All your statements about Baba Yaga are wrong. According to new research and Slavic-Aryan Vedical Knowledge Baba Yaga is the beautiful sorcerer woman. She was the guardian of the border between world of Navi (world of spirits and dead ancestors) and world of Navi (our world). She also had other responsibilities in the community she was living in because every big community had such druid women for helping them with different spiritual and alike causes. And she was not eating children, but taking orfan children to raise them in the temple as druids or warriors. All this bullshit you are talking about here is made up by Christian Church and dark masonic forces which are trying to kill ancient vedical knowledge of white people. Alexandr Afanasyev , so-called "collector of Russian fairy Tales" was a jew and he just helped the church to reconstruct traditional vedical fairy tales and legends because they didnt manage to erase them totally from russian folklore, so the only option for them was to reconstruct them and gradually replace. For those who want to take a look at more original russian fairy tales I can advise to read Alexandr Pushkins fairy tales.
All wheels in a history with a centric axle was only preinventions. A wheel as a mean of transportation invented polish philosopher Jozef Hoene Wronski at 1836. It enables a gravity support of movement.
Darwinism is false science only used politically to create atheism. No such thing as Neanderthals or home erects and no missing links. We have always been homo sapiens. If government stopped controlling the truthful finds we would soon realize how they have lied about everything since day one to control us. After all look how they have rewritten regular history whether WWI or WWII.... their lies.They try very hard to keep us in an illusion. What about the 13,000+++ year old mummies with blond or red hair and blue eyes. Will never believe man originated in Africa. I believe all landmass was joined until the flood. Many civilizations destroyed but many numerous tribes were already established hence survivors continued. Remember all the finds worldwide of giants some 30 feet tall... the government wants this kept hidden. So if giants roamed for 100,000s of years how on earth did we evolve from monkeys....a total lie. No evidence just common horse sense and tons of research...!!!
Its not surprising, considering "Hinduism"/Vedic civilisation predates the majority of the civilisations by eons. As for the comment about Armenian (Aryarat), it is a modification of the word "Aryavrat". The Aryavrat civilisation was the Mahabharate era civilisation. After that period ended, it is assumed based on circumstantial evidence that many people migrated towards Sumeria, evidence being, striking similarities between the sumerian etymologies with vedic & pre vedic sanskrit.
The author of the article gives mention to the alien hypothesis due to the stones having been discovered by “UFO hunters”. Nonetheless, it also states, “Fortunately, scientists at the Zhirnovsky museum are taking a more rational approach..”
Certainly nothing to get worked up about. Also, I don’t see how the article could state a purpose for the creation these stones that isn’t wildly speculative.
No matter what the Tetrad of the Blood Moons does or does not do, the Godzilla El Nino is supposed to bring rains of near Biblical proportions nonetheless.
I agree that they should not auction it off, but the museum might not have enough money to purchase this item and I am pretty sure there is no such thing as" Assyriology". But they should not auction it off, but possibly donate it.
Yes I do agree that ancient swastika existed all over europe and Europe was Hindu/Pagan before. But the sad part is that Europe got christianised and rest of the world too. Only India is the one which maintained ancient civilization being Hindu/pagan still. But it is true that India did do a lot of things first maybe not everything cause at that time before 7000 BC, HInduism, pagan practices was followed all over the world. It was part of one big civilization. Lord Krishna was known as Hercules in Southern Europe and Thor was Lord Indra.
Really interesting stuff. Somehow I always found leprechauns to be interesting mythological creatures, even thou I have no connections to Ireland whatsoever. I even did a small project recently about Ireland for my local community, presenting an abridged version of it’s rich culture. I always thought if there was one thing everyone associates with Ireland, it’s leprechauns.
