If Humans have non-split pineal gland surely its possible elongated skulls may have whole brain non-split. note that humans are genetically engineered and dumbed down species. reason why humans use only 10-15% of their brain plus pineal gland partially functioning except for lucky few. why we have primate dna within us and 4000 genetic defects. (check Lloyd Pye - Everything you know is Wrong)
These elongated skulls are either Aliens or Humans who are possibly genetically unaltered. i don't believe elongated ones are extinct and pretty sure they are living inside hollow earth or other planets or both.
I understand that the person who did the genetic analysis was Dr. Melba Ketchum.
I'm not inclined to give this much credence. However, if the claim is true, no doubt other researchers will replicate the findings.
Hello Anthony, this information comes directly from the researcher investigating the skulls, Brien Foerster, and the results have just been released so you won't see it in any journals. This is only phase one of the analysis and there are many more tests to be done before it would get even close to publication. For a start, the same analysis is due to be carried out on two more Paracas skulls and the intention is also to analyse multiple samples from the same skulls. A lot more replication has to be done and that has been made very clear in the article.
No data will be released until all stages of analysis have been complete.
We are not here to convince people of any particular view, we are reporting updates and that is all. When we receive the next update, we will report that too.
I don't see any source work. I need citations, and I need to see a link to documentation. This is a poor article without them and cannot hold water. I have searched as much as I could through journals for something along these lines and suspect that this is a gross misinterpretation of data, if it stands at all. If anyone can link to the data please do. Do not HTML tag as it goes against the rules of the forum, but provide a clue to the location of the link.
@skepticalgnostic. I believe they are referring to the statement that there was only one parietal bone. Of course that has nothing to do with whether the brain was split or not, but, hey, it's fun to believe in aliens and flying saucers and dragons and stuff--so there you go.
@Melinda. You're right, and part of keeping an open mind is also remembering that many of the things first considered insane and unbelievable were just that--insane and unbelievable.
My dear sir, you are spot on. A lot of facts are buried and destroyed! We need a new system that is outside of normal peer review so these evil illuminati types can't stop the true facts from getting out!
First of all, those photos look computer generated.
I am glad the DNA testing was done. Follow through with it and report the results. How many chromosomes were there? Is there an X, Y component to it. Of the nearly 300 found were any infants? In what positon they. Were the bungled up or laid out ritually? Any injuries that might indicate a cause of death? These are just a few questions that I have and I'm sure others have many more. If any of this is on the site, please provide links to it.
The mDNA report needs to be provided. This guy is not a geneticist or forensic pathologist. He's a hippie canoe builder. I'm all for investigating, but facts are facts. Not the word of some tour guide. Forensic/DNA labs provide reports. Scan it. Post it. Done.
Hi Malisa, there is nothing to 'buy' at this stage - they are only preliminary results. The good news is that there are up to 300 of these skulls, which means multiple samples can be tested, and repeated analyses can be undertaken. The exciting aspect of all this is that through DNA testing, the mystery of the Paracas people can be unravelled once and for all - whatever their history may be.
Actually whether there is one or two parietal plates is not related to the splitting of the brain into two hemispheres. See here for an explanation on the parietal bone of the skull: http://www.innerbody.com/image_skel01/skel41_new_skull.html
again, q dubs q dubs q dubs q dubs q dubs q dubs q dubs..........cant we have any fun? We dont take kindly to naysayers (unless youre a horse) sniffing around our fantasy land! What am i gonna do bout it? nothin................ im very fragile. Buuuuuuuuut, plz let our imaginations run wild and i suggest exercising your 1st ammendment right on top of a mountain at the top of your lungs til your vocal chords give out for a good several hours! harumph indeed!
Have you read Zeccharia Sitchin's work in the Earth Chronicles?
He talks about evidence all through this old recorded history of 'ET's' and giants being on the earth and also about the existence of another huge planet IN our solar system that has an extremely long orbit around the sun... (my best guess from memory is it's) something like 1700 of our years.
For those of you who insist on clinging to E.T. (in spite of the Van Allen Belts ?) I will concede that they are the offspring/minions of "The Prince of the power of the air" For those who seek the truth it is a "no brainer" that the evidence of the Nephilim (contemporary E.T.'s after death) is irrefutable and spans the entire history of life on Earth. This is without using "any" Religious documents to prop up authentic discoveries.P.S radiological dating is a faulty man made measuring technique designed to fit the "story" and fool the masses.Do your own research,diligently and honestly !
Here you can navigate quickly through all comments made in any article sorted by date/time.
If Humans have non-split pineal gland surely its possible elongated skulls may have whole brain non-split. note that humans are genetically engineered and dumbed down species. reason why humans use only 10-15% of their brain plus pineal gland partially functioning except for lucky few. why we have primate dna within us and 4000 genetic defects. (check Lloyd Pye - Everything you know is Wrong)
These elongated skulls are either Aliens or Humans who are possibly genetically unaltered. i don't believe elongated ones are extinct and pretty sure they are living inside hollow earth or other planets or both.
