The Twenty-First Dynasty were actually contemporaries of the Persians and Ptolemies, as anyone with an ounce of sense will realise after reading Velikovsky's Peoples of the Sea.
Considering that Nepal is way up Norh from the most southern known point of the historical trade route, I fail to see how a discovery in Mustang woud shed light on how far South it extended...
Those of us who research and write about fringe topics like UFOs, the paranormal, and lost civilizations like to think that the so-called "skeptics" who accept conventional views on everything without question are actually true believers in the status quo, and those of us on the fringe, who question conventional ideas, are the true skeptics. But if we are truly skeptical, we must also question and feel free to criticize fringe beliefs that do not seem to be based on facts or logic. An example would be the books of Zechariah Sitchin. Sitchin (7/11/1920-10/9/2010) was an economist, not an archaeologist, and most certainly not an astronomer. He taught himself to read ancient Sumerian, studied Sumerian myths, and constructed an elaborate theory devoid of logic or any real factual foundation.
Sitchin believed that, long ago, a large planet called "Nibiru" entered our Solar System from somewhere else and somehow went into a very erratic orbit around our Sun. It collided with a planet called "Tiamat" orbiting between Mars and Jupiter, creating the asteroid belt with roughly half of Tiamat and sending the other half closer to our Sun, where it magically went into a near circular orbit on the ecliptic, becoming our own world, Earth. Nibiru itself then settled into a highly eccentric orbit going out as far as just beyond the orbit of Neptune, and returning to the inner Solar System every 3,600 years.
An intelligent race somehow appeared on Nibiru, and visited Earth to mine gold, which they needed to somehow protect their atmosphere. Tiring of the work, they combined their DNA with that of Earth’s Homo erectus to produce Homo Sapiens, our own species, to be slaves for them. They created the Sumerian culture, and Sitchin believed that all human languages descended from Sumerian. He wrote in great detail about the history of the people of Nibiru, which he called the "twelfth planet," counting Pluto, the Sun, and our Moon as "planets," as did ancient astrologers. In his history he named their kings and princes and described their politics.
There are so many problems with this that it is hard to know where to begin. First of all, a planet entering our system from interstellar space would be unlikely to settle into a highly eccentric elliptical orbit; it would either be ejected from the Solar System or settle into a more nearly circular orbit. If, at its greatest distance from the Sun, it was closer than Pluto (as well as larger) it would long ago have been spotted by our astronomers, and also would noticeably perturb the orbit of Neptune. For an orbit to have a period of 3,600 years it would have to extend far, far beyond Pluto. If Earth was the result of the collision described by Sitchin it would have a much more eccentric orbit than it does.
Advanced life forms on planetary surfaces tend to exist only if the planet is in the "Goldilocks zone," not too hot or too cold. Even as far out as Jupiter, the moons of the outer planets are frozen solid on the surface; farther out, even hydrogen freezes solid. During most of its orbit, Nibiru would be so bitterly cold and dark that nothing could live, save perhaps extremophile bacteria far below the surface. Sitchin "explained" life on Nibiru by claiming that the planet is volcanically active, and, somehow, warmth seeps up from its interior. First of all, that would still not provide the sunlight needed for photosynthesis, which produces the oxygen needed for what we call advanced life forms. And volcanic heat does not seep up evenly, but in the form of deadly eruptions that devastate some areas and leave others cold and frozen. I have stood near the Yellowstone geysers, shaking with cold (don’t go there in winter). A very few years out of every 3,600 would not allow advanced surface life forms to develop.
Professional archaeologists and experts in ancient languages have criticized Sitchin’s translation as being inaccurate, and have been skeptical of his interpretation of Sumerian mythology. They have pointed out (and I agree with them) that it is dangerous to interpret myths and legends in too literal a fashion. For example, some Christians believe that Noah literally had two of every land animal species on Earth plus food for all on his tiny ark. I have the utmost respect for Christians, but this is simply impossible. Some also believe that the Biblical flood literally covered the entire Earth, including even today’s mountains... if so, where did the water come from, and where did it go, and why is there no geological evidence for such a flood? In fact, the Bible is essentially correct; there was a global flood giving rise to the Biblical legend and the legend of Atlantis. Sea levels were lower during the last major glaciation because so much water was locked up in the vast continental ice sheets; when the Earth warmed and they melted, sea levels rose some 400 feet, flooding the continental shelves which had been dry land but are now submerged. In like manner, many of the Sumerian legends (including the original flood legend) were probably inspired by real people and real events, but much has been lost in the telling and retelling and the copying and recopying, and even the original stories may have referred, not to beings from another planet, but to paranormal entities. Also, many of the stories may have been intended from the start to be parables or to have a symbolic meaning.
Sitchin considered Sumer to be Man’s oldest civilization, but the evidence shows Sumer to be less than six thousand years old. On the submerged continental shelves off the coast of India and elsewhere, small cities over nine thousand years old have been found; elsewhere, the walled city of Jericho is about ten thousand years old; and the massive, extensive, and elaborate stone structures of Gobekli Tepe in Turkey are nearly twelve thousand years old.
Sitchin believes that the people of Nibiru created our own species less than half a million years ago, by genetically altering Homo Erectus. In fact, there is no hard evidence that Homo erectus was a different species ancestral to modern Man; it is more likely that they were fully human and were merely a different race rather than a different species. I have discussed this at some length in an article in Atlantis Rising magazine. Homo erectus is well over a million years old, and researchers Michael Cremo and Richard Thompson have uncovered massive evidence that people like us were alive on this Earth at least one or two million years ago, and probably five or ten million years before the present. There is even some evidence for still earlier dates.
