I would imagine if they whad other fod sources they would not have ate rats, especially when fishing would have been an island. They had boats, if not they would not have made it to the island in the first place.
A lof of them eating rats has to do with overpopulation of the little island and the deforestation of the land. Not to mention the spanish brought rats with them on their boats, probably not intentional, nonetheless they were brought to this island. So when you have too many people, deforetation, and an animal population the reproduces rapidly, you are left with an undesirable food source.
Very interesteing article that points out some of the important questions that still needs answers, some of which we may never know. I am familiar with the authors work and this is another good article. There are cases like this all over the world that will shed light on the past and provide answers for our path to understanding.
For Brien Foerster. In mapping out where the process of deformed skulls existed, pls consider Marinduque in the Philippines where such elongated skulls were discovered by F. Jagor in 1860, the first time it was discovered in the oriental island world, followed by the discovery by A. Marche of the same skulls in 1881. see Marinduque Rising
Yeah, too bad they didn't have Aquaman and Flash Gordon to help fight off those Blue Meanies Lucifer had. Too bad, indeed. Duhhhhhhhhhh (makes mouth bubbles).
My, one would think the author really believes this. Or expects us to believe it? All of those wonderful statements about how none of us are 100% bad or good would lead one to expect better than just another individual, stating their own bias and prejudices. Comments like:
"These bozos who specialize in controlling and brain-washing us"
or
"The corporatist elite continues to get away with the lies and the contempt."
only address personal beliefs because the author was correct when she stated that nobody is Vanilla ........ Chocolate ......... Pistachio, or anything else that is defined as a being a specific thing or way. There is truth in those statements where some are concerned, but it does not apply to every individual who fits that description across the board. Why? Because every person is an individual. Case, point, end of story.
I find it disheartening to read one piece after another where the author starts off by making eloquent statements of truth, but winds up fulfilling the height of hypocrisy by doing the very thing they rail against. Is this the destiny of the human race? To point fingers at one another while doing the same things ourselves? Who here can offer up one single example of an issue where assignment of blame resolved anything?
I am sorry, but if this is the way we are destined to behave, then I'm glad my waning years are here. But I feel truly sorry for those of you who will have to muddle through attitudes like this for another fifty years or so.
How about saying you don't believe we descended from 'Africans' (whatever you may mean by that term), rather than stating it as if it's a fact, and one which you cannot prove?
I wonder what would have happened if Hitler had chosen something other than a swatika. A star or a triangle or circle, anything else. We would have the same general negative reaction to a smiley face if Hitler had decided to use it as his symbol. I know quite a few people who think that anything to do with Germany or the German people is bad because Hitler was a German. It's sad to think how one bad person can have such an effect on the world even after they're long gone.
Yeah, I can see what you mean. He does try, and only misfired on a couple of points.
I only wanted to point out that unsubstantiated opinion does not make for scientific evidence myself, and I'm one who has issues with current established theory. Is everyone aware that the entire fossil record for anything from 10k BC back would fit in a box not much larger than a coffin until the villages were found from the Green Sahara era a few years back? It doesn't exactly match what they lead you to believe, does it?
I wish they would get their collective acts together, because the recent discovery on the Arabian Peninsula is liable to blow everything we know out of the water. Providing the Arabians allow excavation of course.
I'm not a scientist but what Anthropos323 has written, out of all the post that I have read, makes a lot of sense. All the other post seem to be based off emotion and the discomfort that their ancestors came out of Africa, where Anthropos323 post are based on scientific fact.
First of all, somebody made a statement that people are trying to overturn the out of Africa concept for purely racist reasons. This is both an assumption, and one of the standard ploys used by the scientific community to get people to back off.
That said, I would like to point out that some form of a proper scientific paper is always available if the research has indeed been done, irregardless of how far off the norm the subject is. Here's an excellent example of this:
I totally agree with what you wrote Thomast.
The bible about this is 3Forbidden archeology" by Cremo and Thomson.
