ways, but neither the Bible nor other texts delve into this idea.
The Virgin Mary is a Symbol for Many Things
Mary became a symbol for many things, including the famous Ark of the Covenant. As the specialists from the website Catholic Bible 101 explain:
''The Old Testament Ark of the Covenant contained three items – The Word of God in the form of stone tablets (the 10 Commandments), manna (bread) from Heaven, and the rod of Aaron that resprouted and came back to life (Hebrews 9:4). Just so, the womb of the Blessed Virgin Mary contained Jesus Christ – The living Word of God (John 1:1), the bread of life (John 6:48), and the ruler with a rod of iron who also came back to life (Rev.12:5). At the Annunciation of Mary, Gabriel told her that the power of the most high would “overshadow” her (Luke 1:35). The term “overshadow” is significant, because it was also used to refer to the cherubim “overshadowing” the mercy seat of the Ark of the Covenant (Hebrews 9:5). The Ark was made with pure gold (Exodus 4ff), and was very holy, which parallels the Catholic teaching that Mary is also pure and holy. The Ark of the Covenant was so holy, that no ordinary person could even touch it. Uzzah reached out to steady it, and was instantly struck dead (2 Samuel 6:7).''

Moses and Joshua in the Tabernacle, bowing before the Ark, (1896-1902) By James Tissot. (Public Domain)
These suggestions support the idea that Mary was depicted as a symbolic holy vessel, which brought Jesus to life. But it also became the beginning of an interesting story. It may be nothing to do with being inexperienced as a sexual lover.
Mary could have been called a virgin because of her charisma, strength, and power to support her son. Ancient people living in the Middle East during her lifetime didn't see virginity in the same way as the Romans did, for example.
- Virgin Mothers and Miracle Babies: The Ancient History of Miraculous Conceptions
- Archaeologists Excavate Possible Home of Mary Magdalene and Synagogue Where Jesus May Have Preached
- Did Jesus Have a Wife? New Tests on Ancient Coptic Papyrus May Give Answers

The Virgin Mary from the Ghent Altarpiece – called “The adoration of the lamb” (1432) by Jan van Eyck. (Public Domain)
Is Mary Really Holy?
Over the centuries, some priests and bishops have wondered if Christians should worship Mary, the mother of Jesus. Perhaps they were aware of the mistake which appeared in the translations of the early texts, but felt that there was nothing they could do to change that error.
However, this doesn't change Mary’s position in history. Some maintain that the stories in the Bible cannot be read as real historical accounts, but as symbolic legends. This idea creates even more debate between religious people and some researchers. Nonetheless, as time passes by and new discussions reveal more about her, the story of Mary becomes even more fascinating.

Pavia, Italy. 2017/11/11. Painting of the Coronation of the Virgin Mary. XIV century. Currently in the Castello Visconteo (Visconteo castle). (Adam Ján Figeľ /Adobe Stock)
Top Image: Verona - Coronation of Virgin Mary scene. Source: Renáta Sedmáková /Adobe Stock
References:
W. Eichelberger, Kobieta bez winy I wstydu, 2015.
The Blessed Virgin Mary, available at:
http://www.catholicbible101.com/theblessedvirginmary.htm
Should we worship Mary, available at:
https://bible.org/question/should-we-worship-mary
Toledot Yeshu, available at:
http://jewishchristianlit.com//Topics/JewishJesus/toledoth.html


Koran
Permalink
In reply to Not true by Amyj (not verified)
There is nothing remotely noble about the Koran. If you have read this book in a language you understand you would know this. Even though both Jewish and Christian concepts and stories were appropriated by the madman who came up with the Koran the versions of those stories are faulty.
Good
Permalink
Very good article. Needs more references to mentioned ideas though. Would be interesting if the author could write a second part to it expanding more on the same ideology.
The difference between religion and historical facts
Permalink
If you are so touchy about your faith that even a plain historical article referring to a linguistic schism makes you feel under threat, I’m sorry, but your actions speak for themselves. Religion is a spiritual path and ‘Holy’ books are meant to be taken as metaphors and moral guidelines not as historical fact. Quibbling over whether historical linguists are right or not, only shows that you don’t even understand the notion of spirituality at its core.
Besides...
Permalink
In reply to The difference between religion and historical facts by Moonsong
Besides..they were all high when they had their “Visions” anyhoo. Just do a search about the early Christian frescos found depicting the“Snail Ceremony" that just happened to include Amanita Muscaria…
It was easier on the stomach if it was first fed to Snails and then ingest the Snails. There are a whole lot of Historical facts being stashed away and hidden through deception for the purpose of manipulation of the masses..
J.R. Bentley, many things
Permalink
In reply to Besides... by J.R. Bentley
J.R. Bentley, many things have been done in the past and in the present in the name of Christianity. Not all have anything to do with the teachings of Jesus as recorded in the canonical book of the Bible. Just as the Sefer Toledo Yeshu (which can be found online). Just because something has been practiced, believed, or written about doesn't make it true. That is why adequate research and study of resources are critical to any historical thesis or essay. Thank you for making the point of my criticism of this article.
Pagination