All  

Iraq Banner Desktop

Store Banner Mobile

Here you can navigate quickly through all comments made in any article sorted by date/time.

  • Reply to: Revealing the Face and Identity of the Controversial Mummy KV55   3 years 1 month ago
    Comment Author: Charles Bowles

    Hi Bruce,  If you could build a TIME MACHINE and went back to the building of the pyramids in ancient Egypt/Nubia, I guarantee you that the Black people would give you a strange look as if they had NEVER seen a white person before, then start whispering to themselves while saying in their ancient tongues, “WHAT HAPPENED TO HIS SKIN, DID HE LOSE IT”,  same as the brown skin on an irish potato when you peel off the skin and see the only the white meat of the veggie.   It is a fact that you don’t listen to the facts which I have posted about the ancient Egyptian “BOOK OF THE DEAD” which was approved by all of the ancient Egyptian Priests written by the scribe name “Hunefer” which stated very clearly where the ancient Black Egyptians came from:    “WE CAME FROM WHERE THE NILE BEGIN, AND WHERE GOD  “HAPI” DWELL, AT THE FOOTHILLS OF THE MOUNTAIN OF THE MOON”…….   hunefer papyrus                                                                                                                                                                                                          There are only two mountains in all of Africa that are referred to as “MOUNTAINS OF THE MOON”and they are the Kilimanjaro in Tanzania, and the Rwesori in Uganda, and both are located in East/Central Africa in the Great Lakes region of Africa.  But it appears that you think that Caucasoid’s came from a home in Central Africa, used the African skull practice of “LIPOMBO” to deform the heads of white royal babies.   Okay, Okay, Okay, you said twice that you were going to ignore me, but you seem to have a difficult time doin so.  I sincerely hope that you ignore me and continue believing in your white supremacist rhetoric...

  • Reply to: Revealing the Face and Identity of the Controversial Mummy KV55   3 years 1 month ago
    Comment Author: Senowsret

    Sir Charles,

    You are just another insecure hotep culture vulture who covets an advanced civilization your ancestors had nothing in common with.

    You should look into the research of an actual female anthropologist, a real scientist like Miranda Lovett:

    A citation from Miranda Lovett,a Black woman and anthropologist,in Sapiens on line magazine 07/21/20:

    “Ironically, perhaps, recent research has shown that early Egyptians were mostly lighter-skinned: Genetically, Egyptians did not mix with darker-skinned sub-Saharan peoples until the last 1,500 years, well after the end of native Egyptian dynasties. I have seen the ancient word for the Nile Valley, Kmt—which translates as “black land”—used as evidence that Black people lived in Egypt; actually, it refers to the black, fertile soil of that region.”

     

    https://apple.news/AR7dvTZYrTbqBe19699eGpQ

     

  • Reply to: Revealing the Face and Identity of the Controversial Mummy KV55   3 years 1 month ago
    Comment Author: Charles Bowles

    Hi Bruce, i can see that you are a very emotionally unstable guy who wish that the ancient Black Egyptians, Nubians, Carthaginians, Kushites, Axumites, ancient Somalians (Punt), BLACK MINOANS, Pheonicians, Canaanites, Etruscans, and even the wealthiest man that lived on earth by the name of Mansa Musa (Emperor of Mali) were not Black race people?  Well Buddy, you just have to live with that fact of emotional racist illnesses….  later dude

  • Reply to: Revealing the Face and Identity of the Controversial Mummy KV55   3 years 1 month ago
    Comment Author: Charles Bowles

    Hi Senowswet, I agree that ancient Black Egyptians/Nubians were a very beautiful and intelligent race of people, and that present day people throughout the world still admire them more than any other race of people on earth.  Because of that universal admiration, it is a fact that all other races like to claim these ancient Black people to be members of their own races, and i can understand them having that kind of “inferiority complex”’..