It takes serious guts to go against the official (nonsense) theories!
Guys like David Icke and so many more are all pointing at other interesting ideas but one has to seriously want to know what the truth could really be !
Many "flying saucers" are man made, no question about that!
So whether it is really from outer space or not is quite irrelevant to me...
The question is: who gave "us" the means of building them and what was the deal exactly about!
I don't we will get answers soon!
Only some of the skulls were possibly not the result of head binding, not 300...use your critical thinking,people..there are no ancient aliens..although there maybe some genetic malformation within that population that inspired others to bind the heads of their children.People have been trying for a hundred years to disprove the out of Africa theory of origin for purely racist reasons..that is why mainstream Archaeology often ignores this kind of research..they see it for what it is..
This analysis was started by author LA Marzulli to prove that fallen angels (what many think of as aliens from another planet) visited earth as described in the book of Genesis and the book of Enoch that was in the early Bibles.
The result of non-human DNA was expected. Visit his site at lamarzulli.wordpress.com/ or for more understanding read: tribulation-now.org/light-workers/ or for an ancient text expert visit author Zen Garcia at fallenangels.tv/
New Age Bozo? I assume that you are refering to someone different to the "Old" Age Bozo . . . like an archaeologist, or paleontologist for example?
I would seem that too many people are unable to differentiate between knowing something and having an opinion about something. Drawing conclusions from available information should not infer that those conclusions are fact. Some know only what they have been taught and never question the validity of what they have learned, and a lot of them call themselves "scientists".
In regard to this subject, you refer to someone who has an opinion you don't agree with as a "Bozo" . . .an incompetant who has an opinion not worthy of consideration. Lkke most "experts" I've met, you flatter yourself.
Here you can navigate quickly through all comments made in any article sorted by date/time.
I would imagine if they whad other fod sources they would not have ate rats, especially when fishing would have been an island. They had boats, if not they would not have made it to the island in the first place.
A lof of them eating rats has to do with overpopulation of the little island and the deforestation of the land. Not to mention the spanish brought rats with them on their boats, probably not intentional, nonetheless they were brought to this island. So when you have too many people, deforetation, and an animal population the reproduces rapidly, you are left with an undesirable food source.
Very interesteing article that points out some of the important questions that still needs answers, some of which we may never know. I am familiar with the authors work and this is another good article. There are cases like this all over the world that will shed light on the past and provide answers for our path to understanding.
For Brien Foerster. In mapping out where the process of deformed skulls existed, pls consider Marinduque in the Philippines where such elongated skulls were discovered by F. Jagor in 1860, the first time it was discovered in the oriental island world, followed by the discovery by A. Marche of the same skulls in 1881. see Marinduque Rising
Yeah, too bad they didn't have Aquaman and Flash Gordon to help fight off those Blue Meanies Lucifer had. Too bad, indeed. Duhhhhhhhhhh (makes mouth bubbles).
My, one would think the author really believes this. Or expects us to believe it? All of those wonderful statements about how none of us are 100% bad or good would lead one to expect better than just another individual, stating their own bias and prejudices. Comments like:
"These bozos who specialize in controlling and brain-washing us"
or
"The corporatist elite continues to get away with the lies and the contempt."
only address personal beliefs because the author was correct when she stated that nobody is Vanilla ........ Chocolate ......... Pistachio, or anything else that is defined as a being a specific thing or way. There is truth in those statements where some are concerned, but it does not apply to every individual who fits that description across the board. Why? Because every person is an individual. Case, point, end of story.
I find it disheartening to read one piece after another where the author starts off by making eloquent statements of truth, but winds up fulfilling the height of hypocrisy by doing the very thing they rail against. Is this the destiny of the human race? To point fingers at one another while doing the same things ourselves? Who here can offer up one single example of an issue where assignment of blame resolved anything?
I am sorry, but if this is the way we are destined to behave, then I'm glad my waning years are here. But I feel truly sorry for those of you who will have to muddle through attitudes like this for another fifty years or so.
