All  

Store Banner Mobile

Store Banner Mobile

Here you can navigate quickly through all comments made in any article sorted by date/time.

  • Reply to: Mediterranean Tsunami Could Have Been the Inspiration for the Biblical Story of Moses Parting the Waters   8 years 7 months ago
    Comment Author: Tom Carberry

    In his opus magnum, Ages in Chaos, Velikovsky made the best case, in my opinion, of the time and circumstances of the Exodus. Velikovsky argued that the Exodus occurred during a massive natural catastrophe that destroyed Egyptian civilization and led to the rule of the Hyksos or Amu, who invaded from the Arabian deserts as the Hebrew slaves fled Egypt.

    Velikovsky uses in part ancient Egyptian manuscripts, such as the papyrus Ipuwer, which has plagues identical to the Bible's and in the same order, and refers to an invasion from the east and the destruction of Egyptian civilization.

    As to the "parting" of the Red Sea, Velikovsky argues that a classical tsunami situation occurred during massive earthquakes. The sea receded as the Hebrews went past, but as the Egyptian army came by, the tsunami came roaring in from the sea.

    Virtually all astronomers have accepted Velikovsky's theories, without admitting it even once. The earth went through a series of terrible worldwide catastrophes caused by close encounters with other planets.

    But mainstream science cannot openly admit it, because thousands of careers depend on not admitting it.

    No other human document contains more provable historical data than the Bible, or what many call the Old Testament. Every year we find more and more archaeological evidence of biblical events.

    But the move to secularism in the 1700s and 1800s, which has continued to this day, has led to a total rejection of the Bible as history, when in fact it provides the most accurate history of all.

    So because archaeologists got all of the timeline of Egyptian history wrong by using Manetho's lists as brought to use by Josepus Flavius and Josephus Africanus as well as Eusebius, the decided the Bible had no truth to it, because the period of judges has no mention of Egypt and the Hebrew slaves could not have fled Egypt during strong kings.

    But in fact if, as Velikovsky argued, the Hyksos ruled in Egypt during the time of the judges, the Hebrews had nothing to fear from the non-existent Egyptian military etc.

    But thousands of academic careers depend on not believing anything Velikovsky had to say, in many different areas of academia.

  • Reply to: Viking Chief Tore Hund and his successful resistance against Christian conversion   8 years 7 months ago
    Comment Author: Drewbie

    Mark Chapter 3

    23 And he called them unto him, and said unto them in parables, How can Satan cast out Satan?

    24 And if a kingdom be divided against itself, that kingdom cannot stand.

    25 And if a house be divided against itself, that house cannot stand.

    26 And if Satan rise up against himself, and be divided, he cannot stand, but hath an end.

    27 No man can enter into a strong man's house, and spoil his goods, except he will first bind the strong man; and then he will spoil his house.

    28 Verily I say unto you, All sins shall be forgiven unto the sons of men, and blasphemies wherewith soever they shall blaspheme:

    29 But he that shall blaspheme against the Holy Ghost hath never forgiveness, but is in danger of eternal damnation.

    30 Because they said, He hath an unclean spirit.

    31 There came then his brethren and his mother, and, standing without, sent unto him, calling him.

    32 And the multitude sat about him, and they said unto him, Behold, thy mother and thy brethren without seek for thee.

    33 And he answered them, saying, Who is my mother, or my brethren?

    34 And he looked round about on them which sat about him, and said, Behold my mother and my brethren!

    35 For whosoever shall do the will of God, the same is my brother, and my sister, and mother.

    You stated that you are a devout follower of Jesus, but yet you attack other people you clearly seem to think are Christians (even though by their actions they CLEARLY are not) One can only presume that you must be catholic if you consider the roman organization to actually be Christian. But still, who are you trying to please or convince?

    Have a nice day.

  • Reply to: 1,200-Year-Old Telephone, Amazing Invention of the Ancient Chimu Civilization   8 years 7 months ago
    Comment Author: BlogDog

    "may have dug" - That's some pretty weakass provenance. Not buying this one.

