Store Banner Desktop

Store Banner Mobile

Pericles' Funeral Oration, Philipp Foltz, 1877.

Are We in Tyrannical Times? Has Plato’s Terrible Prediction Come True?

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

Okay, so Plato once predicted that all democratic governments would inevitably lead to chaos and anarchy.

And sure, he foresaw that elected leaders would try to lie to us, in attempts to placate the people. And yes, Plato deduced that the only logical result from democracy was...Tyranny; a state where lawmakers would purposely undermine the people’s needs in order to maintain power. But really, come on. It’s not like this is happening now, right? Right?

I may have just given away the ending, put my cards on the table a bit too soon, so to speak.

But to investigate whether or not you are living in a tyrannical government - an important issue to be sure - it’s best to get to the point.

So, today we are discussing ancient, political philosophy. Specifically, Plato’s political ideas found within his magnum opus, The Republic.

I, for one, love political philosophy. This topic has allowed our society to progress over thousands of years. Without it, we would no doubt be living in the wild, killing each other with pointy sticks. Fortunately, we have definitely progressed; we now know that missiles are much more effective.

Strengths and Weaknesses of Government

Back to the point. We are discussing Book VIII of Plato’s The Republic. It is here that Socrates, along with a slew of his philosophical mates, talk about the various forms of government, including their strengths and weaknesses.

The Statue of Socrates at the Academy of Athens. Work of Leonidas Drosis (d. 1880). (C messier/CC BY SA 4.0)

The Statue of Socrates at the Academy of Athens. Work of Leonidas Drosis (d. 1880). (C messier/CC BY SA 4.0)

They begin with “timocracy”, a system that stresses honor and military strength. You won’t be surprised to learn that timocracy was effectively used by the Spartans for centuries.

Next up is “oligarchy”, of which Socrates claims the leaders aim to acquire as much wealth as possible. Within this form of government, lawmakers are generally the richest, most affluent citizens.

But this is a serious problem. The wisest, most honorable citizens may never become lawmakers simply because they don’t have enough money. Moreover, disparity between the rich and the poor will lead to mistrust, tensions, and inevitable uprisings.

In conclusion, oligarchies never last. The poor will hate the rich so much that revolution will wash the oligarchical system away, and be replaced with, you guessed it, a democracy.

“And then democracy comes into being after the poor have conquered their opponents, slaughtering some and banishing some, while to the remainder they give an equal share of freedom and power” –Socrates (Plato’s Republic)

While oligarchies are interested in wealth, the principle concern of democracy is freedom. Socrates continues that an abundance of freedom leads to an abundance of diversity. When people are given control over their lives, surely, they will start to think and act independently.

Plato, ancient Greek philosopher. From Thomas Stanley, (1655), ‘The history of philosophy: containing the lives, opinions, actions and Discourses of the Philosophers of every Sect, illustrated with effigies of divers of them.’ (Public Domain)

Plato, ancient Greek philosopher. From Thomas Stanley, (1655), ‘The history of philosophy: containing the lives, opinions, actions and Discourses of the Philosophers of every Sect, illustrated with effigies of divers of them.’ (Public Domain)

At first, democracy might just be the ideal state. Socrates describes it as “a charming sort of government, full of variety and disorder, and dispensing a sort of equality to the equal and unequal alike.”

That sounds about right.

Socrates goes on that a democracy is uniquely beautiful. Like a cloak created by innumerable distinct pieces of cloth, it is beautiful and diverse.

“This, then, seems likely to be the fairest of States, being like an embroidered robe which is spangled with every sort of flower.” –Socrates (Plato’s Republic)

This all seems rather nice. Wouldn’t you agree? Sure, we all know Democracy isn’t perfect, but it is the imperfections that make it perfect. It appears that we have finally found our ideal state. Great! We can all go home; confident that we are living in the best possible version of society.

“And so tyranny naturally arises out of democracy, and the most aggravated form of tyranny and slavery out of the most extreme form of liberty” –Socrates (Plato’s Republic)

Wait a minute… what?! But I thought we were living in an imperfectly perfect state? Right?

Socrates, often considered to be a mouthpiece for Plato, contends that once given freedom in a democracy, we tend to become drunk off of it. We become so concerned with our liberty that we recoil at any institution that would try to limit it.

Philosopher Plato (1560s) by Paolo Veronese. (Public Domain)

Philosopher Plato (1560s) by Paolo Veronese. (Public Domain)

The obvious result is unrest. Citizens fight against lawmakers who try to limit their freedoms. Younger generations mistreat and disrespect older generations. Even the animals attack men who may attempt to pen them.


“…all things are just ready to burst with liberty.” –Socrates (Plato’s Republic)

So how did this happen?

A Popularity Contest

Within a democracy, a leader does not need to be honorable, wise, or even intelligent. He only has to be popular.

Early on, democratic leaders will try to stay popular with the average citizen. They will fight against the wealthy, seize their land and money - all through the guise of taxes - in order to redistribute this wealth to the masses and gain favor.