And then there is the matter of the gold the people of Nibiru allegedly wanted to somehow protect their atmosphere... from what? And how? None of this makes any sense. If these people wanted to mine gold it is almost certainly found in asteroids, particularly nickel-iron asteroids, rich in heavy metals. And, assuming that they could only get gold on Earth, why go to the trouble of creating a new species as slaves? If the people of Nibiru could travel about the Solar System, surely they could create machines to do the work. And what menaced Nibiru’s atmosphere, frozen solid out there in the cold darkness beyond Neptune? Did they want the gold to be suspended as dust for a reflective shield? Even if the atmosphere existed in gaseous form (it couldn’t), gold, being heavy and dense, would not stay suspended as easily and as long as many lighter (and more abundant) materials. From beyond Neptune our Sun would appear as little more than a very bright star; the last thing anyone on a dark and frozen world could possibly want would be to reflect the pathetically little sunlight and warmth available.
And Sitchin imagines that this advanced race could fly all over the Solar System with rockets, and even use them to transport massive amounts of gold from Earth to Nibiru. Rocket technology, especially the chemical rockets we are presently using, has very limited capabilities, which is why we have to use multiple stages to get large payloads even into orbit around Earth, let alone beyond. We can imagine some combination of nuclear powered scramjets and rockets and ion drive, but even this would be limited in its capabilities. Something on the order of gravity control would be needed to do the planetary mining and transport Sitchin describes.
People like Sitchin, along with people who believe in a hollow Earth, give all alternative thinkers a bad name. And, ironically, Sitchin is not guilty of being overly imaginative as much as not being imaginative enough. His too-literal interpretation of myths and his failure to conceive of anything better than primitive rocket technology all indicate a mind that in many ways was unable to break free from conventional ideas. And his belief that the gods described in myths could not have been paranormal entities but had to have been flesh and blood aliens in nuts and bolts spacecraft shows him to have been limited by the materialist mindset so prevalent in the modern world.
Sitchin and Nibiru:
Those of us who research and write about fringe topics like UFOs, the paranormal, and lost civilizations like to think that the so-called "skeptics" who accept conventional views on everything without question are actually true believers in the status quo, and those of us on the fringe, who question conventional ideas, are the true skeptics. But if we are truly skeptical, we must also question and feel free to criticize fringe beliefs that do not seem to be based on facts or logic. An example would be the books of Zechariah Sitchin. Sitchin (7/11/1920-10/9/2010) was an economist, not an archaeologist, and most certainly not an astronomer. He taught himself to read ancient Sumerian, studied Sumerian myths, and constructed an elaborate theory devoid of logic or any real factual foundation.
Sitchin believed that, long ago, a large planet called "Nibiru" entered our Solar System from somewhere else and somehow went into a very erratic orbit around our Sun. It collided with a planet called "Tiamat" orbiting between Mars and Jupiter, creating the asteroid belt with roughly half of Tiamat and sending the other half closer to our Sun, where it magically went into a near circular orbit on the ecliptic, becoming our own world, Earth. Nibiru itself then settled into a highly eccentric orbit going out as far as just beyond the orbit of Neptune, and returning to the inner Solar System every 3,600 years.
An intelligent race somehow appeared on Nibiru, and visited Earth to mine gold, which they needed to somehow protect their atmosphere. Tiring of the work, they combined their DNA with that of Earth’s Homo erectus to produce Homo Sapiens, our own species, to be slaves for them. They created the Sumerian culture, and Sitchin believed that all human languages descended from Sumerian. He wrote in great detail about the history of the people of Nibiru, which he called the "twelfth planet," counting Pluto, the Sun, and our Moon as "planets," as did ancient astrologers. In his history he named their kings and princes and described their politics.
There are so many problems with this that it is hard to know where to begin. First of all, a planet entering our system from interstellar space would be unlikely to settle into a highly eccentric elliptical orbit; it would either be ejected from the Solar System or settle into a more nearly circular orbit. If, at its greatest distance from the Sun, it was closer than Pluto (as well as larger) it would long ago have been spotted by our astronomers, and also would noticeably perturb the orbit of Neptune. For an orbit to have a period of 3,600 years it would have to extend far, far beyond Pluto. If Earth was the result of the collision described by Sitchin it would have a much more eccentric orbit than it does.
Advanced life forms on planetary surfaces tend to exist only if the planet is in the "Goldilocks zone," not too hot or too cold. Even as far out as Jupiter, the moons of the outer planets are frozen solid on the surface; farther out, even hydrogen freezes solid. During most of its orbit, Nibiru would be so bitterly cold and dark that nothing could live, save perhaps extremophile bacteria far below the surface. Sitchin "explained" life on Nibiru by claiming that the planet is volcanically active, and, somehow, warmth seeps up from its interior. First of all, that would still not provide the sunlight needed for photosynthesis, which produces the oxygen needed for what we call advanced life forms. And volcanic heat does not seep up evenly, but in the form of deadly eruptions that devastate some areas and leave others cold and frozen. I have stood near the Yellowstone geysers, shaking with cold (don’t go there in winter). A very few years out of every 3,600 would not allow advanced surface life forms to develop.
Professional archaeologists and experts in ancient languages have criticized Sitchin’s translation as being inaccurate, and have been skeptical of his interpretation of Sumerian mythology. They have pointed out (and I agree with them) that it is dangerous to interpret myths and legends in too literal a fashion. For example, some Christians believe that Noah literally had two of every land animal species on Earth plus food for all on his tiny ark. I have the utmost respect for Christians, but this is simply impossible. Some also believe that the Biblical flood literally covered the entire Earth, including even today’s mountains... if so, where did the water come from, and where did it go, and why is there no geological evidence for such a flood? In fact, the Bible is essentially correct; there was a global flood giving rise to the Biblical legend and the legend of Atlantis. Sea levels were lower during the last major glaciation because so much water was locked up in the vast continental ice sheets; when the Earth warmed and they melted, sea levels rose some 400 feet, flooding the continental shelves which had been dry land but are now submerged. In like manner, many of the Sumerian legends (including the original flood legend) were probably inspired by real people and real events, but much has been lost in the telling and retelling and the copying and recopying, and even the original stories may have referred, not to beings from another planet, but to paranormal entities. Also, many of the stories may have been intended from the start to be parables or to have a symbolic meaning.
