New research challenges a previous view that humans got to America via this area, where an ice-free corridor existed during the last ice age.

Textbook Story of How Humans Populated America is Biologically Unviable, Study Finds

Using ancient DNA, researchers have created a unique picture of how a prehistoric migration route evolved over thousands of years – revealing that it could not have been used by the first people to enter the Americas, as traditionally thought.

The established theory about how Ice Age peoples first reached the present-day United States has been challenged by an unprecedented study which concludes that their supposed entry route was “biologically unviable”.

The first people to reach the Americas crossed via an ancient land bridge between Siberia and Alaska but then, according to conventional wisdom, had to wait until two huge ice sheets that covered what is now Canada started to recede, creating the so-called “ice-free corridor” which enabled them to move south.

In a new  study published in the journal Nature, however, an international team of researchers used ancient DNA extracted from a crucial pinch-point within this corridor to investigate how its ecosystem evolved as the glaciers began to retreat. They created a comprehensive picture showing how and when different flora and fauna emerged and the once ice-covered landscape became a viable passageway. No prehistoric reconstruction project like it has ever been attempted before.

The researchers conclude that while people may well have travelled this corridor after about 12,600 years ago, it would have been impassable earlier than that, as the corridor lacked crucial resources, such as wood for fuel and tools, and game animals which were essential to the hunter-gatherer lifestyle.

If this is true, then it means that the first Americans, who were present south of the ice sheets long before 12,600 years ago, must have made the journey south by another route. The study’s authors suggest that they probably migrated along the Pacific coast.

Opening of human migration routes in North America.

Opening of human migration routes in North America. Credit: Pedersen et al., 2016. Nature

Who these people were is still widely disputed. Archaeologists agree, however, that early inhabitants of the modern-day contiguous United States included the so-called “Clovis” culture, which first appear in the archaeological record over 13,000 years ago. And the new study argues that the ice-free corridor would have been completely impassable at that time. The research was led by Professor Eske Willerslev, an evolutionary geneticist in the Department of Zoology and Fellow of St John’s College, University of Cambridge, who also holds posts at the Centre for GeoGenetics, University of Copenhagen, and the Wellcome Sanger Institute in Cambridge.

“The bottom line is that even though the physical corridor was open by 13,000 years ago, it was several hundred years before it was possible to use it,” Willerslev said.

“That means that the first people entering what is now the US, Central and South America must have taken a different route. Whether you believe these people were Clovis, or someone else, they simply could not have come through the corridor, as long claimed.”

Mikkel Winther Pedersen, a PhD student at the Centre for GeoGenetics, University of Copenhagen, who conducted the molecular analysis, added: “The ice-free corridor was long considered the principal entry route for the first Americans. Our results reveal that it simply opened up too late for that to have been possible.”

The corridor is thought to have been about 1,500 kilometres long, and emerged east of the Rocky Mountains 13,000 years ago in present-day western Canada, as two great ice sheets – the Cordilleran and Laurentide, retreated.

On paper, this fits well with the argument that Clovis people were the first to disperse across the Americas. The first evidence for this culture, which is named after distinctive stone tools found near Clovis, New Mexico, also dates from roughly the same time, although many archaeologists now believe that other people arrived earlier.

“What nobody has looked at is when the corridor became biologically viable,” Willerslev said. “When could they actually have survived the long and difficult journey through it?”

The conclusion reached by Willerslev and his colleagues is that the journey would have been impossible until about 12,600 years ago. Their research focused on a “bottleneck”, one of the last parts of the corridor to become ice-free, and now partly covered by Charlie Lake in British Columbia, and Spring Lake, Alberta – both part of Canada’s Peace River drainage basin.

The team gathered evidence including radiocarbon dates, pollen, macrofossils and DNA taken from lake sediment cores, which they obtained standing on the frozen lake surface during the winter season. Willerslev’s own PhD, 13 years ago, demonstrated that it is possible to extract ancient plant and mammalian DNA from sediments, as it contains preserved molecular fossils from substances such as tissue, urine, and faeces.

Mikkel W. Pedersen and colleague preparing for coring of the lake sediments.

Mikkel W. Pedersen and colleague preparing for coring of the lake sediments. Image provided by Mikkel Winther Pedersen, Centre for GeoGenetics, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen.

Having acquired the DNA, the group then applied a technique termed “shotgun sequencing”. “Instead of looking for specific pieces of DNA from individual species, we basically sequenced everything in there, from bacteria to animals,” Willerslev said. “It’s amazing what you can get out of this. We found evidence of fish, eagles, mammals and plants. It shows how effective this approach can be to reconstruct past environments.”