  • Reply to: Witch Pricking And The Devil’s Mark   3 years 1 month ago
    Comment Author: Caesar A. Mendez

    Ok, the ‘Hay-Day’ of these Wich-Finders was supposedly from the late 16th to the mid-to-late(?) 17th centuries which was the Baroque era an extention of the earlier Renaissance era. Definitely after the Medieval period. This “Hay-Day” fell within the era where Catholics & Protestants were at eachother’s throats literately. There were other politcal & economic conflicts & changes going during this time that the mostly illiterate common folk couldn’t grasp so they were open to find a convenient ‘scape-goat’; a great oppotunity for witch-finder con-artist. And these ‘witch-finders’ weren’t the only unscrupulous ones; think of the people who hired them. Accusing, “proving” & executing someone for being a witch was a great way to be rid someone, an unwanted wife, a woman of some property or other wealth that the accuser wanted. I bet it wasn't always some poor old-hag. Thinking about it I wouldn’t be surprised if these “witch-finders” weren't in a way murder-for-hire assasins. And don’t forget the Salem witch-trials which was really using superstition as a weapon in a political struggle between Salem village & Salem town proper.  

  • Reply to: Ancient Indian Flying Machines –Truth in the Legends?   3 years 1 month ago
    Comment Author: granbo

    anita soderman
    Sun 3/21/2021 9:55 AM
    Thank you Chandra for your eyeopening insights in the Indian past, to which we seem needy to turn for real enlightment about our far past. - I could hardly believe my eyes when I read and reread your message....
    But don´t we have a whole nation well advanced in Sanskrit for the translations you talk about. I mean the Israelians are well versed in that language and used to studies of esotherics? Could they not be enthused to help out with a little translations? May be I could be of help with connecting.
    For me I would love to know more about that official study by a committee within the Aeronautical Research and
    Development Board of India in 2001, as such covering metals, heat absorbing material, aerial routes , machinery, pilot , clothing and of course Melting as well as the list of 32 special features. Would there be copies of this or other information anywhere handy?

    What is your opinion on the Viper vids on YT? For me they are sensational with the informative texts as well as beautiful imagery accompanying. Maybe the talk there is about the same Sastry that you mention, to apparently have found ways to shortcut eons of time into explainable volumes? Highly enjoyable and testing to the fact that India is now as ever where to turn for explanations in this field. A little note, actually I was most impressed from my Agra experience by the whole sheet going straight up in the air, and down again slowly, no gravitation there. East is east and west is west.. you know.
    Best regards

    Anita Söderman

  • Reply to: What did the Egyptians think of Cleopatra?   3 years 1 month ago
    Comment Author: rwthless.hunt@b...

    Well, she would certainly know quite a lot about Egypt.  She would have been trained by priests about the history of her people, especially about her predecessors.  She would need to have information brought to her by spies and traders, often the same thing about the nations that she would encounter.  If they were preparing for war, what goods were hard to get in their countries, what they would pay a lot for, how much crime was usual in their country, how much they respected women if at all.  

    For example, she knew the Romans had the Paterfamilias arrangement in their families, with the husband having the power of life and death over his household, wives, children and slaves. She needed to surprise Caesar hence having a carpet rolled out with her inside it.  I can’t rememberoffhand if this was Shakespeare’s idea (he copied most of them from other people) or something that actually happened.  It would have surprised him and given her a momentary advantage since he was arriving as a conqueror. 

  • Reply to: Revealing the Face and Identity of the Controversial Mummy KV55   3 years 1 month ago
    Comment Author: Bruce Nowakowski

    You aren’t educated at all, you are a bigoted idiot.  The Greeks, including the Cretes as well as the Etruscans all have Steppe DNA in the lineage based on studies done of the Iron and Bronze aged inhabitants in said regions. by Steppe we mean Russia ergo they are Indo-Europeans.    Hannibal was from Carthage a PHOENICIAN colony ergo he was Semetic not African.  The style of pottery found in Crete was stylistic and not meant to represent skin tone.  Not all Europeans have thing noses etc.  Take one look at nearing any Slavic/Eastern European male face and you will easily see that.   Its a Fact the Egytpians where Olive skinned although the did have interactions with the folks from Cushites and Nubians.  They did on occasion have dynasties from those areas, but at the time we are talking about the Hyksios culture was dominant and thus Semetic as Hyksios is the Egyptian word for the the area between the Tigris and the Medeteranean.  I’m sorry you have been brainwashed into thinking all these fallacies, but really.  Take a nap and think about the hate you are spewing while ignoring the actual article you are spewing it about.  People like you are the reason there is so much hate in the world.  Its people like you who judge people on skin tone, ignoring Martin Luther King Jr’s pleas to judge people by their heart and not their skin.  You are a racist and have an great evil in your soul.   You are lost and need to find light and peace.

