All  

Store Banner Mobile

Store Banner Mobile

Here you can navigate quickly through all comments made in any article sorted by date/time.

  • Reply to: Is Bigfoot Real? Let’s Look at Emerging Scientific Evidence   8 years 2 weeks ago
    Comment Author: Rolfe Jaremus

    For me, the most compelling evidence of the existence of Sasquatch are not only the foot prints but the extraordinary number of sighting reports that continue to pour in from all over the country. Now if the people described small green men or animals that fly or walking dead zombies, we'd know that these creatures were figments of people's imagination. The sightings on the BFRO site, which go back over 50 years describe a very similar creature. The vast majority of sightings are accidental and those that are not are usually in very remote areas. If you have taken the time to attend BFRO outings you would find that the people that attend are people from all walks of life that have little in common except their interest in this animal. Or they may have seen one, but most people have not. I was very skeptical about this for many years, and I still have many questions. But if you take the time to read some books on the subject and look at the online reports, the evidence is pretty clear.

  • Reply to: Is Bigfoot Real? Let’s Look at Emerging Scientific Evidence   8 years 2 weeks ago
    Comment Author: Blue Poppy

    So called "experts" claim people misidentify Bigfoot as a grisly bear. But a bear would not run away like Bigfoot does when it encounters a human - it would run at you and kill you.

  • Reply to: Is Bigfoot Real? Let’s Look at Emerging Scientific Evidence   8 years 2 weeks ago
    Comment Author: Rolfe Jaremus

    Veronica, you are not very well informed. There were many many reports of large harry men living in the wilderness during the pioneer days. They were not called Bigfoot or sasquatch, but newspaper reports described them much as people do today. In the early days when people encountered them they thought they were wild men, windegos, etc. They assumed that they were people that were raised by wolves. It is only because of the internet and mass communication that we have been able to assemble enough credible evidence to propose that these animals exist. Check out the BFRO web site.

  • Reply to: Intelligence and Witchcraft – What Caused the Downfall of Anne Boleyn?   8 years 2 weeks ago
    Comment Author: cremevell

    It was very stupid for ANYONE, (including Cromwell,) to remain in Henry VIII's service. Although there was no diagnostic criteria for psychopathy, it doesn't take a genius to figure out that eventually Henry would use your head in his royal bowling alley. A fantastic, historical (and somewhat hysterical) display of being blinded by greed and power.

    Ann was a pawn of her relatives. They participated in her conviction.

  • Reply to: Greed and Decline: The Treasure of the Knights Templar and Their Downfall   8 years 2 weeks ago
    Comment Author: Patrick vallée

    They made this one,

    It is said the Templar had the head of John the baptiste not jesus one.

     

  • Reply to: Planet X – Is there Scientific Evidence?   8 years 2 weeks ago
    Comment Author: Ron Salah

    For a different view of much the same material, read Immanuel Velikovsky's books beginning with Worlds in Collision. Be sure to follow up with all of his other books. Excellent reads all of them. Check out thunderbolts.com and the theory of the electric universe, and check out video of their's on youtube Symbols of an Alien Sky. Fascinating stuff.

  • Reply to: 1,600-Year-Old Goblet Shows that the Romans Used Nanotechnology   8 years 2 weeks ago
    Comment Author: Patrick vallée
     

     

    In the case of this cup, the change of color is relates to the light direction. If you put wine into it, with or without poison the light won't notice, i think :)

  • Reply to: Planet X – Is there Scientific Evidence?   8 years 2 weeks ago
    Comment Author: Glen

    Waldo,

    Now would be the optimal time for you to produce the names of these German scholars.

  • Reply to: Double Medieval child burial, one Pagan, one Christian, mystifies German researchers   8 years 2 weeks ago
    Comment Author: Glen

    While I had never heard of dual interment in the same grave, my first impression was that it was a means of ensuring an unbaptized child would go to Heaven.

    I am not clear as to why the Merovingian child would be buried so far from the family seat? More questions arise when one considers that Frankfurt is far from a place where a Scandinavian would be buried.

  • Reply to: New study confirms ancient people of Chile died of slow poisoning from arsenic   8 years 2 weeks ago
    Comment Author: Glen

    Would this have anything to with the copper deposits in northern Chile?

  • Reply to: Intelligence and Witchcraft – What Caused the Downfall of Anne Boleyn?   8 years 2 weeks ago
    Comment Author: Glen

    I did not realized this had been posted. I thought it had been lost because of a computer glitch.

    There is some digression her and as you can see, and deleted it with my new post.

    I will answer questions for this segment also.

