lack of science and lefts over charlatanism in this supposed "research ''.
Nowadays, there are plenty of authors who fake data to sell esoteric fiction.
The Paracas skulls case is another example.
Every person is lactose intolerant it is just a matter of the degree of intolerance. We do not become lactose tolerant. Milk and especially the milk of an entirely different species is not and I repeat, not digestible by a human adult. We do not have the enzyme to coagulate and slowly digest milk after being weaned from our human mothers. Many (most) babies suffer because of cows milk.
Human adaptation is provable. Evolution has not yet been proved. The two subjects should be distinguished. “very likely to have dark brown skin and blue eyes” very likely is not fact or proof. In fact it is most probably not the case. The image of the dark man is a reconstruction by Kennis and Kennis is not a fact but an artistic rendition. I do sometimes feel that we are being educated to take this in as reality, the fiction of our ancestors and I also feel for a malevolent purpose.
I find it very convenient that none of the claims made by so called discoverers of various articles; the Ark of the Covenant, Noah’s Ark, etc., can produce definitive proof. I have no problem with people’s belief in various religious texts, but please if you are going to make these types of claims provide some sort of proof. I believe in evolution because proof of various adaptations allowing survival of the fitist exists. Until there is definitive proof the Bible (written a hundred years after the death of Christ) is merely the story of a man who started a movement and belief system which has persisted for many years.
I thinks its possible “ The Beast of Exmoor” could be an escaped zoo animal or even an exotic pet that somone let go. I’m a fan of cryptozoology so I take an interest in arcticles such as this.
I agree with Tsurugi! If the evidence is plausible then the possibility that these “ Negev Desert dwellers” were in fact the ancient Israelites shouldn’t be ignored by archeologists.
Many see what they want to see. When we first saw the 'face' on Mars, I couldn't believe the intelligence, or lack of it, from thousands of people thinking it was anything more than the sun on a piece of rock, but there we have it.
This article is full of lies:
1) As Catalan I must say that our lenguage is spoken today in Catalonia for around 3 million people, thnaks to the supporting effort of Spain...please be careful with figures
2) In the 8th century there was a muslim invasion in all the territory of Spain, Barcelona was also muslim for about 100 years and Carlomagno and the french people call Cathalaunic to the same territoryof Castle ...Castilla de central de region of Spain, so that Cathalaunic means "Spain". Ples read an inform yourself a little bit more
3) Never exist such athing like an "independent" county as tthe counties were parto France first and Aragon Kingdom later, to read some Spanish history could be convenient....and so on, so on
Here you can navigate quickly through all comments made in any article sorted by date/time.
Return with your SHEILD or on it.
... and puns, this is why the 'serpent' was really Sarpanit.
OMG, my former teacher's name is Phryne. If only she knew it meant frog and was used by a prostitute.
Yes because white skin, blond and red hair only arrived in Europe along with the arrival of Indo-European speakers.
lack of science and lefts over charlatanism in this supposed "research ''.
Nowadays, there are plenty of authors who fake data to sell esoteric fiction.
The Paracas skulls case is another example.
Dr Pinkola Estés describes Baba Yaga as the cycle life-death-life.
Much of this article is speculative at best.
Every person is lactose intolerant it is just a matter of the degree of intolerance. We do not become lactose tolerant. Milk and especially the milk of an entirely different species is not and I repeat, not digestible by a human adult. We do not have the enzyme to coagulate and slowly digest milk after being weaned from our human mothers. Many (most) babies suffer because of cows milk.
Human adaptation is provable. Evolution has not yet been proved. The two subjects should be distinguished. “very likely to have dark brown skin and blue eyes” very likely is not fact or proof. In fact it is most probably not the case. The image of the dark man is a reconstruction by Kennis and Kennis is not a fact but an artistic rendition. I do sometimes feel that we are being educated to take this in as reality, the fiction of our ancestors and I also feel for a malevolent purpose.
representations of ;handbags; are in Aboriginal rock art, much earlier than Gobekli Tepe
I find it very convenient that none of the claims made by so called discoverers of various articles; the Ark of the Covenant, Noah’s Ark, etc., can produce definitive proof. I have no problem with people’s belief in various religious texts, but please if you are going to make these types of claims provide some sort of proof. I believe in evolution because proof of various adaptations allowing survival of the fitist exists. Until there is definitive proof the Bible (written a hundred years after the death of Christ) is merely the story of a man who started a movement and belief system which has persisted for many years.
I thinks its possible “ The Beast of Exmoor” could be an escaped zoo animal or even an exotic pet that somone let go. I’m a fan of cryptozoology so I take an interest in arcticles such as this.
I agree with Tsurugi! If the evidence is plausible then the possibility that these “ Negev Desert dwellers” were in fact the ancient Israelites shouldn’t be ignored by archeologists.
It seem as though I always tend to attract angry ignorant people to my posts because the truth really hurts them the most...
It is Fake made out of Brass. It was NEVER made in Ancient Rome.
In reply, I think I'll just quote part of your first sentence.
"Ignorant minded people always post their ignorant racist beliefs..."
Couldn't agree more with the concluding paragraphs. Well said.
Many see what they want to see. When we first saw the 'face' on Mars, I couldn't believe the intelligence, or lack of it, from thousands of people thinking it was anything more than the sun on a piece of rock, but there we have it.
This article is full of lies:
1) As Catalan I must say that our lenguage is spoken today in Catalonia for around 3 million people, thnaks to the supporting effort of Spain...please be careful with figures
2) In the 8th century there was a muslim invasion in all the territory of Spain, Barcelona was also muslim for about 100 years and Carlomagno and the french people call Cathalaunic to the same territoryof Castle ...Castilla de central de region of Spain, so that Cathalaunic means "Spain". Ples read an inform yourself a little bit more
3) Never exist such athing like an "independent" county as tthe counties were parto France first and Aragon Kingdom later, to read some Spanish history could be convenient....and so on, so on
forgot to add that whoever wrote this article didnt do a good job. At all. I mean the name of the site is rediscovering humanit's past....
The original version of Adam and Eve is NOT from the hebrew bible but around 800 years older and was found on clay tablets in Ugarit.
It was simply copied and parts altered (made misognystic) where necessary.
Does this prove that the Genesis is not the word of god? Very likely. ;)
Breathe in. Then breathe out. You have just pronounced God's name. Ugh! Tsk Tsk Tsk. YHWH. Sigh.
Pages