i saw my own doppelganger but as a reflection on the mirror and then infront of me leaving passing throught the wall. its been i think two weeks and iam so scared because its an omen of death.in that house i was leaving alone and now i already visited my family and i think i shouldnt go back to were i saw the doppelganger.can you help me?
Creations that "have never been seen before"? Their makers certainly saw what they made. These carvings were clearly meant to be seen and were seen. They were visited, observed, and *used*, likely for aesthetic and spiritual, as well as practical reasons.
The authors meant that they had not been seen by white anthropologists and tourists.
It's obvious he got his measurements wrong. Sutton says in his letter that, in answer to their question about his measurements of the skeletons, he uses the formula that the "femur bone is approximately one third of the total length". The femur bone is 26.74% of the total length of a person's skeleton, it is a standard ratio across all ethnic types. There is no evidence of a cover up here - it's standard for Journals to only accept submissions in correct formats, and they were clearly asking for supporting evidence from him ie. the photographs and allowing him time to provide it. At any rate, the article seems never to have been published, probably due to these sorts of basic errors. "Professor" Sutton is a google phantom, and seems never to have had any articles published at all. If anyone has links to genuine articles or the report of 1958, these should be provided here.
I take it that you are a strict adherent to blame whitey and someone who is quick to scream hypocrite when some one disagrees with you.
Relax, you suffer from white guilt.
Besides, like Aleksa, you probably believe the Jews wiped out the dinosaurs.
You do NOT want to join a MASONIC?SATANIC worshipping LODGE! CHRIST is the foundation stone that the builders=Masons rejected and their all seeing eye on the Egyptian pyramid and their Lightbearer is Lucifer! He bore the light at one time til iniquity was found n him. But CHRIST is the LIGHT! DR. Raymond E Capt says the Scotts are an Isrealite tribe and its in the Scottish Declaration of independence. My great great grandfather wasof the Anderson?Andrews Clan of the Scottish lowlands and my grand mother was Irish from County Cork Ieland of the Twohig and Ballard Clans. Keep searching Sister.
Many things are unexplained/unexplainable. That doesn't automatically mean by default that a magic invisible, all powerful spirit in the sky made them, that is Bronze Age thinking. There is more real evidence for aliens than there is for the Supergod. Humans have a great deal of trouble admitting to themselves, and saying, 'We don't know', especially 'educated' folks. If the DNA researchers are correct that our DNA has 'knowledge switches', and correct when they say some of them are "turned off", we don't know, and can't now. What we do know is that we don't know everything about DNA yet, so some of what we know now, may change. What I can say in favor of the scientific discipline is that they continue the pursuit of knowledge, unlike those who rest upon the unfounded claims of religion. As for my 60 some years of trying to learn, I have learned that the more I find out, the more I find out which I don't know. It seems that for every question I find an answer for, four or more questions pop up that need to be answered. Truth is a word I have necessarily eliminated from my vocabulary. Learning how to examine evidence has been a huge boon in advancing knowledge.
That's part of the whole problem! In research when it comes to origins and philosophy, things are a little murky. I have found two points of murkiness when it comes to Bible translations! And so have many others, but we are still considered to be a sort of underground, lol!
Don't forget the Old Testament of the Bible was penned in Hebrew, and the new in Greek (or actually parts may have been in Aramaic, a Hebrew dialect). And of course the Bibles we read have been translated into our own languages.
The first thing I noticed, research wise, was how there really is no "forever" in the Bible. More accurately, it is eon/aion, age and agelasting or ageduring. Okay, so if that is off by a bit, what else might be?
The first flaw, to my mind, was the less than logical ever popular theory of 'hell'. I say “ever popular” tongue in cheek, as I actually believe many believing folks do not believe in a hell. Verse 1 John 4:8 tells us "God is love". (All of it?) And the scriptures also throughout declare him to be "almighty". "With God nothing is impossible" .."love never fails.." Etc, etc.
