Except that none of that is really the case in the way you state it. The global average temp has been on the rise since the end of the little ice age in the late 1700s / early 1800s, and the rate of increase has remained perfectly steady from then up to the present day. It did not change at all with increases in mankind's CO2 output.
And the argument is not that natural climate change is being augmented by manmade climate change. AGW advocates argue that manmade climate change has completely overwhelmed any natural processes such that any changes we experience are now a result solely of manmade causes.
Pollution and manmade climate change or AGW are not the same thing. However terrible the problem of plastics in the ocean is, it does not contribute to increasing global temperatures and no one is trying to claim it does. Remember that AGW is said to be caused by CO2, a perfectly natural component of the atmosphere that all fauna exhale and all flora inhale. No one has yet had the audacity to rate CO2 as a pollutant(but they will eventually). So do not conflate the problem of pollution--which I agree is real in some cases and needs to be addressed--with manmade climate change.
Hah. I said nothing about you or your ideology. The revisionist version of history you were citing, with its "blame America first" attitude, is certainly a product of the left, which is what I said.
It’s been a while since I’ve been around regularly, but I’m attempting a comeback! I miss talking to people and reading articles and discussing ideas. Somedays it's just hard to find the time, but I’ve been quietly trying to work all of this back into my life routine. Let’s see how I do! :)
Years ago (late 1970s) I was researching Atlantic voyaging and came across a reference in a Conference proceedings - I think - in which a linguist pointed out that the Mayan? word for calendar "lamed" or "lamet" was identical to the Jewish word. He said he had no idea why this should be the case.
It is important to know the history of the ancient members for us todays world. So it is the post We hangout very much, where individuals are going out of their way and meeting new people and establishing quality connections.Coming to Parties We do more for building a special relationships
Why? I believe because it is the path of truth, knowledge, acceptance, and Love. However, when I close my eyes, I see a world that is like this exactly, so I do not believe that the world will end when they say it does. I think it is the beginning of truths and Christ Consciousness and Love. I believe humanity will strive. I have read the Bible, however I read it differently from other people. I read it metaphorically. I believe it was meant to deceive us from what really is. The constellations also have meanings/ as well as relativity between the Gods.
No, I’m not ‘They’. I just thought that your name was worthy of a greeting and stopped to say ‘hello’. You seemed to have put some thought in calling yourself Allah and YAHWEH and various names for the Devil; yet no one else had greeted you yet.
Wow, I really am in awe. That is 100% the truth, thankyou so much Victor. I'm 22 now, when I was around 18/19 I turned to Christianity shorty after ceasing my addictions to drugs and more, my best friend was a very non-religious Christian to say.
Within months I turned away, I realised that most Christians I met believed that other religions followers were basically false worshipers destined for hell. I could not accept this as in my view every single man and woman on earth and e.t's in the universe, I know them as my family. I don't care who a person is or what they have done, they need awareness as much as me and deserve it the same, therefore I try to treat people equally.
Since being reborn as the true energy being i am I have decided that I want to devote my life to helping raise consciousness and awareness and settling frequencies. I have to admit until I read this post I really wasn't sure whether I would really go through with it. Now I'm scrapping my plan of making money out of it and am now going to go in hard making videos, social accounts, doing peaceful walks, visiting 3rd world countries to show truth.
Instead of my original idea of charging for 1 to 1 services, I will just allow people to donate to the cause instead, I will then use that money to put back into the cause and will list everything publicly.
Excuse me but fuck money, it's time to help nurture planet earth and her children into truly existing not just existing.
Thank you again brother much love to you and bless you for sharing your words wisdom!
The US plains were once completely under ocean, and for a good looooong time, too. No flood needed. But it's subsequent uplift would have left pockets of ocean, which would fit the data Mr Yoon shared here regarding the Great Salt Lake. Not a mystery, sadly. But I'm glad he explored it! And really enjoyed his detailed focus! <3
I believe many geologists have covered this information, and it should be easily findable at any reputable academic library.
