Apparently their language skills were better as well. The title of the article should read "Ten Things the Ancients Did Better than We" if I remember my 4th grade English lessons.
I had to laugh at your use of the word "craftsmanship" since it denotes "man" when you clearly think aliens are responsible. It's not that I doubt the existence of aliens, it's that I doubt their intent. A space fairing race would need vast amounts of resources to be well space fairing. Meaning to reach us they would need to extract a large amount of resources to move on so it really makes no sense that they would take a bit help out the natives then leave. Also even if there are good matured aliens you can bet there are not so nice ones. So why is it we never see any effects of the latter? It's always some benign beings with only good intent towards us. Yes it may be that they no longer need those resources but by that point in their development they don't need anything and would certainly see the downside of any interaction with other far far lesser animals.
One final question is why is it so difficult to believe these people were much better at doing what they did everyday all day as we are at doing it? At least as good as what we do? Yes our tech is better but 95% of the crap we put out will be useless in 15 to 20 years. Many naturally think we do everything better. I do not believe this and feel credit should be given where credit is due. To the people that did it. In fact that's all they did. No TV, internet, shopping or any of the other activities we think so important today. The rock cutter had one job, to cut rocks all day everyday. The reason we can't figure out how they did it is because no one has ever sat down for 10 or 15 years and thought about nothing but getting a pile of rocks to fit together.
Plus if alien were actually here to help why do you suppose they would do it for us? Build a wall that they knew the natives could not repeat. It's as if your suggesting they trolled the natives. "Here let me show you how to do that........well of course you can't do it we are aliens."
So what was their intent? Because when you consider what happened to those tribes and places that everyone says aliens visited, so far it doesn't look like they taught them anything of value. Certainly not how to save themselves from any real crisis.
The question remains did early advanced humans perform these incredible feats or did they have help from aliens? It could also be the case where from today’s severely limited state of human consciousness, we are projecting these limits on our ancestors. It is hubris to think of ourselves today and the pinnacle of consciousness.
Even if it does not have pharmocological properties, covering an area with a pleasant scent may be enough to affect someones wellbeing. Sickrooms have a definite odor even if they are not in a hospital - sweat, body odors, biowaste odors, wound drainage and so forth contribute to the scent of illness. I frequently burn incense if I am ill to cover any smells I dislike. [Granted, I prefer nag champa, but it is a scent I like]
Why else do you think there is a serious amount of money spent on pot pourri, scented candles, air fresheners and other scent agents? People want to modify their surroundings to make them pleasant.
I made the film, The Teaching Rocks, Kinnomaagewaplong. It took 16 years to make. to clear the record, I will soon be publishing INTO THE STONE. I made the film, and wrote the book as a result of the wildly speculative "scientific" information above.
This article illustrates why I would never go to Wikipedia for information.
yeah definitely Dan Brown can write on the true after events post Hitler's death and make this into movie. Looks like the Vatican is also involved with all the Hitler's art gallery and his sudden rising of Father Krespi image
agree , Romans cement use was due to the availability of volcanic dust , aluminum within the dust is responsible for the watertight effect, you are right saying Egypt and Peru should be set apart these construction were not done by humans , the technological level of hard rock cutting surpassed what we can do today , possibly aliens the best were in Puma Punku with fantastic craftsmanship
The reason that we can't understand how ancient people with no technology, machinery or even decent tools could have accomplished what they seem to have been able to do is very simple. They didn't do it. They occupied and used what was available to them from before a near extinction event occurred. Some of what they were able to use had become exposed by time and erosion. I think that long before that time the world population had grown way beyond what we currently think is possible for our planet to support. With the methods in use today there is simply not enough room for all of the housing, industry, and agriculture required to support a population of that size. The most important consideration to be able to support an extremely large population would be the ability to provide enough food. There is no way to work around the fact that agriculture requires sunlight and a reliable source of water. There needed to be a way to have enough room for all of the people and a way to ensure a reliable source for all of the food that was needed. Pyramids are the key to understanding how that problem was solved. In places where erosion has exposed them the visible evidence varies depending on how much has been exposed and eroded. In spite of that fact if you spend a little time comparing them they leave behind very identifiable "footprints" as they erode away. Evidence in this video suggests that a pyramid was an architectural support. The steps of a pyramid supported levels for habitation and industry below the surface. Other functions that appear to have been incorporated into their designs include control of networked irrigation and drainage systems and access to other levels. The methods in use at that time would solve many of the problems that we face today as well as other problems that we have not yet had to deal with. Terrible storms, flooding, droughts, fires, inadequate food production, expensive climate control, and high insurance costs from damages to name a few off the top of my head. If a surplus of water occurred, it would flow into the networked irrigation and drainage systems, be stored in above and below ground reservoirs, and used when needed. The worst damage that could occur would be localized crop damage from some types of storms. There appear to have been both dome shaped and long rows of surface structures that are eroding away, with interior divisions being exposed by wind and water erosion. There are places with erosion occurring by levels that are loaded with the type of "footprints" that pyramids leave behind, as well as fractures in the surface of the higher ground in the surrounding areas that lead to evidence of being artificially supported. Some of the most interesting places to examine are where it seems that one layer is eroding away and exposing another. Especially if the surface that is eroding away has features that do not appear to have been naturally formed.
