Unless of course we are dealing with an intelligent species capable of love and thus cultural attachment to proper disposal by burial of deceased members of their group. Indeed, such intelligence probably allowed them to develop many thousands years ago, the ability to extensively avoid contact with Homo Sapiens. All of that of course is mere speculation, as is your theory that such hominids do NOT exist. Lets just, as scientists, keep our minds open until proof is found either way. Closed minds lead to zero progress. The earth is indeed not flat.....
Good to see an article about our Yotvingians.Hopefully more research will be done on this tribe however it is still very much alive where I come from (South of Lithuania - Dainava/Dzukija). There are schools, streets, clubs named after Yotvingians and you can also visit an annual festival honouring our ancestors https://www.facebook.com/jotvosvartai/?fref=nf
I think that until an actual skeleton is found, or a sample of the ‘creature’ is captured, we will never know, there are too many ‘sightings’ and evidence around the world to totally discount this, but I find it too inexplicable that in such a crowded world they could still manage to hide from us and we do not constantly get filmed episodes (cameras everywhere nowadays!) or find a grave that contains an actual fresh body. If they are there they have to die. The ‘wilderness’ was amazingly busy with lone hunters even in the 1800’s in America, so I fail to see how we could be missing them. The only thing is that we know there were ‘giants’ recorded in prior centuries, so is it possible these giant Bigfoot are actually human-like and therefore VERY intelligent and that is why they are able to hide so well ? BUT – I think if that were true, they would much more likely WANT to let us know they were there ! Here’s hoping we actually find a real one ~!
Larry, you are treating sasquatch as if it was a dumb animal. If that was so, they would have been caught, filmed or otherwise documented long ago. These are intelligent creatures that bury their dead. There is a plethora of evidence that they are able to detect and evade cameras, game cameras, and other recording devices. If you look at the BFRO website, you will see dozens of reports every month from random people throughout the country reporting a sighting of an animal that has common characteristics. I think it is easy for the scientific community to dismiss this phenomenon because it is not easy to study, it does not conform with current hominid theory, and it presents a habitat issue/problem for many that would prefer to ignore the evidence.
Bram Stoker knew little more than the name Dracula, which he read of in an early 19th century travel guide he found in the Whitby library in May of 1890.He liked the sound of it and it's etymology [son of the dragon or devil].The brief quote he used was so vague it seems to have merged Vlad 3 with his father, Dracul.The title VOIVODE was cited but not the first name Vlad.The date was also quite obscure. Vlad was not called the impaler and was not always recognized as 'Dracula' until the 20th century by historians.Although the British museum had one of the german pamphlets on Vlad tsepesh there is no evidence Stoker ever saw or heard of it. The segment in the novel where the count describes his 'ancestors' was almost a direct lift from the book by Wilkinson from Whitby. The impaler horror tales are nowhere mentioned in the novel or Stoker's notes.Had he known of them Stoker surely would've used it as it would make his villain yet more fearsome.So, Vlad 3 and the vampire count share a name but little else. The latter, for example, was a Szekely nobleman from Transylvania not a Vlach ruler of Wallachia to the south.
The earliest known undecipherable cuneiform writing is from around 23 - 24 century BCE and it is Akkadian and Summerian not Assyrian .... Assyrian empire came much later .... So how can this tablet be from 2800 BCE .... It is obviously based on a poor source or it is fake ...
Its always the same story all over the world regarding Giants - cover up!
So, there is no real hard proof evidence and its very hard for people to believe in giants including me......
Sorry for my bad english:))
There is evidence of something tugging on the southwest underbelly of our solar system (Mike Brown, CalTech) but it is presumptuous to call it anything other than a large gravitational influence. Many very smart astrophysicists with excellent equipment have been looking for a large distant planet for several years but found nothing. This suggests the gravitational influence may be something other than a planet. German scholars of Sumerian texts (long before Sitchin) interpret the word Nibiru to mean bright object or brightest star. The brightest star in the sky is now known as Sirius, which lies to the Southwest, inclined to the plane of the solar system. It also happens to be a binary star system with a very heavy white dwarf creating a rather large gravity well.
You miss the point. Even for any mainstream accepted view there are those who claim to "debunk" it. It all comes down to what one chooses to believe. I see no compelling reason for accepting what the "sitchiniswrong" people claim. Or not.
How on Earth in 2016 can any educated European, South American, North American, Asian. Australasian continue to cling to stone age Semitic myths imposed on them (or their ancestors) by feudalistic Roman sponsored spivs 500 or 1000 or 1500 years ago? We ALL have stone age myths, can we now allow the semitic peoples to keep theirs to themselves?
The 'Kings' or 'Princes' who subjected each nation to the Popes did so by bonding the nations in debt and fealty to the most corrupt government/corporation the world has ever seen. The big message of Their religion was to be meek and ask forgiveness as you're totally unsound and a wretched sinner. I mean, Jaysus, what an utterly life-sapping, degenerate message to be peddling to anybody. But peddle it the Roman Church did and still do and for what?
