Ancient Humans Bred with Completely Unknown Species

Denisova Cave
Getting your audio player ready...

A new study presented to the Royal Society meeting on ancient DNA in London last week has revealed a dramatic finding – the genome of one of our ancient ancestors, the Denisovans, contains a segment of DNA that seems to have come from another species that is currently unknown to science. The discovery suggests that there was rampant interbreeding between ancient human species in Europe and Asia more than 30,000 years ago. But, far more significant was the finding that they also mated with a mystery species from Asia – one that is neither human nor Neanderthal. 

Scientists launched into a flurry of discussion and debate upon hearing the study results and immediately began speculating about what this unknown species could be.  Some have suggested that a group may have branched off to Asia from the Homo heidelbernensis, who resided in Africa about half a million years ago. They are believed to be the ancestors of Europe's Neanderthals. 

However others, such as Chris Stringer, a paleoanthropologist at the London Natural History Museum, admitted that they “don’t have the faintest idea” what the mystery species could be.

Traces of the unknown new genome were detected in two teeth and a finger bone of a Denisovan, which was discovered in a Siberian cave. There is not much data available about the appearance of Denisovans due to lack of their fossils' availability, but the geneticists and researchers succeeded in arranging their entire genome very precisely.

"What it begins to suggest is that we're looking at a 'Lord of the Rings'-type world - that there were many hominid populations," Mark Thomas, an evolutionary geneticist at University College London.

The question is now: who were these mystery people that the Denisovans were breeding with?

By April Holloway

mothergoddess (not verified)    27 September, 2015 - 19:45

In reply to by TKMcGuinness (not verified)

Actually, data is considered as a collective whole and is, therefore, singular. Example: a herd of horses is galloping across the plain. Herd is singular. A gaggle of geese is following her around the yard.

mothergoddess (not verified)    27 September, 2015 - 19:46

In reply to by TKMcGuinness (not verified)

Actually, data is considered as a collective whole and is, therefore, singular. Example: a herd of horses is galloping across the plain. Herd is singular. A gaggle of geese is following her around the yard.

Ruba Cat (not verified)    11 January, 2015 - 15:21

In reply to by Last Past

Many people online nowadays are from outside of the US and if you actually toss a piano down a call mine you would get an atonal noice, absolutely not an A flat minor chord. I think that people only commenting other users grammar are boring anyway, and most of all, bad listeners.

Homo Sapien (not verified)    13 January, 2015 - 00:06

In reply to by Ruba Cat (not verified)

Can we please forget about the piano joke. It seems to have been done to death and yet people still don't get the joke [sigh].

Not sure what your point is about people online not coming from the US. I don't.

Anyway - I just want to deviate from this interesting and rivetting discussion on diction and grammar to make a boring but factual comment on the article. The article says that ancient humans bred with "an unknown species". That's impossible. In fact you could say that that is the definition of "species": the ability to breed with one another. Humans, for instance cannot breed with chimps (though I imagine lots have tried) because chimps are a separate species. We once shared a common ancestor, but now humans and chimps have evolved into separate species. So whatever ancient humans bred with long ago, it was simply just another, previously unknown type of human. Nothing surprising about that.

esauis (not verified)    11 March, 2015 - 20:03

In reply to by Homo Sapien (not verified)

Humans could have interbred with a different species and produced offspring, if their DNA were close enough to each others. However, the offspring would have been sterile, and therefore non VIABLE offspring. LION+TIGER=LIGER, HORSE+DONKEY=MULE... but they are sterile. Our DNA is 98% similar to a chimps, more so than the aforementioned hybrids... and certainly in some CIA lab buried under the Pentagon, there are human/chimp hybrids being tested upon as I write