Random thoughts: The longest North/South line at the bottom of the Pacific is 8 to 10 miles wide (So are the intersecting ones) and can be followed for 2,100 miles in a perfect line. The symmetry of some of the underwater mounds is amazing. Pick out a perfect looking 20 mile in diameter mound. If you anchor Google Earth's measuring tool in the right place you can go the same distance in any direction and be at almost exactly the same depth. The similarity of circular formations in different sizes on land is obvious, including the location of possible supports around the outside diameter in predictable locations. Evidence at Easter island and at Train rock (which follows Easter island in the video) appear to support that possibility. What is left at Stonehenge could be the center support structure of an ancient dome shaped building, there is another location that looks very similar to Stonehenge but has not been exposed. The material used for construction was not quarried, finished to size, and set in place, it was poured. Today the binding agents are separating from the sedimentary material and being carried to lower levels by the flow of water. There are similarities between the large statues at Easter island and columns found in ancient ruins that could mean that the natives of Easter island carved existing ruins there to make the statues. It is very likely that Ankor Wat was created out of what was left of an eroding pyramid. There are pyramids in Australia. The evidence of ancient East/West irrigation channels around the Okavango delta in South Africa covers approximately 500 by 700 miles. What can be seen at Gobekli Tepe appears to support the possibility of habitation below the agriculture. Machu Picchu is just a small example of that type of evidence. We've wondered why we can't find evidence of what hit the ground in Crater national park but never wondered how it could blast a square hole in the ground. I suspect our near extinction event may have been similar to what happened at Tunguska in 1908, but on a much larger scale. Large enough to fracture the Earths crust, push part of it down into the molten core, and tilt the Earths axis.
From my research I have concluded several aspects of the pyramids that indicate the largest has some features that embrace lost technologies. Several scientist have suggested the largest structure, having closed channels below the base, may have utilized water from tidal forces produced by the Nile. What the resulting forces or energies are anyone can only guess at. Another oddity, the eastern slope is not flat, but angles inward at the center axis. This suggest a focusing of radiation, presumably, light. At one time the pyramid was covered in white wash consisting of quartz and formica. This would have made the structure reflect the sun when directly overhead, to the horizon. The slight angling would intensify this effect. It is also said that the capstone was covered in gold. One observing this would see a what appears as a fiery monument, all the way to the horizon. Perhaps this why it is called a pyramid, Pry=fire, amid=amidst
I believe the pyramids at Giza were built long before the Egyptians came to that land. Historians try to explain them as burial chambers even though no evidence supports such claims. They also try to claim the "bent" and "step" pyramids were first attempts at constructing that culminated in the three large edifices on the plateau. This is a blatant lie. No one seems to explain how the structures suddenly appeared in the Forth Dynasty (26133-2498 BCE ) but the builders had no idea how to build them in the Third Dynasty, then completely lost the art again in the Fifth! Actually, the structures were found buried beneath the sands during the Fourth Dynasty! Egyptian Kings then claimed them as burial chambers and attempted to build more but failed, resulting the step and bent ones. These were the last efforts, not the first
The mercury lake in the Chinese tomb was the first thing that I thought of when I read about this. I've seen some sculptures from South America that look Asian in facial features, leading me to speculate about contact between these cultures.
In a word the ancients were more ADVANCED than we are today. Mainstream archaeology still clings to its linear advancement meme. Civilization and humanity are cyclical; rising to heights and being destroyed by natural cataclysm. Get over it ‘scientists’ you’ll never know how the Inca built those walls until you use the technology they used, and stop all this rubbing and fitting nonsense.
Anyone familiar with the ark, or the lamp of the tabernacle already knows they were found in Tut's tomb. Photos available, and images on temple walls also illustrate the Tabernacle lamp.
He was a "Kheperuu" which is the way they spelt "Khaberu" which are the people from the Khaber River, the princesses of "Mitannu" that inter-married with the 18th dynasty.