This period in history is very interesting: first some citizens because of trade managed to get richer and more powerfull than the old land owning aristocracy. The two most significant regions where this happened: Toscane in Italy and later in Flanders and the larger Netherlands. At the same time protestant religion came up which was in fact a kind of 'democratisation' of the christian faith. The hierarchy 'believer', priest, bisshop, cardinal, pope was broken and the 'believer' got a direct relation to God. The Roman Catholic religion which had always stood on the side of old aristocratic order made way for the upcoming power of the protestant citizens. And in 1588 The Netherlands even became a republic which shortly after became a super power. So powerfull that in 1688 they even kicked the warmongering catholic King James II out of the UK and took over reign.... (wikipedia 'Glorious Revolution' https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glorious_Revolution ) After that never could a catholic be the monarch of the UK again.
.
Thanks for that. An interesting idea. It would make an interesting story for Ancient Origins.
However:
This was supposed to be a 6th century history, not a 11th century history.
Arthur was named after Ursa Major, not Arcturus. We know this because he had twelve knights, and the only constellation with twelve sons-knights-disciples is Ursa Major.
Arthur's father was called Ben Dragown, not Pendragon.
Helm means 'steerman' or 'navigator'. Hense the Williams were the first of the Priory de Scion Nautoniers - the helmsmen that giuded society.
Ambrosius Aurelianus was the son of an Emperor, but Alan was not.
And finally,
King Arthur was only one generation removed from Joseph of Arimathaea.
The story was written by Josephus Flavius (who could not be writing about 11th century events)
Half the family came from Babylon and Nineveh.
Much of the action takes place in the East - in Palmyra and Damascus.
The story is closely linked to the gospel story.
etc: etc:
These are the elements of Arthurian history that previous authors and researchers have glossed over, because they did not understand them.
Alan's family claimed a descent from St James, brother of St John, who by tradition were related to the Holy Family. (Remember, Compostela is in Galicia, Magnus Maximus's homeland.) Patron saints of Brittany include St Anne (the Virgin Mary's mother) and St Michael the Archangel (shared with Normandy). The emblem of Brittany, which Alan wore, is ermine, a symbol of the Virgin.
With his brother Brian, Alan led the Bretons at the Battle of Hastings. The 12th century writers Gaimar and Wace attribute the victory principally to the prowess of Alan and his men.
Alan led the Norman Rearguard, and commanded William the Conqueror's bodyguard, his household knights.
Alan's father, Eudon, Lord of Brittany (c.999-1079), contributed over a third of William's army and receives a cameo in the Norman French version of the "Song of Roland".
Eudon assumed the title "Penteur" (Head of the Clan"). Eudon was a maternal first cousin to King Edward the Confessor and could, had he wished, have claimed the throne of England in his own right as the previous king's closest living male relative and as a male-line descendant of ancient kings of Britain.
Compare:
Arthur's name is an abbreviation of Arcturus, the brightest star in the northern hemisphere, which the 2nd century geographer and astronomer Claudius Ptolemy described as "subrufus" (somewhat red).
Now compare:
Arthur/Arcturus "subrufus" vs Alan Rufus
Arthur's father Uther Pendragon with Alan's father Eudon Penteur.
Uther's elder brother Ambrosius Aurelianus, High King of the Britons, with Eudon's eldest brother Alan III, Duke of Brittany and Guardian of Normandy.
"Arcturus" is Greek and means "Protector of the Bear". Alan Rufus was the Protector of William the Conqueror (William = Wilhelm = "Wants a Helm", "Helm" symbolises Protection).
Alan led armies in many battles up and down the length of England, and in France as well, quashing almost every foe. In the one exception, the epic Siege of Sainte-Suzanne, where King William abandoned his own bodyguard, leaving them to continue the siege against the impregnable castle alone, while fending off an endless stream of the most ambitious knights of France for three years (!), the conflict was resolved by (probably Alan's) diplomacy to mutual satisfaction.
Alan died on 4 August, probably in 1093, but almost certainly before the First Crusade. He was buried at the Abbey of St Edmund in Suffolk by Abbot Baldwin, physician to both Edward the Confessor and William the Conqueror.
