I come across these articles on this site masquerading as fact and history. This nonsense is feminazi propaganda and has no place in a site claiming to have scientific credentials.
The matter of witches is an interesting one however the writer focuses on her social justice warrior closed-bubble indoctrination and obviously gets her info from feminazi publications rather than reading contemporary works. Witches, or peasant traditionalists, were caught up in the fight between ancient paganism and the church and had been going on fo centuries. This is a complex subject that requires the reading of books and actual research and journalism to understand fully.
I grew up in the Western Pennsylvania area and spent many days as a child, and a young adult fossil hunting in both Pennsylvania and West Virginia. During that time I became more than a little familiar with the terrain and it’s rock formations in those areas, and I believe that what we are seeing in these photos is nothing more than erosion.
Beautiful formations yes, but man made? I see no evidence that these are anything more than the result of natural erosion. Be it hydrological or glacial erosion, they are still a natural phenomena and in no way a product of homo sapiens.
In addition to the above IS the filled with pozzolanic concrete inside my Ark of my Testimony when I cemented it inside my Altar of Burnt Offering together with all of my other preserved Mishkan relics at the bottom of easternmost Scroll Trench.
Plenty of pulverised volcanic ash at my Stonehenge for that pozzolanic concrete slurry which I poured throughout before skidding my Heel Stone 3.6m (12ft) southeast over it (rotated 1/4 turn clockwise) from its original location by the builders.
The new descovery regarding the ancient Egyptians is based on the DNA/genetics, not the historical presumptions. Your theory is concurrent and based on the history books. The whole point of DNA analysis is the deviation of the course from historical books/studies to genetic evidence, which is the real deal nowadays.
Ancient people shifted back and forth, from location to locations in search for living. But even their mobile activities were limited to their localities. This discovery sheds light on a specific DNA haplogroup found in ancient Egyptian mummies. This particular Y-DNA haplogroup is R1b haplogroup that is strictly limited to Armenians in the entire Middle East/near East/Asia minor/west Asia etc. this particular R1b haplogroup has its subclades at certain frequencies that is limited to certain natives. For example Western Europeans’ dominant haplogroup is R1b, and so are Armenians. But R1b in Armenians Have different subclades that is consistent with ancient Europeans, more like European hunter gatherers. So therefore, this descovery illustrates that particular aspect of their relationship with Armenians than others. The hint in the context is the possibility, that either the ancient Egyptians and Armenians were blood related or modern Egyptians are not related to the ancient Egyptians or both.
One thing in the contest is not illustrated is the historical perception. Nearly impossible to relate nations with the comparisons of ancient artifacts, clay tablets with cuneiform inscriptions on them, or any archeological diggings. Nations went through so many wars, that no traces of ancient people left behind. And if things were to be left in the hands of Turks and Azeris, they would have destroyed everything that had other than Turkish bearings. When they destroyed all the ancient artifacts, churches or any evidence that had the Armenian bearings on them, then reality would definitely look like the formality.
Hi, please read my previous message. The member and the main ancient origins site are completely different. This only a preview of the member site. You can browse thousads of article here for free.
That is funny. I had full access before for free with ads. Now you want me to pay? I don't think so. I figured this was bait and switch. Now I know I was right. Bye!
The expense of putting mosaics in huge numbers may not have been an issue. Today in an Italian family, children help in the kitchen. I know when making gnocchi the entire family gets involved in the kitchen making these small potato dumplings. This teaches the children how to cook for the next generation. So if you are a mason, you might have a bunch of children working on cosmetic things to train them on how to sculpture in a small scale and then use their carvings as a mosaic to show off their work. Unfortunately, I may not have been quite the artist and my mother never hung my artwork on the refrigerator, but that maybe the reason I pursued a different career.
It has nothing to do with historical importance. I live near this place. It is just an excuse used by anti-mining fundation to stop the lignite mine. Nobody would talk or write about this if it would not be on the area of the open pit project.
Many archeologists feel suspicious on this one. It's too controversial, it's like trying to see alphabetic characters in the spots of the Sun that are no there. You can google for "Experts Cast Doubt On Viking Textile With ‘Allah’ Inscription" on gizmodo for full story.
“The oldest civilization on earth”? First off, John Cargill is probably right, the rock markings look more like glacial marks and ordinary fracture lines than any petroglyphs I have seen. Having studied both anthropology and geology in BC I’ve seen a fair amount of both. This sound far more like wishful thinking or an anywhere but Africa theory.
Many “myths” are truths while many "truths” are myths. I went back almost 12,000 years into history when I wrote my book, Secrets of the Pink Kush, and discovered that we have been deceived for thousands of years. The reaon for this deceit is that the tetraploid humans wish to control us and part of their strategy is to walk the left hand path of deceit.