Sitchin considered Sumer to be Man’s oldest civilization, but the evidence shows Sumer to be less than six thousand years old. On the submerged continental shelves off the coast of India and elsewhere, small cities over nine thousand years old have been found; elsewhere, the walled city of Jericho is about ten thousand years old; and the massive, extensive, and elaborate stone structures of Gobekli Tepe in Turkey are nearly twelve thousand years old.
Sitchin believes that the people of Nibiru created our own species less than half a million years ago, by genetically altering Homo Erectus. In fact, there is no hard evidence that Homo erectus was a different species ancestral to modern Man; it is more likely that they were fully human and were merely a different race rather than a different species. I have discussed this at some length in an article in Atlantis Rising magazine. Homo erectus is well over a million years old, and researchers Michael Cremo and Richard Thompson have uncovered massive evidence that people like us were alive on this Earth at least one or two million years ago, and probably five or ten million years before the present. There is even some evidence for still earlier dates.
And then there is the matter of the gold the people of Nibiru allegedly wanted to somehow protect their atmosphere... from what? And how? None of this makes any sense. If these people wanted to mine gold it is almost certainly found in asteroids, particularly nickel-iron asteroids, rich in heavy metals. And, assuming that they could only get gold on Earth, why go to the trouble of creating a new species as slaves? If the people of Nibiru could travel about the Solar System, surely they could create machines to do the work. And what menaced Nibiru’s atmosphere, frozen solid out there in the cold darkness beyond Neptune? Did they want the gold to be suspended as dust for a reflective shield? Even if the atmosphere existed in gaseous form (it couldn’t), gold, being heavy and dense, would not stay suspended as easily and as long as many lighter (and more abundant) materials. From beyond Neptune our Sun would appear as little more than a very bright star; the last thing anyone on a dark and frozen world could possibly want would be to reflect the pathetically little sunlight and warmth available.
And Sitchin imagines that this advanced race could fly all over the Solar System with rockets, and even use them to transport massive amounts of gold from Earth to Nibiru. Rocket technology, especially the chemical rockets we are presently using, has very limited capabilities, which is why we have to use multiple stages to get large payloads even into orbit around Earth, let alone beyond. We can imagine some combination of nuclear powered scramjets and rockets and ion drive, but even this would be limited in its capabilities. Something on the order of gravity control would be needed to do the planetary mining and transport Sitchin describes.
People like Sitchin, along with people who believe in a hollow Earth, give all alternative thinkers a bad name. And, ironically, Sitchin is not guilty of being overly imaginative as much as not being imaginative enough. His too-literal interpretation of myths and his failure to conceive of anything better than primitive rocket technology all indicate a mind that in many ways was unable to break free from conventional ideas. And his belief that the gods described in myths could not have been paranormal entities but had to have been flesh and blood aliens in nuts and bolts spacecraft shows him to have been limited by the materialist mindset so prevalent in the modern world.
Well Jesus (the name) didn't exist in history because that is an English interpretation of Yeshua, so you will not find that name in original texts unless they are translated. There is proof though by people of other beliefs and no beliefs, the difference being who He was. The cross is believed to have been salvaged and sent in pieces to plenty of places, so it does remain, aside for that, I don't know where the rest are. That shouldn't shock anyone as you will not see articles of ridicule from any capitol punishment kept as souvenirs, despite the large number of people who have been killed. As for God creating Him perhaps He wanted a full on experience of the human condition. It would be nice if the ones who rule came and lived like regular people do, and to do that honestly one needs to start at the beginning. Funny on the why don't He "fix" the problems, He could ask the same question, maybe that is why He created you. I can't argue on many of the churches or Preachers of the day, many are bad. Lack of proper research explains that and how they use this for control, just as it does some of the ones who have posted about history. It is funny how ignorance works on all sides. As for Him being a genocidal God, well one has to know real history, and I'm not talking about just the Bible who these things were. Don't worry though, they are coming back, everything travels in full circle. When they do though, religion will not be done away with, they have one to replace all religions, and it is mandatory. You will see it their way of die, and that isn't just from a Christian's perspective. To them we are just low class animals here to use as they wish, and too many of us anyway, so they will thin the herd. Right now, as in the past, your tax dollars have been spent killing and thinning out the herd. Do you support that? They know who God really is, they just hope you don't figure it out soon enough.
Don't blame the whole West...a lot of us also think things have been hidden, history purposefully lost or erased(the rock art in the Hypogeum on Malta, for example). The historical narrative is constantly being manipulated, by many factions(not just the West).
It sucks to see western academics be so condescending about the myths, legends, and traditions of cultures around the world, relegating them to highly exaggerated recounts of ancient events at best or fanciful fairy tales at worst.
But it shouldn't be surprising, and I don't think it's linked with racism or anything like that. After all, they do it to everyone's cultural myths, regardless of race, creed, nationality, etc.
And in fact, they did it to their own myths first.
Correct. One can visit South America and see giant skeletons the Smithsonian never got their fingers on. There are 150 years of numerous newspaper articles documenting the many discoveries of giant skeletons.... all over the USA. Science has always tried to stand against the Bible and an almighty creator. Discoveries are hidden, proof is hidden, scientific credentials lost when those few dare to speak the truth. The Rothschilds and their NWO luciferian agenda cannot come to fruition if the Bible is proven to be true. Hence the cabal controls it all for they write the rules and control the money. Sadly they try to keep us in their false matrix of lies and absurdities.