Anselm of Canterbury wrote two angry letters to Gunhild, daughter of the late King Harold Godwinson, berating her for giving up her (supposed) vocation as a nun at Wilton Abbey to be, first, with Alan Rufus, and after his death, with his brother Alan Niger. (My personal opinion is that Anselm got it wrong, that Alan was Gunhild's guardian, and this is why Anselm removed his copies of those letters from his archive.)
Therein is also the genesis of the Lancelot-Guinevere story: the greatest Breton knight has an (alleged) affair with a royal lady and this is associated with the fall of a kingdom.
It's almost a mirror-image of the Arthurian tale: Lancelot caused the destruction of a British Kingdom, paving the way for Saxon domination; whereas Alan's efforts caused the destruction of the Anglo-Saxon kingdom, and he gained the lands of Harold's wife Edith the Fair (who may have been a niece of King Edward's) and the love of Harold's and Edith's daughter.
Alan's epitaph gives further support for this comparison. It's in Leonine Hexameter and runs:
1 Stella ruit regni: comitis caro marcet Alani.
2 Anglia turbatur: satraparum flos cineratur.
3 Iam Brito flos regum: modo marcor in ordine rerum.
4 Praecepto legum: nitet ortus sanguine regum.
5 Dux uiguit summus: rutilans a rege secundus.
6 Hunc cernens plora: « requies sibi sit, deus » ora.
7 Vixit nobilium: praefulgens stirpe Brittonum.
Note the first three words of line 1: "A star of the kingdom falls in violent ruin". (Arcturus?)
Observe also how many times Alan's royal pedigree is stated.
Line 3a: "The flower of the Kings of Britain".
5a: "Dux" is Arthur's title as commander of the British armies.
5b: "Rutilans" means "shining with a reddish-golden glow". There's a hint of Ambrosius Aurelianus and a strong claim to Roman heritage here: Julius Caesar's mother was Aurelia Cotta of the clan of the Aurelii, and her mother was Rutilia of the clan Rutilius Rufus. (There's that adjective Rufus again.)
Line 7 emphasises Alan's "noble and shining British ancestry".
Line 2b calls Alan "the flower of the magnates", but uses a word deriving from the Persian for a regional governor. This may be a reference to Alan's Iranian ancestors, the Alans, for whom he was named. The Alans had merged with the Britons in both Brittany and Galicia after both nations helped the Romans and Visigoths to defeat Attila the Hun in 451.
Alan managed to reconcile with the local populations, Anglo-Saxon, Anglo-Danish, Cumbrian and others, and actually promoted them instead of Normans. After Easter in 1088 this came to a head when the Norman barons rebelled en masse, only to be comprehensively defeated by Alan's Breton knights in alliance with the local church and people. A fleet from Normandy was also destroyed.
In late January 1091, Alan was at Dover with William II just days before the launch of a successful "English" invasion of Normandy.
Alan's legacy included the return of the British exiles, the strengthening of the English army and navy, the development of great ports, enrichment of the nation, the abolition of the Danegeld.
No wonder that "Anglia turbatur" ("England was distraught") at Alan's death "without offspring of his body".
But they needn't have despaired, for his heirs included the man (William de Tancarville) who trained and knighted William Marshall, as well as the people who opposed King John and so inspired the Robin Hood stories as well as those (alongside the Marshall) who endeavoured to restrain him with wise counsel, countless great heroes and reformers through the centuries (including the courageous Dukes of Brittany), and even some of the USA's political, legal and commercial giants.
Sometimes I wonder if nothing else is there to explore any more besides alien life. Why are people quick to assign everything to aliens? It clearly states in the article that the object is 'manmade' then what's the hype about? I would have preferred a neatly written article stating the purpose of these massive objects rather than being childish about it.
Here you can navigate quickly through all comments made in any article sorted by date/time.
