If as far back genetically they’ve gone in Africa is 45 hundred years, it would seem pretty much All the dogmatic cradle crap is speculation at best. There could never have been a first of anything...cat, dog, snake or man. There had to be at leaste 2...and if 2 why not 50, and why on the same continent?
The flea hasn’t “evolved”, even on a micro level, in 20 million years. Yet we’re supposed to believe man went from tossing turds at each other, hanging out in African trees, to populating the whole of the earth and landing on the moon in one or 2 million? (not to mention the earth has had to start over from several extinction events, a couple of which would have required restarts far more recently than 2 million years ago.)
“They” must sit on doughnuts to allow for breathing.
I would be extremely interested in reading your thesis on Loki, or at the very least a list of your references. I have a strong interest in learning all that I can - and many insights as well. triviumthink at gmail dot com is my email address.
I've seen a lot of the work I've done over the last 9 years showing up here and there with other peoples ideas about what it means. I don't personally feel that we have enough information to be sure of very much yet. See what you think.
Colavito styles himself a skeptic, but somehow his "skepticism" only faces one direction: away from the mainstream. Thus, I am skeptical of his skepticism, and suspect he is merely a shill for modern academic authority.
I completely agree, the jury is still out on much of this stuff.
The problem is, mainstream Egyptology insists that not only is the jury is not still out, but the judge made his ruling, the baliff emptied the courtroom, the lights were turned off, and everyone went home. Trial is over, no appeals, stfu or be found in contempt of court.
The stars have not noticably changed configuration in all that time, so the night sky was the same night sky then as now. Humans looking at it then would discern the same patterns as humans looking at it now. While that certainly isn't proof they had the same constellation groups as we do now, it is plenty of reason to leave open the possibility.
Also there is the fact that the origins of the constellation groups is unknown. The trail disappears into the mists of prehistory.
As for Giza having an over arching site-plan, I see the logic in your arguments, but that same logic works just as well assuming the entire complex was designed and built as one project as it does with assuming each monument was a separate construction.
Someone building a single giant pyramid will take into account all the problems such a project presents and act accordingly, as you said.
But someone building multiple giant pyramids with specific geometric relationships to each other would do the same thing.
Well, originally (in the late 1700s) the meter was defined as being some division of the distance from the equator to the north pole...like one ten-millionth the distance or thereabouts. Later the standard changed to a wavelength emitted by krypton, and eventually changed again to what it is today, the distance travelled by light in some tiny fraction of a second.
The overall length of the meter remained the same despite all the changes in the standards used to define it, so it remains a fraction of the distance from the equator to the north pole even if that isn't how we measure it anymore.
There is plenty of evidence that the architects of the large monuments at Giza had surveyed the earth themselves and used units based on divisions of earth measurements. So it doesn't seem too unlikely that they would have had something like the meter.
Also, as I recall, there was a pyramidion found on the Giza plateau that measured a meter in height, with a margin of error so tiny as to make it highly improbable it was merely coincidence.
Perhaps GOD is the embodiment of the universe itself. Coming into being with the creation of the big bang. Maybe every star instead of being intelligent it's self is just one of God's brain cells.
I’m stunned after reading this. I can’t believe authorities could sell off pieces of their historical past, let alone to an overseas company. Ireland is one of the most beautiful and spiritual places on this Earth – the people of Waterford/Ireland need to stop this early on or it will continue till all is lost and forgotten.
Ignorant moron. Iranians are very proud of their history, they would never even consider what you said. Why do you talk shit when you don't know what you're talking about? You're just as vile as those IS monkeys.
You are a typical Fox news slave.
Sorry but no matter where you stand in the climate debate you have to know that crap about the "6th extinction" is complete BS. The 5 historical mass extinctions that occurred were vast catastrophic events of unimaginable violence and devastation that wiped out tens of thousands of species in very short spans of time. The most recent mass extinction coinciding with the end of the last ice age, for instance, was so deadly to the megafauna that to match its destruction we'd have to kill every single animal on earth today weighing more than a hundred pounds. And that's just what happened to the megafauna that lived on land, not counting the countless species of smaller creatures gone without a trace, not to mention the toll taken on marine life.
Comparing what is happening today with events of such magnitude is ridiculous and insulting. Alarmism at its shrill worst.
It is difficult for me to tell what's going on with historical tales from survivors of catastrophic events. They always say the world was destroyed because humans were wicked or playing too much xBox or whatever...thus implying--overtly or not--that they themselves were pure and righteous. After all, they didn't die, did they?
It's not difficult to imagine that, having somehow miraculously survived a cataclysm that killed nearly everyone and everything else on the planet and totally reshaped the surface of the earth, a person might believe it had been some kind of divine punishment. Logic would thus dictate that everyone who died was bad, and anyone who lived was good. So the survivors are by default "righteous" people. This is what is described in the biblical Genesis as well, with Noah and his family being "righteous" and everyone else being sinful, because the former lived and the latter died.
I'm just saying, I don't know how much credence to give such accounts. Seems too easy to fall into such a mindset whether it was true or not. The PTSD and survivors' guilt must have been overwhelming.
Here you can navigate quickly through all comments made in any article sorted by date/time.
If as far back genetically they’ve gone in Africa is 45 hundred years, it would seem pretty much All the dogmatic cradle crap is speculation at best. There could never have been a first of anything...cat, dog, snake or man. There had to be at leaste 2...and if 2 why not 50, and why on the same continent?