Question: Has every instance thus far been proven to be individual stones or are any portion of the stones possibly carved in relief from larger stones?
No one wanted to talk about Zoroaster and Aberhamic religions? Damn! Maybe you should write an artical about it and get it put on the front page. That would stir people up. Well, it would stir them up but I dont think that they would believe you. For as much as this site talks about religion, by the comments on many articles, it sounds as if the majority of the people here are judo-christians. Or that the majority just supports the Judo-Christians.
I dont know how much ‘world chaning’ you are looking for. If anything, the more I read about the past the more apparent it becomes that the people of today are just like the people of yesterday. It seems that the world hasent ever really changed at all.
The fact that every country in the world has stories of a devastating worldwide Flood that wiped out all humanity except for one family and samples of wildlife to repopulate simply prove that these are exaggerations, otherwise...only ONE of these accounts would exist since no-one else would have survived! Just as today, in ancient times news and stories spread as people travelled. These are superstitious exaggerations of devastating local floods that occurred from natural causes. Besides, IF there was some sort of worldwide Flood, then the FIRST story would be the original one, right? And the original one was told in the Epic of Gilgamesh and predated the Biblical account by hundreds of years.
Thanks for information on Frauke Sachse and Allen J. Christenson’s , Tulan and the Other Side of the Sea: Unraveling a Metaphorical Concept from Colonial Guatemalan Highland Sources. Sache and Christenson argue that : h'aqa palo "across the sea," releb'al q'ij "where the sun emerges," that is from the east., is a metaphor. Their discussion is interesting, but the support for the theory they present is based on Aztec and other Central Mexican traditions about the underworld, when the Quiche concept of "h'aqa palo releb'al q'ij", literally meant “across the sea from the east”, not a metaphor for the otherword.
Sache and Christenson believes that Tulan Zuyua, refers to an out of worldly place. This is their opinion.
Tedlock translated Zuyua as “twisted speech”, because it was a secret language that Elites had to know, before they could assume positions of leadership. In Quiche the term Tulan has been interpreted as “a city or house that has been abandoned” ; or a “palace, or manor-house”. In reality the term Zuyua is an Olmec word that relates to the Mayan system of Higher Education.
In the Chilam Balam of Chumayel , Zuiva is spelled Zuyua. This document declares that the “head chiefs” of towns were periodically examined in the language of Zuyua.
The language of Zuyua, was suppose to have been understood by the Mayan elites. Scholars are not sure about the meaning of the mysterious term Zuyua.
Zuyua is an Olmec term. The actual sound value of /z/ in Olmec is /s/. Thusly, Zuyua = Olmec su-yu-a, and Zuiva= su-i-wa . Su-yu-a translated in Olmec, means “Shaper of Life”, while Su-i-wa, means “The Shaper of Good”, or “ The thing which hurries your welfare”.
The Olmec translations of Su-i-wa and Su-yu-a , are associated with leadership, and the role of both secular and religious leaders in the community, make them sematically appropriate terms to interpret Zuyua and Zuiva, because, a priest or chief is a shaper of the welfare of his people it was only natural that this specialists probably had to know secret terms and symbols to manifest the great power(s) surrounding his office.
Most researchers fail to understand literacy among the Maya because they don’t acknowledge the fact that the Maya had a system of Higher Education, to accommodate the construction of pyramids and writing hieroglyphics.
In summary Tulan Zuyua probably means “Manor of the Shapers of Good”, i.e., the place were elites are trained and tested. Clearly, Sache and Christenson’s hypothesis that the Quiche ancestors came from the East, from across the Sea, was a metaphor has no support from the Quiche. If relib'al q'ij , that is "where the sun emerges," was a Quiche metaphor, the authors should have found evidence from the Quiche, instead of using Aztec and Central Mexican ideologies to explain Quiche traditions.
