Dan Brown in the Da Vinci Code (copied from The Passover Plot) got the story of Jesus descendants from a Gnostic heresy a few hundred years after Christ.
King Arthur was a real king of France and England. He was a Black Jew and Catholic Knights Templar. He was about 12 feet tall a descendant of the Nephilim. His skeleton was dug up in the cemetery at Glastonbury a Pagan worship sight for the Megalithic builders.
He and his knights went to Jerusalem in the first part of the Crusades to locate the treasure buried by the Jews in 70 AD when the Romans scattered them, The treasure was recorded in the copper scroll hidden by the Pagan Essene Gnostic cult at Quran. Arthur had this same information on the whereabouts of the treasure. These knights found the treasure and went back to Europe and established banks to control Europe and establish the World Government and planned to use their riches to re-establish the Pre-Flood world government of Cain destroyed by God in 2347 BC by a worldwide flood.
These knights planned to create a world government that had been destroyed by God a second time under the direction of Nimrod of Babel about 1900 BC. Nimrod was of the bloodline of the Serpent the Nephilim which became commonly known as the Illuminati.
The Grail represents the Grail Treasure hidden by the Knights Templars (These Knights Templars are the highest Scottish Rite Freemasonry refounded in 1776 in Washington DC led by George Washington a Mason) The Grail was to be used to fraudulently confirm the bloodline of the future Antichrist to Jesus. The Antichrist's blood type will be the rarest AB Negative the same as the founder of the Knights Templars Jacques de Molay, found on the Shroud of Turin, falsely claimed to be the image of Jesus. Obama has this same rare blood type, as do many rich and powerful descendants of royalty, the Illuminati Families.
You talk about "so much" evidence from acient times of UFOs, ETs etc. We do not have objective unambiguous evidence. We have often graphical depictions of something which we interpret as alien. There have been many books written about this yes, that does not make it fact, many of those book discuss other references and bring no evidence to the debate.
As much as we might like to believe in Aliens, there is actually no objective evidence of aliens or UFOs - only supposition
Further more a number of the works you cite do not actually have anything to do with UFOs or ETs - for example - The Doomsday chronicle - this is effectively just a huge scale inventory of the King's "possessions" -
Is this article supposed to <a href="http://google.com" rel="nofollow">be about the castle</a> or the Nazi train? If it's about the castle, then stick to the castle, which is in the title. The train has already received more publicity than it deserves. The castle, not so much.
Hillary Clinton, Nancy Pelosi, Donna Brazile, Angela Merkel, Theresa May, Dilma Roussieff Park geun-hyi...
Don't look at me, I didn't give 'em the vote!
I feel I'm understanding what you are relaying to me. I just have 1 question. well, maybe 2. where did our souls come from, and or how? This will help me understand more.
My, my, aren't you the outdated Chauvanist? Women have and will still accomplish much more in the centuries to come while 'small thinkers' such as yourself are left forgotten in the dust.
There is plenty of Protein in the Sea and along the edges of both Polar Ice caps, no need for dependence on land at all. Even the Capuchin Monkey is known to eat Shellfish!
I just finished blogging about this very subject on my site. Sea levels in prehsitoric times were lower than they are today so any evidence of searfaring is likely under water and accumulated sediments. BTW chimps HAVE been observed using logs to float across water on. No they don’t build boats BUT they obviously have the concept of using a log to float upon the waters to get to where they are going.
Misleading title ... you mean oldest cemetery of the colonial slave trade, we have plenty of ancient slave burials that are well documented for Roman Imperial, Greek City State and Egypt [not to mention Warring States Chinese era] that well predate this cemetery ...
Not many 'serious' scholars dispute that Yeshua of Nazareth son of Joseph lived and was crucified. His enemies then, the ruling class of religious scholars, did not deny him but worked to have him put him to death, being forbiddin that ability in and of themselves by Roman law. Whether you are religious or not, it is a historical certainty, Jesus was born, raised in Judea, and crucified for daring to make himself King of the Jews or the Messiah otherwise known as The Christ. Pilot knew this and to avoid allowing this Jesus the ability to foment any trouble for Rome directly or indirectly, Jesus was crucified at the behest of the Sanhedrin.
This is all factual and an extremely well documented part of history. Facts from 2000 years ago are seldom preserved and documented this well. His birth, life and death are better established than most any historical figure of antiquity.
