time is infinite so there is no 'before the beginning of time'! my dog is well educated so no worries...i can not look toward the external to know where i come from or where i am going. we need no proof that we are here and pride can cause us to refuse improvement.
I have no idea if this is a hoax or not. However, if its real i have a hypothesis the "The Phaistos disc" is in fact a list of symbols that represent specific trade goods either in demand or cheaply available at that port. The river and pyramid at the center of side would of course represent Egypt as a starting point.
The title of academic is usually bestowed upon people by other peers. Too many so called academics are calling nearly all of Turkey : Anatolia. Everyone knows that the Greeks called Anatolia, the lands beyond the shores. There is still Kapadokia, and after that the Armenian highlands, before you get to Eastern Turkey. Despite Turkish government efforts to erase any traces of pre Islamic history. Academics who want accolades, need to show more integrity, and do more research.
It would be very useful for authors and everyone to get in the habit of differentiating between gender and sex. There is no such a thing as a third sex. Even intersexed people are a combination of both male and female primary and secondary sex characteristics, but they are not a third sex unto themselves.
Sex is biological, it's in our chromosomes and most people are either XX or XY. A few who are inter-sexed may have different combinations but they are still primarily male or female.
Gender is basically what used to be referred to as sex-role stereotypes. The aesthetics and mannerisms that are enforced upon people from birth. These are cultural and are not really hardwired in accordance with being male or female (sex). Sometimes they coincide, sometimes they do not and sometimes they are brutally imposed on people who do not want them and can't perform them with any degree of gusto or credibility. Overall, you could say gender is oppressive to many people and appealing to some as well. Please stop conflating sex and gender.
The people archaeology attempts to study are not part of a modern paradigm. Most people are able to understand that performative preferences and defaults do not a biological sex make. Divisions of labor along male and female (sex) lines have been common to many cultures but these are not always consistent from culture to culture. Attempting to interpret something as delicate sex and gender balance ratio through the contemporary identity fracas is at best irresponsible and revisionist.
The most important part they are forgetting tis the hypothesis of back migration. Native Americans were already in the Americas or Beringia since before 31,000 thousand years, and a few back migrated into Northeast Siberia around 12,000-10,000 years ago.,, That's why this 10,000 year old Siberian is related to Native Americans.
There is evidence that is willfully ignored by the mainstream academic community. They're more concerned with career than in reconciling difficult facts. The land bridge wasn't the only way to North America. There were seaworthy boats at least 40,000 years ago (how we got to Australia) and there is evidence of African migrations to South America older than 15,000 years ago. You don't hear much about them though.
Considering how sparse the land is in Oceania and how fully populated it is, it is reasonable to think that some of those migrations missed the islands and kept going until they hit North America. Maybe most of them did. Sure, the Oceania islands were populated more recently, but, throw a bunch of darts at a dart board from too far away and you'll hit the background far sooner and far more often than the bulls-eye. Shoot across the pacific, and the islands of Oceania are less than a bulls-eye compared to the background of the Americas.
Your stories probably contain an element of truth too. Before the advent of writing, oral histories were usually accurate going back thousands of years. The historicity of Noah's Ark is a stunning example of this. The events may be preserved, but specific details were lost or embellished with editorial flourish. The biblical version of Noah's ark is only a fairly recent version of many accounts describing a grand flooding event that happened (if I remember correctly) about 50,000 years ago, according to the geological record.
But, that's the problem. Without written records and/or an abundance of hard evidence, it can't rise above the realm of speculation. It can be likely, and it can even be true. But without proof, it's not science. You can't build an academic career on speculation. That doesn't mean it shouldn't be taken seriously.
You are so close to the truth, yet remain so far away from our (Native America Indians) ancestral history of where we come from.
Yes a percentage of modern natives did come from Asia, we have oral history that speaks about the great Western invasion from people from the northwestern areas, that would kill all males, and keep the females that could bear child birth
We fought a war that rage over a three hundred period here in North America. But our stories don't fit your time line or concept of where we come from.
In the real story of the legend of kituwah, my ancestors have always been here since before the beginning of time. Though I don't have the education degrees you guys have, so in the main frame of society you are right, and I am wrong.
If I was going to buy an expensive wine to drink I think I would get from a highly rated and small batch producer for a fresh bottle no older than 25 years.
If I was just a wine collector I would definitely want one of those sunken bottles to show my friends in my big wine cellar.
If people are willing to try the fetid soup from that sarcogophus in Egypt, some would surely be willing to try this wine, but why spoil it? I tried some 60 year old whisky from a fancy decanter bottle – some brand I’d never heard – and it was terrible. I think the cork had deteriorated and let air in, but I’m not sure it was very good when it was bottled. Buyer beware, ha.