  • Reply to: Revealing the Face and Identity of the Controversial Mummy KV55   3 years 1 month ago
    Comment Author: Bruce Nowakowski

    He is a racist.  You could build a time machine, take him back to the building of the Pyramids and show them people were olive skinned and he’d still insist he was right.  I am ignoring him, and I suggest others do too. 

  • Reply to: What did the Egyptians think of Cleopatra?   3 years 1 month ago
    Comment Author: Osirisan

    Something I doubt she had any erudition based on historical summaries

  • Reply to: Revealing the Face and Identity of the Controversial Mummy KV55   3 years 1 month ago
    Comment Author: Senowsret

    Sir Charles,

    Black phenotypes are dominant:prognathism, woolly hair, large flared nostrils, black to jet black skin, lack of male facial hair-all of these are absent amongst the autochthonous Caucasian people of North Africa and the Middle East. Just like there have never been black Egyptians there have never been black Moors or other Amazigh peoples. Science is real . White people did not descend from black albinos or Mullatos for that matter. Furthermore, Egyptians haven't been a primitive tribal people for over 5000 years. Can't say the same for the rest of our neighbors though! Egypt occupies less than 3% of the continent, yet no evidence of ancient Egypt in the other 97%. Sad, one nation is responsible for all civilization on the continent. I see how tempting for black supremacists to covet us so much...Egypt is sexy.

  • Reply to: The Establishment Has Already Acknowledged A Lost Race of Giants - Part 1   3 years 1 month ago
    Comment Author: Barry Sears

    “About 13,000 years ago, more than three-fourths of the large Ice Age animals, including woolly mammoths, mastodons, saber-toothed tigers and giant bears, died out.”

    Life grew to a maximum size when environmental conditions allowed this and since life has been reducing in size and logic suggests so have humans. There is a planetary model that suggests why and you will find it known as the cosmic drag theory. Discrepancies with data and observations can be corrected with this concept and I believe that animal evolution also correlates to the concept. An organic process of planetary motion suggests the planets move towards the sun and this change produces changing environmental conditions described through terrestrial evolution. If the Earth was further from the sun millions of years ago a year may have 420 days, seasons and a year would be longer, larger more cumbersome creatures would have existed. As we get closer to the sun we warm up, time is relatively shorter and so species change and adapt, get smaller, less hair, less blubber…..   

  • Reply to: Revealing the Face and Identity of the Controversial Mummy KV55   3 years 1 month ago
    Comment Author: Charles Bowles

    Hi Senowswet,   ALL OF KING TUTS FAMILY WERE BLACK RACE, WHICH IS WHY HE WAS BLACK, BECAUSE WHITE FOLKS DON’T HAVE BLACK CHILDREN?   BLACK PARENTS CAN INDEED HAVE BIOLOGICAL “NON-MELANATED” WHITE ALBINO CHILDREN WITH BLOND HAIR, LIGHT EYES, BUT ARE STILL BLACK PHENOTYPE RACE.  HOWEVER, WHITE FOLK CANNOT HAVE A FULL “MELANATED” BLACK SKIN CHILD ha ha?  So yes Black King Tut, Black King Akhenaten (father), Black Nefertiti (stepmother), and all the rest were indeed Black race Egyptian Royals.  Now there is the story of this little Caucasian “Dwarf”mfrom the LEVANT AREA who an Egyptian Pharaoh ordered his soldiers to bring to him ALIVE and not kill him so that he could be used for ENTERTAINMENT purposes (cute little fella) for dancing ha ha ha?   I have photos of him sittig with a light yellow skin woman who supposed to have been his wife, but he was not an original Egyptian, imstead, he was just a funny small Caucasian Dwarf who was captured and brought into the Egypt, with orders not to kill the little fella…  later