All your statements about Baba Yaga are wrong. According to new research and Slavic-Aryan Vedical Knowledge Baba Yaga is the beautiful sorcerer woman. She was the guardian of the border between world of Navi (world of spirits and dead ancestors) and world of Navi (our world). She also had other responsibilities in the community she was living in because every big community had such druid women for helping them with different spiritual and alike causes. And she was not eating children, but taking orfan children to raise them in the temple as druids or warriors. All this bullshit you are talking about here is made up by Christian Church and dark masonic forces which are trying to kill ancient vedical knowledge of white people. Alexandr Afanasyev , so-called "collector of Russian fairy Tales" was a jew and he just helped the church to reconstruct traditional vedical fairy tales and legends because they didnt manage to erase them totally from russian folklore, so the only option for them was to reconstruct them and gradually replace. For those who want to take a look at more original russian fairy tales I can advise to read Alexandr Pushkins fairy tales.
very cool story dean.
I am very intrigued at how the mechanics of reincarnation might work.
All wheels in a history with a centric axle was only preinventions. A wheel as a mean of transportation invented polish philosopher Jozef Hoene Wronski at 1836. It enables a gravity support of movement.
Darwinism is false science only used politically to create atheism. No such thing as Neanderthals or home erects and no missing links. We have always been homo sapiens. If government stopped controlling the truthful finds we would soon realize how they have lied about everything since day one to control us. After all look how they have rewritten regular history whether WWI or WWII.... their lies.They try very hard to keep us in an illusion. What about the 13,000+++ year old mummies with blond or red hair and blue eyes. Will never believe man originated in Africa. I believe all landmass was joined until the flood. Many civilizations destroyed but many numerous tribes were already established hence survivors continued. Remember all the finds worldwide of giants some 30 feet tall... the government wants this kept hidden. So if giants roamed for 100,000s of years how on earth did we evolve from monkeys....a total lie. No evidence just common horse sense and tons of research...!!!
Its not surprising, considering "Hinduism"/Vedic civilisation predates the majority of the civilisations by eons. As for the comment about Armenian (Aryarat), it is a modification of the word "Aryavrat". The Aryavrat civilisation was the Mahabharate era civilisation. After that period ended, it is assumed based on circumstantial evidence that many people migrated towards Sumeria, evidence being, striking similarities between the sumerian etymologies with vedic & pre vedic sanskrit.
Looks more like a disc of accreted material to me. Vastly more like to be a natural phenomenon than something man-made.
The author of the article gives mention to the alien hypothesis due to the stones having been discovered by “UFO hunters”. Nonetheless, it also states, “Fortunately, scientists at the Zhirnovsky museum are taking a more rational approach..”
Certainly nothing to get worked up about. Also, I don’t see how the article could state a purpose for the creation these stones that isn’t wildly speculative.
No matter what the Tetrad of the Blood Moons does or does not do, the Godzilla El Nino is supposed to bring rains of near Biblical proportions nonetheless.
I agree that they should not auction it off, but the museum might not have enough money to purchase this item and I am pretty sure there is no such thing as" Assyriology". But they should not auction it off, but possibly donate it.
Yes I do agree that ancient swastika existed all over europe and Europe was Hindu/Pagan before. But the sad part is that Europe got christianised and rest of the world too. Only India is the one which maintained ancient civilization being Hindu/pagan still. But it is true that India did do a lot of things first maybe not everything cause at that time before 7000 BC, HInduism, pagan practices was followed all over the world. It was part of one big civilization. Lord Krishna was known as Hercules in Southern Europe and Thor was Lord Indra.
Ancient Africa
Really interesting stuff. Somehow I always found leprechauns to be interesting mythological creatures, even thou I have no connections to Ireland whatsoever. I even did a small project recently about Ireland for my local community, presenting an abridged version of it’s rich culture. I always thought if there was one thing everyone associates with Ireland, it’s leprechauns.
Hear hear !!!
I'm curious if Rumplestilskin (sp?) comes from these legends as well?