I understand that the person who did the genetic analysis was Dr. Melba Ketchum.
I'm not inclined to give this much credence. However, if the claim is true, no doubt other researchers will replicate the findings.
Hello Anthony, this information comes directly from the researcher investigating the skulls, Brien Foerster, and the results have just been released so you won't see it in any journals. This is only phase one of the analysis and there are many more tests to be done before it would get even close to publication. For a start, the same analysis is due to be carried out on two more Paracas skulls and the intention is also to analyse multiple samples from the same skulls. A lot more replication has to be done and that has been made very clear in the article.
No data will be released until all stages of analysis have been complete.
We are not here to convince people of any particular view, we are reporting updates and that is all. When we receive the next update, we will report that too.
I don't see any source work. I need citations, and I need to see a link to documentation. This is a poor article without them and cannot hold water. I have searched as much as I could through journals for something along these lines and suspect that this is a gross misinterpretation of data, if it stands at all. If anyone can link to the data please do. Do not HTML tag as it goes against the rules of the forum, but provide a clue to the location of the link.
@skepticalgnostic. I believe they are referring to the statement that there was only one parietal bone. Of course that has nothing to do with whether the brain was split or not, but, hey, it's fun to believe in aliens and flying saucers and dragons and stuff--so there you go.
@Melinda. You're right, and part of keeping an open mind is also remembering that many of the things first considered insane and unbelievable were just that--insane and unbelievable.
My dear sir, you are spot on. A lot of facts are buried and destroyed! We need a new system that is outside of normal peer review so these evil illuminati types can't stop the true facts from getting out!
Are there photos of all these shells? It's hard to detach ourselves of your biases, even for writers.
First of all, those photos look computer generated.
I am glad the DNA testing was done. Follow through with it and report the results. How many chromosomes were there? Is there an X, Y component to it. Of the nearly 300 found were any infants? In what positon they. Were the bungled up or laid out ritually? Any injuries that might indicate a cause of death? These are just a few questions that I have and I'm sure others have many more. If any of this is on the site, please provide links to it.
Hello Bec, what spelling errors are you referring to?
The mDNA report needs to be provided. This guy is not a geneticist or forensic pathologist. He's a hippie canoe builder. I'm all for investigating, but facts are facts. Not the word of some tour guide. Forensic/DNA labs provide reports. Scan it. Post it. Done.
It would sound more believable if the spelling and grammar were correct. Someone needs to edit.
The source is directly from Brien Foerster, who is coordinating the entire project. He has written a more detailed account here: http://www.ancient-origins.net/ancient-places-americas-opinion-guest-aut...
Hi Malisa, there is nothing to 'buy' at this stage - they are only preliminary results. The good news is that there are up to 300 of these skulls, which means multiple samples can be tested, and repeated analyses can be undertaken. The exciting aspect of all this is that through DNA testing, the mystery of the Paracas people can be unravelled once and for all - whatever their history may be.
Actually whether there is one or two parietal plates is not related to the splitting of the brain into two hemispheres. See here for an explanation on the parietal bone of the skull: http://www.innerbody.com/image_skel01/skel41_new_skull.html
Where does this article state that these skulls (plural) indicate that the brain was not split? The word "brain" doesn't appear in the article.
again, q dubs q dubs q dubs q dubs q dubs q dubs q dubs..........cant we have any fun? We dont take kindly to naysayers (unless youre a horse) sniffing around our fantasy land! What am i gonna do bout it? nothin................ im very fragile. Buuuuuuuuut, plz let our imaginations run wild and i suggest exercising your 1st ammendment right on top of a mountain at the top of your lungs til your vocal chords give out for a good several hours! harumph indeed!
We are in contact with Dr Poulianos, and soon we will post an update with news on the topic.
Have you read Zeccharia Sitchin's work in the Earth Chronicles?
He talks about evidence all through this old recorded history of 'ET's' and giants being on the earth and also about the existence of another huge planet IN our solar system that has an extremely long orbit around the sun... (my best guess from memory is it's) something like 1700 of our years.
For those of you who insist on clinging to E.T. (in spite of the Van Allen Belts ?) I will concede that they are the offspring/minions of "The Prince of the power of the air" For those who seek the truth it is a "no brainer" that the evidence of the Nephilim (contemporary E.T.'s after death) is irrefutable and spans the entire history of life on Earth. This is without using "any" Religious documents to prop up authentic discoveries.P.S radiological dating is a faulty man made measuring technique designed to fit the "story" and fool the masses.Do your own research,diligently and honestly !
Pages