Perhaps the sun does need more respect, but the evidence here all points very strongly towards a comet swarm. A solar outburst on the scale you imagine would not discriminate - the entire surface of the Earth would be 'sterilised'. There is no evidence for that.
Natalia: your English is not good, and neither is your knowledge of history. It was painful to read your articles. I will give just a couple of examples of your mistakes: King Jagiello, does, in fact, appear in Matejko's Grunwald painting. He is shown standing on a hill in the upper right. Second, the abandonment of the siege of Malbork was hardly a "loss". The battle weakened the Order to such an extent that they were unable to stand against the Prussian Confederation (historically Polish cities under Teutonic rule). I don;t understand how you have a Master's degree in History. Your research is nonexisting, your arguments biased.
How does this jive with the big eruption of Krakatoa (sp) also about 12,000 years ago that supposedly reduced the earth's population to about 2,000 people?
Why would you say... "However, for some unknown reason, Polish researchers have generally said that the Kingdom of Lechia is nothing more than a legend or fairy tale."
Where did you gather such nonsense? Please delete this statement unless you can back it up with extensive details. You may be confused somehow.... I gather that you wrote the sentence wrong. The story of the Lechia kingdom is also a legend (legenda) but it's not a fairytale (basnia) yet its history could have been mentioned in fable books etc. and therefore mixed with fictional stories. It tells you how ancient this land of Lechia (later baptised Polska) is. This is called HISTORY. Your statement is rude. Lechia was very much real which adapted the name for the land where a man named Lech lived. Research properly.
There is actually quite a bit of detailed, published, and peer-reviewed research from various individuals, groups, and organizations that DO support this theory. Try reading some books and publications, instead of being merely a f-tard.
I wept while watching the videos of the fire and I'm not a Catholic, or even a Christian, but Notre Dame was an icon of Western history and culture. Its demise is symbolic of the fall of Western civilization.
Baseless accusations are not welcome here. It is very dangerous to accuse a community of people without any evidence whatsoever. Any further comments along these lines will result in the suspension of your account.
I'm not sure if it was the black plague in the mid-14th century B. C. E. that caused the Pharaoh Amenhotep lll to break with tradition and usurp the solar disk of Ra-Harakhte, which was portrayed in relief so as to appear life-like and then added sun rays extended downward with little hands on the tips that were always "enlightening" the Pharaoh. The cult of the "Aton" was thus established with the influence of the Pharaoh while courting Mittanni princesses from "the land of the sons of the east" (Genesis 29:1).
The Hebrews inherited likewise from the Hurrians dwelling among them in the central hill country, having the blessing of Japheth dwelling in the tent of Shem (Genesis 9:27). The biblical association with Ararat links it to the kingdom of Urartu, where Hurrian is the spoken language.
In the Amarna diplomatic correspondence tablets we have the king of Megiddo relaying to the Pharaoh that he had conscripted forced laborers to reap the grain harvest in the region of Shunem, which is in the territory of the tribe of Issachar. This in accordance with Canaan being a slave of a ruler who is a slave to Pharaoh.
While this is going on, the mystery that those people were acquainted with at the Raqefet Cave 13,000 years ago around the time of the cataclysm. The ceremony in which wheat kernals germinate in water before undergoing a fermentation process, is described by an author as being part of the mystery of the Egyptian Sed festival designed to revitalize an aging and perhaps, inept king.
"There is a kinship between the effect of a fermentation and that of leaven in bread, but even more so with the phenomenon of gene mutation."
"Sacred Science; The King of Pharaonic Theocracy," by R. A. Schwaller de Lubicz, p. 242
The great fire of Notre Dame 2019 is a sign. As the billows arose, I thought: the smoke of Satan. It is a great tragedy. It is not just a building, not just a museum. It is a monument to God and our Lady that represents the majesty of God and the beauty and Queenship of The great Mother of God, as well as a home to those who built it, those who worship there, and all pilgrims. Who knows how many non-believers it inspired to seek God.
Ironic that with the restoration going on, the restoration was reversed and that destruction would take place instead! Odd that such a great monument would be left so unguarded. 1. Sprinkler system? 2. One would think that a least two security guards would be there for it with round-the-clock watch. 3. Most churches have an adoration chapel – there were no adorers? So, there was a lack of vigilance. “He came to the disciples and found them sleeping. And he said to Peter, “So, could you not watch with me one hour?” (Matthew 26:40)
"The cathedral came under attack during the French Revolution in 1793 AD, and many of its treasures were destroyed or plundered. In 1801 AD, the new ruler, Napoleon Bonaparte, ordered the cathedral to be restored. Since then, it has undergone numerous restoration works, and ironically, latest restoration works may result in its final destruction."
