All  

Moses Restored: The Oldest Religious Secret Never Told

ISBN-10: 
0995993610

It is an incredible time for history-lovers, Egypt-lovers, archaeology-lovers, and lovers of age-old mysteries that are on the verge of rediscovery. We have reached a point of historical convergence where artifacts, geography, inscriptions, memory and texts meet to reveal a greater truth and to solve one of the greatest mysteries of all time: Who was Moses? In a shocking revelation that could potentially upturn the archaeological and religious worlds, my first non-fiction historical book, Moses Restored, shows how the heretic pharaoh Akhenaten lived on to become one of the most influential people in history: Moses. The problem of Moses is daunting and timely, for according to the most recent scholarship he never existed. This stands directly opposite the religious belief that he was real. My book provides a solution to this paradox by using detailed analysis to show how he and Akhenaten were one and the same, as the pharaoh abandoned traditional Egyptian polytheism and introduced the first monotheism. I have integrated modern archaeology and Egyptology with the latest in Torah research, reviewing topics of family, death, magic, writing, law, memory, religion, and the Exodus. Woven throughout is a narrative story of Moses, putting readers directly into the mind of this religious revolutionary. There have been countless biographies on both men, but this is the first complete biography, from cradle to grave, of the first monotheist in history.

Comments

With respect, Moses was b ~1287/1286 BCE. Moses was (self-)exiled age 40 (~1247124/6 BCE). The Exodus happened according tobiblical and archaeological data 1207/06 (Black Stone of Merenptah). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Merneptah_Stele Merenptah died in 1203 BCE. Moses was age 80 at the time of the Exodus.

Merenptah and Horemheb A were the grandsons of Raamses II the Great. This irrefutable fact is shown in the massive painted genealogical chart in Raamses II the Great's Tomb. Merenptah ruled the conjoint Upper/Lower Nile, while Horemheb A ruled over the Nile Delta. It is Horemheb A (with firstborn son Horemheb B) who is the Pharaoh of the Exodus, and his lost son Horemheb B.

Egyptology puts the 18th and 19th dynasties as linear, whereas the real truths of the whole 1295, 1292 period of taking back Egypt from the Hyksos and other invaders in the 1600s, had the cousins of Khaemwaset of the northern Nile Delta Amenhoteps/Tutmoses and southern Upper Nile Raamses as colinear. In fact, they warred against each other, and you can see who died on each side and their times.

As being colinear, it is Amenhoteps Aye who dies (or killed) by the Raameside Horemheb A, who then establishes himself over the Nile Delta. This entirely shortens down the entire "longevity" of Egyptian history, and now accurately restored actual history and timelines to that period of time.

Aye dies in those days before Horemheb conquests the Nile Delta. Aye ruled ~4 years. Tutanhkamon ruled ~9 years. Ankhenaton ruled ~17 years. Those years post-Ankhenaton are 13 years. 1207/1206 + 13 = 1220/1219. Ankhenaton then would have ruled ~1237/1236 - 1220/1219 BCE. Moses (General Tutmoses) would be 43/42 - 26/25 years old.

It is Horemheb who CORECTLY abdicates and gives in old age the Nile Delta to the grandson of Merenptah, Raamses ... who then and only then was their a single Egyptian pharaonic dynasty over the land. This error of Egyptologists has massively (and deliberately ?) bungled the history and dynasties of Egypt Nile Delta and the Upper/Lower Nile of Kmet.

It is said that Moses (Tutmoses) was an Egyptian General, and that he fought many and great battles, before his biblical mentions of returning back to his Israelite heritage, and his 40 year (self-)exile to Midyan (northern Saudi) Arabia and that of modern day Petra, Jordan. It would be the death of Raamses II the Great, that became the sending messaage to Moses to go back and liberate the Israelites. Raamses II died in 1213 BCE.