Further, the land called "Israel" never existed, and there is no way that "Solomon" isn't Amenhotep III, it is his treasure found in Tut's tomb, hidden there by Hezekiya, the "Jewish king" known as Hezekiah. This land was Egypt during the years cited in article, ONLY. Amenhotep III was "Shalmanu" the "god of the city" of Urusalim. He is documented for receiving "Shalmani gifts" from vassals and worshupers while seated on his Urusalim/Jerusalem throne. Go to "lexiline" website for actual photos of the Ark, the Lamp of the Tabernacle (I saw it in Seattle in 2012 at Tut exhibit) and other utlems listed in the OT for confirmation.
The "Hebrews" were the Khaburs of Mitanni, who spoke Luwian, which is Levite. That is why the OT states the Levi is a tribe of the Hebrews. But it is a nice story for children to listen to, I suppose, if you like your children's head filled with fake history.
The Merneptah stele says JEZREEL, it does NOT say "Israel." How can I PROVE IT? Because Merneptah IS JEHOSEPHAT! WRITTEN AND DOCUMENTED ROYAL TITULARY, And Jehosephat/Merneptah laid waste to JEZREEL.
Of coarse their's money being found, just ask the History channel & all the private contractors!
Personally I do believe the Templar's/Romanic Khazars/Cabals of the Scottish Rite may have gone threw the trouble of hiding it - It's probable it's (TREASURES) sitting somewhere close to Israel by now or in a basement in the Vatican.
*This is off topic but speaking of basements of the Vatican some had said (a date back in 1963) that this huge demonic beast was conjured up but after a prayer of a bishop these plasma/liquid chains appeared & bound it - this came from a reliable source and wondering if it's still bound?!
I'm not trying to get mystic, just thought it to be strange, that's all.
*If someone knows more about this, well, just thought might have some hard copy's - back in 63 ritual (sacrificial) took place simultaneously in the basement of the Vatican & here in the state of Georgia.
Here you can navigate quickly through all comments made in any article sorted by date/time.
then the Sun itself is the father. Each planet on our solar system goes around its axis to get close to the sun. hahaha (lol)
Apparently their language skills were better as well. The title of the article should read "Ten Things the Ancients Did Better than We" if I remember my 4th grade English lessons.
I had to laugh at your use of the word "craftsmanship" since it denotes "man" when you clearly think aliens are responsible. It's not that I doubt the existence of aliens, it's that I doubt their intent. A space fairing race would need vast amounts of resources to be well space fairing. Meaning to reach us they would need to extract a large amount of resources to move on so it really makes no sense that they would take a bit help out the natives then leave. Also even if there are good matured aliens you can bet there are not so nice ones. So why is it we never see any effects of the latter? It's always some benign beings with only good intent towards us. Yes it may be that they no longer need those resources but by that point in their development they don't need anything and would certainly see the downside of any interaction with other far far lesser animals.
One final question is why is it so difficult to believe these people were much better at doing what they did everyday all day as we are at doing it? At least as good as what we do? Yes our tech is better but 95% of the crap we put out will be useless in 15 to 20 years. Many naturally think we do everything better. I do not believe this and feel credit should be given where credit is due. To the people that did it. In fact that's all they did. No TV, internet, shopping or any of the other activities we think so important today. The rock cutter had one job, to cut rocks all day everyday. The reason we can't figure out how they did it is because no one has ever sat down for 10 or 15 years and thought about nothing but getting a pile of rocks to fit together.
Plus if alien were actually here to help why do you suppose they would do it for us? Build a wall that they knew the natives could not repeat. It's as if your suggesting they trolled the natives. "Here let me show you how to do that........well of course you can't do it we are aliens."
So what was their intent? Because when you consider what happened to those tribes and places that everyone says aliens visited, so far it doesn't look like they taught them anything of value. Certainly not how to save themselves from any real crisis.
who thimk that pheonix are real i do
This symbol can also represent four hands clasped at the wrist… a symbol of strength or unity of a group or community.
The question remains did early advanced humans perform these incredible feats or did they have help from aliens? It could also be the case where from today’s severely limited state of human consciousness, we are projecting these limits on our ancestors. It is hubris to think of ourselves today and the pinnacle of consciousness.
Even if it does not have pharmocological properties, covering an area with a pleasant scent may be enough to affect someones wellbeing. Sickrooms have a definite odor even if they are not in a hospital - sweat, body odors, biowaste odors, wound drainage and so forth contribute to the scent of illness. I frequently burn incense if I am ill to cover any smells I dislike. [Granted, I prefer nag champa, but it is a scent I like]
Why else do you think there is a serious amount of money spent on pot pourri, scented candles, air fresheners and other scent agents? People want to modify their surroundings to make them pleasant.