  • Reply to: Viking Chief Tore Hund and his successful resistance against Christian conversion   8 years 7 months ago
    Comment Author: Drewbie

    Mark if you were devout follower of Jesus then you would know exactly what He himself said if His gospels and the Sermon on the Mount like

    Matthew 5:44 "But I say to you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hurt you, and pray for them which despitefully use you and persecute you. 45 That you may be the children of your Father which is in heaven: for He maketh His sun to rise on the evil and on the good, and sendeth rain on the just, and on the unjust.

    Or

    Matthew 6:15 Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves. 16 Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles? 17 Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit: but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit. 18 A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit. 19 Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire. 20 Wherefore by their fruits ye know them. 21 Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.

    How about;

    John 15 King James Version (KJV)

    15:1 I am the true vine, and my Father is the husbandman. 2 Every branch in me that beareth not fruit he taketh away: and every branch that beareth fruit, he purgeth it, that it may bring forth more fruit. 3 Now ye are clean through the word which I have spoken unto you. 4 Abide in me, and I in you. As the branch cannot bear fruit of itself, except it abide in the vine; no more can ye, except ye abide in me. 5 I am the vine, ye are the branches: He that abideth in me, and I in him, the same bringeth forth much fruit: for without me ye can do nothing. 6 If a man abide not in me, he is cast forth as a branch, and is withered; and men gather them, and cast them into the fire, and they are burned. 7 If ye abide in me, and my words abide in you, ye shall ask what ye will, and it shall be done unto you. 8 Herein is my Father glorified, that ye bear much fruit; so shall ye be my disciples. 9 As the Father hath loved me, so have I loved you: continue ye in my love. 10 If ye keep my commandments, ye shall abide in my love; even as I have kept my Father's commandments, and abide in his love. 11 These things have I spoken unto you, that my joy might remain in you, and that your joy might be full. 12 This is my commandment, That ye love one another, as I have loved you. 13 Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends. 14 Ye are my friends, if ye do whatsoever I command you.
    15 Henceforth I call you not servants; for the servant knoweth not what his lord doeth: but I have called you friends; for all things that I have heard of my Father I have made known unto you. 16 Ye have not chosen me, but I have chosen you, and ordained you, that ye should go and bring forth fruit, and that your fruit should remain: that whatsoever ye shall ask of the Father in my name, he may give it you. 17 These things I command you, that ye love one another. 18 If the world hate you, ye know that it hated me before it hated you. 19 If ye were of the world, the world would love his own: but because ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you. 20 Remember the word that I said unto you, The servant is not greater than his lord. If they have persecuted me, they will also persecute you; if they have kept my saying, they will keep yours also.
    21 But all these things will they do unto you for my name's sake, because they know not him that sent me. 22 If I had not come and spoken unto them, they had not had sin: but now they have no cloak for their sin. 23 He that hateth me hateth my Father also. 24 If I had not done among them the works which none other man did, they had not had sin: but now have they both seen and hated both me and my Father. 25 But this cometh to pass, that the word might be fulfilled that is written in their law, They hated me without a cause. 26 But when the Comforter is come, whom I will send unto you from the Father, even the Spirit of truth, which proceedeth from the Father, he shall testify of me: 27 And ye also shall bear witness, because ye have been with me from the beginning.

    And:

    Colossians 3 King James Version (KJV)