Amen= Egyptian god Amun Mish mash of wishful thinking mixed with infantile bondage of spiritual progress. Too sad. Wake up and smell the Gnosis. Respectfully-not. Dennis
Of course these colossal heads are not what they clearly represent, that would be insane. Certainly the first people that walk the earth were not travelers of the land or navigators of the the oceans. I think Negro people feared going anywhere outside the continent of Africa for all eternity. If it weren't for the great Spanish conquerers, the poor Africans may still be stuck in Africa today. Except for the fact that Africans (Moors) ruled Spain for close to eight hundred years before the Spanish even came to the
Americas. Whoops! Wonder were the Spanish learned how to navigate the oceans. Let's see, if the Olmec's were Africans and the Mayan and Inca cultures came later. My goodness, well one would surmise that the Olmec mixed into those cultures as well. Hmm... they may even have traveled to Northern America. No, you are probably right, that could never have happened. African's due to their color, probably couldn't accomplish such a feat.
The wolf pits, from which the village of Woolpit took its name, hint at the elemental root of the myth. Two children emerging from a wolf pit. One diagnosis is lycanthropy. The odds are, they were Flemish. Flanders sits next to France. When the floods came, the Flemish migrated to the British isle. The loup-garou came with them. That is why the children did not eat. Peasants would not have been offered meat. Then the childrens' canine senses, with heightened smell, detected in beans the nutrient and amino acid profiles, that approximate those of fresh meat. It even explains the boy's death here: https://youtu.be/Hcp_Y6tcTTk
Where is the evidence the West says? The evidence is in the scripts in which they could be built.
Now the Vimana Shastra was given by the WEST with their fake translations but even so the surviving scripts you could fully construct a chromatometer/monochromator.
WHERE WERE THE WESTERN INVENTIONS before 16th CENTURY?
The white man has simply destroyed many evidences and kept them in his labs, just like Rajiv Malhotra has said - some of them are kept in Harvard where he was invited in a special room
The so called jewish holocaust supposedly had 6 million.
Lenin, Stalin and Co. killed 20-30 million.
Mao killed 100,000,000+
There natives of the Western Hemisphere were not holocausted, they mostly died of illness, which wan't the fault of white boys like me, thank you very much.
"But giant floods fit the picture much better. Giant floods explain how marine fossils appear on top of mountains, while ice sheets can’t explain it.".
Nope, not giant floods, nor ice sheets. The mainstream explanation is plate tectonics, continental drift, upthrust and mountain building.
This was taken almost at random off the web:
"During the Palaeozoic and Mesozoic eras (65 million to 570 million years ago) the area that is now the Himalaya occupied the floor of the ancient Tethys Sea on the northern part of the Indian Plate of the Earth’s crust. The mountains were formed by the action of plate tectonics as the Indian Plate, moving north, slowly began to press against the stationary Asian land mass. As a result, the already shallow seabed rapidly folded and was raised into longitudinal ridges and valleys. The principal uplift occurred during the middle or late Tertiary period (12 million to 65 million years ago).
Although the phase of major upheaval of the Himalayas has passed, the Himalayas are still rising, albeit at a much slower rate. The Indian plate is continuously moving north at the rate of about 2 cms every year. Because of this reason the Himalayas are rising at the rate of about 5 millimeter per year. This means that the Himalayas are still geologically active and structurally unstable. For this reason, earthquakes are a frequent occurrence in the entire Himalayan region."
This statement makes me question much of the study:
“Alan Cooper, an evolutionary biologist who was a lead author of the study, said the only possible route was along the Pacific coast because the ice sheets were so thick and there was no way through farther inland.”
Mr. Cooper may have expertise in genetics, but his assertion of an ice barrier doesn’t hold up. Few people realize the entire idea of an “ice age” comes out of imagination and conjecture, not actual science or observation.
In the 19th century, researchers tried to explain how certain formations occurred and how certain thiings, like erratic boulders, appeared in different places.
Because at the time the concept of slow, steady evolution had gripped all of academia, they needed a slow process for carrying all this stuff and making these formations.
But giant floods fit the picture much better. Giant floods explain how marine fossils appear on top of mountains, while ice sheets can’t explain it.
Historical genetics separated from other sciences cannot work. Modern geneticists have made the same errors, I believe, as scientists in the past made about such claims regarding fingerprints and other forensic data. To this day you will hear people say that everyone has a unique fingerprint, although we have no way of testing this assumption and we know for a fact some people have fingerprints so similar that even FBI experts can’t tell them apart.
They have not created a genome database for the tribes in North America.This whole subject is about connecting with DNA . I am a member of the original Cherokee from Georgia,and Arkansas.I'm In contact with tribal leaders and tribal member,both State and Federal.The federally recognized tribes all have tribal ID and a C.D.I.B. card from the Bureau of Indian Affairs.Neither the Tribal Nations nor the B.I.A. have engaged in this DNA process,for the purpose of connecting to ancient ancestors.These DNA co's and their junk scientist , would have to verify each tribal member prior to taking samples.They have done this to a point in Europe and Africa and Asia.the native American Indian Nations all speak a different language,they look different and like the before mentioned countries,they would have to be sampled.This would be the same for this alleged group in S.America.If they went and tested everybody within a 200mi radius , from this area-they would find very similar DNA patterns.
"Additionally, it has also been pointed out that there are numerous differences between the Buache Map and the Piri Re’is Map, another map purported to illustrate the topography of an ice-free Antarctica."
You are making an awful lot of assumptions and guesses about how they came to their conclusions based entirely on what to you seems the most obvious and logical solution.....
Everything you just said may be totally irrelevant because your guesses and assumptions are very likely not correct.
Reminds me of the quote "chasing the bear". Even though there were some not so positive connotations to the bear or Author, still the fact that the constellations chase the bear seems to show a form of following, as in the disciples following the Lord. I appreciate your research!!
Here you can navigate quickly through all comments made in any article sorted by date/time.
Humans are most greedy and most violent creatures on earth for sure.