Leave Semitic religion to Semitic people and understand that the Roman Church destroyed pagan Europe, then Meso-America, then Africa not in the name of an imaginary Jew named Jesus Christ but in the pursuit of power and wealth through rapine and subjugation.
We call it Vulcan because Madam Blavatsky called it that and told us how to find it. Here are its nominal mass and orbital parameters. It's aphelion/perihelion is about 448/134 AU. However it forms comet swarms that pass through the inner solar system.
" Tour Guide " in the same vein as the Giza pyramid Guides? By that I of course mean - Trapped hopelessly in the dogma of an antiquated and preposterous belief culture.
"PETUNIA is right in what he/she says." ...interesting, all that from on High, I suppose
PS, I did read the info. then I read the remark about how one theory/idea/speculation is
just wrong, and this other one is just Truth, so believe it. then you defend he/she/it and refer me to 2 debunking links about Sitchin/Von Daniken. (hardly reliable sources)
OK OK I am now convinced, you and Pet. are correct and I am a childish dope for believing anything else could possibly be truth. I am waiting now for your quotes from the scripture
PS, Sitchin was an excellent researcher and most of the time in his books (if you have read them) you will see that he clearly identifies what is a speculation and what is not. Because of him we know a lot about Sumerians and their writings. This of course doesn’t make him perfect and he did excagerate in many things.
Quoting two ‘debunking’ sites is not a reliable source at all. Basically no debunking site is a good source. Debunkers have only one goal “no matter what discredit anyone that is against mainstream”. They take things out of context, add things, cook things and present them in a convincing way. That’s all.
Coincidence is one of those nice words we like to us when we are unable or unwilling to accept a new thought, idea, concept, happening. "a remarkable concurrence of events or circumstances without apparent causal connection", 'oh that's just a coincidence'
While you are correct in that Sitchen was mistranslating the Sumerian texts, that's not exactly what the article is about. Its just stating that he may have been right about there being a 9th planet. Which is just basically complete coincidence on his part.
Here you can navigate quickly through all comments made in any article sorted by date/time.
Unless of course we are dealing with an intelligent species capable of love and thus cultural attachment to proper disposal by burial of deceased members of their group. Indeed, such intelligence probably allowed them to develop many thousands years ago, the ability to extensively avoid contact with Homo Sapiens. All of that of course is mere speculation, as is your theory that such hominids do NOT exist. Lets just, as scientists, keep our minds open until proof is found either way. Closed minds lead to zero progress. The earth is indeed not flat.....
So, the Aboriginal Giants of Ireland, the Formore, took their advanced technologies across the Atlantic....
Good to see an article about our Yotvingians.Hopefully more research will be done on this tribe however it is still very much alive where I come from (South of Lithuania - Dainava/Dzukija). There are schools, streets, clubs named after Yotvingians and you can also visit an annual festival honouring our ancestors https://www.facebook.com/jotvosvartai/?fref=nf
I think that until an actual skeleton is found, or a sample of the ‘creature’ is captured, we will never know, there are too many ‘sightings’ and evidence around the world to totally discount this, but I find it too inexplicable that in such a crowded world they could still manage to hide from us and we do not constantly get filmed episodes (cameras everywhere nowadays!) or find a grave that contains an actual fresh body. If they are there they have to die. The ‘wilderness’ was amazingly busy with lone hunters even in the 1800’s in America, so I fail to see how we could be missing them. The only thing is that we know there were ‘giants’ recorded in prior centuries, so is it possible these giant Bigfoot are actually human-like and therefore VERY intelligent and that is why they are able to hide so well ? BUT – I think if that were true, they would much more likely WANT to let us know they were there ! Here’s hoping we actually find a real one ~!
Larry, you are treating sasquatch as if it was a dumb animal. If that was so, they would have been caught, filmed or otherwise documented long ago. These are intelligent creatures that bury their dead. There is a plethora of evidence that they are able to detect and evade cameras, game cameras, and other recording devices. If you look at the BFRO website, you will see dozens of reports every month from random people throughout the country reporting a sighting of an animal that has common characteristics. I think it is easy for the scientific community to dismiss this phenomenon because it is not easy to study, it does not conform with current hominid theory, and it presents a habitat issue/problem for many that would prefer to ignore the evidence.
