1,700-Year-Old Evidence of Chemical Warfare
One of the distinguishing features of the First World War was the widespread use of chemical weapons. Chemical gases of various lethality, including mustard gas, phosgene and tear gas, were used to disable and kill enemy defenders. Although chemical weapons played a major role during the Great War, its usage can be dated to a much earlier period of history.
One of the earliest references to the use of chemical weapons in western literature can be found in the Greek myth of Heracles, in which the hero dips his arrows in the blood of the Hydra to make them toxic. It has also been claimed that poisoned arrows were mentioned by Homer in both his epics, the Iliad and the Odyssey.
Hercules killing the Stymphalian birds with toxic arrows. Detail of The Twelve Labours Roman mosaic from Llíria (Valencia, Spain). ( Wikimedia Commons )
Poisonous Weapons and Fumes
Records of the use of chemical weapons also appear in the ancient civilisations of the East. In India, for instance, the use of poisons during warfare can be found in both the Mahabharata and the Ramayana. Moreover, recipes for poisonous weapons can be found in Kautilya’s Arthashastra, which dates to India’s Mauryan period. In China, there are writings that describe the use of toxic gases by defenders of a city as far back as 1000 BC. The toxic fumes, produced by burning balls of mustard or other toxic vegetables, are pumped into tunnels dug by a besieging army using bellows.
Returning to the Western world, the use of poisonous fumes may be traced to the Peloponnesian War , which took place during the 5 th century B.C. During one of the battles between the Spartans and the Athenians, the former burnt a mixture of wood, pitch and sulphur under the walls of the latter, hoping that the fumes would incapacitate the defenders, and thus disabling their ability to resist the Spartan assault.
Historical records reveal that in 189 BC, Greeks burnt chicken feathers at the entrance to siege tunnels used by Roman invaders and used bellows to send the poisonous smoke into the subterranean hideouts.
In the Middle East, the use of petrochemical fires was common in ancient warfare.
The examples provided thus far have been obtained through the surviving literary evidence. For the earliest available archaeological evidence of the use of chemical weapons, however, one would need to look at the site of Dura-Europos, which is located on the bank of the Euphrates River in Syria. Dura-Europos was a Roman city which fell to the Sassanians around the middle of the 3 rd century A.D.
The ancient site of Dura-Europos on the Euphrates River in Syria. Credit: Erik Hermans / flickr
The Siege of Dura-Europos
Although there are no literary records about the final siege, archaeology provides a clue as to what happened. Dura-Europos was excavated during the 1920s and 30s by French and American archaeologists. Among the features found by the archaeologists were mines, one dug by the Persians and another dug by the Romans as a counter. In addition, the piled bodies of at least 19 Roman soldiers and a lone Sassanian soldier in the tunnel were also found. The initial interpretation was that a fierce battle ensued in the tunnel, where the Sassanians successfully repelled the Roman defenders. After the battle, the Sassanians destroyed the counter-mine by setting fire to it, as evidenced by the presence of the sulphur crystals and bitumen in the tunnel.
Fortifications at Dura-Europos, Syria . Credit: Erik Hermans / flickr
Evidence of Chemical Warfare
In 2009, a re-examination of the evidence led to a re-interpretation of the events that happened during the siege. As the tunnels were too narrow for effective hand-to-hand combat, doubts were cast on the established interpretation. Furthermore, the position of the Roman bodies, stacked deliberately into a pile, suggests that this was not the place where they fell.
The alternate interpretation, as suggested by Prof. Simon James, an archaeologist at the University of Leicester, was that the Sassanians employed toxic gases to kill the Roman defenders. When sulphur and bitumen were thrown onto a fire, it became a choking gas, and turned into sulphuric acid when breathed in by the Roman defenders. Within minutes, the Romans who were in the tunnel were dead. This happened when the Sassanian mine was broken in by the Romans, whose counter-mine was right above theirs. The lone Sassanian soldier may have been a victim of his own weapons, and died of the poison gasses as well. Once the tunnel was cleared, the Sassanians stacked the Roman bodies at the mouth of the counter-mine as a shield wall, and proceeded to destroy this mine, so that they could resume their sapping work.
