All  
24,000-Year-Old Butchered Bones Found in Canada Change Known History of North America

24,000-Year-Old Butchered Bones Found in Canada Change Known History of North America

Print

Archaeologists have found a set of butchered bones dating back 24,000 years in Bluefish Caves, Yukon, Canada, which are the oldest signs of human habitation ever discovered in North America. Until recently, it was believed that the culture that represented the continent’s first inhabitants was the Clovis culture. However, the discovery of the butchered bones challenges that theory, providing evidence that human occupation preceded the arrival of the Clovis people by as much as 10,000 years.

For decades, it has been believed that the first Americans crossed the Bering Strait from Siberia about 14,000 years ago and quickly colonized North America. Artifacts from these ancient settlers, who have been named the Clovis culture after one of the archaeological sites in Clovis, New Mexico, have been found from Canada to the edges of North America.

A hallmark of the toolkit associated with the Clovis culture is the distinctively shaped, fluted stone spear point, known as the Clovis point. These Clovis points were from the Rummells-Maske Cache Site, Iowa

A hallmark of the toolkit associated with the Clovis culture is the distinctively shaped, fluted stone spear point, known as the Clovis point. These Clovis points were from the Rummells-Maske Cache Site, Iowa ( public domain ).

However, the recent discovery of bones in Canada that show distinctive cut marks supports the perspective that there were other inhabitants of America that preceded the Clovis.

The finding was made in the Bluefish Caves in Yukon, which consists of three small caves that are now considered to hold the oldest archaeological evidence in North America.  Researchers have found the bones of mammoths, horses, bison, caribou, wolves, foxes, antelope, bear, lion, birds and fish, many of which exhibit butchering marks made by stone tools.

Cut marks in the jaw bone of a now-extinct Yukon horse serve as evidence that humans occupied the Bluefish Caves in Yukon, Canada, up to 24,000 years ago. Photo by Bourgeon et al

Cut marks in the jaw bone of a now-extinct Yukon horse serve as evidence that humans occupied the Bluefish Caves in Yukon, Canada, up to 24,000 years ago. Photo by Bourgeon et al.

The site was first excavated by archaeologist Jacques Cinq-Mars between 1977–87, and initial dating suggested an age of 25,000 before present.  This was dismissed at the time as it did not fit with the well-established Clovis-First theory. However, a new study published in the journal PLOS One supports the initial dating, demonstrating that humans occupied the site as early as 24,000 years ago.

As part of the study, the research team analysed 36,000 mammal bones found in the caves. Carnivore tooth marks were observed on 38 to 56% of the bone material. A total of fifteen bone samples with cultural modifications confidently attributable to human activities were identified, while twenty more samples with “probable” cultural modifications were also found. “The traces identified on these bones are clearly not the result of climato-edaphic factors or carnivore activity,” the researchers report. “The presence of multiple, straight and parallel marks with internal microstriations observed on both specimens eliminates carnivores as potential agents.”

Bone sample from Bluefish cave showing cut marks made by humans.

Bone sample from Bluefish cave showing cut marks made by humans.

The findings support the hypothesis that prior to populating the Americas, the ancestors of Native Americans spent considerable time isolated in a Beringian refuge during the Last Glacial Maximum [LGM], the last period in the Earth's climate history during the last glacial period when ice sheets were at their greatest extension. As the researchers of the study concluded:

“In addition to proving that Bluefish Caves is the oldest known archaeological site in North America, the results offer archaeological support for the “Beringian standstill hypothesis”, which proposes that a genetically isolated human population persisted in Beringia during the LGM and dispersed from there to North and South America during the post-LGM period.”

Top image: Main: Kluane National Park, Yukon ( CC by SA 3.0 ) Inset: Cut marks in the jaw bone of a now-extinct Yukon horse serve as evidence that humans occupied the Bluefish Caves in Yukon, Canada, up to 24,000 years ago. Photo by Bourgeon et al.

By April Holloway

Comments

Roberto Peron's picture

The Buttermilk Creek, TX site yielded dates between 13.2-12.9 kya (thousand years ago).  The Pedra Furada, Brazil site yielded dates between 10.5-12 kya.  The Monte Verde, Chile site yielded dates between 18.5-14.8 kya.  There are actually several sites in South America that have yielded dates older than 11,000 years ago.

I thought archaeological evidence older than 11,000 years old was found in South America, thus conclusively contradicting the Clovis First model? Or is the rapid colonization referred to the model that was changed to account for that evidence?

Maybe what they are referring to is the people that will throw away any proof that does not go along with their line of thinking or book they wrote. I have seen it and can testify to this.

True science has no dogma. It incorporates new data and modifies its hypothesis when that new data is verified and accepted as fact. Yes, there are many pretty books that make extraordinary claims but extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence and most of the time these claims do not live up to the test. You can claim ANYTHING. The Yonaguni Rocks are Atlantis! um...no. They are simply naturally occurring columnar basaltic rocks. The first Americans were Africans (or Europeans, take your pick). No. Genomic studies show they are descended from Siberians. All it takes to falsify any of these specious claims is one tiny discrepancy. Darwin once famously stated that all it would take to disprove his theory of evolution was a single fossil out of sequence. To date, that has never happened. That's the difference between the wishful thinking of "alternative history" and real science.

Funny thing about "accepted" evidence that IS dogma. There is a big book out by Cremo I believe; "Unconventional Archeology" if I remember correctly which has several evidences of early high tech(relatively)and evidence of modern humans much "earlier" than so called scientists were/are willing to accept so these evidences are suppressed, discredited or disappear so they will not upset or discredit the "accepted" dogma. That is NOT science! It is nothing but protecting what some few people are willing to accept.

Pages

Next article