Store Banner Mobile

Store Banner Mobile

The Stone Age’ (1882-1885), detail of a painting by Viktor M. Vasnetsov.

Ancient DNA Sheds Light on the Mysterious Origins of the First Scandinavians


Jan Apel /The Conversation

Tracking the migration of humans isn’t easy, but genetics is helping us uncover new information at breathtaking speed. We know that our species originated in Africa and likely reached Europe from the southeast no later than 42,000 years ago. During the last ice age some 33,000-20,000 years ago, when a permanent ice sheet covered northern and parts of central Europe, modern humans in southwest Europe were isolated from groups further to the east.

When the ice sheet retreated, some of these hunter gatherers eventually colonised Scandinavia from the south about 11,700 years ago, making it one of the last areas of Europe to be inhabited. But exactly who these individuals were and how they got there has remained a puzzle for researchers. Now we have sequenced the genomes of seven hunter gatherers, dated to be 9,500-6,000 years old, to find out.

Artist’s impression of a blue-eyed hunter gatherer.

Artist’s impression of a blue-eyed hunter gatherer. (PELOPANTON / CSIC )

One of the reasons the origins of the first Scandinavians is so enigmatic is a major shift in stone tool technology that appeared soon after they got there. This new technology seemed to have had an origin in eastern Europe and it has been an open question how it reached Scandinavia.

Early Migration

Our interdisciplinary research team combined genetic and archaeological data with reconstructions of the ice sheets to investigate the earliest people of the Scandinavian peninsula. We extracted DNA for sequencing from bones and teeth of the seven individuals from the Norwegian Atlantic coast and the Baltic islands of Gotland and Stora Karlsö.

We then compared the genomic data with the genetic variation of contemporary hunter gatherers from other parts of Europe. To our surprise, hunter gatherers from the Norwegian Atlantic coast were genetically more similar to contemporaneous populations from east of the Baltic Sea, while hunter gatherers from what is Sweden today were genetically more similar to those from central and western Europe. One could say that – in Scandinavia at that time – the geographic west was the genetic east and vice versa.

This contradiction between genetics and geography can only be explained by two main migrations into Scandinavia. It would have started with an initial pulse from the south – modern day Denmark and Germany – that took place just after 11,700 years ago. Then there would have been an additional migration from the northeast, following the Atlantic coast in northern Finland and Norway becoming free of ice.

Artist’s impression of the last ice age.

Artist’s impression of the last ice age. (CC BY-SA 4.0)

These results, published in the PLOS Biology, agree with archaeological observations that the earliest occurrences of the new stone tool technology in Scandinavia were recorded in Finland, northwest Russia and Norway – dating to about 10,300 years ago. This kind of technology only appeared in southern Sweden and Denmark later on.

Blue Eyes, Blonde Hair

Knowing the genomes of these hunter gatherer groups also allowed us to look deeper into the population dynamics in stone age Scandinavia. One consequence of the two groups mixing was a surprisingly large number of genetic variants in Scandinavian hunter gatherers. These groups were genetically more diverse than the groups that lived in central, western and southern Europe at the same time. That is in stark contrast to the pattern we see today where more genetic variation is found in southern Europe and less in the north.

Axe, fish hook and other stone tools from the earliest Scandinavians, found in a cave on Gotland.

Axe, fish hook and other stone tools from the earliest Scandinavians, found in a cave on Gotland. Jan Apel, Author provided

The two groups that came to Scandinavia were originally genetically quite different, and displayed distinct physical appearances. The people from the south had blue eyes and relatively dark skin. The people from the northeast, on the other hand, had a variation of eye colours and pale skin.

Originally, humans are a species from warmer climates closer to the equator and we mainly cope with challenging environments with specific behaviour and technology. This includes making fires, clothes and specialised hunting equipment. However, in the long term there is also potential for adaptation through genetic changes.

For example, we found that genetic variants associated with light skin and eye pigmentation were carried, on average, in greater frequency among Scandinavian hunter gatherers than their ancestors from other parts of Europe. Scientists believe that light skin pigmentation helps people better absorb sunlight and synthesise vitamin D from it.

That suggests that local adaptation to the high-latitude climate associated with low levels of sunlight and low temperatures took place in Scandinavia after these groups arrived. In fact, this is in agreement with the worldwide pattern of pigmentation decreasing with distance to the equator.

Modern people of northern Europe trace relatively little genetic ancestry back to the early Scandinavians studied by us. That’s because several later migrations have changed the Scandinavian gene pool over time. We know that migrations during the later stone age, the bronze age and historical times have brought new genetic material as well as novel technologies, cultures and languages.

‘At the hunter-gatherers.’

‘At the hunter-gatherers.’ (Hans Splinter/CC BY ND 2.0)

The picture is similarly complex in other parts of the world. Hopefully it won’t be long before genetics helps us work out the detailed picture of exactly how humans have spread across the world since we first emerged.

Ancient DNA Origins

Top Image: ‘The Stone Age’ (1882-1885), detail of a painting by Viktor M. Vasnetsov. Source: Public Domain

The article ‘Ancient DNA Sheds Light on the Mysterious Origins of the First Scandinaviansby Jan Apel was originally published on The Conversation and has republished under a Creative Commons license.



I have had my dna testing done and I am 100% European with 0 from Africa so I do not believe every one came from there.

Dan's Mark or Danmark is the tribe of Dan

This article is a bit flawed. The lost landmass, Doggerland, between Brittain and Denmark isn't mentioned. Today Doggerland is 100 meters under the seawater, of the North Sea. Around to 6.000 years ago it was a paradise-land populated by humans. The humans who survived the climate changes and the tsunami, most also be the emigrants who colonized Scandinavia and northern Brittain.

I would tend to agree with ANDREAS OST and GUILLAUMÉ above. I had my DNA tested. And as being a direct descendant (both maternal and paternal) of the same Scandinavians above found ZERO trace of anything Africa related. Traces were found of Mid-Eastern and Mediterranean, which would make entirely sense having olive colored skin. Other small traces were found of the British Isles / Irish. The ONLY way, I was told, to have that type of DNA makeup is to be Viking / Norseman descendant.

Well, I got past the afro-centric myth that man came out of africa. But then "artists interpretation" of ----. not scholar, not scientist. OH no an artist. Could not find any stained glass windows? So as any serious person, I quit reading there. I would like to see articles valid enough to read & contemplate.


ancient-origins's picture


This is the Ancient Origins team, and here is our mission: “To inspire open-minded learning about our past for the betterment of our future through the sharing of research, education, and knowledge”.

At Ancient Origins we believe that one of... Read More

Next article