There is a footnote on the explanation of this thesis. “The discussion of these texts revealed that scholars differ about the interpretation (of the Kuntillet el-'Ajrud inscriptions), reading either 'Asherata' or 'his Asherah' and also about the question whether only the sacred pole is implied. The initial objection to the rendering 'his Asherah' that a possessive pronoun could not be attached to a proper name, is increasingly proved to be unfounded by a great deal of comparative material (Especially P. Xella, 'Le dieu et «sa» déesse: I'utilisation des suffixes pronominaux avec des théonymes d'Ebla à Ugarit et à Kuntillet 'Ajrud', UF 27 (1995), pp. 599-610). Furthermore, this objection is no longer valid if one accepts that 'asherah', like Babylonian istaru might also mean a synonym or title for a goddess, in particular, the divine spouse.” Meinhardt Dukstra El, the God of Israel – Israel the people of YHWH: On the Origins of Ancient Israelite Yahwism in Only One God?: Monotheism in Ancient Israel and the Veneration of the Goddess Asherah (Biblical Seminar ) by Bob Becking, Meindert Dijkstra, Marjo C. A. Korpel, Karel J. H. Vriezen, Sheffield Academic Press 2001, p. 117
I am reading ‘ašerato lamo assuming: (a) an original r got corrupted to d (see Cross-Freedman ibid. p. 106) . This can easily happen in either the old Hebrew or the Aramaic script. (b) a construction similar, to the admittedly much later, Song of Songs 1:6 karmi šelli.
You so want to say God (Yaweh) had a wife. This is stretching it a bit. Maybe you should read the Bible a little more for better understanding?
Here you can navigate quickly through all comments made in any article sorted by date/time.
Perhaps the sun does need more respect, but the evidence here all points very strongly towards a comet swarm. A solar outburst on the scale you imagine would not discriminate - the entire surface of the Earth would be 'sterilised'. There is no evidence for that.
To my knowledge, there was no such eruption at that time. Perhaps you are referring to Toba, circa 70,000 BC?
Again, did you even read my book before commenting? The evidence is all there.
Natalia: your English is not good, and neither is your knowledge of history. It was painful to read your articles. I will give just a couple of examples of your mistakes: King Jagiello, does, in fact, appear in Matejko's Grunwald painting. He is shown standing on a hill in the upper right. Second, the abandonment of the siege of Malbork was hardly a "loss". The battle weakened the Order to such an extent that they were unable to stand against the Prussian Confederation (historically Polish cities under Teutonic rule). I don;t understand how you have a Master's degree in History. Your research is nonexisting, your arguments biased.
How does this jive with the big eruption of Krakatoa (sp) also about 12,000 years ago that supposedly reduced the earth's population to about 2,000 people?
there is nothing to suggest anything of the sort happened.
Mutilation of both genders should be illegal,
The answer is simple. It did not survive in the region and this region remains occupied territory by Muslims to this day
Why would you say... "However, for some unknown reason, Polish researchers have generally said that the Kingdom of Lechia is nothing more than a legend or fairy tale."
Where did you gather such nonsense? Please delete this statement unless you can back it up with extensive details. You may be confused somehow.... I gather that you wrote the sentence wrong. The story of the Lechia kingdom is also a legend (legenda) but it's not a fairytale (basnia) yet its history could have been mentioned in fable books etc. and therefore mixed with fictional stories. It tells you how ancient this land of Lechia (later baptised Polska) is. This is called HISTORY. Your statement is rude. Lechia was very much real which adapted the name for the land where a man named Lech lived. Research properly.
There is actually quite a bit of detailed, published, and peer-reviewed research from various individuals, groups, and organizations that DO support this theory. Try reading some books and publications, instead of being merely a f-tard.
Excellent comment!!
I wept while watching the videos of the fire and I'm not a Catholic, or even a Christian, but Notre Dame was an icon of Western history and culture. Its demise is symbolic of the fall of Western civilization.
The scientific evidence is all there, as summarised in my book Prehistory Decoded. Did you read it before making your comment?
speculation at best, no material evidence to support any of the claims in this article!
Baseless accusations are not welcome here. It is very dangerous to accuse a community of people without any evidence whatsoever. Any further comments along these lines will result in the suspension of your account.
