The Enigma of Prehistoric Skulls with Bullet-Like Holes

The Kabwe Skull with bullet-like hole. prehistoric skulls.	Source: Jim Di Loreto and Don Hurlbert / Smithsonian Institution
Getting your audio player ready...

Nearly one century ago, a Swiss miner was searching for metal ore deposits in the limestone caves of Kabwe, Zambia, when he found a prehistoric skull that dated back between 125,000 and 300,000 years. It was the first fossil to be discovered in Africa with Homo sapiens characteristics.

But there was an even bigger surprise. The prehistoric skull had a small, circular shaped hole on the side, which forensic scientists say could only have been created by an extremely high-velocity projectile, such as that caused by a bullet. The mystery was compounded by the discovery of an ancient auroch skull with exactly the same feature. The discoveries have led to many wild and wonderful speculations, but we are really no closer to solving the puzzle.

Replica of the prehistoric Kabwe skull, housed in Mauer Museum, in Heidelberg, Germany. (Gerbil / CC BY-SA 3.0)

Replica of the prehistoric Kabwe skull, housed in Mauer Museum, in Heidelberg, Germany. (Gerbil / CC BY-SA 3.0)

Trying to Classify Prehistoric Skulls – The Case of the Kabwe Skull

The skull found in Kabwe (also known as Broken Hill) attracted a great deal of attention when it was first discovered. According to the Smithsonian Institution, it was initially believed that the Kabwe prehistoric skull was the first ever example of a new species of hominid called Homo rhodesiensis.

It was subsequently assigned the classification of Homo heidelbergensis, although more recent research has shown that several characteristics shown similarities to Homo erectus, Homo neanderthalensis, and modern Homo sapiens. Whoever the skull belonged to, it appears he or she may have been the product of interbreeding between different hominid species.

But its unique combination of features was not all that was unique about the Kabwe skull. It was also found to have a small, perfectly-round hole on the left side of the cranium, as well as a shattered parietal plate on the opposite side.

This suggests the projectile that entered on the left side, passed through the skull with such force that it completely shattered the right side. Strangely, the presence of these highly-unusual characteristics are missing from descriptions of the Kabwe skull on the Smithsonian Institution page, as well the Natural History Museum of London, although their photos clearly depict the hole in the skull.

A replica of the prehistoric Broken Hill or Kabwe skull from the Museum in Livingstone, Zambia, with the apparent bullet hole visible on the left. (The Xenophile Historian)

A replica of the prehistoric Broken Hill or Kabwe skull from the Museum in Livingstone, Zambia, with the apparent bullet hole visible on the left. (The Xenophile Historian)

What Could Have Caused the Hole in the Kabwe Skull?

While it is natural to assume that the hole may have been caused by a high-speed spear or javelin, investigations proved this was not possible. “When a skull is struck by a relatively low-velocity projectile – such as an arrow, or spear – it produces what are known as radial cracks or striations; that is, minute hairline fractures running away from the place of impact,” wrote The Shields Gazette. “As there were no radial fractures on the Neanderthal skull, it was unanimously concluded that the projectile must have had a far, far greater velocity than an arrow or spear.”

According to the book Technology of the Gods: The Incredible Sciences of the Ancients by David Hatcher Childress, a German forensics expert came to an even more radical conclusion: “the cranial damage to Rhodesian man’s skull could not have been caused by anything but a bullet.” Researcher Rene Noorbergen, who investigated the mystery in Secrets Of The Lost Races, concurred, saying that “this same feature is seen in modern victims of head wounds received from shots from a high-powered rifle.”

If this were true, it would mean that a) the skull is not as old as claimed, b) the ancient skull was shot in modern times, c) the ancient skull was shot in ancient times by a technologically advanced civilization. The first and second options are discounted by the fact that the skull was found 60 feet (18.2 m) below the surface, which confirms that it is at least several thousand years old.

It was not located near enough to ground level to have been accidently or intentionally shot in recent decades. Does that just leave us with the third option, or could there be other explanations in the mix?

Auroch skull with bullet-like hole in the forehead. (Technology of the Gods: The Incredible Sciences of the Ancients)

Auroch skull with bullet-like hole in the forehead. (Technology of the Gods: The Incredible Sciences of the Ancients)

Turning to Other Prehistoric Skulls for Clues

Before exploring other hypotheses, we must give consideration to another prehistoric skull discovery which further compounds the mystery. Thousands of miles away, along the Lena River in Russia, another ancient skull was discovered with the same clean, round hole.