The Twenty-First Dynasty were actually contemporaries of the Persians and Ptolemies, as anyone with an ounce of sense will realise after reading Velikovsky's Peoples of the Sea.
Considering that Nepal is way up Norh from the most southern known point of the historical trade route, I fail to see how a discovery in Mustang woud shed light on how far South it extended...
Sitchin and Nibiru: Enough Already!
Those of us who research and write about fringe topics like UFOs, the paranormal, and lost civilizations like to think that the so-called "skeptics" who accept conventional views on everything without question are actually true believers in the status quo, and those of us on the fringe, who question conventional ideas, are the true skeptics. But if we are truly skeptical, we must also question and feel free to criticize fringe beliefs that do not seem to be based on facts or logic. An example would be the books of Zechariah Sitchin. Sitchin (7/11/1920-10/9/2010) was an economist, not an archaeologist, and most certainly not an astronomer. He taught himself to read ancient Sumerian, studied Sumerian myths, and constructed an elaborate theory devoid of logic or any real factual foundation.
Sitchin believed that, long ago, a large planet called "Nibiru" entered our Solar System from somewhere else and somehow went into a very erratic orbit around our Sun. It collided with a planet called "Tiamat" orbiting between Mars and Jupiter, creating the asteroid belt with roughly half of Tiamat and sending the other half closer to our Sun, where it magically went into a near circular orbit on the ecliptic, becoming our own world, Earth. Nibiru itself then settled into a highly eccentric orbit going out as far as just beyond the orbit of Neptune, and returning to the inner Solar System every 3,600 years.
An intelligent race somehow appeared on Nibiru, and visited Earth to mine gold, which they needed to somehow protect their atmosphere. Tiring of the work, they combined their DNA with that of Earth’s Homo erectus to produce Homo Sapiens, our own species, to be slaves for them. They created the Sumerian culture, and Sitchin believed that all human languages descended from Sumerian. He wrote in great detail about the history of the people of Nibiru, which he called the "twelfth planet," counting Pluto, the Sun, and our Moon as "planets," as did ancient astrologers. In his history he named their kings and princes and described their politics.
There are so many problems with this that it is hard to know where to begin. First of all, a planet entering our system from interstellar space would be unlikely to settle into a highly eccentric elliptical orbit; it would either be ejected from the Solar System or settle into a more nearly circular orbit. If, at its greatest distance from the Sun, it was closer than Pluto (as well as larger) it would long ago have been spotted by our astronomers, and also would noticeably perturb the orbit of Neptune. For an orbit to have a period of 3,600 years it would have to extend far, far beyond Pluto. If Earth was the result of the collision described by Sitchin it would have a much more eccentric orbit than it does.
Advanced life forms on planetary surfaces tend to exist only if the planet is in the "Goldilocks zone," not too hot or too cold. Even as far out as Jupiter, the moons of the outer planets are frozen solid on the surface; farther out, even hydrogen freezes solid. During most of its orbit, Nibiru would be so bitterly cold and dark that nothing could live, save perhaps extremophile bacteria far below the surface. Sitchin "explained" life on Nibiru by claiming that the planet is volcanically active, and, somehow, warmth seeps up from its interior. First of all, that would still not provide the sunlight needed for photosynthesis, which produces the oxygen needed for what we call advanced life forms. And volcanic heat does not seep up evenly, but in the form of deadly eruptions that devastate some areas and leave others cold and frozen. I have stood near the Yellowstone geysers, shaking with cold (don’t go there in winter). A very few years out of every 3,600 would not allow advanced surface life forms to develop.
Professional archaeologists and experts in ancient languages have criticized Sitchin’s translation as being inaccurate, and have been skeptical of his interpretation of Sumerian mythology. They have pointed out (and I agree with them) that it is dangerous to interpret myths and legends in too literal a fashion. For example, some Christians believe that Noah literally had two of every land animal species on Earth plus food for all on his tiny ark. I have the utmost respect for Christians, but this is simply impossible. Some also believe that the Biblical flood literally covered the entire Earth, including even today’s mountains... if so, where did the water come from, and where did it go, and why is there no geological evidence for such a flood? In fact, the Bible is essentially correct; there was a global flood giving rise to the Biblical legend and the legend of Atlantis. Sea levels were lower during the last major glaciation because so much water was locked up in the vast continental ice sheets; when the Earth warmed and they melted, sea levels rose some 400 feet, flooding the continental shelves which had been dry land but are now submerged. In like manner, many of the Sumerian legends (including the original flood legend) were probably inspired by real people and real events, but much has been lost in the telling and retelling and the copying and recopying, and even the original stories may have referred, not to beings from another planet, but to paranormal entities. Also, many of the stories may have been intended from the start to be parables or to have a symbolic meaning.
Sitchin considered Sumer to be Man’s oldest civilization, but the evidence shows Sumer to be less than six thousand years old. On the submerged continental shelves off the coast of India and elsewhere, small cities over nine thousand years old have been found; elsewhere, the walled city of Jericho is about ten thousand years old; and the massive, extensive, and elaborate stone structures of Gobekli Tepe in Turkey are nearly twelve thousand years old.
Sitchin believes that the people of Nibiru created our own species less than half a million years ago, by genetically altering Homo Erectus. In fact, there is no hard evidence that Homo erectus was a different species ancestral to modern Man; it is more likely that they were fully human and were merely a different race rather than a different species. I have discussed this at some length in an article in Atlantis Rising magazine. Homo erectus is well over a million years old, and researchers Michael Cremo and Richard Thompson have uncovered massive evidence that people like us were alive on this Earth at least one or two million years ago, and probably five or ten million years before the present. There is even some evidence for still earlier dates.