I thought archaeological evidence older than 11,000 years old was found in South America, thus conclusively contradicting the Clovis First model? Or is the rapid colonization referred to the model that was changed to account for that evidence?
Much of the story of the domestication of cattle has been uncovered in the last five years. This research shows that the evolutionary origins of all domestic cattle lie in the wild aurochs, which ranged through Europe, Asia, and North Africa, before being driven extinct in 1627. Aurochsen, immortalized in the 17,000 year old cave paintings of Lascaux, looked something like cows on steroids; they were bigger, more muscled, and had larger horns than most modern cows.
Between 7,000 and 10,000 years ago, people in the Middle East began to domesticate wild aurochsen living nearby through the process of artificial selection. These early humans saw the advantage of maintaining aurochs for their personal use, as opposed to relying on what they could gain from hunting wild animals. As they began to live more closely with aurochsen, they spurred the evolution of their animals by selecting for individuals with particular traits. This may have been done consciously or unconsciously. For example, perhaps naturally docile animals were the only ones that the herdspeople could prevent from escaping, so without anyone intending it, ancestral cattle herds ended up with an unusually high frequency of gene versions that confer a quiet temperament. Other traits that differentiate domestic cattle from aurochs (like small horns) may have been consciously chosen. In either case, humans likely selected which individuals would be part of their herds and which individuals would be mated to maintain the herd — all the while, favoring individuals with traits that made them more useful to us. Through many generations of this process, an ancestral population of wild aurochs evolved into the animals that we recognize as cows.
Here you can navigate quickly through all comments made in any article sorted by date/time.
What are those two white square objects in the X-ray?
Except that none of that is really the case in the way you state it. The global average temp has been on the rise since the end of the little ice age in the late 1700s / early 1800s, and the rate of increase has remained perfectly steady from then up to the present day. It did not change at all with increases in mankind's CO2 output.
And the argument is not that natural climate change is being augmented by manmade climate change. AGW advocates argue that manmade climate change has completely overwhelmed any natural processes such that any changes we experience are now a result solely of manmade causes.
Pollution and manmade climate change or AGW are not the same thing. However terrible the problem of plastics in the ocean is, it does not contribute to increasing global temperatures and no one is trying to claim it does. Remember that AGW is said to be caused by CO2, a perfectly natural component of the atmosphere that all fauna exhale and all flora inhale. No one has yet had the audacity to rate CO2 as a pollutant(but they will eventually). So do not conflate the problem of pollution--which I agree is real in some cases and needs to be addressed--with manmade climate change.
Hah. I said nothing about you or your ideology. The revisionist version of history you were citing, with its "blame America first" attitude, is certainly a product of the left, which is what I said.
Also, I am not a conservative.
Have a nice day :)
It’s been a while since I’ve been around regularly, but I’m attempting a comeback! I miss talking to people and reading articles and discussing ideas. Somedays it's just hard to find the time, but I’ve been quietly trying to work all of this back into my life routine. Let’s see how I do! :)
Hello Alanna W.! Hello Alanna W.!
Are you ‘They’? (profile)
Years ago (late 1970s) I was researching Atlantic voyaging and came across a reference in a Conference proceedings - I think - in which a linguist pointed out that the Mayan? word for calendar "lamed" or "lamet" was identical to the Jewish word. He said he had no idea why this should be the case.
It is important to know the history of the ancient members for us todays world. So it is the post We hangout very much, where individuals are going out of their way and meeting new people and establishing quality connections.Coming to Parties We do more for building a special relationships
Why? I believe because it is the path of truth, knowledge, acceptance, and Love. However, when I close my eyes, I see a world that is like this exactly, so I do not believe that the world will end when they say it does. I think it is the beginning of truths and Christ Consciousness and Love. I believe humanity will strive. I have read the Bible, however I read it differently from other people. I read it metaphorically. I believe it was meant to deceive us from what really is. The constellations also have meanings/ as well as relativity between the Gods.
