All  
An illustration depicting the construction of the Egyptian pyramids

Demystifying the Egyptian Pyramids with Hard Facts

Print

It has always fascinated, and worried me at the same time, how many people I meet that are still mesmerized by aspects of the pyramids in Egypt that archeologists solved many years ago. The when, how, what and where aspects are all now understood, leaving “why” as the real mystery.

How Many People Built The Great Pyramid?

Archeologists, Engineers and amateur enthusiasts debate on exactly “how many” people contributed to the building of the pyramids in Egypt, which were erected for each of three pharaohs: Khufu, Khafre and Menkaure. Most Egyptologists over the last two decades have thought this number to be between to 20,000 or 30,000 based on the size of the tombs and the cemetery, but famed Egyptologist, Zahi Hawass, believes around 36,000 ancient Egyptians built the pyramids.

The first attempt at guessing what this elusive number might be was made by the Greek historian Herodotus, who estimated that “100,000 men worked in three shifts” to build the structures. The trouble with this account is that it was unclear whether each shift contained 100,000 men, or 33,000 men worked three shifts. According to a archeologist Mark Lehner of the Giza Plateau Mapping Project at the Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago and Harvard Semitic Museum postulated a  different number .

Map of the Giza Plateux by MesserWoland, work created in Inkscape.

Map of the Giza Plateux by MesserWoland, work created in Inkscape. CC BY-SA 3.0

Lehner's team calculated how many men would be needed to deliver “340 stones each day” and determined there were likely 1,200 people in the quarry and 2,000 transporting the stones, while others must have cut stones and set them into place. He concluded that to have built the pyramid within a 20-40-year period, the process would have required "5,000 men to actually do the building and the quarrying and the schlepping from the local quarry.”

More recently, archeologist Richard Redding, the chief research officer at Ancient Egypt Research Associates (AERA), estimated the workforce at Giza to be around 10,000 people “for all three pyramids.” In a Live Science study published in 2013, Redding found that “enough cattle, sheep and goats were slaughtered every day to produce 4,000 pounds of meat, on average, to feed the pyramid builders” and he used the animal bone remains found at Giza, to calculate the “nutritional requirements for a person doing hard labor, to arrive at his number of 10,000.”

How Were The Pyramids Built?

Although many old school, pseudo-historians, will tell you that “if anybody tells you they know how the pyramids were built they are lying,” this is either a lie itself, or less sinisterly, ignorance. It is a fact that many thousands of highly qualified archeologists, engineers and anthropologists know precisely how pyramid structures were assembled.

A word of caution. When a writer or lecturer tells you that mystery surrounds how such massive stones blocks were shaped and transported for using in the pyramids, they are really saying “I wrote a cranky book in the 90’s and now “I can’t" admit archeologists understand how all this was done.” So, they continue to throw on layers of childish complexity and for every person that listens to this type of author, a thousand cry.

A fact that this type of writer holds back from readers, is that about 90% of the pyramid's blocks are soft limestone quarried "just across the river" from the pyramids. And while you are often told “no metal” was used in the pyramid’s construction, contrary to this, according to James A. Harrell and Per Storemyr, The University of Toledo, Ohio archeologists have found many copper wedges which were used with “wooden levers to mechanically fracture the soft limestone.”

In the face of spaceships, anti-gravity levitation mechanisms and magic, a papyrus found by the Red Sea explained precisely how the massive blocks were made easier to move using water. The papyri, found at Wadi al-Jarf informed that the limestone “used in the casing is from a quarry located at Turah, near modern-day Cairo,” and was shipped to Giza by boat over 4 days along the Nile River then along a series of canals. And most of the stones used to build Khufu's pyramid were quarried from a "horseshoe-shaped quarry located just south of the pyramid," said Mark Lehner who published his finds back in 1985 in the journal Mitteilungen des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts.

Crumbling Rock temples were cut directly in the rocks at the Silsileh quarrying site, near Aswan, for use by quarry workers.

Crumbling Rock temples were cut directly in the rocks at the  Silsileh quarrying site, near  Aswan, for use by quarry workers. CC BY-SA 3.0

Talking of what happened to the blocks once they were at the building site, a team of physicists from the University of Amsterdam found in a study published  in the journal Physical Review Letters in 2004, that “Egyptians pushed and pulled large wooden sledges and that  sand in front of the sledge was likely dampened with water , reducing friction, making it easier to move.” And this act of pouring “water in-front of sledges” was so central to the building process that it is depicted many times in ancient Egyptian artwork.

But how on earth could a civilization of farmers “all of a sudden” build massive pyramids?