Moses is not Anhkenaton, however, it is entirely possible (and strongly accepted) that Moses did take from the Amarna era, and its contacts with the Midyan-Petra region adjoining the Nile Delta, such religious precents, as to what will eventually become the Israelite religion (of the Old Testament Torah).

Moses is not Ankhenaton, but the purified Egyptian religion IS the spinoff religion of the Israelites.

Є лише жидівська сатанинськса тоталітарна програма-ідеологія, придумана сатанистами-левітами. І більше нісого. А люди з розумом вивчають об'єктивну археологію і правдиву історію. Правда, ілюмінатська зграя блокує поширення правдивих знань і цькує чесних дослідників.

There is only the Jewish satanic totalitarian program-ideology invented by the Levitical Satanists. And more than a nose. And people intelligently study objective archeology and true history. However, the Illuminati gang blocks the spread of true knowledge and harasses honest researchers.

Not sure whether you are agreeing with me ... or shooting cocaine up your nose. People yapping their mouth about all the jewish cabal are just as much sock puppets to the puppet masters.

What I have said is validated in time and place. Ankhenaton is NOT Moses. I did give credit that Moses did convert this Egyptian faith into the Israelite religion.

Let it go - otherwise your are just trolling and not worth guvno.

Moses is over 100 years before Akhenaten.
Exodus is 1453 BCE, when Moses was 80.
Therefore he lived 1533 - 1413 BCE.
Joshua led the assault on Jericho in 1413 BCE and a burnt plank was carbon dated from there at 1410 BCE.
Akhenaten receives entreaties from Canaanite cities begging for military aid to counter the raiding Habiru.
Freud wrote a book saying Moses was Akhenaten and he was as wrong about that as he was about everything else!

I doubt this dating and, mostly, for one reason: The Genesis story of Josef does not make sense withour Akh’naten – no earlier Pharao would have empoyed foreigners to oust the priests of Thebes/Karnak from their position in the state. The recent findings about the city of Aten on the left bank of the Nile may indicate such a beginning by Amunhotep III, but the rushed exit fro Aten to Amarna seems to indicate that Akh’naten had to rush that move – the priests were not idle! And losing their position of power over the food of the country would have been a good reason for open rebellion – or under-cover war.   - By the way,Freud did not claim any identity of Mosis and Akh’naten, but indicated -as I presumed- that Mosis was a Prince of the house.      As for the Habiru, we may have to take in here the Genesis chapter 34 and the Genocide in Shehem, and that the name Hab’ru, Hebrew indicates a wild past – including Josef not going to Egypt as slave but as slave-merchant, selling all the girls and women of Shehem, after the slaughter of all males. The colorfull frock fits even in: A decoy to explain Josef’s absence – without letting Jacob know about the slave-trade: He had been furious about his sons’ deed. On the other hand, these women would have been a danger for all children of Jacob’s tribe: the Habiru.

 

JbAten

Why is that when articles like these are written, it seems as though great lengths are taken to mislead the fact that these ancient civilizations were black civilizations. Let's not forget that when the Greeks invaded Egypt, instead of the conquerers forcing their way of life on the conquered, the Greeks adopted many of the Egyptian customs and philosophies and made them their own. The Pyramids had already been built, Algebra had already been invented, the wheel had already been in use, and Astronomy was already an area of intense study.

As to Moses. He went to Egypt to escape persecution of the Romans in Isreal and it is stated he went to Egypt in order to blend in with the Egyptians as to not be discovered. Well, if Moses were a person of Caucasian descent, he would have been spotted in 10 minutes in the hot, stifling desert heat.

I'm not writing this as a racist rant of any sort. I'm simply writing this comment as a reminder that Blacks have a long rich history long before Caucasians left central Asia for Europe. Notice I differentiate between Black and African. Not all Blacks are Africans as noted by the Aborigines of Australia or the Indians of India.