That's some seriously silly, stupid garbage you're espousing there. Are you yourself a neanderthal? Have any nice white robes in the attic?
How about saying you don't believe we descended from 'Africans' (whatever you may mean by that term), rather than stating it as if it's a fact, and one which you cannot prove?
Except, as the article says, this started decades ago, well before the current economic crisis there.
I wonder what would have happened if Hitler had chosen something other than a swatika. A star or a triangle or circle, anything else. We would have the same general negative reaction to a smiley face if Hitler had decided to use it as his symbol. I know quite a few people who think that anything to do with Germany or the German people is bad because Hitler was a German. It's sad to think how one bad person can have such an effect on the world even after they're long gone.
Yeah, I can see what you mean. He does try, and only misfired on a couple of points.
I only wanted to point out that unsubstantiated opinion does not make for scientific evidence myself, and I'm one who has issues with current established theory. Is everyone aware that the entire fossil record for anything from 10k BC back would fit in a box not much larger than a coffin until the villages were found from the Green Sahara era a few years back? It doesn't exactly match what they lead you to believe, does it?
I wish they would get their collective acts together, because the recent discovery on the Arabian Peninsula is liable to blow everything we know out of the water. Providing the Arabians allow excavation of course.
I'm not a scientist but what Anthropos323 has written, out of all the post that I have read, makes a lot of sense. All the other post seem to be based off emotion and the discomfort that their ancestors came out of Africa, where Anthropos323 post are based on scientific fact.
First of all, somebody made a statement that people are trying to overturn the out of Africa concept for purely racist reasons. This is both an assumption, and one of the standard ploys used by the scientific community to get people to back off.
That said, I would like to point out that some form of a proper scientific paper is always available if the research has indeed been done, irregardless of how far off the norm the subject is. Here's an excellent example of this:
http://abob.libs.uga.edu/bobk/nuclear.html
This is what some of the folks are asking for. Does anybody know where to find something similar regarding this story?
http://doubtfulnews.com/2014/02/foerster-pye-and-ketchum-collaborate-par...
I totally agree with what you wrote Thomast.
The bible about this is 3Forbidden archeology" by Cremo and Thomson.
It takes serious guts to go against the official (nonsense) theories!
Guys like David Icke and so many more are all pointing at other interesting ideas but one has to seriously want to know what the truth could really be !
Many "flying saucers" are man made, no question about that!
So whether it is really from outer space or not is quite irrelevant to me...
The question is: who gave "us" the means of building them and what was the deal exactly about!
I don't we will get answers soon!
Only some of the skulls were possibly not the result of head binding, not 300...use your critical thinking,people..there are no ancient aliens..although there maybe some genetic malformation within that population that inspired others to bind the heads of their children.People have been trying for a hundred years to disprove the out of Africa theory of origin for purely racist reasons..that is why mainstream Archaeology often ignores this kind of research..they see it for what it is..
Sorry, misunderstanding :-) You can edit your posts once you register as a user!
This analysis was started by author LA Marzulli to prove that fallen angels (what many think of as aliens from another planet) visited earth as described in the book of Genesis and the book of Enoch that was in the early Bibles.
The result of non-human DNA was expected. Visit his site at lamarzulli.wordpress.com/ or for more understanding read: tribulation-now.org/light-workers/ or for an ancient text expert visit author Zen Garcia at fallenangels.tv/
New Age Bozo? I assume that you are refering to someone different to the "Old" Age Bozo . . . like an archaeologist, or paleontologist for example?
I would seem that too many people are unable to differentiate between knowing something and having an opinion about something. Drawing conclusions from available information should not infer that those conclusions are fact. Some know only what they have been taught and never question the validity of what they have learned, and a lot of them call themselves "scientists".
In regard to this subject, you refer to someone who has an opinion you don't agree with as a "Bozo" . . .an incompetant who has an opinion not worthy of consideration. Lkke most "experts" I've met, you flatter yourself.
Pages