All  

Store Banner Mobile

Store Banner Mobile

Here you can navigate quickly through all comments made in any article sorted by date/time.

  • Reply to: Sanctuary of the Mysterious ‘Great Gods’ on the Island of Samothrace   3 years 7 months ago
    Comment Author: Zucchini

    Hi Ed,

    Exciting article to read here all I have to do is attempt to trace the names of these beings and match them in Enoch somehow. Although if that winged being is represented as Nike then her father was a Cherub only Cherubs and Seraphims in God's angelic hierarchy has wing's.

    I'm only saying this because of the headless statue of Nike on the island.

    I am curious about one thing how many homes on the island are identified as the gods houses?

  • Reply to: From The Ashes Of Angels – The Forbidden Legacy of a Fallen Race   3 years 7 months ago
    Comment Author: Zucchini

    Hi Andrew Collins,

    Thank you for sharing this article I suppose we should
    re-examine those Cupid statues holding their Psyche's just think it was 200 of them that married Human Women and had children by them that grew too 3000 feet and were Cannibals.

    Which clears up the mystery paintings of Cronus eating his children; now we can multiply those horrifying moments by the two hundred off-spring from those Fallen Angel's.

    To say the World was a Mess would be an understatement.

    Thank you God for sending The Great Flood wiping them all out. Binding their Father's in Heaven 2 & Heaven 5, that are both identified by Enoch as Hell.

    So Hell is not of Earth but in the Vastness of the Universe somewhere. Thank God for changing their Wives in to Sirens; this is where the concept of Echo may have merged, since God declared that the Sirens wives of those Fallen Angel's, can only Sigh not Sing like originally thought but Sigh!

    This is what I've been learning from Enoch 1 The Book of Watchers though I've read Enoch 2 Book of Secrets of Enoch, Enoch 3 The Book of Giant's, I did read the fragment of Noah I found out where Big Foot, & Abominable Snowman sometimes Snow Beast because they ate people.

    Enoch 1 says that God changed the Angels children in to Evil-Spirits. This is also where the concept of Demonology came from due to this Judgement from God.

    Since we People were defenseless against these Giant's and Monsters to save our lives God pit them against each other remember those And the gods fought in great War's Stories from the Ancient World?

    Cronus against his father Uranus behalf of his Mom?
    Zeus against Cronus on behalf of his Mom Shea?

    Loki, Odin, Thor, Baldur War's?

    How about that big Snake Thor fought? In The Book of Giant's that snake is the Leviathan the one who fought it his name is Oy*ha son of Shemyaza I think, I might have spelled that kids name wrong.

    On a side note I was doing some research on a website First People's looking for Por Qui stories I read a story from The Iroquois and his name came up. Back to his name business Oy*ha I know it started with Oy and He fought with the Leviathan he killed it with his bear hands' but lost too the arch-Angel Raphael upon God's Command bound him and threw him in to the same prison as his Father Semyaza or Smeyaza in other words He's chained up in Hell.

    By the way God judged these Children of the Angels because of their Behavior how they conducted themselves The Book of Giant's state God built them a Special Sanctuary to help them because it was not their faults they were born that was their Father's Crime.

    Before, The Great Flood God tried reaching out too the ones who were more reasonable; but, they rejected The Olive Branch, when Methuselah died God gave Earth a 3 day Reprieve you know Stay of execution that was rejected.

    The Great Flood was the only option left; or We the People would have gone, Extinct.

    This is what I've come too learn from Studying The Book's of Enoch & Jubilees.

    Again Andrew thank you for sharing this Book with me and this article it was exciting too read appreciate it.

  • Reply to: Tales of a Two-headed Giant: Are Legends of Patagonia’s Kap Dwa Real?   3 years 7 months ago
    Comment Author: Zucchini

    Hello Caleb,

    Thank you for sharing your article it was very intriguing.

    This may surprise you so all I have too say is for every continent where there are people living for all these people universally in every language to swear on Heaven & Earth; that Giant's other than Dinosaurs once walked the Earth clearly there has too be some Truth too this Giant Phenomenon.

    I would of thought it impossible for People too turn in to a Tree then I saw the Learning Channel and oh boy a Man was becoming a Tree that Walked, what if they're weren't cameras and video rolling and someone said (in The Bible A Man said He saw Trees Walking after Christ began healing him of blindness) I saw a man turn in to a Tree an Walk.

    Then people would say that's just a myth A man can't turn in to a Tree and Walk honestly that documentary was fascinating soon after Grey's Anatomy either Season 7 or 8 they did do an Episode about a Man turning in to a Tree.

    I believe Meredith Grey's sister before the plane crash summed it up well but, I can't take the Lord's name in Vain.

    Of course my favorite subject Enoch 3 Book of Giant's a two-headed giant would not surprise me; if memory serves me right I think the Greek Stories might mention two headed Giant's in its page's.

    Until next time Caleb Goodbye!