I made the film, The Teaching Rocks, Kinnomaagewaplong. It took 16 years to make. to clear the record, I will soon be publishing INTO THE STONE. I made the film, and wrote the book as a result of the wildly speculative "scientific" information above.
This article illustrates why I would never go to Wikipedia for information.
yeah definitely Dan Brown can write on the true after events post Hitler's death and make this into movie. Looks like the Vatican is also involved with all the Hitler's art gallery and his sudden rising of Father Krespi image
agree , Romans cement use was due to the availability of volcanic dust , aluminum within the dust is responsible for the watertight effect, you are right saying Egypt and Peru should be set apart these construction were not done by humans , the technological level of hard rock cutting surpassed what we can do today , possibly aliens the best were in Puma Punku with fantastic craftsmanship
That's what I've been saying.
The reason that we can't understand how ancient people with no technology, machinery or even decent tools could have accomplished what they seem to have been able to do is very simple. They didn't do it. They occupied and used what was available to them from before a near extinction event occurred. Some of what they were able to use had become exposed by time and erosion. I think that long before that time the world population had grown way beyond what we currently think is possible for our planet to support. With the methods in use today there is simply not enough room for all of the housing, industry, and agriculture required to support a population of that size. The most important consideration to be able to support an extremely large population would be the ability to provide enough food. There is no way to work around the fact that agriculture requires sunlight and a reliable source of water. There needed to be a way to have enough room for all of the people and a way to ensure a reliable source for all of the food that was needed. Pyramids are the key to understanding how that problem was solved. In places where erosion has exposed them the visible evidence varies depending on how much has been exposed and eroded. In spite of that fact if you spend a little time comparing them they leave behind very identifiable "footprints" as they erode away. Evidence in this video suggests that a pyramid was an architectural support. The steps of a pyramid supported levels for habitation and industry below the surface. Other functions that appear to have been incorporated into their designs include control of networked irrigation and drainage systems and access to other levels. The methods in use at that time would solve many of the problems that we face today as well as other problems that we have not yet had to deal with. Terrible storms, flooding, droughts, fires, inadequate food production, expensive climate control, and high insurance costs from damages to name a few off the top of my head. If a surplus of water occurred, it would flow into the networked irrigation and drainage systems, be stored in above and below ground reservoirs, and used when needed. The worst damage that could occur would be localized crop damage from some types of storms. There appear to have been both dome shaped and long rows of surface structures that are eroding away, with interior divisions being exposed by wind and water erosion. There are places with erosion occurring by levels that are loaded with the type of "footprints" that pyramids leave behind, as well as fractures in the surface of the higher ground in the surrounding areas that lead to evidence of being artificially supported. Some of the most interesting places to examine are where it seems that one layer is eroding away and exposing another. Especially if the surface that is eroding away has features that do not appear to have been naturally formed.
Random thoughts: The longest North/South line at the bottom of the Pacific is 8 to 10 miles wide (So are the intersecting ones) and can be followed for 2,100 miles in a perfect line. The symmetry of some of the underwater mounds is amazing. Pick out a perfect looking 20 mile in diameter mound. If you anchor Google Earth's measuring tool in the right place you can go the same distance in any direction and be at almost exactly the same depth. The similarity of circular formations in different sizes on land is obvious, including the location of possible supports around the outside diameter in predictable locations. Evidence at Easter island and at Train rock (which follows Easter island in the video) appear to support that possibility. What is left at Stonehenge could be the center support structure of an ancient dome shaped building, there is another location that looks very similar to Stonehenge but has not been exposed. The material used for construction was not quarried, finished to size, and set in place, it was poured. Today the binding agents are separating from the sedimentary material and being carried to lower levels by the flow of water. There are similarities between the large statues at Easter island and columns found in ancient ruins that could mean that the natives of Easter island carved existing ruins there to make the statues. It is very likely that Ankor Wat was created out of what was left of an eroding pyramid. There are pyramids in Australia. The evidence of ancient East/West irrigation channels around the Okavango delta in South Africa covers approximately 500 by 700 miles. What can be seen at Gobekli Tepe appears to support the possibility of habitation below the agriculture. Machu Picchu is just a small example of that type of evidence. We've wondered why we can't find evidence of what hit the ground in Crater national park but never wondered how it could blast a square hole in the ground. I suspect our near extinction event may have been similar to what happened at Tunguska in 1908, but on a much larger scale. Large enough to fracture the Earths crust, push part of it down into the molten core, and tilt the Earths axis.