This period in history is very interesting: first some citizens because of trade managed to get richer and more powerfull than the old land owning aristocracy. The two most significant regions where this happened: Toscane in Italy and later in Flanders and the larger Netherlands. At the same time protestant religion came up which was in fact a kind of 'democratisation' of the christian faith. The hierarchy 'believer', priest, bisshop, cardinal, pope was broken and the 'believer' got a direct relation to God. The Roman Catholic religion which had always stood on the side of old aristocratic order made way for the upcoming power of the protestant citizens. And in 1588 The Netherlands even became a republic which shortly after became a super power. So powerfull that in 1688 they even kicked the warmongering catholic King James II out of the UK and took over reign.... (wikipedia 'Glorious Revolution' https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glorious_Revolution ) After that never could a catholic be the monarch of the UK again.
.
Thanks for that. An interesting idea. It would make an interesting story for Ancient Origins.
However:
This was supposed to be a 6th century history, not a 11th century history.
Arthur was named after Ursa Major, not Arcturus. We know this because he had twelve knights, and the only constellation with twelve sons-knights-disciples is Ursa Major.
Arthur's father was called Ben Dragown, not Pendragon.
Helm means 'steerman' or 'navigator'. Hense the Williams were the first of the Priory de Scion Nautoniers - the helmsmen that giuded society.
Ambrosius Aurelianus was the son of an Emperor, but Alan was not.
And finally,
King Arthur was only one generation removed from Joseph of Arimathaea.
The story was written by Josephus Flavius (who could not be writing about 11th century events)
Half the family came from Babylon and Nineveh.
Much of the action takes place in the East - in Palmyra and Damascus.
The story is closely linked to the gospel story.
etc: etc:
These are the elements of Arthurian history that previous authors and researchers have glossed over, because they did not understand them.
Thanks anyway for those interesting ideas,
Ralph
Alan's family claimed a descent from St James, brother of St John, who by tradition were related to the Holy Family. (Remember, Compostela is in Galicia, Magnus Maximus's homeland.) Patron saints of Brittany include St Anne (the Virgin Mary's mother) and St Michael the Archangel (shared with Normandy). The emblem of Brittany, which Alan wore, is ermine, a symbol of the Virgin.
Two words: Alan Rufus.
With his brother Brian, Alan led the Bretons at the Battle of Hastings. The 12th century writers Gaimar and Wace attribute the victory principally to the prowess of Alan and his men.
Alan led the Norman Rearguard, and commanded William the Conqueror's bodyguard, his household knights.
Alan's father, Eudon, Lord of Brittany (c.999-1079), contributed over a third of William's army and receives a cameo in the Norman French version of the "Song of Roland".
Eudon assumed the title "Penteur" (Head of the Clan"). Eudon was a maternal first cousin to King Edward the Confessor and could, had he wished, have claimed the throne of England in his own right as the previous king's closest living male relative and as a male-line descendant of ancient kings of Britain.
Compare:
Arthur's name is an abbreviation of Arcturus, the brightest star in the northern hemisphere, which the 2nd century geographer and astronomer Claudius Ptolemy described as "subrufus" (somewhat red).
Now compare:
Arthur/Arcturus "subrufus" vs Alan Rufus
Arthur's father Uther Pendragon with Alan's father Eudon Penteur.
Uther's elder brother Ambrosius Aurelianus, High King of the Britons, with Eudon's eldest brother Alan III, Duke of Brittany and Guardian of Normandy.
"Arcturus" is Greek and means "Protector of the Bear". Alan Rufus was the Protector of William the Conqueror (William = Wilhelm = "Wants a Helm", "Helm" symbolises Protection).
Alan led armies in many battles up and down the length of England, and in France as well, quashing almost every foe. In the one exception, the epic Siege of Sainte-Suzanne, where King William abandoned his own bodyguard, leaving them to continue the siege against the impregnable castle alone, while fending off an endless stream of the most ambitious knights of France for three years (!), the conflict was resolved by (probably Alan's) diplomacy to mutual satisfaction.