No "ancient Greeks" existed. As well as "Ancient Greece". There is absolutely NO MENTION about them and this country! The Greeks are mentioned, and they are the inhabitants of Greece - today's southern Ukraine, whose gods were Ell (Apollo) and Lada. No "Greeks" invaded Egypt, went there as liberators, Arians, at that time - the Hyksos. Arians are an ethnic group, inhabitants of a country that used to have one of the names - Aratta, which is Ariana, Aratta, now Ukraine. The core of which stretched from the Oder to the Don, the Caucasus. By the way, all Caucasian peoples are aggressive newcomers from the east. The Caucasus, Colchis - is the original land of the Aryans, as further east.
Egypt, inhabited by white Aryans, was captured by the Jews. As a result of the onset of black masses.

Rome did not exist in 1300-1400 BCE.

Oy vey! The Romans came into existence following Romulus and Remus (tomb recently located in Rome) and that is 700 years after Exodus! What have you been reading????
There is no doubt that blacks get the short shrift when it comes to ancient times. But they are not helped when you write drivel like this!
The Dravidians moved westward into the Persian Gulf in 6200 BCE. They settled the west coast of the Gulf, later called Dilmun. They colonized the east side of the Gulf and were called Elamites. (The Torah is wrong when it states that Elam was a Semite). They were the ancestors of the Sumerians, fused with Caucasian tribes. Later, at the time of the Flood, they moved south westward and became the Ethiopians. And they were black. But Moses was not.

Oh man, what a mess!
The Arians (Azilians) migrated from Doggerland in 6200 BCE, down the Danube, through Hungary, to the Black Sea, then north around the Black Sea to the Volga, then south through the Caucasus and northern Mesopotamia to the Persian Gulf. There they joined with the black Dravidians and the black Elamites to build the first southern city, Eridu, in 5400 BCE. This culture is called Ubaidian. It precedes Sumer by 1400 years.

I have read my way through a number of the older texts of Mesopotamia and Egypt, and I came to the conclusion that the first part of the Thora had “borrowed” freely from hence. As for the Exodus, we have a nice blend between diverse historical eras and events streching, even unit just before the exodus, over nearly 200 years (namely involving the Thira-eruption to the much later exodus). As for (Tut)Mosis, an old royal name and, therefore, person of princely status, possibly military or diplomatic official, it seemed likely that he led a group (of uncetain size) of Follwers of Akhenaten’s early Monotheism, which survived his death only for as long ad Nerferuaten (Nefertiti), aka or in conjunction with Smenkharne, tried to maintain the Faith in the new Nile Delta capital city of AtAten (Amarna). Ak’nAten’s heir TutAnkhAmun was, obviously, already forced back under the priests of Karnak’s rule, changng his name back to the old Gods. General Ay only came into the crown for a very short time.                              The important point for the Exodus must, however, be the position of those “foreigners” in the long established ‘Civil Service’ and food supply/storage. These had been necessary from the time of the Great Building Projects (pyramids) which, basically, set the population up in 3 layers: Builders, Feeders, Service (army, priests, civil serce). This service had  been in the hands of the priests – and here, Akh’naten was in absolute need for an “Expat Civil Sevice” – possibly brought in with advice from Neferuaten from her Levatine origin area.                     So, we are not talking about the “freeing of foreign slaves” but the chasing out of unwanted Expatriate Middle Class civil servants and Egyptians who became a political danger to the old Faith and Powers. The Move away from Amarna towards Sinai , and “losing Rameses’ army by crossing the REED SEA arm of the Red Sea just in time for the snow melt on Sinai.        The rest is still interesting, and I would put my little ‘monograph’ in here – BUT I only recently found out that I need to correct and insert a good portion, first giving a good patt of the start of Monotheism AND THE FIRST MOVE AWAY FROM KARNAK TO AMUNHOTEP III and Tiide, father and mother of Akh’nAten: The new Capital city “Aten” was built on the West bank of the Nile, near the two “Singing Monolith” statues of the two royals – and, as the new excavations show, “LEFT IN A DEFINITE HURRY – even with bread in the oven – which must have been Akh’nAten’s final Great Decision (New state, capital, and civil service), out of the reach of the priests.

