All  
Dinosaur

Scientist dismissed after soft tissue found on dinosaur fossil

Print

A microscope scientist working for California State University has been fired following the discovery that a Triceratops horn still contained soft tissue complete with bone cells “that look alive”, according to a report in CBS Los Angeles . The scientist, whose analysis of the Triceratops horn was published in the peer-reviewed scientific journal, is also an evangelical creationist, and claimed that the finding supports the view that Earth is 6,000 years old and that dinosaurs roamed the planet around 4,000 years ago. While the university claims the scientist, Mark Armitage, was fired for allowing his religion to interfere with his work, Armitage is suing the University for wrongful dismissal on the basis of violation to freedom of speech and academic freedom. 

Mark Armitage, a published scientist of over 30 years, was working at the Hell Creek Formation excavation site in Montanaa when he discovered one of the largest Triceratops horns ever unearthed at the site. According to conventional perspectives, the Triceratops is a genus of herbivorous dinosaur that first appeared in the late Cretaceous period, about 68 million years ago in what is now North America, and became extinct around 66 million years ago.

Example of a Triceratops horn

Example of a Triceratops horn. Photo source .

Armitage studied the fossil in the California State University lab using a high-powered miscroscope and was stunned to find soft tissue complete with bone cells.  According to Armitage, the preservation of such cells is a scientific impossibility if the dinosaur really walked the Earth over 66 million years ago. On this basis, he felt it was not unreasonable to open discussion with colleagues and students about the implications of such a finding being that the creationist perspective is correct and that dinosaurs existed much later than mainstream science maintains. The results of Armitage’s analysis of the soft tissue was eventually published in July 2013 in the journal Acta Histochemica . Nevertheless, Armitage was fired from the University of California, which he is now fighting in court.

“Terminating an employee because of their religious views is completely inappropriate and illegal,” said Attorney Brad Dacus of Pacific Justice Institute. “But doing so in an attempt to silence scientific speech at a public university is even more alarming. This should be a wakeup call and warning to the entire world of academia.”

While numerous examples of suppression of ‘academic freedom’ can be cited in which scientists have been discriminated against for presenting views that conflict with mainstream perspectives, Armitage made the ‘unscientific’ mistake of assuming that the dinosaur must be only several thousand years old simply because the process in which the cells were preserved was not understood by him.

In fact, the finding of the soft tissue is not the first of its kind.  Several ground-breaking discoveries in the last decade have revealed preserved soft tissue on dinosaur remains, such as the recent finding of 68-milion-year-old soft tissue from the bones of a Tyrannosaurus rex. However, Mary Schweitzer, a molecular paleontologist at North Carolina State University, who headed up the research on the T. rex remains, explained that the soft tissue was able to be preserved by iron in the dinosaur’s body, which preserved the tissue before it could decay.

The legal case surrounding Armitage’s dismissal opens up many important questions about academic freedom, whether science and religion can ever truly coexist in harmony, and what knowledge may be unravelled by the discovery of preserved cells in the remains of dinosaurs.

Featured image: A Triceratops. Source: BigStockPhoto

By April Holloway

Comments

It's fascinating to me that these scientists will not carbon-date this soft tissue because it will produce ridiculously young dates. So then you have a problem. The evolutionist has supposedly ancient rocks in which soft material appears with the appearance of youth; he needs those long periods of time because he believes even the impossible can happen in a long period of time. The creationist has young soft material which appears in rocks which have the appearance of age. So both have a problem, but the creationist doesn't need long ages of time because he has a Creator. If you will not have a God before Whom you must give personal account someday, then you believe evolutionism in hopes that no God is needed.

I find that it is quite possible...even probable that God started the process of evolution. The Biblical account of creation tells of many animals originating in the sea, Adam and Eve being clothed in animal skins, and even the first murder recorded was by way of a rock to the head.
This sounds a lot like the evolutionary process of life forms transitioning out of the water onto land, early humanoids using animal skins and using sticks and rocks as weapons.
There are more similarities and parallels, but I think you get the gist of what I am saying.
Its plausible.

More accurately, Mark was fired because he did not believe in the evolution. Find something that makes the sacred cow of evolution look bad, and the high priests will fire you.

Stop arguing about the calendar and start cloning.

Notice that they won't carbon-date that soft tissue, because it will produce ridiculously young dates. So they will date the soft tissue by the age assigned to the layer in which it was found in order to continue the narrative. No science here.

Pages

Next article