Alan died on 4 August, probably in 1093, but almost certainly before the First Crusade. He was buried at the Abbey of St Edmund in Suffolk by Abbot Baldwin, physician to both Edward the Confessor and William the Conqueror.
Anselm of Canterbury wrote two angry letters to Gunhild, daughter of the late King Harold Godwinson, berating her for giving up her (supposed) vocation as a nun at Wilton Abbey to be, first, with Alan Rufus, and after his death, with his brother Alan Niger. (My personal opinion is that Anselm got it wrong, that Alan was Gunhild's guardian, and this is why Anselm removed his copies of those letters from his archive.)
Therein is also the genesis of the Lancelot-Guinevere story: the greatest Breton knight has an (alleged) affair with a royal lady and this is associated with the fall of a kingdom.
It's almost a mirror-image of the Arthurian tale: Lancelot caused the destruction of a British Kingdom, paving the way for Saxon domination; whereas Alan's efforts caused the destruction of the Anglo-Saxon kingdom, and he gained the lands of Harold's wife Edith the Fair (who may have been a niece of King Edward's) and the love of Harold's and Edith's daughter.
Alan's epitaph gives further support for this comparison. It's in Leonine Hexameter and runs:
1 Stella ruit regni: comitis caro marcet Alani.
2 Anglia turbatur: satraparum flos cineratur.
3 Iam Brito flos regum: modo marcor in ordine rerum.
4 Praecepto legum: nitet ortus sanguine regum.
5 Dux uiguit summus: rutilans a rege secundus.
6 Hunc cernens plora: « requies sibi sit, deus » ora.
7 Vixit nobilium: praefulgens stirpe Brittonum.
Note the first three words of line 1: "A star of the kingdom falls in violent ruin". (Arcturus?)
Observe also how many times Alan's royal pedigree is stated.
Line 3a: "The flower of the Kings of Britain".
5a: "Dux" is Arthur's title as commander of the British armies.
5b: "Rutilans" means "shining with a reddish-golden glow". There's a hint of Ambrosius Aurelianus and a strong claim to Roman heritage here: Julius Caesar's mother was Aurelia Cotta of the clan of the Aurelii, and her mother was Rutilia of the clan Rutilius Rufus. (There's that adjective Rufus again.)
Line 7 emphasises Alan's "noble and shining British ancestry".
Line 2b calls Alan "the flower of the magnates", but uses a word deriving from the Persian for a regional governor. This may be a reference to Alan's Iranian ancestors, the Alans, for whom he was named. The Alans had merged with the Britons in both Brittany and Galicia after both nations helped the Romans and Visigoths to defeat Attila the Hun in 451.
Alan managed to reconcile with the local populations, Anglo-Saxon, Anglo-Danish, Cumbrian and others, and actually promoted them instead of Normans. After Easter in 1088 this came to a head when the Norman barons rebelled en masse, only to be comprehensively defeated by Alan's Breton knights in alliance with the local church and people. A fleet from Normandy was also destroyed.
In late January 1091, Alan was at Dover with William II just days before the launch of a successful "English" invasion of Normandy.
Alan's legacy included the return of the British exiles, the strengthening of the English army and navy, the development of great ports, enrichment of the nation, the abolition of the Danegeld.
No wonder that "Anglia turbatur" ("England was distraught") at Alan's death "without offspring of his body".
But they needn't have despaired, for his heirs included the man (William de Tancarville) who trained and knighted William Marshall, as well as the people who opposed King John and so inspired the Robin Hood stories as well as those (alongside the Marshall) who endeavoured to restrain him with wise counsel, countless great heroes and reformers through the centuries (including the courageous Dukes of Brittany), and even some of the USA's political, legal and commercial giants.
Sometimes I wonder if nothing else is there to explore any more besides alien life. Why are people quick to assign everything to aliens? It clearly states in the article that the object is 'manmade' then what's the hype about? I would have preferred a neatly written article stating the purpose of these massive objects rather than being childish about it.
This is fascinating, April,and I plan to add this material to my lecture on Boudica next month at Gordon.
Pages