The history of the tetraploid humans and the history of us diploid humans is quite different and yet intersects throughout history. The have always been here (since about 12,000 years ago) but always remain in hiding. The Greek and Roman gods/goddesses were in fact real. They were giants or tetraploid humans to us scientists. They control our planet and they most of the Old Testament. They occupied Atlantis until Atlantis shifted to its current location in the Antarctica. From there Hades went into the Hollow Earth or Underworld while Poseidon and Demeter remained on the surface (originally Malta, I believe) and remained to rule over us.
It was the tetraplolid humans that built the megaliths, not us. Stonehenge, Gobekli Tepe, Pyramids (Egypt, Mayan, Incan, Cambodian, Antarcitca, Mars, Ceres), Puma Punku and other megatliths that encircle the globe.
You cannot reconcile or understand history until you understand the tetraploid humans and was them that created civilization for us. We did not do many of the things that they attempt to attribute to us normal diploid humans.
Find out the real history in Secrets of the Pink Kush. It should answer most questions that you have about life, history, religion, occult, nature and GOD.
Thanks for your feedback. Excellent Article by the way. Recently a researcher pulled the LanSAT satellite images for the area. This satellite is capable of basically imaging 30 ft (by what is released to the public) below ground (it merges a few techs ground penetrating radar and multi spectral imaging). One researcher in the https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bzwCSpl4Liw link at about 34 min (the rest is hype) basically has found the riverbeds of the ancient rivers. Saudi was much wetter during 6,000 years ago. One of the misconceptions is that it could be referring to the merging by the sea not further in land (I believe you pointed that out too). Just additional information. Your conclusions seem well founded also.
I always found it interesting how ignorant we are. When analyzing great literature I remember a professor once telling me that you have to analyze it within the time period it was written. So if you look at the Bible or any other literature you have to put it in context. If the Bible says God created man in his own image, it could have been written in such a way at that period to say God created man to look like him, but it didn’t. Perhaps man at that time didn’t have the science to describe what was meant at the time. God could have been referring to creating man in its own distinct DNA image and forming man from the ground could simply meant that we are from the elements and compounds in the ground. Even today breathing life into someone is something that we have no scientific concept of so how do you describe giving sentiments’ to a form of life. If Norway or Ireland were talking about Leprechaun or “Wee People” they could very well have been talking about other species or shorter people like pygmies. Perhaps it’s all about context in time.
Here you can navigate quickly through all comments made in any article sorted by date/time.
I recommend Bock Saga, a family saga about the ancient times.
Tolkien must have heard that story before creating his world.
http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL2bKPBjVu5gXa3NO9NhbJqKBVCPCd8hhY
I come across these articles on this site masquerading as fact and history. This nonsense is feminazi propaganda and has no place in a site claiming to have scientific credentials.
The matter of witches is an interesting one however the writer focuses on her social justice warrior closed-bubble indoctrination and obviously gets her info from feminazi publications rather than reading contemporary works. Witches, or peasant traditionalists, were caught up in the fight between ancient paganism and the church and had been going on fo centuries. This is a complex subject that requires the reading of books and actual research and journalism to understand fully.
Try again. Could do better!
I grew up in the Western Pennsylvania area and spent many days as a child, and a young adult fossil hunting in both Pennsylvania and West Virginia. During that time I became more than a little familiar with the terrain and it’s rock formations in those areas, and I believe that what we are seeing in these photos is nothing more than erosion.
Beautiful formations yes, but man made? I see no evidence that these are anything more than the result of natural erosion. Be it hydrological or glacial erosion, they are still a natural phenomena and in no way a product of homo sapiens.
In addition to the above IS the filled with pozzolanic concrete inside my Ark of my Testimony when I cemented it inside my Altar of Burnt Offering together with all of my other preserved Mishkan relics at the bottom of easternmost Scroll Trench.
Plenty of pulverised volcanic ash at my Stonehenge for that pozzolanic concrete slurry which I poured throughout before skidding my Heel Stone 3.6m (12ft) southeast over it (rotated 1/4 turn clockwise) from its original location by the builders.
YHWH Allah
The new descovery regarding the ancient Egyptians is based on the DNA/genetics, not the historical presumptions. Your theory is concurrent and based on the history books. The whole point of DNA analysis is the deviation of the course from historical books/studies to genetic evidence, which is the real deal nowadays.
Ancient people shifted back and forth, from location to locations in search for living. But even their mobile activities were limited to their localities. This discovery sheds light on a specific DNA haplogroup found in ancient Egyptian mummies. This particular Y-DNA haplogroup is R1b haplogroup that is strictly limited to Armenians in the entire Middle East/near East/Asia minor/west Asia etc. this particular R1b haplogroup has its subclades at certain frequencies that is limited to certain natives. For example Western Europeans’ dominant haplogroup is R1b, and so are Armenians. But R1b in Armenians Have different subclades that is consistent with ancient Europeans, more like European hunter gatherers. So therefore, this descovery illustrates that particular aspect of their relationship with Armenians than others. The hint in the context is the possibility, that either the ancient Egyptians and Armenians were blood related or modern Egyptians are not related to the ancient Egyptians or both.