The skull belonged to an auroch, an extinct species of wile cattle that lived between 2 million and 4,000 years ago. Like the Kabwe skull, the hole in the auroch skull is also missing radial cracks that would result from spear or arrow projectiles.

The prehistoric skull, which is now on display in Moscow’s Museum of Paleontology, could not have been struck by a bullet in more modern times because calcification around the bullet hole shows that the auroch survived the wound for some time afterwards.

The Kabwe skull, or Broken Hill skull, with its bullet-like hole clearly visible on the site, on display in the National History Museum in London. (Jonathan Cardy / CC BY-SA 3.0)

The Kabwe skull, or Broken Hill skull, with its bullet-like hole clearly visible on the site, on display in the National History Museum in London. (Jonathan Cardy / CC BY-SA 3.0)

Alternative Explanations for the Kabwe Skull

All these pieces of the puzzle have really brought us no closer to learning the truth. Numerous hypotheses and speculations have surfaced, from radical theories, such as the idea proposed by The Shields Gazette that “someone from the future, carrying a firearm, travelled back into the past and engaged in some sort of trans-temporal hunting expedition,” to the slightly more plausible suggestion that the holes were caused by shrapnel from a small meteorite or something similar.

In alternative archaeology circles, the most popular perspective is that ancient man may have been technologically developed to a very high degree, before virtually all traces were lost. But could two separate societies, separated by thousands of years and a vast cultural gulf, have both invented weapons that just happened to fire small, cylindrical projectiles at high speed?

The only lukewarm attempt to debunk the alternative theories comes from the Bad Archaeology website, which denies the injuries to the right-side of the skull exist. Although they present no explanation or evidence, they claim that the bullet-like hole was caused by “a pathological, rather than a traumatic lesion, caused by an infection in the soft tissue over it.”

At this stage, none of the hypotheses are supported by adequate evidence or logic. Unless more prehistoric skulls or fossils are discovered with the same type of injuries, we may never hold the real answers to the Kabwe skull enigma.

Top image: The Kabwe Skull with bullet-like hole. prehistoric skulls. Source: Jim Di Loreto and Don Hurlbert / Smithsonian Institution

By April Holloway

Hoog    16 August, 2014 - 15:32

Really funky story only but am I wrong in thinking that the wound could have been created after death? Could it not have been carved by some kind of tool. I'm aware that it would need to be fairly sharp and able to carve bone into a smooth circle but it's not beyond belief, is it? If that's the case, could it have been some kind of keyhole surgery? (no, I know, that's very silly, I apologise). Okay then, what about a method of torture? Opening a hole in someone's head and slowly increasing the size of that hole leaving the marks we see in the skull nowadays. Or it was done a long time after the victim's death and a hole carved into the skull for that seedy 'ritual purpose.' Answers on the back page of your nearest hotel bible. I have no idea what to think about this skull. I like that. 

calijohno    16 August, 2014 - 16:06

In reply to by Hoog

it says about the first skull that their is not only a entrance wound but also an exit wound with the other side fractured and blown out consistant with a high velocity object. i dont think the fact that it was a high velocity object is in question just what that object was is the mystery i agree it is a funky story, but with archeology finding complex and history defying structures dating from 25000 to 150000 years old showing there was a time in prehistory that we were much more advanced than previosly thought, combine that with the flood stories that are prevalant in almost every anciant culture i dont think it to far feched that at one point we were much more advanced and may have possesed tech that could have caused this that has since been washed away. i always thought it was strang that modern humans are 200+ thousand years old but only stated making technological discoveries in the last five thousand years we are way too creative and complex a species to just have been twiddling our thunbs for 200000 years than all of a suddan saying hey why dont we do somthing with these thumbs.

Dan Fan (not verified)    16 August, 2014 - 16:10

The hole on Broken Hill Man's skull (aka the skull referenced above) shows signs of healing around the margins, indicating it was not a bullet hole.

This was evaluated in 1974, guys. This article is just pseudoarchaeology bullshit.

aprilholloway    17 August, 2014 - 01:34

In reply to by Dan Fan (not verified)

If you re-read the article, you will see that at no point have I concluded it is a bullet hole. I have presented different opinions and theories and finished by saying that no one knows what caused it.   

As explained in the article, the auroch skull shows signs of healing. All this shows is that the animal survived whatever pierced the skull. There are cases of people who have survived a one inch metal pole shooting through the front of their face and out the back of their head, so if there was indeed an evaluation showing that the hominid skull also had signs of healing, it still doesn't bring us any closer to knowing a cause.