The flea hasn’t “evolved”, even on a micro level, in 20 million years. Yet we’re supposed to believe man went from tossing turds at each other, hanging out in African trees, to populating the whole of the earth and landing on the moon in one or 2 million? (not to mention the earth has had to start over from several extinction events, a couple of which would have required restarts far more recently than 2 million years ago.)
“They” must sit on doughnuts to allow for breathing.
I would be extremely interested in reading your thesis on Loki, or at the very least a list of your references. I have a strong interest in learning all that I can - and many insights as well. triviumthink at gmail dot com is my email address.
"No further excavations have been done there since it is considered an ancient archaeological site"
Well that just makes all kinds of sense. >.>
I've seen a lot of the work I've done over the last 9 years showing up here and there with other peoples ideas about what it means. I don't personally feel that we have enough information to be sure of very much yet. See what you think.
https://vimeo.com/album/2045605
https://vimeo.com/user12206452/videos
https://vimeo.com/133518040
Excellent point!
Colavito styles himself a skeptic, but somehow his "skepticism" only faces one direction: away from the mainstream. Thus, I am skeptical of his skepticism, and suspect he is merely a shill for modern academic authority.
Look up the Oklo Natural Nuclear Disaster. In Africa in 1972 there was a 'nuclear explosion' made by natural causes. It is a possible explanation.
I completely agree, the jury is still out on much of this stuff.
The problem is, mainstream Egyptology insists that not only is the jury is not still out, but the judge made his ruling, the baliff emptied the courtroom, the lights were turned off, and everyone went home. Trial is over, no appeals, stfu or be found in contempt of court.
The stars have not noticably changed configuration in all that time, so the night sky was the same night sky then as now. Humans looking at it then would discern the same patterns as humans looking at it now. While that certainly isn't proof they had the same constellation groups as we do now, it is plenty of reason to leave open the possibility.
Also there is the fact that the origins of the constellation groups is unknown. The trail disappears into the mists of prehistory.
As for Giza having an over arching site-plan, I see the logic in your arguments, but that same logic works just as well assuming the entire complex was designed and built as one project as it does with assuming each monument was a separate construction.
Someone building a single giant pyramid will take into account all the problems such a project presents and act accordingly, as you said.
But someone building multiple giant pyramids with specific geometric relationships to each other would do the same thing.
Well, originally (in the late 1700s) the meter was defined as being some division of the distance from the equator to the north pole...like one ten-millionth the distance or thereabouts. Later the standard changed to a wavelength emitted by krypton, and eventually changed again to what it is today, the distance travelled by light in some tiny fraction of a second.
The overall length of the meter remained the same despite all the changes in the standards used to define it, so it remains a fraction of the distance from the equator to the north pole even if that isn't how we measure it anymore.
There is plenty of evidence that the architects of the large monuments at Giza had surveyed the earth themselves and used units based on divisions of earth measurements. So it doesn't seem too unlikely that they would have had something like the meter.
Also, as I recall, there was a pyramidion found on the Giza plateau that measured a meter in height, with a margin of error so tiny as to make it highly improbable it was merely coincidence.
Now I might well be wrong, but don’t scientist tell us that we didn’t leave Africa until 200,000 years ago.
Perhaps GOD is the embodiment of the universe itself. Coming into being with the creation of the big bang. Maybe every star instead of being intelligent it's self is just one of God's brain cells.
I’m stunned after reading this. I can’t believe authorities could sell off pieces of their historical past, let alone to an overseas company. Ireland is one of the most beautiful and spiritual places on this Earth – the people of Waterford/Ireland need to stop this early on or it will continue till all is lost and forgotten.
You know what bulgeria means in Persian? Nothing.
I thought everything Midas touched turned to mufflers? (And the mufflers turn to rust...)
Phoenicia was lebanon. And israel is forcibly in palestine.
Ignorant moron. Iranians are very proud of their history, they would never even consider what you said. Why do you talk shit when you don't know what you're talking about? You're just as vile as those IS monkeys.
You are a typical Fox news slave.
Sorry but no matter where you stand in the climate debate you have to know that crap about the "6th extinction" is complete BS. The 5 historical mass extinctions that occurred were vast catastrophic events of unimaginable violence and devastation that wiped out tens of thousands of species in very short spans of time. The most recent mass extinction coinciding with the end of the last ice age, for instance, was so deadly to the megafauna that to match its destruction we'd have to kill every single animal on earth today weighing more than a hundred pounds. And that's just what happened to the megafauna that lived on land, not counting the countless species of smaller creatures gone without a trace, not to mention the toll taken on marine life.
Comparing what is happening today with events of such magnitude is ridiculous and insulting. Alarmism at its shrill worst.
It is difficult for me to tell what's going on with historical tales from survivors of catastrophic events. They always say the world was destroyed because humans were wicked or playing too much xBox or whatever...thus implying--overtly or not--that they themselves were pure and righteous. After all, they didn't die, did they?
It's not difficult to imagine that, having somehow miraculously survived a cataclysm that killed nearly everyone and everything else on the planet and totally reshaped the surface of the earth, a person might believe it had been some kind of divine punishment. Logic would thus dictate that everyone who died was bad, and anyone who lived was good. So the survivors are by default "righteous" people. This is what is described in the biblical Genesis as well, with Noah and his family being "righteous" and everyone else being sinful, because the former lived and the latter died.
I'm just saying, I don't know how much credence to give such accounts. Seems too easy to fall into such a mindset whether it was true or not. The PTSD and survivors' guilt must have been overwhelming.
Err....what?? Slave owners, by definition, are the ones selling the products of slave labor, not the ones buying it.
Seriously.
Has anyone noticed that the winged God in the photo is wearing a watch?
Pages