All

But how is a document written a same time for historical record, wrong ? or inaccurate ?
Down a hill, they may have just let it slide down, there is probably not anything saying about those details, but i would like to see whole record to be translated, for all to read.
But upon translation, there can be no more doubt as to the details it does provide, on how stones weer moved back then. Unlike egypt that had no frozen anything, let alone ice to slide their stones, but sleds and man power did that all anyway, same with stone henge, mayan, and various others.. There still could be an egypt documentation of how they did things they did, just not found yet..

I do wonder if they moved stones at night ? More probable to move them at night with moon light to help.
And crews for day, and for night.

@Peter Harrap: I believe that you need to Go back to math class in school. One kilometer is 3,281 in feet times 70 equals 229,670 feet. That is divided by 21,600 (3ft per second=15 ft. per minute times 60 minutes = 900 feet per hour times 24 hours = 21,600) to give you 10.6328 days to move it 70 kilometers....

The men probably did not stand on the ice road to pull, but to either side in front. Pulling evenly on both sides. All you need is center line to follow, both on the stone and marked on the ice and some one on top to keep them lined up by calling out orders to each team. I'm betting the path was scouted out completely looking for the flattest way, and flatning areas that needed flatening all as the stones were being cut... Probably took yeas to move them all with teams assigned to each stone.

Good points. I'd add that if the blocks were on ice, so, presumably, were the men pulling on the ropes. Suddenly it doesn't sound quite so easy.

Also, it should be kept in mind whenever discussing the transport of large masses of stone, that although stone has an extremely high compression strength, it is weak to tension and torque, and is prone to spauling, especially on corners and finished faces. The more a stone weighs, the more likely that its own weight can cause it damage. Just setting a heavy block down on uneven ground can damage it by breaking edges of corners or chipping flat surfaces.

Moving these things isn't just about mustering the force necessary to overcome gravity and friction. That force must be wielded with finesse; there must be fine control. People yanking on ropes is not finesse.

The base of the St. Petersburg statue is often brought up as a modern example of a huge mass of stone moved by people dragging it overland with ropes. Ice was used as a means of reducing friction in that case as well, and supposedly lots of little bronze spheres acted as ball bearings to help move things along.
But that stone is just a giant boulder with no particular shape. No one cared if bits of it broke away during transport. There were no fragile corners or flattened surfaces to protect. The accounts of moving that stone are believable to me, for those reasons. Because no one was trying to build anything with it. It was a giant boulder dragged a long way to a new resting place, where it was used as...a giant boulder.

Giant blocks, which are not just dragged from A to B, but are used in the construction of a structure at B, are a problem of a different order of magnitude entirely.

## Pages

### April

April Holloway is a Co-Owner, Editor and Writer of Ancient Origins. For privacy reasons, she has previously written on Ancient Origins under the pen name April Holloway, but is now choosing to use her real name, Joanna Gillan.