I've been studying since 1979 (I've also had some pretty neat experiences). Every (assumed) reference to ‘hell’ is very easily refuted. First of all, it was “the liar” in the account of Adam and Eve, who said “surely you won’t… die..?” when offering the forbidden fruit of contradicting Yahweh. But Yahweh (God) said “dust you are.. And to dust shall you return..” So just how did we get to the point of collectively believing in the inherent immortality of humans? Or rather of their ‘immortal soul’? Which if some of God’s created children are to be ‘lost’ then there needs to be an explanation of where the immortal estranged ones from God must go and reside after this life. No problem! The pre-Christian beliefs of Babylon.. Egypt delivered levels of afterlife, and Greece, etc. why surely must be true! (Not.)
Even the Jerusalem city dump, called gehenna, was translated to read “hell”. In this dump was even disposed and burned, the bodies of criminals. Jesus said it was better one throw their hand into gehenna to be burned than it would be to offend “one of these little ones” (in context) “and they be cast into gehenna”. Of course it is translated to read “cast into hell”.
It’s written how Jesus “descended to the lower parts of the earth” and this is assumed to be a subterranean ‘hell’. But we can clearly see that from the heights of the heavens, he descended as low as to be in the dust of the grave. Perhaps this is why it also reads sort of like he ‘went to hell’ and preached to those who perished in Noah’s flood. But I think it reads more like he went “via the Spirit” and “preached to those who were waiting while the ark was being prepared”.
The Greek word (and idea) is “hades” the “place of the dead”. The place of the dead is still the grave, like it always was in the Old Testament and Hebrew! “Sheol” (the grave) where “all meet” and “oh, Yahweh, that you would hide me in sheol” (in these instances, hard to translate sheol into ‘hell’). “In sheol where there is neither thought nor doing”.
1 Timothy 4:10 says “God is the savior of all, especially of those believing”. Jesus said “if I am lifted up from the earth” (on the cross, an image strong enough to eventually pierce every psyche) “I will draw all to me” - John 12:32. “All things in heaven and earth are being gathered into Jesus” - Ephesians 1:10. “By Jesus, to reconcile all things to Himself, both in heaven and earth” - Colossians 1:20. I could go on and on. The two images in this post - http://gospel-truth4all.blogspot.com/2016/01/his-great-plan-of-salvation... may better explain it.
I figure God is life itself, the force and breath of.. And is also (surely?) perfect, aka, perfection. (Or He too would fade?) When he endowed thinking ability a whole new world (er tree) of possibilities came about, because with thinking ability, sooner or later, comes the ability to make choices. But to choose anything in thought, word, or deed other than he does, is to become imperfect, the opposite of life (and hence, also, life as we presently know it). So God built in the rescue “from the beginning/foundation”. (Note, to other believers - why, are there two resurrections?) Surely, Perfect makes no mistakes. Can lose nothing. Perfect also implies that the ‘end’ result of all this (human history) can only be the best one possible.
Hope you don’t mind my rambling on so.. Blessings! :)
People who believe these signs represent aircraft must avoid the issue of context for their views to be sustained. It's almost as if they don't know that hieroglyphics represent a spoken language that's governed by rules of syntax and grammar, like all languages are. You can't just insert random words into a sentence and have it make sense. If I say, "My girlfriend took me to the Apple Store and helicopter me an iPad for my birthday," that doesn't make sense. You expect a word like "purchased" or "bought" instead of "helicopter." The question that the aircraft believers can never answer is how the sentence reads that those signs occur within. Now if the sentence began with something like, "A strange object appeared in the sky..." that would support the aircraft theory. But if it's more along the lines of random words inserted, like "helicopter me an iPad," then it doesn't make sense. I'd like to see someone who believes these signs represent aircraft to read the full sentence and explain how the signs fit into it for a coherent meaning. They can't, because it doesn't make sense as aircraft within its context, which is a palimpsest of the names of Seti and Rameses. They seem to believe that because they can't read hieroglyphics, that no one else can either. Aircraft makes no sense within the context of the full inscription. It would be just random words inserted into an otherwise coherent meaning.
War it was and remains the main human activity , does not matter the means( not only weapons) of today's war. It is the financial industry war against the value of our work as everyday war.