  • Reply to: Intelligence and Witchcraft – What Caused the Downfall of Anne Boleyn?   8 years 2 weeks ago
    Comment Author: Glen

    Anne's failure to provide a son and heir for Henry VIII caused her downfall. Also needing consideration were other families who wished for their daughters to marry Henry VIII and increase the families prestige, power and wealth.
    Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor, was the nephew of Catherine of Aragon and blamed Anne for his aunt's misfortunes. Therefore, Charles was not unbiased. Charles was also the King of Spain which put him in competition with Henry for control of the Atlantic Ocean and the New World. Anne had refused to go to bed with Henry for about 3 years after she had caught his attentions, here is where the bewitched or casting a spell on Henry originated.. Since Henry had divorced Catherine, divorce was not an option the second time in a row. So, another option was needed.

    Cromwell, Henry/s new top advisor, came up with a solution for Henry's d esire to end his marriage. Rumor mongers had spread stories of Anne's lovers, when married to a monarch, adultery becomes high treason against the king, a capital offense punishable by death. Since Anne was the Queen, the manner of death would be by beheading. Henry secured the services of a swordsman to who could remove her head with one stroke of his sword. With an axe, 3 blows of the axe was usually necessary to remove the head. However, Anne could also be accused of witchcraft which was also a capital offense, manner of death is being burned at the stake.
    Anne was given the choice of confessing to incest/adultery with her brother or confessing to witchcraft.
    She confessed to incest. Anne's brother and father were also beheaded.

    Questions?

  • Reply to: Planet X – Is there Scientific Evidence?   8 years 2 weeks ago
    Comment Author: Patrick vallée

    Write a novel, this seem interesting enough :).

  • Reply to: Planet X – Is there Scientific Evidence?   8 years 2 weeks ago
    Comment Author: TheAdmonisher

    STFU government liar! The site Sitchiniswrong is nothing but an evil government lying operation! Planet X is what the chemtrails hide every day globally! Your evil governments have planned on Americans dying inWW3 and most of the rest of the world dying when Planet X comes around. It will end the war that destroys America.

  • Reply to: Planet X – Is there Scientific Evidence?   8 years 2 weeks ago
    Comment Author: Patrick vallée

    Petunia Your last comment is more interesting then your first.

    Your first is more like if a fervent believer that all as been debunked and blablabla...

  • Reply to: Planet X – Is there Scientific Evidence?   8 years 2 weeks ago
    Comment Author: Patrick vallée

    So a dubious translater with no name say nibiru mean bright object then jumping on that bandwagon a so very gang of smart astronomer with yet again no names speculate that must be the brightest star then jump on Sirius. Yes they are very smart indeed.

    Im under the impression that this is just rubish speculation so far.

  • Reply to: Planet X – Is there Scientific Evidence?   8 years 2 weeks ago
    Comment Author: TheAdmonisher

    Shut up government liar!

  • Reply to: Planet X – Is there Scientific Evidence?   8 years 2 weeks ago
    Comment Author: TheAdmonisher

    You are a government liar!

  • Reply to: Planet X – Is there Scientific Evidence?   8 years 2 weeks ago
    Comment Author: RenegadeProphet

    The entire government are evil treasonous criminals. The day of the next false flag using the nuke they stole in 2007 and blamed on Iran, America will be destroyed by Russia, China and the SCO. This is the war of Armageddon and you can know it is now because of Planet X and the toxic chemtrails that hide it every day. Planet X will end the war when it rips the earth apart again but 90% of Americans will be dead already. All planned by your evil government.

  • Reply to: Intelligence and Witchcraft – What Caused the Downfall of Anne Boleyn?   8 years 2 weeks ago
    Comment Author: Glen

    Anne's failure to provide a son and heir for Henry VIII caused her downfall. Also needing consideration were other families who wished for their daughters to marry Henry VIII and increase the families prestige, power and wealth.

    Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor, was the nephew of Catherine of Aragon and blamed Anne for his aunt's misfortunes. Therefore, Charles was not unbiased. Charles was also the King of Spain which put him in competition with Henry for control of the Atlantic Ocean and the New World. Anne had refused to go to bed with Henry for about 3 years after she had caught his attentions. Since Henry had divorced Catherine, divorce was not an option the second time in a row. So, another option was needed.
    Cardinal Wolsey, Henry's main advisor, had delayed Henry's divorce because of his position in the Roman Catholic Church. The Pope, whose approval was needed for the divorce of a monarch, was essentially a prisoner of Charles V, so he was in no position to grant Henry's annulment.

Pages