The Possible Origins of the Early Persian Kings: Mystery Men - Part I
I have written on the origins of the Arsacid Dynasty (Parthian Empire) and that of the Sassanid’s in previous articles. However, one dynasty often gets much attention in terms of its social, political, and military achievements along with its decline and eventual fall, and that is the Achaemenid dynasty.
I began to notice that much of what is today the country of Iran, was overrun by Cimmerians and Saka/Scythian tribes before the time of Cyrus the Great, and thus they entrenched themselves in the region and made it their home. Therefore, a question arose: were the early Persian kings of Cimmerian and Scythian stock? Could it be possible that many have overlooked this area and the people who inhabited the land?
However, one has to be careful when using the terms Cimmerian and Scythian for both terms are generic. Yes, there was Cimmerian and Scythians, but at the same time there were many other people who lived a similar lifestyle and who had no connection. Because the ancient writers did not know any better, they decided to stir those peoples into the same mix, as it was felt everyone who lived in a certain region must be of the same stock.
Many historians in the field have had little to say on the origins of the Persian kings, and rightfully so. There really is no information on the beginnings of their foundation but only scraps of names and cities. However, one is not at a total loss. What I attempt to demonstrate is that the Persian Empire, ruled by the Achaemenid dynasty, may in fact have been from Cimmerian and Scythian origin. This is based on the chronicles of many historians in the field of Near Eastern and Indian history. These have provided scraps of information concerning the names and possible origins of this once-great dynasty that ruled from the borders of India to the east to Thrace in the west.
Map of the expansion process of Achaemenid territories under different kings. ( CC BY-SA 4.0 )
These scraps of information come from a linguistic perspective. At times a mere sentence or two provides a great deal of information. However, even with many leads, information eventually hits a wall, leaving one to ponder and speculate. Therefore, the subject you are about to read does contain many truths and facts about the Persians. However, not everything should be completely taken as fact, for there is much speculation and many more questions arising from these speculations that still need to be weighed, and in some cases may never get their due because of the limited amount of information present. Nevertheless, the theory should be considered and evaluated to see if it is found wanting.
Achaemenid art in the National museum of Iran. ( CC BY 2.0 )
The Persian Kings like Cyrus the Great, Darius, and Xerxes, to name a few, all claimed descent from Achaemenes, who ruled sometime around 700 BC. Not much is known about the man himself. However, he is considered the eponymous founder according to the Behistun inscription of Darius I, being listed in his genealogy. Cyrus the Great says nothing on the Babylonian cylinder about the founder of their dynasty. Cyrus refers to himself as an Achaemenid on the inscriptions found at Pasargadae, but it is also debated whether the inscriptions are genuine as it could be possible that Darius I wrote those inscriptions after Cyrus died. Nevertheless, there most likely was a man by the name of Achaemenes. The only problem surrounding Achaemenes is the question: who was he?
This is a free preview of an exclusive article from Ancient Origins PREMIUM.
To enjoy the rest of this article please join us there . When you subscribe, you get immediate and full access to all Premium articles , free eBooks, webinars by expert guests, discounts for online stores, and much more!
- Antony's Parthian War: Politics and Bloodshed between Empires of the Ancient World
- The Battle of Carrhae: A crushing defeat of the unstoppable Roman juggernaut by the Parthian Empire
- The House of Arsacid Falls to the House of Sasan: It Started with a Wedding – Part I
Top Image: Mosaic depicting Persian Archers. (Pre 4th Century BC) ( CC BY 2.0 )
By Cam Rea
Good work! As you know, the Cimmerians are mentioned in the Hebrew Scriptures as “Gomer” (in the table of Nations). Gomer is also the symbolic name used by Hosea, for the northern 10 tribes of Israel, in the Book of Hosea. The Assyrians used a similar name for the ten tribes back then. The Assyrian King Tiglath Pileser III, who transported Israelites into the city cities of the Medes, referred to them as “Bit Khumri” (The house of “Khumri,” as “Gomer,” being a transliteration of the notable Israelite king “Omri.”).
The Greek historians, such as Herodotus and Xenophon, reported that the Persians Kings were descendants of Perseus and Andromeda through their son Perses. Perses was a king of Joppa, the capital of the tribe of Dan. The Persians themselves were supposed to have been named after him. Thus bolstering the notion cut the Persian Kings were ultimately descended from Jacob. I wonder if the name “Achaemenes” could somehow be a corruption of the name “Jacob” (“Achaem” as “Jacob”)
Anyway, I would refer your readers to a work of mine which has more information along this line of reasoning and can be found at:
Keep up the good work and thanks for your article.