Look at the raptor criminal activity named taxation just to make grow and maintain/ sustain the armada of official useless parasites structures !
This is WAR !
Sacrifice, human or otherwise, is not hard to fathom. It derives from religion. Most of the present leaders of ethnological religious research are of the opinion that animism, the belief in the ghosts and souls of the departed, is to be regarded as the first stage of religious consciousness in man. Primitive man's response, when he felt confronted with the ghosts with which his imagination peopled the world, was primarily fear. From this fear arose quite spontaneously the desire to secure the goodwill of these powers. It is, therefore, quite natural that primitive man should try to impress the spirits by concrete proofs of his veneration and submission, which took the form of offering and sacrifice to these imaginary powers. Sacrifice became the central point of all religious usages and festivities which festivities rested on a dependency of man upon a higher power which his own imagination had called into being and whose slave he had become. Inasmuch as sacrifice was offered ritualistically in a religious setting to secure protection from a greater power, it is clear that for the primitive mind religion became intergrown with the idea of might, of supernatural superiority, in a word, of rulership. Nor without reason do all advocates of the principle of authority trace its origin back to God. Thus we arrive at the foundations of every system of rulership and recognize that all politics is in the last instance religion, and as such tries to hold the spirit of man in the chains of dependency.
Totem, in your rational world where tunnels only exist where mined by modern hands, I presume you believe the Giza pyramids were just tombs. In spite of there being zero evidence of that. Simply because that's what a small group of people decided, to make sense of what they couldnt understand within their frame?
Here you can navigate quickly through all comments made in any article sorted by date/time.
i saw my own doppelganger but as a reflection on the mirror and then infront of me leaving passing throught the wall. its been i think two weeks and iam so scared because its an omen of death.in that house i was leaving alone and now i already visited my family and i think i shouldnt go back to were i saw the doppelganger.can you help me?
Creations that "have never been seen before"? Their makers certainly saw what they made. These carvings were clearly meant to be seen and were seen. They were visited, observed, and *used*, likely for aesthetic and spiritual, as well as practical reasons.
The authors meant that they had not been seen by white anthropologists and tourists.
It's obvious he got his measurements wrong. Sutton says in his letter that, in answer to their question about his measurements of the skeletons, he uses the formula that the "femur bone is approximately one third of the total length". The femur bone is 26.74% of the total length of a person's skeleton, it is a standard ratio across all ethnic types. There is no evidence of a cover up here - it's standard for Journals to only accept submissions in correct formats, and they were clearly asking for supporting evidence from him ie. the photographs and allowing him time to provide it. At any rate, the article seems never to have been published, probably due to these sorts of basic errors. "Professor" Sutton is a google phantom, and seems never to have had any articles published at all. If anyone has links to genuine articles or the report of 1958, these should be provided here.
Hello, wondering how wide the hole is in roof of vestibule ? And how high is hole off ground floor ?
Joe
If that comment was intended for me, it is entirely unfounded.
I am well aware of man's inhumanity to man, that said, none of that inhumanity to man is found in the narrative nor many of the comments.
You whine like a sore loser.
I take it that you are a strict adherent to blame whitey and someone who is quick to scream hypocrite when some one disagrees with you.
Relax, you suffer from white guilt.
Besides, like Aleksa, you probably believe the Jews wiped out the dinosaurs.
Lucy turned out to be a big hoax. So, to use it as an example is disingenuous.
Tracing my husband's family tree. I hope to find more information on Alexander White, 1842-1914, buried in St Regis Falls NY.
And what evidence do they have about Mary living there besides conjecture? Did they find any Asheroth poles?
"the liberal all purpose accusation, 'hypocrite'."
"white guilt"
All right, absolutely nothing else you have to say is worth giving any credence.