    3:1 If ye then be risen with Christ, seek those things which are above, where Christ sitteth on the right hand of God. 2 Set your affection on things above, not on things on the earth. 3 For ye are dead, and your life is hid with Christ in God. 4 When Christ, who is our life, shall appear, then shall ye also appear with him in glory. 5 Mortify therefore your members which are upon the earth; fornication, uncleanness, inordinate affection, evil concupiscence, and covetousness, which is idolatry: 6 For which things' sake the wrath of God cometh on the children of disobedience: 7 In the which ye also walked some time, when ye lived in them. 8 But now ye also put off all these; anger, wrath, malice, blasphemy, filthy communication out of your mouth. 9 Lie not one to another, seeing that ye have put off the old man with his deeds; 10 And have put on the new man, which is renewed in knowledge after the image of him that created him: 11 Where there is neither Greek nor Jew, circumcision nor uncircumcision, Barbarian, Scythian, bond nor free: but Christ is all, and in all. 12 Put on therefore, as the elect of God, holy and beloved, bowels of mercies, kindness, humbleness of mind, meekness, longsuffering; 13 Forbearing one another, and forgiving one another, if any man have a quarrel against any: even as Christ forgave you, so also do ye. 14 And above all these things put on charity, which is the bond of perfectness. 15 And let the peace of God rule in your hearts, to the which also ye are called in one body; and be ye thankful. 16 Let the word of Christ dwell in you richly in all wisdom; teaching and admonishing one another in psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, singing with grace in your hearts to the Lord. 17 And whatsoever ye do in word or deed, do all in the name of the Lord Jesus, giving thanks to God and the Father by him.

    Finally;

    Philippians 2 King James Version (KJV)

    2:1 If there be therefore any consolation in Christ, if any comfort of love, if any fellowship of the Spirit, if any bowels and mercies, 2 Fulfil ye my joy, that ye be likeminded, having the same love, being of one accord, of one mind. 3 Let nothing be done through strife or vainglory; but in lowliness of mind let each esteem other better than themselves. 4 Look not every man on his own things, but every man also on the things of others. 5 Let this mind be in you, which was also in Christ Jesus: 6 Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God: 7 But made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men: 8 And being found in fashion as a man, he humbled himself, and became obedient unto death, even the death of the cross.
    9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: 10 That at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under the earth; 11 And that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

    You claim to be devout follower of Jesus and yet you still say that so called Christians committed the atrocities you want to blame them for. What it comes down to is that by the example of Jesus and Paul's words here, that these so called people weren't obeying what Jesus Himself and His apostle Paul CLEARLY STATED followers of Jesus would do, what actions they should take, to show they are His true followers.

    If you are really are a devout follower of Jesus then you would know this already. But as I quoted earlier, you will know them by their fruits. and your article is producing a fruit of division and causing others to hate Jesus. If you still say those that committed all this were still Christians then you are incorrect historically and have some type of agenda other then spreading the gospel of the good news of Jesus to a lost and dying world.

    So, why would a supposed devout follower of Christ produce fruit that only would damage who He is among those who don't know him? Well the proof is in the pudding so to speak. Your no devout follower of Jesus, otherwise you would work to produce the good fruit He spoke of and be doing the great commission He commanded His followers to do in Matthew 28 and Mark 16.

    How do you reconcile what you have written with the scriptural examples provided of Jesus Himself instructing on how true believers should act. Of course, you can't, but if you still want to claim to be follower of Jesus but don't obey what He commanded then your just like the people in your article you are trying so hard to convince how terrible people who claim to be Chrisitians were.

  • Reply to: Viking Chief Tore Hund and his successful resistance against Christian conversion   8 years 7 months ago
    Comment Author: Mark Miller

    I happen to be a devout follower of Jesus. But I detest what the Christians did in stamping out the indigenous religions of Europe and the New World.

    Sincerely,

    Mark Miller

  • Reply to: Viking Chief Tore Hund and his successful resistance against Christian conversion   8 years 7 months ago
    Comment Author: Drewbie G

    Clearly the author is unaware that up until recently the roman CATHOLIC Church never referred to itself as Christian, and historically I do agree that the roman church has committed many atrocities, it killed more biblical followers of Christ then they ever killed any other type of system, pagan or otherwise. Historically the Norse or Danes were the most brutal and bloodthirsty people that ransacked Europe and beyond, the reason the nation of Russia is called that is because the original name for the Vikings that came down the River Volga were known as the Rus, let alone what the danes did to Britton, Ireland and Normandy.

