All  

Welcome to the Ancient-Origins.net Forums. In order to avoid spam messages, we require all users of the forum to register first.

If you are not registered please click on the Register link from the top menu. If you are registered LOGIN here.

11 posts / 0 new
Last post
Cubit Numerology

Numerology

     The link to the core of numbers overlooked is cubits in mankind's time line.  Modern numerology using astronomy as the main focus misses the anomalies in human existence.  The missed target is a result of modern numbers, the units and calculation from the Georgian calendar.  These units have only been in practice for about 500 - 800 years.  What of the previous 12,000 years and even further back to creation?  One only needs to look upon man's past unit of measure and record of time to conceive this.  Some fixed examples, Stonehenge, the sun temple of Ra, the celestial moon temples and the cubit rod of Maya on display at the Turin museum.  In modern times, mysticism, chemistry and fiscal systems were derived from these earlier measures.  Mankind truly is great however, he lost (or Cyrus guild ed) his graduate achievement that built and civilized the ancient world from the view of above to below.  It is my impression that this loss unplugged numerology from its rightful inheritance of the earth.

     Were cubits a number unification theorem?  An explanation can be found in the progression of the cubit rod ratios:

7 28 4 Egyptian

4 16 4 Sumerian

6 24 4 Biblical

9 36 4 Babylonian (the last evolved cubit rod ratio 539 B.C.)

     One can see an advancement in the incorporation of the circle formed 36 unit rod of Babylon with each of the 36 units/digits in 10 degree increments for radial calculation.  This is in parallel with Ancient Egyptian astronomy having 36 groups of stars (small constellations).  Every 10 days a new constellation would have a heliacal rising. A total of 36 decans were observed and were presided over by a deity.  The rising of each new constellation decan marked the beginning of a new decanal "hour".  Later, the twelve signs of the Zodiac and/or “the little animals” adopted a 3 decan balancing. 3 decan x 12 = 36.

     The union of harmonics reinvented using cubits can be attributed to Pythagoras' musical scale. Unison √432 and the perfect 5th √648 are tuned to a root 2 and root 3 hierarchical cubit rod.  So, Pythagoras instead of using root length increments, squared up for appeasement.  Why re-invent ? It is written that Cyrus met with Pythagoras, Cyrus would have executed Pythagoras if he brought back cubits to the forefront.  The one and only thing that united the ancient world of Egypt and Babylonia was the philosophy of cubits.  Cubits would have been viewed as an undermine to Cyrus' rule (thus, secret society).  Pythagoras later introduced Musica universalis and along with his string portion musical scale is the modern equivalent to string theory.  With one exception, all of Pythagoras' work was accomplished from one unit of rule, cubits the math of the previous kings.

     These cubit examples in relationship with the teachings of Thoth (Hermes, Mercury) seeded a hierarchy of ever increasing knowledge and self awareness, a physical order to the heavens as well as a mystical one in a consciousness of the quantum universe both spiritual and material.  The language of mathematics was the aether that bonded the priests of egypt, kabbalahist, alchemists, ancient astronomers, pythagorean and the stonemasons to erect external and internal from above to below.  So, did the ancients have a mathematical unification theorem to “all is number” ?  The answer is yes, one unit of measure produced all of these divine societies and the sacred geometry that drove them.

     Lastly, what is the composition of a cubit rod?  Digits/cubits are a mediator between SI units (mm) and the British inch system. Decimals and fractions thereof inter-populated with root length increment and right angle theorem in a network of interwoven numbers.  In the physical, geometry energizes the rod, numbers being “all”.  One has to think if one unit of rule, cubits can predict linear distance, radial, dimensional, cosmic, platonic, harmonic, time etc., logic suggests this should be numerology's base to forecast.  In my ongoing opinion, the only thing standing in mankind's way is mankind.  Don't believe me, just ask the Pythagorean brotherhood or any of the aforementioned societies.  Well okay, astronomers have their own tarot card.  -Frank A. Tytar

Note:

In 1582, the introduction of Georgian calendar.

The zero was introduced in the 15th century but, oddly enough, arrived on scene in about 400 and 300 B.C. in Babylon's Fertile Crescent.

Additionally

     Are the aforementioned SI units (mm) and the British inch derived from and integral to cubit rods? The answer is yes. It is curious why mankind re-scripted this. I still can not grasp the missed interpretations of Sir William Matthew Flinders Petrie and the biblical cubit analysis thereafter. They were comparing a cubit unit to that of our modern units currently held in the office of weighs and measures. Instead, if you took the standard inch unit block and the standard millimeter block housed there and added .00219” to the inch block, the millimeter would then calibrate to 25.455mm (√2 at 36 increments in a one inch unit). The shared mechanics of the modern yard, the Babylonian cubit rod, the millimeter, the inch and √right angle theorem. It is really that simple. The √2 hypotenuse is now the gateway to the square, diameter of its coincident circle and Plato's platonic shapes thereof. The area and volume in unison are harmonically exercised together in Pythagorean arithmetic. As a note, Pythagorean math is more so that of Egyptian mathematics, where Pythagoras studied cubits.  Ancient wisdom held theorems were absolutely true from one scale. Cubit rods are a theory of everything that move toward a better description of nature.

     The standard length of a digit/cubit would predict in parallel with that of an inch and a millimeter because a cubit rod hierarchy consists of all three. A cubit rod hierarchy is a trifecta of the three measures, not one.

?

     Is there anyone interested in the actual workings of a cubit rod?

yes i m interested in cubit

yes i m interested in cubit rod

How so?

The link, just recently posted, basic principals and half of rod functionality.

Is your interest from a mathematical nature or a conscious nature?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6sq9pdO52aI&feature=youtu.be

 

 

 

In closing

It is not only that Galileo's theory of gravity and acceleration or Einstein's theory of relativity is correct, it is more so that the formula is geometrically squared in a manner that cubit rods predict.

I have two eights in the date

I have two eights in the date of my birthday. Read on https://numerologyangel.com/818-angel-number/ that people of number 88 are for fairness and trying to do business honestly. It is said that their integrity and confidence in their actions helps to achieve material well-being. However, 88 means moving in a circle. Who else has these numbers, does everything match?

88's truth

Are you asking if angelic numbers can be reconfigured from cubits? If so, yes, with a much more profound result. Same goes for any means of number forecasting. When numbers are geometrically driven, unlike modern numerology, they accumulate more substance. In this case, with cubits. This, of course, is in scope of numbers being all (Pythagoras) and geometry being all (Masons).

Angelic numbers, for instance, only touches on the British standard unit tier of a cubit rod. There is √length (mm) cubit/digits and geometric integration tiers to consider that the angelic numbers fail to grasp.

If you are familiar with

If you are familiar with Astrology, then you may know a little bit about Numerology; it is similar in quite a few ways but uses a different method to get the information and insight Numbers .By understanding that everything in the world is dependent on, and can equate to numbers you should read more information about this from the article where everything is explained https://www.sunsigns.org/angel-numbers/

familiar indeed

The numerology is is composed wrong, perhaps that’s why your lost. Try it in the manner of the ancients

https://youtu.be/6sq9pdO52aI

 

 

 

Astrology

Your post is about number which is explained well all angel numbers Thanks