You do NOT want to join a MASONIC?SATANIC worshipping LODGE! CHRIST is the foundation stone that the builders=Masons rejected and their all seeing eye on the Egyptian pyramid and their Lightbearer is Lucifer! He bore the light at one time til iniquity was found n him. But CHRIST is the LIGHT! DR. Raymond E Capt says the Scotts are an Isrealite tribe and its in the Scottish Declaration of independence. My great great grandfather wasof the Anderson?Andrews Clan of the Scottish lowlands and my grand mother was Irish from County Cork Ieland of the Twohig and Ballard Clans. Keep searching Sister.
Many things are unexplained/unexplainable. That doesn't automatically mean by default that a magic invisible, all powerful spirit in the sky made them, that is Bronze Age thinking. There is more real evidence for aliens than there is for the Supergod. Humans have a great deal of trouble admitting to themselves, and saying, 'We don't know', especially 'educated' folks. If the DNA researchers are correct that our DNA has 'knowledge switches', and correct when they say some of them are "turned off", we don't know, and can't now. What we do know is that we don't know everything about DNA yet, so some of what we know now, may change. What I can say in favor of the scientific discipline is that they continue the pursuit of knowledge, unlike those who rest upon the unfounded claims of religion. As for my 60 some years of trying to learn, I have learned that the more I find out, the more I find out which I don't know. It seems that for every question I find an answer for, four or more questions pop up that need to be answered. Truth is a word I have necessarily eliminated from my vocabulary. Learning how to examine evidence has been a huge boon in advancing knowledge.
That's part of the whole problem! In research when it comes to origins and philosophy, things are a little murky. I have found two points of murkiness when it comes to Bible translations! And so have many others, but we are still considered to be a sort of underground, lol!
Don't forget the Old Testament of the Bible was penned in Hebrew, and the new in Greek (or actually parts may have been in Aramaic, a Hebrew dialect). And of course the Bibles we read have been translated into our own languages.
The first thing I noticed, research wise, was how there really is no "forever" in the Bible. More accurately, it is eon/aion, age and agelasting or ageduring. Okay, so if that is off by a bit, what else might be?
The first flaw, to my mind, was the less than logical ever popular theory of 'hell'. I say “ever popular” tongue in cheek, as I actually believe many believing folks do not believe in a hell. Verse 1 John 4:8 tells us "God is love". (All of it?) And the scriptures also throughout declare him to be "almighty". "With God nothing is impossible" .."love never fails.." Etc, etc.
I've been studying since 1979 (I've also had some pretty neat experiences). Every (assumed) reference to ‘hell’ is very easily refuted. First of all, it was “the liar” in the account of Adam and Eve, who said “surely you won’t… die..?” when offering the forbidden fruit of contradicting Yahweh. But Yahweh (God) said “dust you are.. And to dust shall you return..” So just how did we get to the point of collectively believing in the inherent immortality of humans? Or rather of their ‘immortal soul’? Which if some of God’s created children are to be ‘lost’ then there needs to be an explanation of where the immortal estranged ones from God must go and reside after this life. No problem! The pre-Christian beliefs of Babylon.. Egypt delivered levels of afterlife, and Greece, etc. why surely must be true! (Not.)
Even the Jerusalem city dump, called gehenna, was translated to read “hell”. In this dump was even disposed and burned, the bodies of criminals. Jesus said it was better one throw their hand into gehenna to be burned than it would be to offend “one of these little ones” (in context) “and they be cast into gehenna”. Of course it is translated to read “cast into hell”.
It’s written how Jesus “descended to the lower parts of the earth” and this is assumed to be a subterranean ‘hell’. But we can clearly see that from the heights of the heavens, he descended as low as to be in the dust of the grave. Perhaps this is why it also reads sort of like he ‘went to hell’ and preached to those who perished in Noah’s flood. But I think it reads more like he went “via the Spirit” and “preached to those who were waiting while the ark was being prepared”.
The Greek word (and idea) is “hades” the “place of the dead”. The place of the dead is still the grave, like it always was in the Old Testament and Hebrew! “Sheol” (the grave) where “all meet” and “oh, Yahweh, that you would hide me in sheol” (in these instances, hard to translate sheol into ‘hell’). “In sheol where there is neither thought nor doing”.
