Initial DNA analysis of Paracas elongated skull released – with incredible results
Paracas is a desert peninsula located within the Pisco Province in the Inca Region, on the south coast of Peru. It is here were Peruvian archaeologist, Julio Tello, made an amazing discovery in 1928 – a massive and elaborate graveyard containing tombs filled with the remains of individuals with the largest elongated skulls found anywhere in the world. These have come to be known as the ‘Paracas skulls’. In total, Tello found more than 300 of these elongated skulls, which are believed to date back around 3,000 years. A DNA analysis has now been conducted on one of the skulls and expert Brien Foerster has released preliminary information regarding these enigmatic skulls.
It is well-known that most cases of skull elongation are the result of cranial deformation, head flattening, or head binding, in which the skull is intentionally deformed by applying force over a long period of time. It is usually achieved by binding the head between two pieces of wood, or binding in cloth. However, while cranial deformation changes the shape of the skull, it does not alter its volume, weight, or other features that are characteristic of a regular human skull.
The Paracas skulls, however, are different. The cranial volume is up to 25 percent larger and 60 percent heavier than conventional human skulls, meaning they could not have been intentionally deformed through head binding/flattening. They also contain only one parietal plate, rather than two. The fact that the skulls’ features are not the result of cranial deformation means that the cause of the elongation is a mystery, and has been for decades.
An artist’s impression based on a Paracas skull. Photo credit: Marcia Moore / Ciamar Studio
Mr. Juan Navarro, owner and director of the local museum, called the Paracas History Museum, which houses a collection of 35 of the Paracas skulls, allowed the taking of samples from 5 of the skulls. The samples consisted of hair, including roots, a tooth, skull bone and skin, and this process was carefully documented via photos and video. Samples from three skulls were sent to the geneticist, although the geneticist was not given any information about what they came from until after the genetic testing, so as not to create any preconceived ideas.
The results of a DNA analysis of one of the skulls are now back, and Brien Foerster, author of more than ten books and an authority on the ancient elongated headed people of South America, has just revealed the preliminary results of the analysis. He reports on the geneticist's findings:
It had mtDNA (mitochondrial DNA) with mutations unknown in any human, primate, or animal known so far. But a few fragments I was able to sequence from this sample indicate that if these mutations will hold we are dealing with a new human-like creature, very distant from Homo sapiens, Neanderthals and Denisovans.
The implications are of course huge. “I am not sure it will even fit into the known evolutionary tree,” the geneticist wrote. He added that if the Paracas individuals were so biologically different, they would not have been able to interbreed with humans.
The result of this analysis is only phase one of many phases of analysis due to take place. The next tests will involve having the initial test replicated, and conducted on other skulls, so that the results can be compared to see if there are any specific Paracas characteristics. We will update when more details emerge.
Watch the video interview with Brien Foerster revealing new details about the genetic analysis.
Featured Image: An elongated skull found in Paracas
I think, facts often become washed when mingled with belief, belief cannot lead a person to absolute truth or provable fact. this is very well documented in a religions stated beliefs (any/every religion) For the under educated particularly, comprehension of absolute facts -vs- beliefs, it s far more difficult to under stand/comprehend, absolute scientific fact, then belief- I work with very educated people, many extremely smart and yet hold tightly to religious belief. IMO, when mixing absolute facts with beliefs has a non-pristine affect of ones ability to be objective, in judging whats real and whats not. We discover things all the time, the process of comprehending whats discovered is clearly impacted by ones own knowledge/intelligence and how that was acquired (what resources)- IMO, scientists of clear mind, should be the ones conducting analysis through scientific process only
We should question the claim that fair hair (blond, reddish) is due to mutation. Seems we are not supposed to see the prehistoric human as a thing of beauty, but instead as per the brutish artist representations (https://d.newsweek.com/en/full/716363/11-19-neanderthal.jpg). Now, the Sumerians (from Anunnaki alien blood?), who are credited with the so-called ‘dawn of civilization’ called themselves the ‘black-headed people’ (meaning black hair), and that region (and many others) is now dominated by dark-haired people. Of note is that the fair-haired ancient Greeks called those people ‘semites’ meaning semi or half man, from a mixing of two distinct peoples. Would the Sumerians have called themselves “black-headed” were there other black haired people there when they arrived? So we wonder and start to see the pattern, comprehensive in many ways, to divert attention from the ancient aboriginal people of Earth who DID SURVIVE the lce Age (100k year long nuclear winter), who were likely, as Plato described the ancient Thebians, as tall blonde/fair-haired people, like how they depicted Zeus and the Atlantean gods. So the claim of fair-haired being a mutation makes the most sense as a diversion from any other explanation, which may open a ‘can of worms’ for the institution and all its Sumerian-centric ancient history. The other aspect is any special characteristics, possibly unknown/little known abilities, that fair-haired may specialize in, compared the dark-haired, who seem to run the world. Or are they right, were just dumb in comparison?
Nobody gets paid to tell the truth.
I wanted to share an article which is based upon genetic studies about the origins of red hair in human beings. I learned that Neanderthals had red hair and that because it is considered a mutation and recessive trait, both parents must have red hair for it to be passed on. In any event it ‘seems’ to prove that the Paracas people were not originally from South America. It says all these people share a common ancestry that can be traced back to a single Y-chromosomal haplogroup: R1b, and this link discusses the genetic evolution and cultural spread of the R1b red headed mutation in detail: http://www.eupedia.com/genetics/origins_of_red_hair.shtml
In studying the textiles of the Paracas people one of their main emblems jumped out at me as I had seen the same artwork before...a two headed bird. http://ololopress.com/amm/sky1.htm
I checked for the history and it originated with the Hittites, also known to have red hair and elongated skulls….and here is the link about this particular art design: http://www.hubert-herald.nl/TwoHeadedEagle.htm
Oh, I just figured out I can ‘Edit’ my comments :-)