One thing in the contest is not illustrated is the historical perception. Nearly impossible to relate nations with the comparisons of ancient artifacts, clay tablets with cuneiform inscriptions on them, or any archeological diggings. Nations went through so many wars, that no traces of ancient people left behind. And if things were to be left in the hands of Turks and Azeris, they would have destroyed everything that had other than Turkish bearings. When they destroyed all the ancient artifacts, churches or any evidence that had the Armenian bearings on them, then reality would definitely look like the formality.
Very enjoyable read.
We are working to remove the ads. Apologies for any issues this may cause you.
Hi, please read my previous message. The member and the main ancient origins site are completely different. This only a preview of the member site. You can browse thousads of article here for free.
That is funny. I had full access before for free with ads. Now you want me to pay? I don't think so. I figured this was bait and switch. Now I know I was right. Bye!
The ads in the free version here have multiplied to an extent the site is hardly worth visiting anymore.
great article by the way.
The expense of putting mosaics in huge numbers may not have been an issue. Today in an Italian family, children help in the kitchen. I know when making gnocchi the entire family gets involved in the kitchen making these small potato dumplings. This teaches the children how to cook for the next generation. So if you are a mason, you might have a bunch of children working on cosmetic things to train them on how to sculpture in a small scale and then use their carvings as a mosaic to show off their work. Unfortunately, I may not have been quite the artist and my mother never hung my artwork on the refrigerator, but that maybe the reason I pursued a different career.
It has nothing to do with historical importance. I live near this place. It is just an excuse used by anti-mining fundation to stop the lignite mine. Nobody would talk or write about this if it would not be on the area of the open pit project.
Many archeologists feel suspicious on this one. It's too controversial, it's like trying to see alphabetic characters in the spots of the Sun that are no there. You can google for "Experts Cast Doubt On Viking Textile With ‘Allah’ Inscription" on gizmodo for full story.
“The oldest civilization on earth”? First off, John Cargill is probably right, the rock markings look more like glacial marks and ordinary fracture lines than any petroglyphs I have seen. Having studied both anthropology and geology in BC I’ve seen a fair amount of both. This sound far more like wishful thinking or an anywhere but Africa theory.
Nope. Too far south for glaciers
Yes, too many real anomalies to believe what the academic gatekeepers are telling us. They have no real answers to any of this material presented.
I think r/K selection is more accurate. Interesting about the origins of the donkey and elephant, though.
Many “myths” are truths while many "truths” are myths. I went back almost 12,000 years into history when I wrote my book, Secrets of the Pink Kush, and discovered that we have been deceived for thousands of years. The reaon for this deceit is that the tetraploid humans wish to control us and part of their strategy is to walk the left hand path of deceit.
The history of the tetraploid humans and the history of us diploid humans is quite different and yet intersects throughout history. The have always been here (since about 12,000 years ago) but always remain in hiding. The Greek and Roman gods/goddesses were in fact real. They were giants or tetraploid humans to us scientists. They control our planet and they most of the Old Testament. They occupied Atlantis until Atlantis shifted to its current location in the Antarctica. From there Hades went into the Hollow Earth or Underworld while Poseidon and Demeter remained on the surface (originally Malta, I believe) and remained to rule over us.
It was the tetraplolid humans that built the megaliths, not us. Stonehenge, Gobekli Tepe, Pyramids (Egypt, Mayan, Incan, Cambodian, Antarcitca, Mars, Ceres), Puma Punku and other megatliths that encircle the globe.
You cannot reconcile or understand history until you understand the tetraploid humans and was them that created civilization for us. We did not do many of the things that they attempt to attribute to us normal diploid humans.
Find out the real history in Secrets of the Pink Kush. It should answer most questions that you have about life, history, religion, occult, nature and GOD.
Thanks for your feedback. Excellent Article by the way. Recently a researcher pulled the LanSAT satellite images for the area. This satellite is capable of basically imaging 30 ft (by what is released to the public) below ground (it merges a few techs ground penetrating radar and multi spectral imaging). One researcher in the https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bzwCSpl4Liw link at about 34 min (the rest is hype) basically has found the riverbeds of the ancient rivers. Saudi was much wetter during 6,000 years ago. One of the misconceptions is that it could be referring to the merging by the sea not further in land (I believe you pointed that out too). Just additional information. Your conclusions seem well founded also.
I always found it interesting how ignorant we are. When analyzing great literature I remember a professor once telling me that you have to analyze it within the time period it was written. So if you look at the Bible or any other literature you have to put it in context. If the Bible says God created man in his own image, it could have been written in such a way at that period to say God created man to look like him, but it didn’t. Perhaps man at that time didn’t have the science to describe what was meant at the time. God could have been referring to creating man in its own distinct DNA image and forming man from the ground could simply meant that we are from the elements and compounds in the ground. Even today breathing life into someone is something that we have no scientific concept of so how do you describe giving sentiments’ to a form of life. If Norway or Ireland were talking about Leprechaun or “Wee People” they could very well have been talking about other species or shorter people like pygmies. Perhaps it’s all about context in time.
Pages