I'm afraind the buddhist are behind this. Paris has been taken over by the buddhists.
I'm not sure if it was the black plague in the mid-14th century B. C. E. that caused the Pharaoh Amenhotep lll to break with tradition and usurp the solar disk of Ra-Harakhte, which was portrayed in relief so as to appear life-like and then added sun rays extended downward with little hands on the tips that were always "enlightening" the Pharaoh. The cult of the "Aton" was thus established with the influence of the Pharaoh while courting Mittanni princesses from "the land of the sons of the east" (Genesis 29:1).
The Hebrews inherited likewise from the Hurrians dwelling among them in the central hill country, having the blessing of Japheth dwelling in the tent of Shem (Genesis 9:27). The biblical association with Ararat links it to the kingdom of Urartu, where Hurrian is the spoken language.
In the Amarna diplomatic correspondence tablets we have the king of Megiddo relaying to the Pharaoh that he had conscripted forced laborers to reap the grain harvest in the region of Shunem, which is in the territory of the tribe of Issachar. This in accordance with Canaan being a slave of a ruler who is a slave to Pharaoh.
While this is going on, the mystery that those people were acquainted with at the Raqefet Cave 13,000 years ago around the time of the cataclysm. The ceremony in which wheat kernals germinate in water before undergoing a fermentation process, is described by an author as being part of the mystery of the Egyptian Sed festival designed to revitalize an aging and perhaps, inept king.
"There is a kinship between the effect of a fermentation and that of leaven in bread, but even more so with the phenomenon of gene mutation."
"Sacred Science; The King of Pharaonic Theocracy," by R. A. Schwaller de Lubicz, p. 242
The great fire of Notre Dame 2019 is a sign. As the billows arose, I thought: the smoke of Satan. It is a great tragedy. It is not just a building, not just a museum. It is a monument to God and our Lady that represents the majesty of God and the beauty and Queenship of The great Mother of God, as well as a home to those who built it, those who worship there, and all pilgrims. Who knows how many non-believers it inspired to seek God.
Ironic that with the restoration going on, the restoration was reversed and that destruction would take place instead! Odd that such a great monument would be left so unguarded. 1. Sprinkler system? 2. One would think that a least two security guards would be there for it with round-the-clock watch. 3. Most churches have an adoration chapel – there were no adorers? So, there was a lack of vigilance. “He came to the disciples and found them sleeping. And he said to Peter, “So, could you not watch with me one hour?” (Matthew 26:40)
"The cathedral came under attack during the French Revolution in 1793 AD, and many of its treasures were destroyed or plundered. In 1801 AD, the new ruler, Napoleon Bonaparte, ordered the cathedral to be restored. Since then, it has undergone numerous restoration works, and ironically, latest restoration works may result in its final destruction."
Holy shit, I can't believe I will never see Notre Dame again.
There is a footnote on the explanation of this thesis. “The discussion of these texts revealed that scholars differ about the interpretation (of the Kuntillet el-'Ajrud inscriptions), reading either 'Asherata' or 'his Asherah' and also about the question whether only the sacred pole is implied. The initial objection to the rendering 'his Asherah' that a possessive pronoun could not be attached to a proper name, is increasingly proved to be unfounded by a great deal of comparative material (Especially P. Xella, 'Le dieu et «sa» déesse: I'utilisation des suffixes pronominaux avec des théonymes d'Ebla à Ugarit et à Kuntillet 'Ajrud', UF 27 (1995), pp. 599-610). Furthermore, this objection is no longer valid if one accepts that 'asherah', like Babylonian istaru might also mean a synonym or title for a goddess, in particular, the divine spouse.” Meinhardt Dukstra El, the God of Israel – Israel the people of YHWH: On the Origins of Ancient Israelite Yahwism in Only One God?: Monotheism in Ancient Israel and the Veneration of the Goddess Asherah (Biblical Seminar ) by Bob Becking, Meindert Dijkstra, Marjo C. A. Korpel, Karel J. H. Vriezen, Sheffield Academic Press 2001, p. 117
I am reading ‘ašerato lamo assuming: (a) an original r got corrupted to d (see Cross-Freedman ibid. p. 106) . This can easily happen in either the old Hebrew or the Aramaic script. (b) a construction similar, to the admittedly much later, Song of Songs 1:6 karmi šelli.
You so want to say God (Yaweh) had a wife. This is stretching it a bit. Maybe you should read the Bible a little more for better understanding?
Pages