And then there is the matter of the gold the people of Nibiru allegedly wanted to somehow protect their atmosphere... from what? And how? None of this makes any sense. If these people wanted to mine gold it is almost certainly found in asteroids, particularly nickel-iron asteroids, rich in heavy metals. And, assuming that they could only get gold on Earth, why go to the trouble of creating a new species as slaves? If the people of Nibiru could travel about the Solar System, surely they could create machines to do the work. And what menaced Nibiru’s atmosphere, frozen solid out there in the cold darkness beyond Neptune? Did they want the gold to be suspended as dust for a reflective shield? Even if the atmosphere existed in gaseous form (it couldn’t), gold, being heavy and dense, would not stay suspended as easily and as long as many lighter (and more abundant) materials. From beyond Neptune our Sun would appear as little more than a very bright star; the last thing anyone on a dark and frozen world could possibly want would be to reflect the pathetically little sunlight and warmth available.
And Sitchin imagines that this advanced race could fly all over the Solar System with rockets, and even use them to transport massive amounts of gold from Earth to Nibiru. Rocket technology, especially the chemical rockets we are presently using, has very limited capabilities, which is why we have to use multiple stages to get large payloads even into orbit around Earth, let alone beyond. We can imagine some combination of nuclear powered scramjets and rockets and ion drive, but even this would be limited in its capabilities. Something on the order of gravity control would be needed to do the planetary mining and transport Sitchin describes.
People like Sitchin, along with people who believe in a hollow Earth, give all alternative thinkers a bad name. And, ironically, Sitchin is not guilty of being overly imaginative as much as not being imaginative enough. His too-literal interpretation of myths and his failure to conceive of anything better than primitive rocket technology all indicate a mind that in many ways was unable to break free from conventional ideas. And his belief that the gods described in myths could not have been paranormal entities but had to have been flesh and blood aliens in nuts and bolts spacecraft shows him to have been limited by the materialist mindset so prevalent in the modern world.
Sitchin and Nibiru:
Those of us who research and write about fringe topics like UFOs, the paranormal, and lost civilizations like to think that the so-called "skeptics" who accept conventional views on everything without question are actually true believers in the status quo, and those of us on the fringe, who question conventional ideas, are the true skeptics. But if we are truly skeptical, we must also question and feel free to criticize fringe beliefs that do not seem to be based on facts or logic. An example would be the books of Zechariah Sitchin. Sitchin (7/11/1920-10/9/2010) was an economist, not an archaeologist, and most certainly not an astronomer. He taught himself to read ancient Sumerian, studied Sumerian myths, and constructed an elaborate theory devoid of logic or any real factual foundation.
Sitchin believed that, long ago, a large planet called "Nibiru" entered our Solar System from somewhere else and somehow went into a very erratic orbit around our Sun. It collided with a planet called "Tiamat" orbiting between Mars and Jupiter, creating the asteroid belt with roughly half of Tiamat and sending the other half closer to our Sun, where it magically went into a near circular orbit on the ecliptic, becoming our own world, Earth. Nibiru itself then settled into a highly eccentric orbit going out as far as just beyond the orbit of Neptune, and returning to the inner Solar System every 3,600 years.
An intelligent race somehow appeared on Nibiru, and visited Earth to mine gold, which they needed to somehow protect their atmosphere. Tiring of the work, they combined their DNA with that of Earth’s Homo erectus to produce Homo Sapiens, our own species, to be slaves for them. They created the Sumerian culture, and Sitchin believed that all human languages descended from Sumerian. He wrote in great detail about the history of the people of Nibiru, which he called the "twelfth planet," counting Pluto, the Sun, and our Moon as "planets," as did ancient astrologers. In his history he named their kings and princes and described their politics.
There are so many problems with this that it is hard to know where to begin. First of all, a planet entering our system from interstellar space would be unlikely to settle into a highly eccentric elliptical orbit; it would either be ejected from the Solar System or settle into a more nearly circular orbit. If, at its greatest distance from the Sun, it was closer than Pluto (as well as larger) it would long ago have been spotted by our astronomers, and also would noticeably perturb the orbit of Neptune. For an orbit to have a period of 3,600 years it would have to extend far, far beyond Pluto. If Earth was the result of the collision described by Sitchin it would have a much more eccentric orbit than it does.
Advanced life forms on planetary surfaces tend to exist only if the planet is in the "Goldilocks zone," not too hot or too cold. Even as far out as Jupiter, the moons of the outer planets are frozen solid on the surface; farther out, even hydrogen freezes solid. During most of its orbit, Nibiru would be so bitterly cold and dark that nothing could live, save perhaps extremophile bacteria far below the surface. Sitchin "explained" life on Nibiru by claiming that the planet is volcanically active, and, somehow, warmth seeps up from its interior. First of all, that would still not provide the sunlight needed for photosynthesis, which produces the oxygen needed for what we call advanced life forms. And volcanic heat does not seep up evenly, but in the form of deadly eruptions that devastate some areas and leave others cold and frozen. I have stood near the Yellowstone geysers, shaking with cold (don’t go there in winter). A very few years out of every 3,600 would not allow advanced surface life forms to develop.
Professional archaeologists and experts in ancient languages have criticized Sitchin’s translation as being inaccurate, and have been skeptical of his interpretation of Sumerian mythology. They have pointed out (and I agree with them) that it is dangerous to interpret myths and legends in too literal a fashion. For example, some Christians believe that Noah literally had two of every land animal species on Earth plus food for all on his tiny ark. I have the utmost respect for Christians, but this is simply impossible. Some also believe that the Biblical flood literally covered the entire Earth, including even today’s mountains... if so, where did the water come from, and where did it go, and why is there no geological evidence for such a flood? In fact, the Bible is essentially correct; there was a global flood giving rise to the Biblical legend and the legend of Atlantis. Sea levels were lower during the last major glaciation because so much water was locked up in the vast continental ice sheets; when the Earth warmed and they melted, sea levels rose some 400 feet, flooding the continental shelves which had been dry land but are now submerged. In like manner, many of the Sumerian legends (including the original flood legend) were probably inspired by real people and real events, but much has been lost in the telling and retelling and the copying and recopying, and even the original stories may have referred, not to beings from another planet, but to paranormal entities. Also, many of the stories may have been intended from the start to be parables or to have a symbolic meaning.
