White Skin Developed in Europe Only As Recently as 8,000 Years Ago Say Anthropologists
The myriad of skin tones and eye colors that humans express around the world are interesting and wonderful in their variety. Research continues on how humans acquired the traits they now have and when, in order to complete the puzzle that is our ancient human history. Now, a recent analysis by anthropologists suggests that the light skin color and the tallness associated with European genetics are relatively recent traits to the continent.
An international team of researchers as headed by Harvard University’s Dr. Iain Mathieson put forth a study at the 84th annual meeting of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists recently.
Based on 83 human samples from Holocene Europe as analyzed under the 1000 Genomes Project , it is now found that for the majority of the time that humans have lived in Europe, the people had dark skin, and the genes signifying light skin only appear within the past 8,000 years. This recent and relatively quick process of natural selection suggests to researchers that the traits which spread rapidly were advantageous within that environment, according to the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) .
This dramatic evidence suggests modern Europeans do not appear as their long ancient ancestors did.
- Ancient European hunter-gatherer was dark-skinned and blue-eyed caveman
- Did light-skinned, redheaded Neanderthal women hunt with the men?
- Europeans share more language and genes with Asia than previously thought
- New studies reveal 20 Percent of Neanderthal genome lives on in modern humans
The samples are derived from a wide range of ancient populations, rather than a few individuals, and they supplied researchers with five specific genes associated with skin color and diet.
AAAS reports that the “modern humans who came out of Africa to originally settle Europe about 40,000 years are presumed to have had dark skin, which is advantageous in sunny latitudes. And the new data confirm that about 8500 years ago, early hunter-gatherers in Spain, Luxembourg, and Hungary also had darker skin: They lacked versions of two genes—SLC24A5 and SLC45A2—that lead to depigmentation and, therefore, pale skin in Europeans today. […]
Then, the first farmers from the Near East arrived in Europe; they carried both genes for light skin. As they interbred with the indigenous hunter-gatherers, one of their light-skin genes swept through Europe, so that central and southern Europeans also began to have lighter skin. The other gene variant, SLC45A2, was at low levels until about 5800 years ago when it swept up to high frequency.”
This differed from the situation farther north. Ancient remains from southern Sweden 7,700 years ago were found to have the gene variants indicating light skin and blonde hair, and another gene, HERC2/OCA2, which causes blue eyes. This indicated to researchers that ancient hunter-gatherers of northern Europe were already pale and blue-eyed. This light skin trait would have been advantageous in the regions of less sunlight.
Mathieson and colleagues do not specify in the study why the genes were favored and spread as quickly as they did, but it is suggested that Vitamin D absorption likely played a role. Ancient hunter-gatherers in Europe also could not digest milk 8,000 years ago. The ability to do so only came about 4,300 years ago.
Paleoanthropologist Nina Jablonski of Pennsylvania State University notes that people in less sunny climates required different skin pigmentations in order to absorb and synthesize Vitamin D. The pale skin was advantageous in the region, as well was the ability to digest milk.
“Natural selection has favored two genetic solutions to that problem—evolving pale skin that absorbs UV more efficiently or favoring lactose tolerance to be able to digest the sugars and vitamin D naturally found in milk,” writes AAAS.
This new research follows related studies on pre-agricultural European genomes and modern humans in Europe before the rise of farming.
Artist’s depiction of Stone Age peoples ( Wikimedia Commons )
- Researchers claim Neanderthals were NOT a sub-species of modern humans
- From farming to sedentary lifestyles - how 6,000 years has transformed the human body
- Stone Age Britons traded with European farmers 8,000 years ago
DNA taken from the wisdom tooth of a 7,000-year-old human found in Spain in 2006 overturned the popular image of light-skinned European hunter-gatherers. The study revealed that the individual had dark hair and the dark-skinned genes of an African. However, the man had blue eyes, an unexpected find by researchers. The hunter-gatherer is the oldest known individual in Europe found to have blue eyes.
Artist’s impression of a blue-eyed hunter gatherer (Credit: PELOPANTON / CSIC )
Previous research published in 2008 found that the earliest mutations in the eye-color genes that led to the evolution of blue eyes probably occurred about 10,000 years ago in individuals living in around the Black Sea.
The surprising aspect of the findings is that while it is fundamental to natural selection that advantageous genetic attributes spread, it is not often a speedy process. The study shows that these genetic pale skin traits swept across Europe speedily, and that phenomenon is of particular interest to researchers.
The preprint study “Eight thousand years of natural selection in Europe” by Mathieson and colleagues has been published in the online journal BioRxiv.
These new findings shed light on humanity’s genetic past, giving us a clearer vision of our ancient origins.
Featured Image: Image of reconstructed faces of three early humans in profile view. Credit: Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History .
By Liz Leafloor
A study conduct by Harvard University’s Dr. Iain Mathieson (photo here – https://genetics.med.upenn.edu/wp-content/blogs.dir/66/files/sites/66/20...) concluded that the ancient Nordics looked less like Swedes and more like Harvard University’s Dr. Iain Mathieson. ...Sure.
Nobody gets paid to tell the truth.
Has anyone looked at why people from outside sub-saharan Africa have straight hair, while sub-saharan Africans have curly or Afro Hair? Seems to me this is as big a differentiation as skin or eye colour, but nobody mentions it.
"Present-day sub-Saharan Africans trace up to 19% of their genetic ancestry to an extinct archaic hominin species (Homo erectus or Homo habilis) that is NOT found in the DNA of present-day Asians or Caucasians." -Robert Sepehr
"Aryans" are mixed. African ancestry? No. Europeans have 1-2% Neanderthal admixture, there were never any Neanderthals in sub-Saharan Africa. Recent discoveries of a TRACE amount of Neanderthal DNA in Africans is because they were hybridized with MIXED Cro magnon." -Robert Sepehr
Fact: the highest incident of psychopathy resides in a single ethnic group.