  • Reply to: Revealing the Face and Identity of the Controversial Mummy KV55   3 years 1 month ago
    Comment Author: Charles Bowles

    Hi Senowset,  I don’t view Coptic as being anything related to ancient Black Egyptian people and their civilization, nor do I relate to a FRENCHMAN telling me anything about ancient Black African Egyptian history, SAME AS YOU DON’T ADHERE TO ANYTHING THAT NUMEROUS BLACK SCHOLARS HAS DONE RESEARCH ON AND WRITTEN ABOUT HA HA HA? SAME AS YOU REFER TO ALL CREDIBLE BLACK SCHOLARS AS BEING “AFROCENTRIC”, WELL,I FEEL THE SAME WAY ABOUT THE WHITE PSEUDO RESEARCHERS YOU MENTION, WHO I DEEM AS BEING RACIST BIGOTED “EUROCENTRICS”.  ALSO, I WILL REFER YOU TO READ THE ANCIENT EGYPTIAN DOCUMENTED HISTORY REFERRED TO AS “BOOK OF THE DEAD” WHICH EXPLAINS THE ORIGINS OF THE ANCIENT EGYPTIANS AS TO WHERE THEY CAMETH, AND SO IT READS:      “WE CAME FROM WHERE THE NILE BEGIN, AND WHERE GOD HAPI (WATER GOD) DWELL, AT THE FOOTHILLS OF THE MOUNTAIN OF THE MOON”..     hunefer papyrus                                                                                                                   It must be noted that the Nile river begins in East Central Africa in the GREAT LAKES AREA where the “WHITE NILE” known as the first Nile river began,and it is not located anywhere in the so-call Mediterranean area ha ha ha?  Also, there are only TWO MOUNTAINS in all of Africa that are referred to as “MOUNTAINS OF THE MOON”, and they are the KILIMANJARO in TANZANIA, and the RWEZORI in UGANDA in East Africa, which is where the first NILE RIVER known as the “white Nile” began, and where God ‘HAPI” dwell, which is where the ancient Egyptians originated, according to the “BOOK OF THE DEAD” which was APPROVED by all of the ancient Black EGYPTIAN PRIESTS for publishing during their time on earth.  The ANCIENT BLACK EGYPTIANS, same as many other ancient Black Africans to this present day used a practice called “LIPOMBO” which would shape the heads of ROYAL BABIES” into a “cone shape” so that they would be distinguable from the non-royal families, and those cone shaped heads can easily be observed in the likes of King Tut, Akhenaten, Nefertiti, Ramses, Senuret III, Thutmosis II etc, etc.  The practice of LIPOMBO among royals was never practiced among European/Asian royals to make Royal distinctions, which was an AFRICAN custom practiced ONLY among BLACK AFRICAN ROYALS…Perhaps, you can tell me that the ANCIENT EGYPTIAN PEOPLE, PRIESTS, AND EVEN THE SCRIBE, HUNEFER LIED about WHERE THE EGYPTIANS ORIGINATED, and that you rely on Coptics and Champolion ha ha ha..   later

  • Reply to: Revealing the Face and Identity of the Controversial Mummy KV55   3 years 1 month ago
    Comment Author: Charles Bowles

    Hi Senowswet,    THAT FAKE WHITE LOOKING STATUE THAT YOU ARE USING AS YOUR IDENTIFICATION PHOTO OF AN EGYPTIAN PHARAOH NEED TO BE RE-DONE AROUND THE RAZOR “THIN LIP” AREA TO MAKE THEM FULL LIKE THE ORIGINAL BLACK EGYPTIAN STATUES, AND YOU ALSO NEED TO BROADEN THE WIDTH OF THE NOSE SO THAT IT DOESN’T APPEAR TO BE THE SIZE OF A SMALL PORK SAUSAGE STETCHED IN A VERTICAL DIRECTION?  I’M JUST GIVIN YOU SOME CONSTRUCTIVE CRITICISM ADVICE?

