Welcome to the Ancient-Origins.net Forums. In order to avoid spam messages, we require all users of the forum to register first.
If you are not registered please click on the Register link from the top menu. If you are registered LOGIN here.
Who would you pick for the best military leaders of all time?
Maybe your list would include Alexander the Great? How about Genghis Khan? Or maybe you think Julius Caesar should top the list?
Tell us who makes your top five list of military leaders!
Ancient Origins has been quoted by:
At Ancient Origins, we believe that one of the most important fields of knowledge we can pursue as human beings is our beginnings. And while some people may seem content with the story as it stands, our view is that there exist countless mysteries, scientific anomalies and surprising artifacts that have yet to be discovered and explained.
The goal of Ancient Origins is to highlight recent archaeological discoveries, peer-reviewed academic research and evidence, as well as offering alternative viewpoints and explanations of science, archaeology, mythology, religion and history around the globe.
We’re the only Pop Archaeology site combining scientific research with out-of-the-box perspectives.
By bringing together top experts and authors, this archaeology website explores lost civilizations, examines sacred writings, tours ancient places, investigates ancient discoveries and questions mysterious happenings. Our open community is dedicated to digging into the origins of our species on planet earth, and question wherever the discoveries might take us. We seek to retell the story of our beginnings.
 |
 |
 |
Surely the best military leader would be the one who has done the most to avoid war.
Paul Webb
Thanks for sharing this information. I am glad to to have a chance for this reading this forum
Jim Bell
I believe the best military leaders are those who won wars that couldn’t be avoided. For me, leaders of wars of invasion and conquest don’t qualify, and losing a war doesn’t disqualify anyone from my list. I nominate
Saladin
Richard I, Lionheart
George Washington
Sam Houston
Robert E. Lee
It's a law of the military universe that the General who makes better use of troops, strategy and equipment wins battles. Those who do that all the time win wars. Ergo, at Waterloo, Wellington was a better general than Napoleon.
What do you think of Alexander the Great or Khalid Ibn Al Walid?
Sundiata Keita
Ancient: Themistocles, Alexander, Hannibal
Medieval: Charles Martel
Modern: George Washington, Napoleon, George S. Patton
Don’t know if I agree with Napoleon being on your list. He lost the two biggest campaigns of his life – Russia and Waterloo. He couldn’t beat Russia’s three unbeatable Generals. General Rain, General Mud and General Winter. Russia was the worst planned campaign in history. NB lost more than half his army retreating in the snow, ice and sleet of a Russian winter.
He lost at Waterloo because he couldn’t organize his forces and manage them well enough to beat Wellington.
It's a law of the military universe that the General who makes better use of troops, strategy and equipment wins battles. Those who do that all the time win wars. Ergo, at Waterloo, Wellington was a better general than Napoleon.
Julius Caesar, without doubt.
Scipio the African
Annibal
Zhukov
General Giap
Asoka: he ended his empire by choice!
If I had to choose a conqueror definitely Ghengis Khan.
Odd History Buff
I will go for the Rashidun general Khalid Ibn Al Walid for the first and foremost. I really admire the battle strategies he planned and applied in the battlefield that won him every single battles he fought. They were sort of tricky and clearly shows his use of his brain during the battle.
Other generals will be Alexander of course, general Belisarius of the Byzantine Empire or maybe the Parthian general Surena who led the Parthian army in the Battle of Carrhae. Surena’s tactics were superb. He didn’t even let the Romans fight and annhiliated them before they had even clashed.
I added a comment yesterday but now i can’t find it
For some reason I can’t directly reply to Filio Scotia’s comment on Napoleon above.
Agree he seriously underestimated Russian weather, but organizing the forces for Waterloo was done in less than 100 days, an unprecedented logistical accomplishment to that point.
Napoleon’s system of organization and tactical maneuver techniques are still studied and used in today’s militaries, his use of artillery in conjunction with cavalry and infantry charges presaged blitzkrieg, and he is arguably the first to grasp and implement the total war concept. He was a revolutionary and transformational figure in military history.
If, as you say, Napoleon was a good organizer and manager, why did he lose at Waterloo?
It's a law of the military universe that the General who makes better use of troops, strategy and equipment wins battles. Those who do that all the time win wars. Ergo, at Waterloo, Wellington was a better general than Napoleon.