Bram Stoker knew little more than the name Dracula, which he read of in an early 19th century travel guide he found in the Whitby library in May of 1890.He liked the sound of it and it's etymology [son of the dragon or devil].The brief quote he used was so vague it seems to have merged Vlad 3 with his father, Dracul.The title VOIVODE was cited but not the first name Vlad.The date was also quite obscure. Vlad was not called the impaler and was not always recognized as 'Dracula' until the 20th century by historians.Although the British museum had one of the german pamphlets on Vlad tsepesh there is no evidence Stoker ever saw or heard of it. The segment in the novel where the count describes his 'ancestors' was almost a direct lift from the book by Wilkinson from Whitby. The impaler horror tales are nowhere mentioned in the novel or Stoker's notes.Had he known of them Stoker surely would've used it as it would make his villain yet more fearsome.So, Vlad 3 and the vampire count share a name but little else. The latter, for example, was a Szekely nobleman from Transylvania not a Vlach ruler of Wallachia to the south.
The earliest known undecipherable cuneiform writing is from around 23 - 24 century BCE and it is Akkadian and Summerian not Assyrian .... Assyrian empire came much later .... So how can this tablet be from 2800 BCE .... It is obviously based on a poor source or it is fake ...
Its always the same story all over the world regarding Giants - cover up!
So, there is no real hard proof evidence and its very hard for people to believe in giants including me......
Sorry for my bad english:))
Wonder if any tangible evidence is available for the masses.
129 means adam. in arabic alphabet 1 = alif, 2= dal, 9 = mim . this seal is powerful indeed
There is evidence of something tugging on the southwest underbelly of our solar system (Mike Brown, CalTech) but it is presumptuous to call it anything other than a large gravitational influence. Many very smart astrophysicists with excellent equipment have been looking for a large distant planet for several years but found nothing. This suggests the gravitational influence may be something other than a planet. German scholars of Sumerian texts (long before Sitchin) interpret the word Nibiru to mean bright object or brightest star. The brightest star in the sky is now known as Sirius, which lies to the Southwest, inclined to the plane of the solar system. It also happens to be a binary star system with a very heavy white dwarf creating a rather large gravity well.
You miss the point. Even for any mainstream accepted view there are those who claim to "debunk" it. It all comes down to what one chooses to believe. I see no compelling reason for accepting what the "sitchiniswrong" people claim. Or not.
How on Earth in 2016 can any educated European, South American, North American, Asian. Australasian continue to cling to stone age Semitic myths imposed on them (or their ancestors) by feudalistic Roman sponsored spivs 500 or 1000 or 1500 years ago? We ALL have stone age myths, can we now allow the semitic peoples to keep theirs to themselves?
The 'Kings' or 'Princes' who subjected each nation to the Popes did so by bonding the nations in debt and fealty to the most corrupt government/corporation the world has ever seen. The big message of Their religion was to be meek and ask forgiveness as you're totally unsound and a wretched sinner. I mean, Jaysus, what an utterly life-sapping, degenerate message to be peddling to anybody. But peddle it the Roman Church did and still do and for what?
Leave Semitic religion to Semitic people and understand that the Roman Church destroyed pagan Europe, then Meso-America, then Africa not in the name of an imaginary Jew named Jesus Christ but in the pursuit of power and wealth through rapine and subjugation.
We call it Vulcan because Madam Blavatsky called it that and told us how to find it. Here are its nominal mass and orbital parameters. It's aphelion/perihelion is about 448/134 AU. However it forms comet swarms that pass through the inner solar system.
http://www.barry.warmkessel.com/vulcanrevealed.html
VULCAN REVEALED
A Dangerous New Jovian Sized Body In Our Solar System
" Tour Guide " in the same vein as the Giza pyramid Guides? By that I of course mean - Trapped hopelessly in the dogma of an antiquated and preposterous belief culture.
"PETUNIA is right in what he/she says." ...interesting, all that from on High, I suppose
PS, I did read the info. then I read the remark about how one theory/idea/speculation is
just wrong, and this other one is just Truth, so believe it. then you defend he/she/it and refer me to 2 debunking links about Sitchin/Von Daniken. (hardly reliable sources)
OK OK I am now convinced, you and Pet. are correct and I am a childish dope for believing anything else could possibly be truth. I am waiting now for your quotes from the scripture
PS, Sitchin was an excellent researcher and most of the time in his books (if you have read them) you will see that he clearly identifies what is a speculation and what is not. Because of him we know a lot about Sumerians and their writings. This of course doesn’t make him perfect and he did excagerate in many things.
Quoting two ‘debunking’ sites is not a reliable source at all. Basically no debunking site is a good source. Debunkers have only one goal “no matter what discredit anyone that is against mainstream”. They take things out of context, add things, cook things and present them in a convincing way. That’s all.
Are you trying to debate my statement of it being coincidence? I'm not seeing the point of your comment.
Coincidence is one of those nice words we like to us when we are unable or unwilling to accept a new thought, idea, concept, happening. "a remarkable concurrence of events or circumstances without apparent causal connection", 'oh that's just a coincidence'
While you are correct in that Sitchen was mistranslating the Sumerian texts, that's not exactly what the article is about. Its just stating that he may have been right about there being a 9th planet. Which is just basically complete coincidence on his part.
Pages