I’ll complete my little book (in German), and I must grant it to old Siegmund Freud that I got some good hints from him (also in view of the “Hibaru/Hib’ru” robbers from the desert – which does not sound unlike the earlier bad events of Shehem, see Genesis 34), but also from some other sides (e.g. the earlier knowledge of El/Elohim to people of ElBeth, the said Reid Sea, also making sense in old Aramaic). – In any case: This story is, by far, not finished.

Dr. J. Boost

JbAten

Many of these comments are unfounded, as well as their replies.

Using (for a scale) the biblical timeline, Joseph was sold into the Nile Delta HYKSOS (non-Egyptians) in the middle of the 1300s BCE.  It was ~19 years later that the Israelites came into the NILE DELTA OF THE HYKSOS.  They DID NOT move into the (united) Lower and Upper Egypt OF THE EGYPTIANS.

The Hyksos were confronted by the clan of Khaemwaset in the 1295, 1292 BCE, and eventually overcame and then took the rulership of the whole of Egypt.  The Raamesides ruled the united Lower and Upper Egypt, while the Amenhoteps (cousins) ruled the Nile Delta.

In (dated geologically) the Thera volcno island explosion occured in 1620 BCE.  It was this time period that the whole Mediterranean area was destroyed by volcanic ash and lahar, and Mediterranean tsunami.  The Europeans were also displaced, and all of these peoples were part of the refugee times of the Hyksos, Sea Peoples, Hapiru, and others who moved into the Nile Delta region.  The Nile Delta region IS NOT PART of the Lower Egypt realm - and never was - The Nile Delta is also NOT Lower Egypt.  It is Abraham and his father's family that moved from Europe (not India) into the Mideast and Canaan.  The Ur of the Chaldees is Europe of the Celts.  The Israelites are caucasian, not Indi-Asain.

It is Ankhenaton aka Amenhotep IV who as the ruler of the Nile Delta Amenhotep rulership, move DID NOT MOVE FROM THEBES to Amarna/Aten.  The rulership was in the Nile Delta since the 1295, 1292 BCE period.

The whole Egyptian timeline is BS - as the one singular statement that Rameses was given the land of the Nile Delta.  They then funk up the whole timeline in making what IS 2 cousins dynaties ruling the land, into a stretched out linear timeline.  Absolute lies.  Both dynasties were collateral timelines, which shortens up much of the whole Egyptian history.

It is Pharaoh Ay of the Nile Delta who has the daughter who marries Horemheb (called in Ramesses II's tomb-painted genealogies) Hor "A".  Ay dies (murdered?) and Horemheb takes over the rulership of the Nile Delta.  It is his brother Merenptah who rules the united Lower and Upper Egyptian lands.  Both of these grandsons, are the only surviving descendants of Ramesses II the Great.  This is the start of the enslavement (and minimum wage occupation labor force) of the Nile Delta population.  The Israelites were not the only people overthrown and enslaved into a governmental work force - all of the previous Hyksos, Sea Peoples, other Hapiru/Hebrews were also enslaved.  They WERE NOT slaves for 400 years - this is another lie within the Hebrew religion.  AT MOST, they were enslaved for ~89-92 years.