1 Timothy 4:10 says “God is the savior of all, especially of those believing”. Jesus said “if I am lifted up from the earth” (on the cross, an image strong enough to eventually pierce every psyche) “I will draw all to me” - John 12:32. “All things in heaven and earth are being gathered into Jesus” - Ephesians 1:10. “By Jesus, to reconcile all things to Himself, both in heaven and earth” - Colossians 1:20. I could go on and on. The two images in this post - http://gospel-truth4all.blogspot.com/2016/01/his-great-plan-of-salvation... may better explain it.
I figure God is life itself, the force and breath of.. And is also (surely?) perfect, aka, perfection. (Or He too would fade?) When he endowed thinking ability a whole new world (er tree) of possibilities came about, because with thinking ability, sooner or later, comes the ability to make choices. But to choose anything in thought, word, or deed other than he does, is to become imperfect, the opposite of life (and hence, also, life as we presently know it). So God built in the rescue “from the beginning/foundation”. (Note, to other believers - why, are there two resurrections?) Surely, Perfect makes no mistakes. Can lose nothing. Perfect also implies that the ‘end’ result of all this (human history) can only be the best one possible.
Hope you don’t mind my rambling on so.. Blessings! :)
People who believe these signs represent aircraft must avoid the issue of context for their views to be sustained. It's almost as if they don't know that hieroglyphics represent a spoken language that's governed by rules of syntax and grammar, like all languages are. You can't just insert random words into a sentence and have it make sense. If I say, "My girlfriend took me to the Apple Store and helicopter me an iPad for my birthday," that doesn't make sense. You expect a word like "purchased" or "bought" instead of "helicopter." The question that the aircraft believers can never answer is how the sentence reads that those signs occur within. Now if the sentence began with something like, "A strange object appeared in the sky..." that would support the aircraft theory. But if it's more along the lines of random words inserted, like "helicopter me an iPad," then it doesn't make sense. I'd like to see someone who believes these signs represent aircraft to read the full sentence and explain how the signs fit into it for a coherent meaning. They can't, because it doesn't make sense as aircraft within its context, which is a palimpsest of the names of Seti and Rameses. They seem to believe that because they can't read hieroglyphics, that no one else can either. Aircraft makes no sense within the context of the full inscription. It would be just random words inserted into an otherwise coherent meaning.
how can you say that if you cant spell claims right
Australia is not in Austronesia, Mike, linguistically or genetically. Check it out, eg on Wikipedia:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Austronesia
War it was and remains the main human activity , does not matter the means( not only weapons) of today's war. It is the financial industry war against the value of our work as everyday war.
Look at the raptor criminal activity named taxation just to make grow and maintain/ sustain the armada of official useless parasites structures !
This is WAR !
Sacrifice, human or otherwise, is not hard to fathom. It derives from religion. Most of the present leaders of ethnological religious research are of the opinion that animism, the belief in the ghosts and souls of the departed, is to be regarded as the first stage of religious consciousness in man. Primitive man's response, when he felt confronted with the ghosts with which his imagination peopled the world, was primarily fear. From this fear arose quite spontaneously the desire to secure the goodwill of these powers. It is, therefore, quite natural that primitive man should try to impress the spirits by concrete proofs of his veneration and submission, which took the form of offering and sacrifice to these imaginary powers. Sacrifice became the central point of all religious usages and festivities which festivities rested on a dependency of man upon a higher power which his own imagination had called into being and whose slave he had become. Inasmuch as sacrifice was offered ritualistically in a religious setting to secure protection from a greater power, it is clear that for the primitive mind religion became intergrown with the idea of might, of supernatural superiority, in a word, of rulership. Nor without reason do all advocates of the principle of authority trace its origin back to God. Thus we arrive at the foundations of every system of rulership and recognize that all politics is in the last instance religion, and as such tries to hold the spirit of man in the chains of dependency.
Totem, in your rational world where tunnels only exist where mined by modern hands, I presume you believe the Giza pyramids were just tombs. In spite of there being zero evidence of that. Simply because that's what a small group of people decided, to make sense of what they couldnt understand within their frame?
Pages