  • Reply to: Revealing the Face and Identity of the Controversial Mummy KV55   3 years 1 month ago
    Comment Author: Senowsret

    Sir Charles,

    Unlike you or other Afrocentric racists trying to appropriate my cultural heritage, I'm Coptic. Perhaps you've heard of a great Copt:

    The Verdict of Champollion on the Coptic Language:

    Jean-François Champollion (1790 – 1832) deciphered the Egyptian hieroglyphs in 1822, and made it possible for modern Egyptology to emerge. He perhaps would not have been able to do that at all had he not studied Coptic first. There is one man, who is still largely enigmatic, who helped him to learn Coptic – Yuhanna Chiftichi, a Coptic priest who worked with the French during the French Campaign in Egypt (1798 – 1801), and left with the French, with many other Copts, to France when the French withdrew.[1] In France, he became priest at the church of Saint-Roch on Rue Saint-Honoré, in Paris. There, he assisted the Egyptian Commission in producing Description de l’Ėgypte; but, perhaps, his lasting service to civilisation was his assistance he gave to Champollion, who befriended him, to learn Coptic.

    Champollion knew many European and Oriental languages, at least sixteen in total, including Latin, Greek, French, English, German, Arabic, Syriac, Chaldean (Aramaic), Sanskrit, Persian, and Chinese. When he became fluent in Coptic, he wrote in 1809:

     I have thrown myself into Coptic, I want to know Egyptian as well as I know French, because my great work on the Egyptian papyrus [hieroglyphics] will be based on this language. . . . My Coptic is moving along, and I find in it the greatest joy, because you have to think: to speak the language of my dear Amenhotep, Seth, Ramses, Thuthmos, is no small thing. . . . As for Coptic, I do nothing else. I dream in Coptic. I do nothing but that, I dream only in Coptic, in Egyptian. . . . I am so Coptic, that for fun, I translate into Coptic everything that comes into my head. I speak Coptic all alone to myself (since no one else can understand me). This is the real way for me to put my pure Egyptian into my head. . . . In my view, Coptic is the most perfect, most rational language known.[2]

     “Coptic is the most perfect and the most rational language known.”

    This is the verdict of Champollion on the Coptic language. Those who know Coptic would tend to agree with him. And the Copts must know this, and be sure of the many beauties of their language.

    ________________

    [1] For more on Yuhanna Chiftichi, see: Chiftichi, Yuhanna (CE:519a-520b) by Anouar Louca in Coptic Encyclopedia, ed. Aziz Suryal Atiya (New York, Macmillan, 1991).   

     [2] Muriel Mirak Weissbach, Jean François Champollion And the True Story of Egypt in 21st Century Science & Technology magazine, Winter 1999-2000, 12 (4), 26–39, p. 32. See also, Andrew Robinson, Cracking the Egyptian Code, The Revolutionary Life of Jean-Francois Champollion (London, Thames & Hudson, 2012), p. 61.

  • Reply to: Revealing the Face and Identity of the Controversial Mummy KV55   3 years 1 month ago
    Comment Author: Charles Bowles

    I can tell that you don’t know anything about school acceptance procedures at the schools you mentioned, and that  expensive PRIVATE institutions are much easier to enroll in when parents have the wealth to PAY FOR SCAMS TO ENROLL THEIR KIDS BASED ON LIES.  Also, all African civilizations are in many ways different from each other in regards to cultural differences, and has absolutely NOTHING TO DO WITH RACIAL DIFFERENCES? For instance, ANGOLA and NIGERIA are West African countries, and their cultures are different, but they don’t difer racially, same as KENYA  and ETHIOPIA and RWANDA and UGANDA are all EAST AFRICAN countries with different cultures and local languages, but their race are the same.  That also goes for ancient EGYPTIANS, NUBIANS, KUSHITES, AXUMITES, CARTHAGINIANS, MINOANS, all have different cultures/linguistics, but the Black race is the same.   I can tell that you are truly LACKING IN EDUCATION, AND IS SO HUNG UP IN YOUR HATE FOR THE BLACK RACE TO THE POINT THAT YOU ARE BLINDED FROM THE TRUTH.  YOUR ATTEMPT TO TRY DIVIDING BLACK RACE PEOPLE BY NATIONALITY IS THE SAME AS IF I WAS STUPID ENOUGH TO TRY DIVIDING ORIENTAL ASIANS INTO RACES BY SAYING THAT CHINESE ARE NOT ORIENTALS BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT JAPANESE, AND THAT THAIS ARE NOT ORIENTALS BECAUSE THEY DON’T LOOK LIKE KOREANS HA HA HA?  ALSO, THAT PALE WHITE SKIN SCANDINAVIANS FROM NORTHERN EUROPA ARE WHITE, AND THAT ITALIANS AND PORTUGUESE ARE NOT WHITE BECAUSE THEY ARE DARKER HA HA HA...YOUR MIND IS SO SCREWED UP WITH SO MUCH RACIST BIGOTRY IN REGARDS TO YOUR HATRED FOR THE BLACK RACE UNTIL IT IS QUITE SICKENING..  LATER