    The author obviously hates Jesus and wants to imply that all his followers are this way. Well he clearly knows nothing about the difference between Christianity and the roman organization that is correctly stated, nothing but paganism labeled with so called Christian names. Biblical followers of Jesus do not celebrate pagan holidays of easter, yule, sol ivictus (Christmas) Samhain, Beltane or any of those. So deal with your anger and personal issues Mr Miller and try to get history right. Even one of the sources you stated mention they weren't going to take Rome's god (which isn't the God of bible by far) but it also goes on to say that Olaf put an end to their Viking and Raiding, which was always the real reason for confrontations and Christianity had spread to parts of Europe including Ireland long before the roman organization began to order their vassal kings to force their organization on the rest of those in Europe. The same thing happened in Mexico with the Spanish Conquest.

    Read history, what do you think King Philip of Spain was doing when he and his jesuit coajutators kept trying to take over England for the pope, hence the famed Spanish Armada that was destroyed by a storm that kept England from being forced to convert back to the rcc. Same with the war of the Roses, the hundred years war, Bloody Mary, queen of Scots, etc. Guy Faulks, same same same.

    Unfortunately the author knows that the majority of it's readers won't take step one to actually research his garbage and will go around spouting this as truth to all of their friends and especially towards those they think are Christians.

    catholics are in a pagan cult, the rest of the bible believing followers of Jesus are fully aware of this. It's just the jesuit controlled education systems and media have been keeping that under wraps and most people won't research for themselves what they were told in school, they will just believe it as fact.

    Everyone is entitled to their opinion, but it's pretty simple really, true Christians follow what Jesus said to do, all a person has to do is read what he said for himself to see that the roman church is and never was in any way truly Christian in any way. So it would be more simple to say it was roman pagans that were forcing their political and financial system on every one else, and that is because the pope and that church had stated that they have all temporal power over everyone else on the planet, both mind, body and soul.

    Have a nice day.

  • Reply to: Ancient Humans Bred with Completely Unknown Species   8 years 7 months ago
    Comment Author: Alex1Rose

    Where does the whole construct about "Man from Africa" derive from other than Phsy-ops Capitalist destroy our identity ideology?
    Petralona Skull goes back 800 000 years.
    There is no link or trace of the Denisovans to Africa.
    Asian (Mongoloid) have Denisovan (Caucasoid) DNA at a time where there was no link to African Congoloid (West African) DNA
    Celebrate the fact that there are different groups that exist in the World (above three) & celebrate our differences & Traditions - less fighting, less war, less arms sales.
    If we're looking for commonality, let’s look for it in Morality & religion.
    Shocking how Scientists preserve Myths & Fairy tales formulated in the Ivory tower of knowledge aka Universities.

  • Reply to: Ancient Humans Bred with Completely Unknown Species   8 years 7 months ago
    Comment Author: Alex1Rose

    Where does the whole construct about "Man from Africa" derive from other than Phsy-ops Capitalist destroy our identity ideology?
    Petralona Skull goes back 800 000 years.
    There is no link or trace of the Denisovans to Africa.
    Asian (Mongoloid) have Denisovan (Caucasoid) DNA at a time where there was no link to African Congoloid (West African) DNA
    Celebrate the fact that there are different groups that exist in the World (above three) & celebrate our differences & Traditions - less fighting, less war, less arms sales.
    If we're looking for commonality, let’s look for it in Morality & religion.
    Shocking how Scientists preserve Myths & Fairy tales formulated in the Ivory tower of knowledge aka Universities.

  • Reply to: The Ancient Civilizations that Came Before: Self-Eradication, Or Natural Cataclysm? – Part I   8 years 7 months ago
    Comment Author: Marc Swanepoel

    How come Immanuel Velikovsky is not mentioned in the article? He wrote a number of books on this topic.

  • Reply to: Lost in the Mists of Time: The Ancient Sao Civilization in Central Africa   8 years 7 months ago
    Comment Author: Defiant

    I don't get the point of this article. The Sao seem like just a failed branch of humanity.