It is now validly dated that the (Velikovsky) rogue planet Venus flew by in multiple events in the 1207/1206 BCE period.  This is the date of the Exodus.  The Black Obelisk memorial attributed to Merenptah states that they were "glad" to have gotten RID of these Israelites.  The Exodus Pharaoh was Horemheb "A".  It is Hor "B" or Horemheb "B", the only and first son of Horemheb A is the one son who died at the time of the Exodus.  This is also painted in the Ramesses' tomb genealogies.  The biblical story DOES NOT state that the Exodus Pharaoh was drowned in the Red Sea - it only states that his army was drowned - as accurately shown in the Cecil B. De Mille's The Exodus movie.  Horemheb lived down to ~1187 BCE, when "HE !!!" gave the Nile Delta into the rulership of the then united Lower and Upper Egypt to Ramesses IV, the grandson of Merenptah.  Here is the whole problem to a BS archaeologist and historian who erred saying that Ramesses I was the receiver, when in reality it was Ramesses IV who received the Nile Delta.  One vast muck up - for sure !

So many lies from archaelogists, historians, and religion that it is an entire muck load of BS to unravel after 40 years of researching this tangled web of BS.

Amenhotep IV was living in and ruling in the Nile Delta, not Thebes.  Such Amon priests becoming prominent with the start of the Amenhotep dynasty rulership in 1295, 1292 BCE who banished during Anhkenaton's time.  Moving the capitol from the OLD HYKSOS CAPITOL, makes a statement that Egypt was an Egyptian land, not of foreign occupation anymore.  Tel Amarna and Aten were built to prove that.  And if there was any consideration of the Amon priesthood causing further political-religious overlordship of the Nile Delta lands from Thebes - it was then that Ankhenaton pushed back and ousted them.  There was the Nile Delta dynasty of the Amenhoteps (who were not sub-Pharaohs to the Ramessides and Amon priesthood) - and the united Lower and Upper Egypt dynasty of the Ramessides and Amon priests.

Only with the union of the Nile Delta Amenhoteps (by Horemheb) with the Lower and Upper Egypt
 of Ramesses IV was there now truly once again a totally UNITED EGYPT, since the times of the pre-1620 BCE period.  The Nile Delta from ~1620- ~1187 BCE was under foreign occupation, then Amenhotep dynasty, until re-united.

Moses was (said to be) 80 years old at the Exodus 1207/1206 BCE.  This makes Moses born in 1287/1286 BCE.  This was during that overthrow period of the Amenhoteps and the Hyksos, and the start of the 1295, 1292-1206/1026 period of hardship.  Here is the true story of Moses and his timeline.  Moses and Anhkenaton were not the same person.  Moses was banished in ~1247/1246 BCE, staying in the Petra region of Jordan and the Midyan area of the northern Saudi peninsula.

The Israelites lived under the rulership of Anhkenaton and his singular god religion in those 1250s period.  It is the Israelites (those Levite Cohen priests - who intermarried with these Aten priests) who became the format for an exclusive one god religion that was eventually banished, and all efforts at destroying the history of this religion.  This is why one can clearly see that ancient Egyptian religion underneath all the symbols of Judaism and Christianity.  The Book of Psalms of David is both King David - but the even more ancient psalms of THOTH.  David is a Hebrew name of the Egyptian god THOTH.  David-DvD-DwD-TwT-ThwTh-THOTH.

Moses was brought up in the Amenhotep pharaoh royal household.  There is strong conjection that Moses' (adoptive) mother was actually his Israelite aunt, who had married the Amenhotep Pharaoh - thus the deception of sister Miriamne, the aunt - and Moses.

These are the more clear and concise statements about this period - and who was who, and what was what.

As to the Romans and Greeks, it is the Greek-Egyptian historian Manetho (Amenhotep) who writes that a portion of the Judaics (Zara-ites) left with a colony, ~150 years before the Exodus, 1357/1356 BCE.  It is this group who founded the many neo-Grecian tribal-cities of Troy and Athens and elsewhere.  The Trojan group was destroyed by the Greeks, and they became many of the refugee migrations into Rome, Britain of Brutus, and western Europe.  All of these events are way before the rise of the Kings of Rome and the Roman Empire. 

Register to become part of our active community, get updates, receive a monthly newsletter, and enjoy the benefits and rewards of our member point system OR just post your comment below as a Guest.