  • Reply to: Revealing the Face and Identity of the Controversial Mummy KV55   3 years 1 month ago
    Comment Author: Senowsret

    Dear Charles,

    Glad you attended and perhaps even graduated fromThe Beach. Objectively, you would not have been considered for attendance to one of your world renowned neighboring schools such as USC or UCLA with acceptance rates less than 1/3 that of Long Beach State. So your supposed suma cum laude would highly unlikely even register anywhere but basically unimpressive. Please stop trying to appropriate Egyptian culture with zero ties to your West African heritage. There simply are no ties between Sub Saharan/West African and ancient Egyptian cultures historically, ethnically nor linguistically other than geography. Egyptian civilization is bereft of primitive tribalism(ie, gangs, clans, and warring tribes) found in great abundance outside the boundaries of ancient Egypt. One nation, one people throughout many unified cities under one rule.

    Fight On✌️ USC grad(Dual BS degrees in Biological Sciences and Chemistry, Doctor of Pharmaceutical Sciences)

  • Reply to: Revealing the Face and Identity of the Controversial Mummy KV55   3 years 1 month ago
    Comment Author: Charles Bowles

    You must be from the southern California area since you understood that my alma mata (CSULB) is located in Long Beach, and the fact that you are aware that such schools as USC and UCLA are in the close vicinity, SO I APPLAUD YOU FOR HAVING THAT KNOWLEDGE CONCERNING THOSE SCHOOLS.  HOWEVER, YOUR STATEMENT ABOUT THE PRIVATE SCHOOL OF “USC” BEING BETTER THAN CSULB IS QUITE ABSURD, AND IT SHOWED ME THAT YOU DON’T HAVE ANY REAL CONCRETE KNOWLEDGE ABOUT HOW ACCEPTANCE WORKS AT USC, HA HA HA?   FIRST OF ALL,MOST DEGREES ARE HIGHLY PAID FOR BY WEALTHY PARENTS IN ORDER TO GUARANTEE GRADUATION FOR THEIR SPOILED “DUMB CHILDREN”.  I GUESS THAT YOU HAVEN’T HEARD ABOUT THE TV ACTRESS AND OTHER WEALTHY WHITE PARENTS WHO PAID AND DONATED MONEY TO “USC” JUST TO HAVE THEIR DUMB CHILDREN ADMITTED AS STUDENTS WHO DID NOT QUALIFY FOR ADMISSION HA HA HA?   ONE OF THE WEALTHY PARENTS WAS RELEASED FROM JAIL TIME ONLY RECENTLY FOR HER PART IN THESE SHAMEFUL UNFAIR ENROLLMENT SCAMS.  IT IS A FACT THAT CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UNIVERSITIES SUCH AS UCLA, CSULB, CSUF(FULLERTON), AS WELL AS UCI (IRVINE) WHERE I WAS ACCEPTED TO STUDY MY PhD IN “COMPARATIVE CULTURES” IN THE SOCIAL SCIENCE DEPARTMENT ARE BY FAR THE MOST COMPETITIVE AND DIFFICULT PROGRAMS TO BE ACCEPTED.  