In a democracy, it is common that an individual will be championed as a hero and protector. He will be brought into greatness by the people and elected to the highest office.

This leader will do away with those who seem to be an enemy of liberty, either through execution or banishment. He will be seen as a man of the people, a liberator.

Head of Platon, Roman copy. The original was exhibited at the Academy after the death of the philosopher (348/347 BC). (Public Domain)

Head of Platon, Roman copy. The original was exhibited at the Academy after the death of the philosopher (348/347 BC). (Public Domain)

The Birth of Tyranny

However, he will grow unpopular, as all leaders inevitably do, and he will become desperate to preserve his power and protect himself from unrest.

His plan will be two-fold. First, he will tax the citizens excessively, so that they have to work constantly to maintain their possessions and their property.

Next the leader will get involved in foreign wars, creating enemies out of neighbors. Any citizen who criticizes this will be labeled as an unpatriotic enemy sympathizer.

Now the leader is truly a tyrant. He neglects the needs of the people in order to maintain his position. Finally, we see how democracy has led to tyranny, how our desire for liberty has brought only slavery. Sound familiar?

Top Image: Pericles' Funeral Oration, Philipp Foltz, 1877. Source: Public Domain

By Van Bryan

Classical Wisdom Limited is an online publishing company that strives to promote and preserve the classics from Ancient Greece and Rome. We aim to bring ancient wisdom to modern minds. You can visit our website here.



Didn't Sparta also have a slave class propping up the system ?

I read an interesting article on how nearing the end of Sparta so if the wealthiest people were woman as they could inherit wealth from their husbands & remarry & inherit more wealth etc due to the men going off & dying in some war somewhere.

I'm interested in where these ideas originally came from. For example the Spartans were in a real state of civil unrest with a few wealthy families controlling the masses that were about to rebel. The law giver, went to other states (Crete and Egypt) to determine models that might work and consulted the Oracle at Delphi (with Priests of the double axe), sending a Cretan Poet/Bard back to Sparta to lay the ground work for the new system. More details on the architect of Spartan society here: This suggests to me that these ideas are not Greek in origin but Minoan and through evolution over three millennia have eventually come back around to the original principles, e.g. equality between the sexes, a strong leader (President or Prime Minister), the US having a fixed 2 term length in office, this is a Minoan concept, Minos had a fixed 8.5 year term. The affairs of state are largely organised by civil servants (priestess in Minoan society) taking direction from the leader, Minos. The appointment of which is by talent, the Minos could have been appointed by trials, being ultimately the ‘last to leave the bull leaping arena’, they needed to be brave and talented and were most likely selection through hard trails by loudest public roar (voting). This society was very stable for two millennia and dominated the region growing wealthy through trade and having a strong military (navy) that were the only fortification that was needed. On learning this the Spartans, pulled down all their city walls (fortifications), the military were the only walls the state needed. Similar there was more equality between the sexes in Sparta than any other Greek state (not by modern day standards, but the principles on which this system was based were – young ladies could jump the bull if they had the talent and inclination), but generally men tended to the heavy agricultural tasks and went to sea and females the lighter tasks and crafts or organised society (Priestess being known as bees, organising the hive, civil servants). It is also interesting to note that Lycurgus travelled to the main minoan trading centres to learn their methods (or what was left of them): Spain (West - tin), South (Eygpt) and Asia minor (India). The Delphic Maxims/Axioms have relevant today for how one should conduct oneself. Considering these are three or more millennia old there is only one that is politically incorrect today (likely to be of Greek origin). These give insight into the ancient thinking and I must confess they are relevant today.
The Spartans, introduced the system of the commons (voting), the second house (lords or Senate) to veto a proposal. With checks and balances to ensure stability.
The British system is aligned with the Spartan system of government (with Monarch/Twin Kings of Hercules decent), the American more Athenian (republic). It was impossible for a tyrant to endure the Minos was (probably) put to death after they had served in office to bring in a new leader, so if they did have a detrimental role on society it was limited. The Spartans had checks and balances to ensure a tyrant could not dominate. Absolute Power corrupts absolutely, the systems are setup to limit a tyrant from ever being able to continue to acquire absolute power. The Queen, by example assembles the government, but plays no part in Politics. It doesn’t matter what these systems are but they all have the same purpose.
Now consider the Greek Parthenon, the Gods hale from the Cyclades islands, but the Minoans don’t believe in them themselves, they are just rulers, the Minoan belief system is actually just describing how the celestial bodies actually work (Mother Earth, Venus, Sun, Moon). The world would now be a lot further along if Thera had not erupted. It has taken three and half millennia to get back to these accepted principles. There are distinct advantages to living on an island, you avoid the infighting between kingdoms and can advance society for the greater good of everyone.

Hence the need for a Constitution to, hopefully, preserve the democratic republic.

Van Bryan's picture

Van Bryan

Van Bryan is a contributing author for Classical Wisdom. Van is an intrepid young writer who divides his time between the bustling streets of Manhattan and the sandy beaches of Miami, Florida. He is a graduate from the University of... Read More

Next article