Sitchin considered Sumer to be Man’s oldest civilization, but the evidence shows Sumer to be less than six thousand years old. On the submerged continental shelves off the coast of India and elsewhere, small cities over nine thousand years old have been found; elsewhere, the walled city of Jericho is about ten thousand years old; and the massive, extensive, and elaborate stone structures of Gobekli Tepe in Turkey are nearly twelve thousand years old.
Sitchin believes that the people of Nibiru created our own species less than half a million years ago, by genetically altering Homo Erectus. In fact, there is no hard evidence that Homo erectus was a different species ancestral to modern Man; it is more likely that they were fully human and were merely a different race rather than a different species. I have discussed this at some length in an article in Atlantis Rising magazine. Homo erectus is well over a million years old, and researchers Michael Cremo and Richard Thompson have uncovered massive evidence that people like us were alive on this Earth at least one or two million years ago, and probably five or ten million years before the present. There is even some evidence for still earlier dates.
And then there is the matter of the gold the people of Nibiru allegedly wanted to somehow protect their atmosphere... from what? And how? None of this makes any sense. If these people wanted to mine gold it is almost certainly found in asteroids, particularly nickel-iron asteroids, rich in heavy metals. And, assuming that they could only get gold on Earth, why go to the trouble of creating a new species as slaves? If the people of Nibiru could travel about the Solar System, surely they could create machines to do the work. And what menaced Nibiru’s atmosphere, frozen solid out there in the cold darkness beyond Neptune? Did they want the gold to be suspended as dust for a reflective shield? Even if the atmosphere existed in gaseous form (it couldn’t), gold, being heavy and dense, would not stay suspended as easily and as long as many lighter (and more abundant) materials. From beyond Neptune our Sun would appear as little more than a very bright star; the last thing anyone on a dark and frozen world could possibly want would be to reflect the pathetically little sunlight and warmth available.
And Sitchin imagines that this advanced race could fly all over the Solar System with rockets, and even use them to transport massive amounts of gold from Earth to Nibiru. Rocket technology, especially the chemical rockets we are presently using, has very limited capabilities, which is why we have to use multiple stages to get large payloads even into orbit around Earth, let alone beyond. We can imagine some combination of nuclear powered scramjets and rockets and ion drive, but even this would be limited in its capabilities. Something on the order of gravity control would be needed to do the planetary mining and transport Sitchin describes.
People like Sitchin, along with people who believe in a hollow Earth, give all alternative thinkers a bad name. And, ironically, Sitchin is not guilty of being overly imaginative as much as not being imaginative enough. His too-literal interpretation of myths and his failure to conceive of anything better than primitive rocket technology all indicate a mind that in many ways was unable to break free from conventional ideas. And his belief that the gods described in myths could not have been paranormal entities but had to have been flesh and blood aliens in nuts and bolts spacecraft shows him to have been limited by the materialist mindset so prevalent in the modern world.
Well Jesus (the name) didn't exist in history because that is an English interpretation of Yeshua, so you will not find that name in original texts unless they are translated. There is proof though by people of other beliefs and no beliefs, the difference being who He was. The cross is believed to have been salvaged and sent in pieces to plenty of places, so it does remain, aside for that, I don't know where the rest are. That shouldn't shock anyone as you will not see articles of ridicule from any capitol punishment kept as souvenirs, despite the large number of people who have been killed. As for God creating Him perhaps He wanted a full on experience of the human condition. It would be nice if the ones who rule came and lived like regular people do, and to do that honestly one needs to start at the beginning. Funny on the why don't He "fix" the problems, He could ask the same question, maybe that is why He created you. I can't argue on many of the churches or Preachers of the day, many are bad. Lack of proper research explains that and how they use this for control, just as it does some of the ones who have posted about history. It is funny how ignorance works on all sides. As for Him being a genocidal God, well one has to know real history, and I'm not talking about just the Bible who these things were. Don't worry though, they are coming back, everything travels in full circle. When they do though, religion will not be done away with, they have one to replace all religions, and it is mandatory. You will see it their way of die, and that isn't just from a Christian's perspective. To them we are just low class animals here to use as they wish, and too many of us anyway, so they will thin the herd. Right now, as in the past, your tax dollars have been spent killing and thinning out the herd. Do you support that? They know who God really is, they just hope you don't figure it out soon enough.
Don't blame the whole West...a lot of us also think things have been hidden, history purposefully lost or erased(the rock art in the Hypogeum on Malta, for example). The historical narrative is constantly being manipulated, by many factions(not just the West).
It sucks to see western academics be so condescending about the myths, legends, and traditions of cultures around the world, relegating them to highly exaggerated recounts of ancient events at best or fanciful fairy tales at worst.
But it shouldn't be surprising, and I don't think it's linked with racism or anything like that. After all, they do it to everyone's cultural myths, regardless of race, creed, nationality, etc.
And in fact, they did it to their own myths first.
Correct. One can visit South America and see giant skeletons the Smithsonian never got their fingers on. There are 150 years of numerous newspaper articles documenting the many discoveries of giant skeletons.... all over the USA. Science has always tried to stand against the Bible and an almighty creator. Discoveries are hidden, proof is hidden, scientific credentials lost when those few dare to speak the truth. The Rothschilds and their NWO luciferian agenda cannot come to fruition if the Bible is proven to be true. Hence the cabal controls it all for they write the rules and control the money. Sadly they try to keep us in their false matrix of lies and absurdities.