What you make of his claims as to being "before Abraham....I AM", "if you do not believe that I am He, then you will die in your sins", or "The Father and I are ONE" is your choice. There is no proof only logic that demands a verdict based on a preponderance of the facts available. This is a separate albeit connected issue from the question of an historical Jesus vs a myth. Don't conflate historical Jesus with the issue of Jesus the One and Only Son of God who is both divine and human as part of the Trinity according to his followers. The former is a well established historical fact and the latter a religious matter settled or not by faith alone.
Typical 'modern' comment takes ages to uncover Archaeology and interpret it, that female rulers were not found immediately to the edification of today's gender kerfuffle, doesn't actually mean anything.
WHY is the narrative that "early" man didn't know how to build boats? Why must we always restrict ourselves to man "walking" all over the earth. If Noah could build a big boat (or Gilgamesh), surely boats had been around even before then.
I am inclined to think Darwin has hoodwinked most people into believing that since apes don't build boats, early man didn't either. Phhht.
Most of them were as much good as contemporary women politicians...absolutely worthless! Women are not likely to be good rulers, administrators, and organizers until they assume equal responsibility with equal privileges or rights.
When a male leader makes a mess of things, other men call him out-whereas when a woman makes a mess of things, chivalry and gynocentrism enter the picture (not to mention a lot of feminism) and any criticism or accountability is banned.
of course it takes an eternity to reluctantly discover that there were females rulers, 'modern' men interpreting the past. Reminds me of the cave drawings that 'modern' men have decided must be prehistoric porn.
Have you read "Carmilla" by an earlier Irish author - Sheridan Le Fanu. It is a relatively short Gothic novel pre-dating Dracula by about 20 years (there are a number of similarities (not least of all the isolated Castle...)? It is dated but still a good read.
Here you can navigate quickly through all comments made in any article sorted by date/time.
wow, that is an amazing situation you are in. Why have you never held all 4 again & entered the altered state again?
Dan Brown in the Da Vinci Code (copied from The Passover Plot) got the story of Jesus descendants from a Gnostic heresy a few hundred years after Christ.
King Arthur was a real king of France and England. He was a Black Jew and Catholic Knights Templar. He was about 12 feet tall a descendant of the Nephilim. His skeleton was dug up in the cemetery at Glastonbury a Pagan worship sight for the Megalithic builders.
He and his knights went to Jerusalem in the first part of the Crusades to locate the treasure buried by the Jews in 70 AD when the Romans scattered them, The treasure was recorded in the copper scroll hidden by the Pagan Essene Gnostic cult at Quran. Arthur had this same information on the whereabouts of the treasure. These knights found the treasure and went back to Europe and established banks to control Europe and establish the World Government and planned to use their riches to re-establish the Pre-Flood world government of Cain destroyed by God in 2347 BC by a worldwide flood.
These knights planned to create a world government that had been destroyed by God a second time under the direction of Nimrod of Babel about 1900 BC. Nimrod was of the bloodline of the Serpent the Nephilim which became commonly known as the Illuminati.
The Grail represents the Grail Treasure hidden by the Knights Templars (These Knights Templars are the highest Scottish Rite Freemasonry refounded in 1776 in Washington DC led by George Washington a Mason) The Grail was to be used to fraudulently confirm the bloodline of the future Antichrist to Jesus. The Antichrist's blood type will be the rarest AB Negative the same as the founder of the Knights Templars Jacques de Molay, found on the Shroud of Turin, falsely claimed to be the image of Jesus. Obama has this same rare blood type, as do many rich and powerful descendants of royalty, the Illuminati Families.
Every one is missing the most obvious clue, 'Brien Foerster / Hidden Inca Tours' . Sounds like a marketing campaign to me.
You talk about "so much" evidence from acient times of UFOs, ETs etc. We do not have objective unambiguous evidence. We have often graphical depictions of something which we interpret as alien. There have been many books written about this yes, that does not make it fact, many of those book discuss other references and bring no evidence to the debate.
As much as we might like to believe in Aliens, there is actually no objective evidence of aliens or UFOs - only supposition
Further more a number of the works you cite do not actually have anything to do with UFOs or ETs - for example - The Doomsday chronicle - this is effectively just a huge scale inventory of the King's "possessions" -
Is this article supposed to <a href="http://google.com" rel="nofollow">be about the castle</a> or the Nazi train? If it's about the castle, then stick to the castle, which is in the title. The train has already received more publicity than it deserves. The castle, not so much.