  • Reply to: Stunning ‘Devil’s Dyke’ Under Threat in Britain   3 years 7 months ago
    Comment Author: T1bbst3r

    Given that the land is very flat round there, was, in my opinion, probably a road to get out of the boggy fenland of the past and as stated above, could have even been a toll somewhere.

  • Reply to: Who Reached America First? Hint: NOT Columbus!   3 years 7 months ago
    Comment Author: Zucchini

    Hi Warwick,

    I don't know about that I think the Native People were aware of distant lands for example, The Aztecs knew of the Apaches, Commanches, Hopis, The Mississippians, Navajos, Utes, and the Zunis.

    Where talking about Civilizations who followed Astronomy with a passion; they would have known of Distant Land's they might not have traded with those Distant places, but, through Oral History, I believe the people already here in The America's knew places that were beyond their land's existed.

    I know, I could be wrong though.

  • Reply to: The Frightening Discovery of the Mount Owen Claw   3 years 7 months ago
    Comment Author: justmyopinion

    Oh come on, DNA of a huge moa placed in a chicken embryo. Really?

  • Reply to: Ancient ritual bath found beneath a home in Jerusalem   3 years 7 months ago
    Comment Author: rachelbeth

    Thank you for sharing such an informative post. Recently I came across a website that discussed the mikvah calendar (https://www.mikvahcalendar.com/wp/) at that time I was wondering about the history of the mikvah calendar but your blog created all my doubts.

    Thank you for sharing!!

     

  • Reply to: Wing Bone Indicates Swan Shamanism Could Be 420,000 Years Old!   3 years 7 months ago
    Comment Author: Bruce Nowakowski

    Zeus, Odin, Toth just to name a few were always associated with birds.  Makes one wonder.

  • Reply to: The Theopetra Cave and the Oldest Human Construction in the World   3 years 7 months ago
    Comment Author: Bruce Nowakowski

    Theopetra means God Rock.  Wonder if that has significance to this age old site?

  • Reply to: Who Reached America First? Hint: NOT Columbus!   3 years 7 months ago
    Comment Author: TomS

    I read a short article some time ago "Ancient Earthworks of North America suggest pre-Columbian European contact." https://www.ancient-origins.net/ancient-places-americas/ancient-earthwor...

    This suggest Europeans came here about 3000 BC.well ducumented

  • Reply to: Battle Of The Pterosaurs! Britain vs China In Dinosaur Wrangle   3 years 7 months ago
    Comment Author: Jagganatha

    Well, did they? Did they fly? were they able to fly, or were they flightless, in the same ways that the ostrich and the Auk and the Dodo are/were?
    Because unless you were there in person and witnessed Pterasaurs etc in flight, and filmed it for us to see, there is NO evidence they ever flew. There is NO evidence that Archeopteryx ever flew either.
    You can get some evidence from fossils, but not this very important claim's validity.
    I could say equally likely, that Covid19 comes from a reopened Egyptian mummy, but I have NO evidence, or that Buddha was black, or Mohammed, or Jesus, but as I was not there and did not film them there is nothing to back this statement up with FACTS.
    We think they flew- it looks like they may have- but you know what thought did, dont you?
    Better to investigate the origin of the IDEA of Heaven: where does that come from? And why do we think Heaven is above us where the Pterasaurs are said to have flown? It stopped me in my tracks today that I had never even thought of either question before today.

  • Reply to: Man Arrested For Vandalizing Rome’s Flavian Colosseum   3 years 7 months ago
    Comment Author: semperego

    This article carries on in hysterics over a form of public expression present at the colosseum from its beginnings. The colosseum, along with many other ancient monuments, is littered with grafiti through the ages, from Roman spectators, to the late antique and medieval monks who used it to sleep, to European luminaries (and just spoiled rich kids) from the romantic era on the grand tour, to soldiers from WWII and so on and so on. 

    The way some classicists and archaeologists fetishize these buildings amounts to idolatry. In the words of the prophet, “shall I fall down before a piece of wood?”. These layers of interaction with the coliseum over the centuries is what gives the structure its profound power. Not the precise dating of a particular antechamber by a team of experts.

    So a hibernian wanted to be remembered in the caput mundi? So did the broke first century Roman whose “vind” was discovered during repairs. Don’t we wish he had written his name as well?

    The suggestion of adding layer upon layer of protection or a synthetic digital experience overlaid on the thing itself, the very rock with it’s magnetic aura, could only be dreamed up by a stingy spirit. Somebody who would rather keep a toy in a box rather than derive any joy from it. It is an unforgivable and elitist idea to ban all those without advanced degrees from the sensation of touch. It is a communion with history, an emotional lineage that has always occured there that would be broken after so long. That is a true tragedy. Not scratching a name on a wall.

  • Reply to: Early Jewish Monotheism and Egyptian Atenism – One And The Same?   3 years 7 months ago
    Comment Author: Paul Davies

    OR… Akenaten, who contrary to the belief of Egyptology was Tut’s younger half-brother, NOT his father (which explains the DNA test). As a 7-yr-old at the time of the plagues, he witnessed the power of the Creator God Yahweh and determined to follow him. If you look at the Armana evidence as a pagan kid trying to follow a God he barely knows, a lot falls into place.