Illustration showing the proposed use of toxic gas at Dura-Europos. Credit: Dr Simon James, University of Leicester.
The archaeological finds at Dura-Europos reveal that chemical warfare was already in use during ancient times, and provides the first physical evidence that the literary sources lack. How often such chemical weapons were used is another question. Is Dura-Europos a unique example of the use of chemical weapons, or were such weapons more widely used? Perhaps more archaeological evidence will emerge that will provide an answer.
Medieval Chemical Weapons
Idea for the use of chemical weapons continued to evolve over time. Historian David Hume, in his history of England, recounts how in the reign of King Henry III (r 1216 – 1272 AD), the English Navy defeated an invading French fleet through the use of quicklime mortars, which blinded the enemy and prevented them from defending themselves.
The the 15th century, Leonardo da Vinci proposed the use of a powdered mixture that combined sulfide, arsenic and verdigris, and would cause asphyxiation. It is not known whether this weapon was actually used in warfare.
In 1672 AD, the Bishop of Munster employed deadly weapons during his siege of the city of Groningen in the Netherlands. One such device was an explosive filled with Deadly Nightshade, a toxic perennial herbaceous plant which would create toxic fumes.
However, it wasn’t until the Industrial era in the 19th century that the modern notion of chemical warfare emerged with the development of the field of chemistry. It was from this point onwards that numerous chemical weapons were developed that were designed and utilized to inflict mass injuries and fatalities.
Top image: One of the skeletons believed to have died during an ancient poison gas attack. (Yale University Art Gallery/Dura-Europos Collection).
Pappas, S., 2011. Buried Soldiers May Be Victims of Ancient Chemical Weapon. [Online]
Available at: http://www.livescience.com/13113-ancient-chemical-warfare-romans-persians.html
ScienceDaily, 2009. Archeologist Uncovers Evidence Of Ancient Chemical Warfare. [Online]
Available at: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/01/090114075921.htm
Syed, T., 2009. Ancient Persians 'gassed Romans'. [Online]
Available at: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7837826.stm
Tharoor, I., 2009. Why Chemical Warfare Is Ancient History. [Online]
Available at: http://content.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1879350,00.html
The Telegraph, 2009. Ancient Persians who gassed Romans were the first to use chemical weapons. [Online]
Available at: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/4240365/Ancient-Persians-who-gassed-Romans-were-the-first-to-use-chemical-weapons.html
University of Leicester, 2014. The Final Siege of Dura: Ancient 'Chemical Warfare'?. [Online]
Available at: http://www2.le.ac.uk/departments/archaeology/people/james/roman-soldiers-in-the-city/final-siege
Wikipedia, 2014. Chemical Warfare. [Online]
Available at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemical_warfare
Wikipedia, 2014. Chemical Weapons in World War I. [Online]
Available at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemical_weapons_in_World_War_I
Wikipedia, 2014. Dura-Europos. [Online]
Available at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dura-Europos
In most of the examples given in this article regarding use of “chemical” weapons. Most utilize poisons or other organic materials to cause pain or death. This fact directly correlates to Biological warfare which is described as the use of pathogens, bacterial or viruses and/or toxins (from animals, funguses or plants) to inflict pain, or death on a person or people. Chemical weapons although having a similar effect tend to be synthesized chemicals with specifically defined characteristics designed to inflict death, pain, or may be used to incapacitate an enemy.
A more nuanced discussion of the evidence may be found at 'The Death of Dura-Europos': http://judithweingarten.blogspot.it/2011/05/death-of-dura-europos.html
Good article DHTWY. They may have intentionally used this as a chemical weapon. I'm sure they had some idea that such a fire causes gas vapors that are deadly.
It could just as well be that the aim was to use fire to smoke them out, or burn them alive. Or even to kill them from smoke inhalation. Unless they specifically set out to make and use a poisonous gas they would not have been conducting chemical warfare.