Hillary Clinton, Nancy Pelosi, Donna Brazile, Angela Merkel, Theresa May, Dilma Roussieff Park geun-hyi...
Don't look at me, I didn't give 'em the vote!
I feel I'm understanding what you are relaying to me. I just have 1 question. well, maybe 2. where did our souls come from, and or how? This will help me understand more.
(said with tongue in cheek)…..Question is did these Old World primates raft to the New World with intent or by accident? :)
My, my, aren't you the outdated Chauvanist? Women have and will still accomplish much more in the centuries to come while 'small thinkers' such as yourself are left forgotten in the dust.
They even think the New World Primates arrived to the Americas by Sea 40 million years ago, Why not early man? Or a Primate that was to become man?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oceanic_dispersal
There is plenty of Protein in the Sea and along the edges of both Polar Ice caps, no need for dependence on land at all. Even the Capuchin Monkey is known to eat Shellfish!
I just finished blogging about this very subject on my site. Sea levels in prehsitoric times were lower than they are today so any evidence of searfaring is likely under water and accumulated sediments. BTW chimps HAVE been observed using logs to float across water on. No they don’t build boats BUT they obviously have the concept of using a log to float upon the waters to get to where they are going.
Misleading title ... you mean oldest cemetery of the colonial slave trade, we have plenty of ancient slave burials that are well documented for Roman Imperial, Greek City State and Egypt [not to mention Warring States Chinese era] that well predate this cemetery ...
Not many 'serious' scholars dispute that Yeshua of Nazareth son of Joseph lived and was crucified. His enemies then, the ruling class of religious scholars, did not deny him but worked to have him put him to death, being forbiddin that ability in and of themselves by Roman law. Whether you are religious or not, it is a historical certainty, Jesus was born, raised in Judea, and crucified for daring to make himself King of the Jews or the Messiah otherwise known as The Christ. Pilot knew this and to avoid allowing this Jesus the ability to foment any trouble for Rome directly or indirectly, Jesus was crucified at the behest of the Sanhedrin.
This is all factual and an extremely well documented part of history. Facts from 2000 years ago are seldom preserved and documented this well. His birth, life and death are better established than most any historical figure of antiquity.
What you make of his claims as to being "before Abraham....I AM", "if you do not believe that I am He, then you will die in your sins", or "The Father and I are ONE" is your choice. There is no proof only logic that demands a verdict based on a preponderance of the facts available. This is a separate albeit connected issue from the question of an historical Jesus vs a myth. Don't conflate historical Jesus with the issue of Jesus the One and Only Son of God who is both divine and human as part of the Trinity according to his followers. The former is a well established historical fact and the latter a religious matter settled or not by faith alone.
Typical 'modern' comment takes ages to uncover Archaeology and interpret it, that female rulers were not found immediately to the edification of today's gender kerfuffle, doesn't actually mean anything.
The remaining sites are under water, but no one wants to search.
WHY is the narrative that "early" man didn't know how to build boats? Why must we always restrict ourselves to man "walking" all over the earth. If Noah could build a big boat (or Gilgamesh), surely boats had been around even before then.
I am inclined to think Darwin has hoodwinked most people into believing that since apes don't build boats, early man didn't either. Phhht.
Most of them were as much good as contemporary women politicians...absolutely worthless! Women are not likely to be good rulers, administrators, and organizers until they assume equal responsibility with equal privileges or rights.
When a male leader makes a mess of things, other men call him out-whereas when a woman makes a mess of things, chivalry and gynocentrism enter the picture (not to mention a lot of feminism) and any criticism or accountability is banned.
Back to the kitchen, ladies...
'modern' men are emasculated by modern cultures.
of course it takes an eternity to reluctantly discover that there were females rulers, 'modern' men interpreting the past. Reminds me of the cave drawings that 'modern' men have decided must be prehistoric porn.
Have you read "Carmilla" by an earlier Irish author - Sheridan Le Fanu. It is a relatively short Gothic novel pre-dating Dracula by about 20 years (there are a number of similarities (not least of all the isolated Castle...)? It is dated but still a good read.
Pages