  • Reply to: What You Should Know About the Codex Gigas, aka the Devil’s Bible   8 years 7 months ago
    Comment Author: Maybedid

    Perhaps they keep the book locked up and hidden because they are worried that some superstitious lunatic might want to try to burn the priceless historical artifact. 

       
  • Reply to: History of the 12,000-Year-Old Swastika: Origin, Meaning and Symbolism   8 years 7 months ago
    Comment Author: chris_n65

    To truly understand the swastika, from where it came, with all the related people, understand Christian Identity.

    christogenea dot org

  • Reply to: The Ancient Civilizations that Came Before: Building on the Ruins of the Ancestors – Part 2   8 years 7 months ago
    Comment Author: Lee W. Forker

    I am very interested in your info of the past.

  • Reply to: The Ancient Civilizations that Came Before: Self-Eradication, Or Natural Cataclysm? – Part I   8 years 7 months ago
    Comment Author: William B Stoecker

    Even mainstream, conventional anthropologists and archaeologists are, grudgingly, pushing the time for human origins and the origins of civilization further and further back. They used to claim, based on nothing much, that we emerged as a species only perhaps 50,000 years ago; now most of them admit that we are over 200,000 years old (even that would provide enough time for civilizations to rise and fall several times. And as I pointed out in one of my many articles in "Atlantis Rising" magazine, there is no proof that Neanderthals or even Homo erectus were separate species from modern man.
    As for civilization, the conventional thinkers said it could only be five or six thousand years old. But then Jericho was dated at about 10,000 B.P., and woven fabrics and fired ceramics 28,000 years old were found in Czechoslovakia. And then they dated the carved stone monoliths at Gobekli Tepe...as old as Plato's Atlantis. We can expect this process to continue.

  • Reply to: Remembering the Barbary Slaves: White Slaves and North African Pirates   8 years 7 months ago
    Comment Author: Thom Husar

    It was actually 8 Marines and a good number of their Arab allies.

  • Reply to: Speakers at Science Congress says ancient India mastered advanced space flight thousands of years ago   8 years 7 months ago
    Comment Author: Ppp

    Idiot. The oldest civilization is Indian civilization. Vimanas are fact ancient Indians flew Aircrafts. Discovery in 1992 has proved Indian civilization is the oldest and the most advanced thatbis 54000 years old. Krishna was born 32000 years ago. U will not accept it because Indians have a brown skin.u whites have always envied India and are always jealous of India's accomplishments.

  • Reply to: The Ancient Civilizations that Came Before: Self-Eradication, Or Natural Cataclysm? – Part I   8 years 7 months ago
    Comment Author: Albert

    Where are the Dams, roadways, mines, other Earth modifications that would have accompanied any civilization? Not ONE

  • Reply to: Mediterranean Tsunami Could Have Been the Inspiration for the Biblical Story of Moses Parting the Waters   8 years 7 months ago
    Comment Author: PS

    Exactly, even Moses is a fabrication !

  • Reply to: What You Should Know About the Codex Gigas, aka the Devil’s Bible   8 years 7 months ago
    Comment Author: kyla

    Everybody says WOW!!! That is so AWESOME!!!!!! But not using their brains... Why do you guys think it is locked up & hidden, hu..??!! Why do you also think that the priest who wrote it has tears and regret. He was force by Lucifer to write that book. The world at the moment is So mess up. So much Hate, Abuse, Rape & Killings is going around. I truly think our Creator has got So much pain & tears in His eyes. What do you guys think will happen if it ends up in the wrong hands.? Nothing good can come from that Book.!! And the Person that says to me "Idiot, have a nice day" Thank you for thinking of me.. I hope you have a Wonderful day too...

  • Reply to: The Ancient Civilizations that Came Before: Building on the Ruins of the Ancestors – Part 2   8 years 7 months ago
    Comment Author: Laura Meyers

    Am especially interested in the subject below: High-Tech prehistoric civilization

Pages