    But hte key is correctly interpreting who Akenaten was. No Egyptologist has considered that he named his son in honour of his dead big brother (the first-born of pharoah who died in the plagues). All this came out with the discovery of the Red Sea Crossing site at Nuweiba in the early 90s by Ron Wyatt, with the Full knowledge of Ali Nasser Hassan, then #2 in the Dept of Antiquities.

    However, politics has prevented the DoA publicly acknowledging Wyatt’s find, though many have gone diving and caught their own photos of the underwater remains of Pharoah Amenhotep III’s army (Tut’s actual father, and Akenaten’s).

    If you work backwards, Moses ws Senemnut/Thutmosis 2, adopted son of Hatshepsut, whose identity was assumed by Tuthmosis III when Moses did a runner. The destruction of the monuments and statuary was to hise this deception, as the commoners couldn’t be allowed to know that the prince of heaven had run off….

  • Reply to: Study Reveals Sapiens Copulated the Y Out of Neanderthals   3 years 7 months ago
    Comment Author: Paul Davies

    Hardly “Established Fact” when the entire Scienc is based on assumption and interpretation. Surely simple honesty should say “broadly-accepted belief”. Evolution is far from unchallenged in the Scientific Community, and basedon what we DO know and CAN prove – some say it CAN NOT HAPPEN (Denton, 1991). Human Evolution is even more unreliable, with fantasy and assumption taking the place of actual evidence and supported claims.

    At least be honest….

  • Reply to: Great Chain of The Golden Horn: Constantinople’s Impenetrable Barrier   3 years 7 months ago
    Comment Author: Prince

    these same chains as anti-ship movements have been used for millennia. What they couldnt do with sunken barges, ships scattered across various islands and atolls, they did with rock barriers - even chains.

    At Mount Vernon, Virginia (George Washington estate) there are remains of a chain that look like the modern anchor chains of aircraft carriers ! Within colonial American history such a chains across the various important waterways (Hudson river, Delaware, etc ...) were chained up preventing ships (even one's own from crossing over. It is only by lowering these massive chains that could traverse up to 5 miles or more, could ships cross over the sag. Such a one was located a t West Point, NY, site of the Army Cadet Academy - and the gold/silver coinage mint - that General Benedict Arnold was stationed to oversee all 3 criteria.

    I would expect to see chains at Genoa, Venice, across various Danish and Swedish islands, across the Dardanelles, Black and Caspian Sea, Baltic, etc. and many of the medieval empires of their day. One can even see the remains of punji boat stakes on the banks of the Thames that were their version of the German Normandy beaches with huge concrete caltrops, barbed wire, metal stakes and fencings etc.

  • Reply to: Neolithic Revolution Challenged! Are These The Real Roots of Civilization?   3 years 7 months ago
    Comment Author: Cataibh

    This is a good article, however it should be clarified that the Australian Aboriginal practice of carrying seeds to plant was usually allied to ceremonies rather than actual plantings in any practical sense.

    There is a concerted effort in some sections of Australian society today to portray Aboriginal society as an agricultural one. It was not. However, neither was it one of starvation or lack of success. Hunting and gathering is not, in any way, worthy of disdain.

    The traditional increase ceremonies, performed for the religious maintenance of individual resources in a very conservative, religious and relatively unchanging society, might have made the adoption of agriculture all but impossible, but the constant use of fire was the relatively untold Australian success story. Indeed, the fire-managed landscape needs to be rediscovered, for the sake of modern Australia.

    Much is made of threats to Australian flora and fauna, but antipathy towards natural resource management, including fire management, is by far the greatest threat of all.

  • Reply to: Neolithic Revolution Challenged! Are These The Real Roots of Civilization?   3 years 7 months ago
    Comment Author: Andy Turnbull

    good point about the banks, but they were established because Switzerland was (and is) a manufacturing center. They make a lot more than watches!

  • Reply to: Neolithic Revolution Challenged! Are These The Real Roots of Civilization?   3 years 7 months ago
    Comment Author: Andy Turnbull

    good point about the banks, but they were established because Switzerland was (and is) a manufacturing center. They make a lot more than watches.

  • Reply to: Neolithic Revolution Challenged! Are These The Real Roots of Civilization?   3 years 7 months ago
    Comment Author: curiouscat

    Interesting article, thanks for posting.

  • Reply to: Neolithic Revolution Challenged! Are These The Real Roots of Civilization?   3 years 7 months ago
    Comment Author: Crasslee

    This is a great article. I especially like that the roots of the one percent are basically robbers. So not much change even after countless millennia.
    The one thing I'd disagree with is Switzerland being so wealthy because of the artisans that live there. Probably the fact that It's one of the most influential worldwide banking hubs has more to do with it? There's also a lot of stolen WW2 Jewish wealth from Europe not accounted for, and Switzerland is surely an obvious place for it to still exist?

Pages