M.Mustafa Ciftcioglu
alexander the great
Napoleon
Chjarlemagne
Saladin
Dzjengiz Kahn
Huub
Pochopitelně Julius Cesar
Karel 4 římský a český král
The top military leader would be one that wins against overwhelming odds and is greatly outnumbered in men and equipment. We could list Henry V. In modern times Ho Chi Minh lead the poorest nation in the world and brought the richest and most powerful nation in the world to its knees. While not a conquest. It was still remarkable and genius to hold his ground.
the prophet Muhammad (PBUH). 1 He was merciful and compassionate to both his army and enemies and of course to innocent people who have nothing to do with the ongoing conflict. 2 He respected war order. 3 He trained and led many other great leaders like Khalid Ibn Alwalid, Amr Ibn Al'ass and others. 4 He was a great strategic planner. 5 He was a democratic leader (which is not easy in warfare) 6 He implemented advanced battlefield tactics and tricks comparing to his time 7 he was surrounded by intelligent local society and culture experts. 8 He preferred making pacts rather than war. 9 In ten years he could change the power balances of the ancient world giving birth to a new era.
Much has been written concerning Napoleon’s loss at Waterloo. Wellington being a pretty good general might account for it as much as any other factor.
For me, Hannibal Barca above all others ancient or modern.
You guys are relying on history to select. I believe you have to read between the lines. Cyrus the great taught all modern rulers how to rule.
I would suggest the following as the great captains of history:
Alexander the Great
Hannibal
Julius Caesar
Gustavus Adolphus
Napoleon Bonaparte
Steffen
Imo George Washington and Sam Houston
Undoubtedly William Marshal and Horatio Nelson.
ECColeman
i am going to cast my vote to General Dwight D.Eisenhower. He won the last war to be won by the USA. since then we have lost all the others. He also warned of the military industrial complex.
riparianfrstlvr
As far as Naval leaders are concerned- I can only give it to one, and I have to throw that vote in for Admiral Yi Sun-sin of the Korean Joseon Dynasty. Of his many achievements here are 3 awesome ones that speak to his character. 1. Opposed a fleet of 333 Japanese vessels with only 13 of his own. 2. Forced a few badly beaten Japanese ships to disembark at a nearby Korean village for fear of engaging in naval combat and instead of pursuing the soldiers, or burning their ships, he retreated so the Japenese soldiers would get back in their ships and flee instead of killing the villagers. 3. He re-imagined and resurrected what was then a 150 year old low riding armored ‘turtle ship’ that became the pride of the Korean Navy. All while obeying the commands from a corrupt leadership even when that meant being demoted to a foot soldier, for a short time until he was re-instated.
And did I mention he never once lost a ship? It seems as though not only was he extremely strategic, he had a love for his people, and for the ancient wisdom that came before him.
It’s not unfair to say he single handly changed the outcome of the Imjin war with his superior naval abilities. By effectively cutting off the supply route from Japan, Korea was able to mount a counter resistance and take full advantage of the Chinese support from the North.
Ziltoidian, Sir. That is a pretty awsome achievement. However, it is difficult to tell if your Admiral would have worked his way up from the lower middle classes to commanding an 18th century warship and then commanding a fleet when having just one arm and the sight of a single eye. Nelson’s leadership became legendary very early on in his career and, although ‘England expects……...’, was a wonderful encouragement, his best advice was ‘No captain can do very wrong if he places his ship alongside that of the enemy.’ In every case of his victories he came up against French or Spanish Admirals who had all earned distinction in their careers. Yet, despite many of his ship’s companies containing a large number of ‘Pressed’ men, his leadership led to victories that echo down the years. Once again, may I say that your Admiral cuts a very impressive figure – but, perhaps sadly, who knows about him these days? Very Best Wishes, Anchorface (former ‘Officer of the Day’ in the ‘Victory’ 1972).
ECColeman
When discussing the best military leaders of all time, it's important to note that opinions may vary, and different leaders may excel in different aspects of military strategy and leadership. However, there are indeed several historical figures who are often regarded as exceptional military leaders https://unoonl.com
Alexander is widely recognized for his military prowess and his ability to lead his troops to numerous victories. He created one of the largest empires in history, stretching from Greece to Egypt and India, through his strategic brilliance and innovative tactics.