Practice Makes Perfect

Again, pseudo-historians never talk of the scores of “failed” pyramids which speckle the Egyptian deserts, which all add to archeologists understanding of the Egyptian’s building chronology. It is in the collapsed attempts at pyramid building that archeologists have learned of the techniques used to build the Giza pyramids, which were developed over centuries, with all of the challenges and setbacks that any modern-day designer, engineer or builder would face.

A Live Science article described how archaeologist Sir Flinders Petrie discovered that pyramids originated from “simple rectangular "mastaba" tombs that were being constructed in Egypt over 5,000 years ago.” He noted a major advance in building skills during “the reign of the pharaoh Djoser (reign started around 2630 B.C).” According to Petrie, Djoser’s pyramid was developed into “a  six-layered step pyramid with underground tunnels  and chambers.”

A prototype pyramid, the Mastabat al-Fir’aun at Saqqara.

A prototype pyramid, the Mastabat al-Fir’aun at  Saqqara. Public License.

The evolution from “step pyramids” came during the reign of the pharaoh Snefru (reign started around 2575 BC), whose architects developed designs for smooth-faced, true pyramids, as we know them today. Practicing as they built, learning from mistakes, Snefru’s architects constructed what is known today as the "bent pyramid" because the angle of the pyramid changes course half-way up, by accident. Then, we see this design flaw being corrected at a second pyramid at Dahshur, the "red pyramid" which has a constant angle from base to tip, making it the first “true pyramid.” In conclusions, Snefru’s son Khufu, learned from all of his father’s construction mistakes and applied his learning in what we know as the "Great Pyramid” at Giza, the largest stone pyramid in the world.

In a  report published  recently in an AERA newsletter , Glen Dash, an engineer who studies the pyramids at Giza noted that Khufu's pyramid is aligned “to true north within one-tenth of a degree.” Admittedly, how exactly the ancient Egyptians did this is not fully clear, but Dash wrote that the builders “used a circumpolar star like Polaris and lines of rope” to achieve this accuracy. And if you take a rope into your backyard and lay out 10 alignments to the celestial north pole, and average them, you get pretty close to this accuracy.

Top image: An illustration depicting the construction of the Egyptian pyramids ( TES Teach )

By Ashley Cowie

Comments

I find it worrying how eager you are to not do any substantial research and claim it as fact while belittling those who have done their research and realize the mystery behind the building of the pyramids. The greatest most successful pyramids predate those failed or of much lower quality to point out one hole in your article. I would be interested in your thoughts on how the Coral Castle was built by Edward Leedskalnin who claimed to know the secrets behind the pyramids construction. There is much evidence going against the claims you make in this article so I would suggest you do some more research before claiming to know things and talking down about those who do.

Gary Moran's picture

I just can’t buy the tomb theory. The pyramids are devoid of any of the self-aggrandizing inscriptions found in known tombs. All of the ancient rulers of this area were so proud of themselves and their accomplishments that they wanted everyone in eternity to know about them. If these buildings were tombs, they would be inscribed at the very least with their Book of The Dead. 

Just because a number of learned academics buy into the prevailing theory does not mean it’s correct. Most of them continued to believe that Egypt had the earliest “advanced” civilization on earth before Gobekli Tepe’s age was proven, and some still refuse to accept it. And now, Gunung Padang threatens to upset the whole apple cart. Any clues as to why there is so much resistance to excavating there – what are they afraid will be found? Evidence that their throries are wrong, I’ll bet.

At the top of this string, it clearly says "8 comments". However, I see just 3 comments. where are the rest of them?

The article promises "hard facts" but offers nothing but speculation.

"It is a fact that many thousands of highly qualified archeologists, engineers and anthropologists know precisely how pyramid structures were assembled."

No it isn't. The author wants to believe in academia and simply chooses to do so.
Mediocrity and arrogance plagues academia as well as politics.

Does egyptology/science know for sure that the pyramids were tombs?
No they do not. It is mere speculation.
Do they know why thousands of tons of granite beams are above the "king's chamber"?
No they don't.
The function of the "grand gallery"?
They simply have no idea whatsoever.
Do they know why there are tunnels? No. Shafts? No.
These idiots cannot tell the difference between an industrial facility and a temple or tomb; between a machine and an inanimate object.
Compare the actual tombs and temples, elaborately decorated, with the pyramids and their supposed "valley" and "mortuary" "temples".
And the evidence that ancient egyptians never had the wheel at that time is what exactly?

Egyptologists see everything through preconceived notions, a distorted lens, and are getting nowhere.

I simply don't regard Zecharia Sitchin as a source of archeological fact.

Pages

Register to become part of our active community, get updates, receive a monthly newsletter, and enjoy the benefits and rewards of our member point system OR just post your comment below as a Guest.

Next article