Fake. Put together from multiple bones that obviously don't go together.
No, I’m not ‘They’. I just thought that your name was worthy of a greeting and stopped to say ‘hello’. You seemed to have put some thought in calling yourself Allah and YAHWEH and various names for the Devil; yet no one else had greeted you yet.
Wow, I really am in awe. That is 100% the truth, thankyou so much Victor. I'm 22 now, when I was around 18/19 I turned to Christianity shorty after ceasing my addictions to drugs and more, my best friend was a very non-religious Christian to say.
Within months I turned away, I realised that most Christians I met believed that other religions followers were basically false worshipers destined for hell. I could not accept this as in my view every single man and woman on earth and e.t's in the universe, I know them as my family. I don't care who a person is or what they have done, they need awareness as much as me and deserve it the same, therefore I try to treat people equally.
Since being reborn as the true energy being i am I have decided that I want to devote my life to helping raise consciousness and awareness and settling frequencies. I have to admit until I read this post I really wasn't sure whether I would really go through with it. Now I'm scrapping my plan of making money out of it and am now going to go in hard making videos, social accounts, doing peaceful walks, visiting 3rd world countries to show truth.
Instead of my original idea of charging for 1 to 1 services, I will just allow people to donate to the cause instead, I will then use that money to put back into the cause and will list everything publicly.
Excuse me but fuck money, it's time to help nurture planet earth and her children into truly existing not just existing.
Thank you again brother much love to you and bless you for sharing your words wisdom!
The US plains were once completely under ocean, and for a good looooong time, too. No flood needed. But it's subsequent uplift would have left pockets of ocean, which would fit the data Mr Yoon shared here regarding the Great Salt Lake. Not a mystery, sadly. But I'm glad he explored it! And really enjoyed his detailed focus! <3
I believe many geologists have covered this information, and it should be easily findable at any reputable academic library.
Question: Has every instance thus far been proven to be individual stones or are any portion of the stones possibly carved in relief from larger stones?
No one wanted to talk about Zoroaster and Aberhamic religions? Damn! Maybe you should write an artical about it and get it put on the front page. That would stir people up. Well, it would stir them up but I dont think that they would believe you. For as much as this site talks about religion, by the comments on many articles, it sounds as if the majority of the people here are judo-christians. Or that the majority just supports the Judo-Christians.
did anyone ever find out what the glyphs are of? or a date or anything?
I dont know how much ‘world chaning’ you are looking for. If anything, the more I read about the past the more apparent it becomes that the people of today are just like the people of yesterday. It seems that the world hasent ever really changed at all.
Hello Shaytan Iblis of Jinn!
The fact that every country in the world has stories of a devastating worldwide Flood that wiped out all humanity except for one family and samples of wildlife to repopulate simply prove that these are exaggerations, otherwise...only ONE of these accounts would exist since no-one else would have survived! Just as today, in ancient times news and stories spread as people travelled. These are superstitious exaggerations of devastating local floods that occurred from natural causes. Besides, IF there was some sort of worldwide Flood, then the FIRST story would be the original one, right? And the original one was told in the Epic of Gilgamesh and predated the Biblical account by hundreds of years.
Thanks for information on Frauke Sachse and Allen J. Christenson’s , Tulan and the Other Side of the Sea: Unraveling a Metaphorical Concept from Colonial Guatemalan Highland Sources. Sache and Christenson argue that : h'aqa palo "across the sea," releb'al q'ij "where the sun emerges," that is from the east., is a metaphor. Their discussion is interesting, but the support for the theory they present is based on Aztec and other Central Mexican traditions about the underworld, when the Quiche concept of "h'aqa palo releb'al q'ij", literally meant “across the sea from the east”, not a metaphor for the otherword.
Sache and Christenson believes that Tulan Zuyua, refers to an out of worldly place. This is their opinion.