Here you can navigate quickly through all comments made in any article sorted by date/time.
time is infinite so there is no 'before the beginning of time'! my dog is well educated so no worries...i can not look toward the external to know where i come from or where i am going. we need no proof that we are here and pride can cause us to refuse improvement.
eventually the earth recycles everything including people and civilizations... dig it
I have no idea if this is a hoax or not. However, if its real i have a hypothesis the "The Phaistos disc" is in fact a list of symbols that represent specific trade goods either in demand or cheaply available at that port. The river and pyramid at the center of side would of course represent Egypt as a starting point.
you are right from your side and i am right from mine...we are all one too many mornings and a thousand miles behind
It’s like chutes and ladders of the Bronze Age. It’s board game. A little more digging would have found the clay d20 and d6
The title of academic is usually bestowed upon people by other peers. Too many so called academics are calling nearly all of Turkey : Anatolia. Everyone knows that the Greeks called Anatolia, the lands beyond the shores. There is still Kapadokia, and after that the Armenian highlands, before you get to Eastern Turkey. Despite Turkish government efforts to erase any traces of pre Islamic history. Academics who want accolades, need to show more integrity, and do more research.
It would be very useful for authors and everyone to get in the habit of differentiating between gender and sex. There is no such a thing as a third sex. Even intersexed people are a combination of both male and female primary and secondary sex characteristics, but they are not a third sex unto themselves.
Sex is biological, it's in our chromosomes and most people are either XX or XY. A few who are inter-sexed may have different combinations but they are still primarily male or female.
Gender is basically what used to be referred to as sex-role stereotypes. The aesthetics and mannerisms that are enforced upon people from birth. These are cultural and are not really hardwired in accordance with being male or female (sex). Sometimes they coincide, sometimes they do not and sometimes they are brutally imposed on people who do not want them and can't perform them with any degree of gusto or credibility. Overall, you could say gender is oppressive to many people and appealing to some as well. Please stop conflating sex and gender.
The people archaeology attempts to study are not part of a modern paradigm. Most people are able to understand that performative preferences and defaults do not a biological sex make. Divisions of labor along male and female (sex) lines have been common to many cultures but these are not always consistent from culture to culture. Attempting to interpret something as delicate sex and gender balance ratio through the contemporary identity fracas is at best irresponsible and revisionist.
The most important part they are forgetting tis the hypothesis of back migration. Native Americans were already in the Americas or Beringia since before 31,000 thousand years, and a few back migrated into Northeast Siberia around 12,000-10,000 years ago.,, That's why this 10,000 year old Siberian is related to Native Americans.
Maybe there was a complete universe at one time that was sucked into a large black hole and then the big bang happened and everything began again.
There is evidence that is willfully ignored by the mainstream academic community. They're more concerned with career than in reconciling difficult facts. The land bridge wasn't the only way to North America. There were seaworthy boats at least 40,000 years ago (how we got to Australia) and there is evidence of African migrations to South America older than 15,000 years ago. You don't hear much about them though.
Considering how sparse the land is in Oceania and how fully populated it is, it is reasonable to think that some of those migrations missed the islands and kept going until they hit North America. Maybe most of them did. Sure, the Oceania islands were populated more recently, but, throw a bunch of darts at a dart board from too far away and you'll hit the background far sooner and far more often than the bulls-eye. Shoot across the pacific, and the islands of Oceania are less than a bulls-eye compared to the background of the Americas.
Your stories probably contain an element of truth too. Before the advent of writing, oral histories were usually accurate going back thousands of years. The historicity of Noah's Ark is a stunning example of this. The events may be preserved, but specific details were lost or embellished with editorial flourish. The biblical version of Noah's ark is only a fairly recent version of many accounts describing a grand flooding event that happened (if I remember correctly) about 50,000 years ago, according to the geological record.
But, that's the problem. Without written records and/or an abundance of hard evidence, it can't rise above the realm of speculation. It can be likely, and it can even be true. But without proof, it's not science. You can't build an academic career on speculation. That doesn't mean it shouldn't be taken seriously.
The original Roman candle was a body strapped to a tree and set ablaze
No rope, use nails.
Mark of Cain
Inca anagram
There are also heads / faces found on Mars
There is a similar short stumpy head
And one that looks like Apollo
There is also one that looks like Obama frowning
Not to mention the giant face next to the pyramid
Nothing in archaeologist is ever 'settled'. that is the most ignorant statement ever made...
You are so close to the truth, yet remain so far away from our (Native America Indians) ancestral history of where we come from.
Yes a percentage of modern natives did come from Asia, we have oral history that speaks about the great Western invasion from people from the northwestern areas, that would kill all males, and keep the females that could bear child birth
We fought a war that rage over a three hundred period here in North America. But our stories don't fit your time line or concept of where we come from.
In the real story of the legend of kituwah, my ancestors have always been here since before the beginning of time. Though I don't have the education degrees you guys have, so in the main frame of society you are right, and I am wrong.
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/whisky-found-shipwreck-1895-set-89...
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/shipwreck-champagne-auctioned_n_1580697
If I was going to buy an expensive wine to drink I think I would get from a highly rated and small batch producer for a fresh bottle no older than 25 years.
If I was just a wine collector I would definitely want one of those sunken bottles to show my friends in my big wine cellar.
If people are willing to try the fetid soup from that sarcogophus in Egypt, some would surely be willing to try this wine, but why spoil it? I tried some 60 year old whisky from a fancy decanter bottle – some brand I’d never heard – and it was terrible. I think the cork had deteriorated and let air in, but I’m not sure it was very good when it was bottled. Buyer beware, ha.
I think that in the future, hunderds of Man’s ancestors will be found
Pages