https://vimeo.com/user12206452/videos
From my research I have concluded several aspects of the pyramids that indicate the largest has some features that embrace lost technologies. Several scientist have suggested the largest structure, having closed channels below the base, may have utilized water from tidal forces produced by the Nile. What the resulting forces or energies are anyone can only guess at. Another oddity, the eastern slope is not flat, but angles inward at the center axis. This suggest a focusing of radiation, presumably, light. At one time the pyramid was covered in white wash consisting of quartz and formica. This would have made the structure reflect the sun when directly overhead, to the horizon. The slight angling would intensify this effect. It is also said that the capstone was covered in gold. One observing this would see a what appears as a fiery monument, all the way to the horizon. Perhaps this why it is called a pyramid, Pry=fire, amid=amidst
I believe the pyramids at Giza were built long before the Egyptians came to that land. Historians try to explain them as burial chambers even though no evidence supports such claims. They also try to claim the "bent" and "step" pyramids were first attempts at constructing that culminated in the three large edifices on the plateau. This is a blatant lie. No one seems to explain how the structures suddenly appeared in the Forth Dynasty (26133-2498 BCE ) but the builders had no idea how to build them in the Third Dynasty, then completely lost the art again in the Fifth! Actually, the structures were found buried beneath the sands during the Fourth Dynasty! Egyptian Kings then claimed them as burial chambers and attempted to build more but failed, resulting the step and bent ones. These were the last efforts, not the first
The mercury lake in the Chinese tomb was the first thing that I thought of when I read about this. I've seen some sculptures from South America that look Asian in facial features, leading me to speculate about contact between these cultures.
“…."It is beyond anything we anticipated for that time."….
In other words, “we don’t have a clue”. We just guess!
He was in class that day.
In a word the ancients were more ADVANCED than we are today. Mainstream archaeology still clings to its linear advancement meme. Civilization and humanity are cyclical; rising to heights and being destroyed by natural cataclysm. Get over it ‘scientists’ you’ll never know how the Inca built those walls until you use the technology they used, and stop all this rubbing and fitting nonsense.
It’s MonSatan!
Anyone familiar with the ark, or the lamp of the tabernacle already knows they were found in Tut's tomb. Photos available, and images on temple walls also illustrate the Tabernacle lamp.
He was a "Kheperuu" which is the way they spelt "Khaberu" which are the people from the Khaber River, the princesses of "Mitannu" that inter-married with the 18th dynasty.
Further, the land called "Israel" never existed, and there is no way that "Solomon" isn't Amenhotep III, it is his treasure found in Tut's tomb, hidden there by Hezekiya, the "Jewish king" known as Hezekiah. This land was Egypt during the years cited in article, ONLY. Amenhotep III was "Shalmanu" the "god of the city" of Urusalim. He is documented for receiving "Shalmani gifts" from vassals and worshupers while seated on his Urusalim/Jerusalem throne. Go to "lexiline" website for actual photos of the Ark, the Lamp of the Tabernacle (I saw it in Seattle in 2012 at Tut exhibit) and other utlems listed in the OT for confirmation.
The "Hebrews" were the Khaburs of Mitanni, who spoke Luwian, which is Levite. That is why the OT states the Levi is a tribe of the Hebrews. But it is a nice story for children to listen to, I suppose, if you like your children's head filled with fake history.
The Merneptah stele says JEZREEL, it does NOT say "Israel." How can I PROVE IT? Because Merneptah IS JEHOSEPHAT! WRITTEN AND DOCUMENTED ROYAL TITULARY, And Jehosephat/Merneptah laid waste to JEZREEL.
Of coarse their's money being found, just ask the History channel & all the private contractors!
Personally I do believe the Templar's/Romanic Khazars/Cabals of the Scottish Rite may have gone threw the trouble of hiding it - It's probable it's (TREASURES) sitting somewhere close to Israel by now or in a basement in the Vatican.
*This is off topic but speaking of basements of the Vatican some had said (a date back in 1963) that this huge demonic beast was conjured up but after a prayer of a bishop these plasma/liquid chains appeared & bound it - this came from a reliable source and wondering if it's still bound?!
I'm not trying to get mystic, just thought it to be strange, that's all.
*If someone knows more about this, well, just thought might have some hard copy's - back in 63 ritual (sacrificial) took place simultaneously in the basement of the Vatican & here in the state of Georgia.
Pages