Tedlock translated Zuyua as “twisted speech”, because it was a secret language that Elites had to know, before they could assume positions of leadership. In Quiche the term Tulan has been interpreted as “a city or house that has been abandoned” ; or a “palace, or manor-house”. In reality the term Zuyua is an Olmec word that relates to the Mayan system of Higher Education.
In the Chilam Balam of Chumayel , Zuiva is spelled Zuyua. This document declares that the “head chiefs” of towns were periodically examined in the language of Zuyua.
The language of Zuyua, was suppose to have been understood by the Mayan elites. Scholars are not sure about the meaning of the mysterious term Zuyua.
Zuyua is an Olmec term. The actual sound value of /z/ in Olmec is /s/. Thusly, Zuyua = Olmec su-yu-a, and Zuiva= su-i-wa . Su-yu-a translated in Olmec, means “Shaper of Life”, while Su-i-wa, means “The Shaper of Good”, or “ The thing which hurries your welfare”.
The Olmec translations of Su-i-wa and Su-yu-a , are associated with leadership, and the role of both secular and religious leaders in the community, make them sematically appropriate terms to interpret Zuyua and Zuiva, because, a priest or chief is a shaper of the welfare of his people it was only natural that this specialists probably had to know secret terms and symbols to manifest the great power(s) surrounding his office.
The Maya had to learn Olmec at the Mayan Universities as I discussed in my article “ Hidden in the Glyphs: Deciphering Bilingual Mayan-Olmec Text”, http://www.ancient-origins.net/artifacts-ancient-writings/hidden-glyphs-deciphering-bilingual-mayan-olmec-text-007171
Most researchers fail to understand literacy among the Maya because they don’t acknowledge the fact that the Maya had a system of Higher Education, to accommodate the construction of pyramids and writing hieroglyphics.
In summary Tulan Zuyua probably means “Manor of the Shapers of Good”, i.e., the place were elites are trained and tested. Clearly, Sache and Christenson’s hypothesis that the Quiche ancestors came from the East, from across the Sea, was a metaphor has no support from the Quiche. If relib'al q'ij , that is "where the sun emerges," was a Quiche metaphor, the authors should have found evidence from the Quiche, instead of using Aztec and Central Mexican ideologies to explain Quiche traditions.
I thought archaeological evidence older than 11,000 years old was found in South America, thus conclusively contradicting the Clovis First model? Or is the rapid colonization referred to the model that was changed to account for that evidence?
Much of the story of the domestication of cattle has been uncovered in the last five years. This research shows that the evolutionary origins of all domestic cattle lie in the wild aurochs, which ranged through Europe, Asia, and North Africa, before being driven extinct in 1627. Aurochsen, immortalized in the 17,000 year old cave paintings of Lascaux, looked something like cows on steroids; they were bigger, more muscled, and had larger horns than most modern cows.
Between 7,000 and 10,000 years ago, people in the Middle East began to domesticate wild aurochsen living nearby through the process of artificial selection. These early humans saw the advantage of maintaining aurochs for their personal use, as opposed to relying on what they could gain from hunting wild animals. As they began to live more closely with aurochsen, they spurred the evolution of their animals by selecting for individuals with particular traits. This may have been done consciously or unconsciously. For example, perhaps naturally docile animals were the only ones that the herdspeople could prevent from escaping, so without anyone intending it, ancestral cattle herds ended up with an unusually high frequency of gene versions that confer a quiet temperament. Other traits that differentiate domestic cattle from aurochs (like small horns) may have been consciously chosen. In either case, humans likely selected which individuals would be part of their herds and which individuals would be mated to maintain the herd — all the while, favoring individuals with traits that made them more useful to us. Through many generations of this process, an ancestral population of wild aurochs evolved into the animals that we recognize as cows.
http://www.pnas.org/content/110/15/E1398.full.pdf
Interesting Stuff, thanks.
Pages