Archaeologists say they have found the bones of Mona Lisa, but cannot extract DNA
A team of researchers seeking to unveil the true identity of the mysterious model who sat for Leonardo da Vinci’s world renowned painting, The Mona Lisa, say they have found bones of the woman with the enigmatic smile.
Archaeologists working in Florence, Italy said this week that they have fragments of bone which they are certain belonged to Lisa Gherardini Del Giocondo—the woman thought to have sat for da Vinci’s famous painting—but the remains cannot be DNA tested due to their decayed condition.
The Life and Death of ‘La Gioconda’
The team of researchers have been working since 2011 to determine through genealogy, carbon dating and genetics, if the model of the painting was Lisa Gherardini, known today as ‘La Gioconda’, a silk merchant’s wife in Florence who lived across the street from da Vinci in the early 1500s. It is believed her husband commissioned da Vinci to paint her portrait in 1503.
Gherardini died a widow and was likely buried in a grave inside the medieval Convent of Saint Ursula in Florence in 1542, according to Discovery News . A dozen bodies were exhumed in the quest to find what might have been Lisa Gherardini, but carbon dating on the remains revealed all but one were too old to be her.
The skull and remains exhumed from beneath a convent in Florence thought to be Lisa Gherardini, who posed for Leonardo da Vinci. Credit: EPA
As reported by The Express Tribune, research leader and historian Silvano Vinceti said the work was “a coming together of elements, from anthropological exams to historic documents, which allow us to conclude that the remains probably belong to Lisa Gherardini.” But confirmation is not possible in this case as the remains are too deteriorated from years of exposure to humidity within the burial vault.
- Unmasking Mona Lisa: Will scientists discover her true identity through DNA and radiocarbon testing?
- Five da Vinci inventions that could have revolutionized the history of technology
- Experts discover traces of rare artificial pigment on Egyptian mummy portraits and panel paintings
Earlier this year Vinceti, the chair of Italy's National Committee for the valorization of historic, cultural and environmental heritage said that comparison of DNA from the remains found in the convent to that of Gherardini's children, who are buried in the family tomb, was not possible, reports Arts Culture & Style (ANSA).
No facial reconstruction could be done on a skull to potentially confirm if it matched the face in the painting.
Skepticism over the claims
Not all are pleased with the recent claims and the quest to prove the physical identity of da Vinci’s elusive model, calling it a waste of time and resources. In an article in Forbes , bioarchaeologist Kristina Killgrove calls the hunt for the bones of the Mona Lisa a “publicity stunt, not science.”
“By all accounts, Gherardini lived a quiet, ordinary life, and it’s unfortunate that she cannot have a quiet, ordinary death. I can’t think of any scientific reason to pour so much money and effort into finding the skeleton of a woman who posed for a (famous, admittedly) painting.[…]
“Exhuming Lisa Gherardini and studying her bones will sate our need for osteo-biographies of famous people of the past. And it will almost certainly bring more tourist dollars to Florence, especially if the skeleton goes on display. But it won’t contribute anything substantial to forensics, archaeology, or art history. Vinceti’s quest to dig up the “real” Mona Lisa is not grounded in scientific research methodology.”
The True Identity
Over the years several theories have surfaced as to the true identity of the model of the Mona Lisa, although most experts favor the Lisa Gherardini theory.
Da Vinci himself spoke of a portrait done on a Florentine lady “at the request of the magnificent Giuliano de' Medici,” but no connection to the Medici family and Lisa del Giocondo was ever made, so it’s thought he may have been referring to another model.
Historian and author Maike Vogt-Lüerssen believes that the sitter was Isabella of Aragon, the Duchess of Milan, as da Vinci was court painter for the Duke of Aragon for 11 years.
A copy of the portrait of Duchess Isabella of Aragon, by Giulio Romano. Public Domain
- 15,000 artworks over ten millennia reveal the evolution of human life on the edge of the Sahara
- Brush strokes on very ancient murals may rewrite the history of art in China
- Rene of Anjou - the Littlefinger of the pre-Renaissance Game of Thrones
Writer Angelo Paratico speculates that the model was da Vinci’s own mother, whom Paratico believes was a Chinese or Middle Eastern slave.
It has further been raised that the portrait actually represents a man, either Lisa’s husband Francesco del Giocondo, or even Leonardo Da Vinci himself.
Comparison to drawing sometimes identified as Leonardo's self-portrait. Public Domain
The secrets of da Vinci’s painting and Gherardini herself seem as elusive as ever, and by the look on the face of the unmistakable model, that seems to suit Mona Lisa just fine.
The full Mona Lisa painting by Leonardo da Vinci. Public Domain
Featured Image: Detail of Leonardo da Vinci’s famous painting, The Mona Lisa. It now hangs in the Louvre in Paris. Public Domain
By Liz Leafloor
Thank you for quoting my theory on Leonardo's mother.
In fact very few historians believe that Monna Lisa Gherardini del Giocondo has anything to do with the Mona Lisa at the Louvre. About my book: http://www.lascarpublishing.com/leonardo/
All the best. A.Paratico
How did they come to the conclusion that the bones were hers if there is no actual proof?
A dreamer is one who can only find his way by moonlight, and his punishment is that he sees the dawn before the rest of the world ~ Oscar Wilde