Amen= Egyptian god Amun Mish mash of wishful thinking mixed with infantile bondage of spiritual progress. Too sad. Wake up and smell the Gnosis. Respectfully-not. Dennis
Of course these colossal heads are not what they clearly represent, that would be insane. Certainly the first people that walk the earth were not travelers of the land or navigators of the the oceans. I think Negro people feared going anywhere outside the continent of Africa for all eternity. If it weren't for the great Spanish conquerers, the poor Africans may still be stuck in Africa today. Except for the fact that Africans (Moors) ruled Spain for close to eight hundred years before the Spanish even came to the
Americas. Whoops! Wonder were the Spanish learned how to navigate the oceans. Let's see, if the Olmec's were Africans and the Mayan and Inca cultures came later. My goodness, well one would surmise that the Olmec mixed into those cultures as well. Hmm... they may even have traveled to Northern America. No, you are probably right, that could never have happened. African's due to their color, probably couldn't accomplish such a feat.
The wolf pits, from which the village of Woolpit took its name, hint at the elemental root of the myth. Two children emerging from a wolf pit. One diagnosis is lycanthropy. The odds are, they were Flemish. Flanders sits next to France. When the floods came, the Flemish migrated to the British isle. The loup-garou came with them. That is why the children did not eat. Peasants would not have been offered meat. Then the childrens' canine senses, with heightened smell, detected in beans the nutrient and amino acid profiles, that approximate those of fresh meat. It even explains the boy's death here: https://youtu.be/Hcp_Y6tcTTk
Where is the evidence the West says? The evidence is in the scripts in which they could be built.
Now the Vimana Shastra was given by the WEST with their fake translations but even so the surviving scripts you could fully construct a chromatometer/monochromator.
WHERE WERE THE WESTERN INVENTIONS before 16th CENTURY?
The white man has simply destroyed many evidences and kept them in his labs, just like Rajiv Malhotra has said - some of them are kept in Harvard where he was invited in a special room
Carloman died in 771, not 711.
The so called jewish holocaust supposedly had 6 million.
Lenin, Stalin and Co. killed 20-30 million.
Mao killed 100,000,000+
There natives of the Western Hemisphere were not holocausted, they mostly died of illness, which wan't the fault of white boys like me, thank you very much.
"But giant floods fit the picture much better. Giant floods explain how marine fossils appear on top of mountains, while ice sheets can’t explain it.".
Nope, not giant floods, nor ice sheets. The mainstream explanation is plate tectonics, continental drift, upthrust and mountain building.
This was taken almost at random off the web:
"During the Palaeozoic and Mesozoic eras (65 million to 570 million years ago) the area that is now the Himalaya occupied the floor of the ancient Tethys Sea on the northern part of the Indian Plate of the Earth’s crust. The mountains were formed by the action of plate tectonics as the Indian Plate, moving north, slowly began to press against the stationary Asian land mass. As a result, the already shallow seabed rapidly folded and was raised into longitudinal ridges and valleys. The principal uplift occurred during the middle or late Tertiary period (12 million to 65 million years ago).
Although the phase of major upheaval of the Himalayas has passed, the Himalayas are still rising, albeit at a much slower rate. The Indian plate is continuously moving north at the rate of about 2 cms every year. Because of this reason the Himalayas are rising at the rate of about 5 millimeter per year. This means that the Himalayas are still geologically active and structurally unstable. For this reason, earthquakes are a frequent occurrence in the entire Himalayan region."
This statement makes me question much of the study:
“Alan Cooper, an evolutionary biologist who was a lead author of the study, said the only possible route was along the Pacific coast because the ice sheets were so thick and there was no way through farther inland.”
Mr. Cooper may have expertise in genetics, but his assertion of an ice barrier doesn’t hold up. Few people realize the entire idea of an “ice age” comes out of imagination and conjecture, not actual science or observation.
In the 19th century, researchers tried to explain how certain formations occurred and how certain thiings, like erratic boulders, appeared in different places.
Because at the time the concept of slow, steady evolution had gripped all of academia, they needed a slow process for carrying all this stuff and making these formations.
But giant floods fit the picture much better. Giant floods explain how marine fossils appear on top of mountains, while ice sheets can’t explain it.
Historical genetics separated from other sciences cannot work. Modern geneticists have made the same errors, I believe, as scientists in the past made about such claims regarding fingerprints and other forensic data. To this day you will hear people say that everyone has a unique fingerprint, although we have no way of testing this assumption and we know for a fact some people have fingerprints so similar that even FBI experts can’t tell them apart.
They have not created a genome database for the tribes in North America.This whole subject is about connecting with DNA . I am a member of the original Cherokee from Georgia,and Arkansas.I'm In contact with tribal leaders and tribal member,both State and Federal.The federally recognized tribes all have tribal ID and a C.D.I.B. card from the Bureau of Indian Affairs.Neither the Tribal Nations nor the B.I.A. have engaged in this DNA process,for the purpose of connecting to ancient ancestors.These DNA co's and their junk scientist , would have to verify each tribal member prior to taking samples.They have done this to a point in Europe and Africa and Asia.the native American Indian Nations all speak a different language,they look different and like the before mentioned countries,they would have to be sampled.This would be the same for this alleged group in S.America.If they went and tested everybody within a 200mi radius , from this area-they would find very similar DNA patterns.
From this article:
"Additionally, it has also been pointed out that there are numerous differences between the Buache Map and the Piri Re’is Map, another map purported to illustrate the topography of an ice-free Antarctica."
You are making an awful lot of assumptions and guesses about how they came to their conclusions based entirely on what to you seems the most obvious and logical solution.....
Everything you just said may be totally irrelevant because your guesses and assumptions are very likely not correct.
Reminds me of the quote "chasing the bear". Even though there were some not so positive connotations to the bear or Author, still the fact that the constellations chase the bear seems to show a form of following, as in the disciples following the Lord. I appreciate your research!!
This is originally piri reis's map. Not buaches
Pages