This approach allowed the team to see, with remarkable precision, how the bottleneck’s ecosystem developed. Crucially, it showed that before about 12,600 years ago, there were no plants, nor animals, in the corridor, meaning that humans passing through it would not have had the resources that were essential for their survival.

Around 12,600 years ago, steppe vegetation started to appear, followed quickly by animals such as bison, woolly mammoth, jackrabbits and voles. Importantly 11,500 years ago, the researchers identified a transition to a “parkland ecosystem” – a landscape densely populated by trees, as well as moose, elk and bald-headed eagles, which would have offered crucial resources for migrating humans.

Somewhere in between, the lakes in the area were populated by fish, including several identifiable species such as pike and perch. Finally, about 10,000 years ago, the area transitioned again, this time into boreal forest, characterised by spruce and pine.

The fact that Clovis was clearly present south of the corridor before 12,600 years ago means that they could not have travelled through it. David Meltzer, an archaeologist at Southern Methodist University and a co-author on the study, said: “There is compelling evidence that Clovis was preceded by an earlier and possibly separate population, but either way, the first people to reach the Americas in Ice Age times would have found the corridor itself impassable.”

“Most likely, you would say that the evidence points to their having travelled down the Pacific Coast,” Willerslev added. “That now seems the most likely scenario.”

The paper  Postglacial viability and colonization in North America's ice-free corridor  is published in the journal Nature on 10. August 2016. DOI: 10.1038/nature19085

​Top image: New research challenges a previous view that humans got to America via this area, where an ice-free corridor existed during the last ice age. Credit: Mikkel Winther Pedersen

The article ‘ Textbook Story of How Humans Populated America is Biologically Unviable, Study Finds’ was originally published by Cambridge University and has been republished under a Creative Commons license.


Once again Science is hampered by the premise that in over 700,000 years of Homo Erectus not one ever watched a Log float by and have the Intelligence to try and replicate this. Or that during numerous prior Interglacial warm periods not one Homo Erectus could have observed one of their major Food Sources, Migratory Waterfowl, pointing the way South flying to "Somewhere" and then followed them.

Could someone please explain why it was impossible for Man to "Float South" over this very lengthy time period and was completely dependent on "Land" to expand?

Where would the pike and perch have come from?

Fish using waterways to migrateis something different than plodding pedestrians treking over vast areas of frozen tundra. Apparently science refuses to give early man the possible credit that he may very well have come here by way of water. And probably did. But ‘science’ will continue to parrot it’s party line.

All day I have been trying to figure out why this is such a strong Consensus going back throughout history. Know what I think? I think that even as intelligent as are in current scientific community is there are still some deep rooted Primal Instincts to be cautious of Water or maybe even some deep set Superstitions in the subconscious resulting from early Myths, Spiritualties or Ancient Texts that cause the subconscious to automatically assume all Mankind throughout the ages were born with Hydrophobia. Kind of like the deep rooted fear of all Serpents this has been going on for a longtime Example:

2. If any one bring an accusation against a man, and the accused go to the river and leap into the river, if he sink in the river his accuser shall take possession of his house. But if the river prove that the accused is not guilty, and he escape unhurt, then he who had brought the accusation shall be put to death, while he who leaped into the river shall take possession of the house that had belonged to his accuser."~ Hammurabi's Code

Would you honor me with the time to speculate on what you think causes this common Consensus that is greatly harming the study of Historical fact? I'm pretty sure no one can ever prove this assumption, Yet it is unanimously accepted as Gospel.

Well, all the superstitions/religions aside. The problem is that mainstream archaeology and science in general refuse to acknowledge cyclical advancement when all over the globe we see evidence of advanced knowledge and technology which simply ceased at some time in the distant past only to begin again in the last 200 years, cycling back up.

Sailing the seas was understood LONG before Columbus got lost. The Romans sailed the seas. And they weren’t the first. The Piri Riis map from the 1500’s, shows the coastline antarctica deviod of ice (and topographically correct) and it was copied from much older source maps according to its author.

Somewhere around 12K years ago there was a major cataclysm which wiped out a lot of the worlds population. It also erased the knowledge those people had. There are ancient Chinese anchors on the seabed off the coast of California. A “round” earth wasn’t heresy before the rise of the current round of superstition/religions.




Register to become part of our active community, get updates, receive a monthly newsletter, and enjoy the benefits and rewards of our member point system OR just post your comment below as a Guest.

Next article