EVERYONE KNOWS THAT IF A STUDENT HAS THE MONEY, THAT THEY CAN EASILY ENROLL AT THE VERY EXPENSIVE PRIVATELY FUNDED UNIVERSITIES IN MY AREA SUCH AS USC, PEPPERDINE, LOYOLA MARYMOUNT  ETC, BECAUSE THOSE DEGREES ARE “BOUGHT” AND NOT ACADEMICALLY EARNED, AS THEY WOULD BE AT CSULB, UCLA, UCI, UC BERKELEY, UC DAVIS AND ALL OF THE REST OF THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UNIVERSITIES WHERE STUDENTS HAVE TO EARN THEIR ACCEPTANCE, AND NOT PAY FOR IT UNDER THE TABLE HA HA HA?  SO YES, I AM VERY PROUD OF MY SEVERAL DEGREES WHICH I EARNED AT CSULB WITH SOME OF THE BEST RENOWN PROFESSORS IN THE USA.  I GUESS THAT YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD OF DR. MAULANA KARENGA (FOUNDER OF KWANZAA) WHO HAS WRITTEN MANY INTERNATIONAL BOOKS, AND HISTORICAL ARTICLES, AND WAS THE CHAIRMAN OF THE “AFRICANA STUDIES” DEPARTMENT AT THE SCHOOL DURING THE COMPLETION OF MY MASTERS DEGREE IN THE SOCIOLOGY DEPARTMENT WHICH WAS WHITE RACIST AS HELL, EVEN AMONG THE 1/3RD MARXIST INSTRUCTORS WHO APPEARED TO TO BE THE LEAST RACIST?  ALSO, I NEVER TRIED TO TIE ANCIENT BLACK EGYPTIAN CIVILIZATION TO ANCIENT WEST AFRICAN BLACK CIVILIZATION HA HA HA?.   IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO COMPARE BLACK EGYPTIAN PHARAOHS SUCH AS KING AKHENATEN, TUT, THUTMOSIS, RAMSES, SENURET III, NEFERTITI, TO THE BLACK WEST AFRICAN KINGS/QUEENS SUCH AS SUNDIETA KEITA, SUNNI ALI BER, ASKIA MUHAMMAD, MANSA MUSA (MALIAN EMPIRE) WHO IS TODAY LISTED BY LEADING FINANCIAL EXPERTS TO BE THE RICHEST MAN EVER TO WALK GODS EARTH WITH AN ESTIMATED NET WORTH OF MORE THAN $600 BILLION USD (BASED ON PRESENT DAY STANDARDS).  ALSO, THAT WEST AFRICAN EMPIRE (MALI) HAS BEEN DOCUMENTED TO HAVE BEEN THE SECOND LARGEST LAND EMPIRE IN THE WORLD, ONLY SECOND TO THE MONGOL EMPIRE OF GHENGISS KHAN HA HA HA?   WHILE THE WEST AFRICAN EMPIRES CITIES SUCH AS “TIMBUKTU & SANKORE” MIGHT NOT HAVE BUILT GLORIOUS PYRAMIDS SAME AS THEIR BLACK EGYPTIAN BROTHERS, THEY DID INDEED BUILD AND CREATE VAST UNIVERSITIES OF HIGHER LEARNING WHERE STUDENTS/SCHOLARS CAME FROM MANY PARTS OF THE WORLD TO STUDY BEFORE THE LAST OF THE GREAT WEST AFRICAN EMPIRES OF GHANA, MALI, AND SONGHAI WAS EVENTUALLY DESTROYED BY THE MOROCCANS UNDER A BLACK AFRICAN SULTAN BY THE NAME OF MULAI ISHMAEL..  I AM SURE THAT YOU PROBABLY NEVER HEARD OF THE BLACK MOROCCAN SULTAN DURING THE 1600’S, AND PROBABLY BELIEVE THAT MOROCCANS WERE ALSO WHITE SCANDINAVIANS OR FROM SAUDI ARABIA HA HA HA?   LATER

  • Reply to: Vimanas: Greater Understanding on a Hotly Debated Topic   3 years 1 month ago
    Comment Author: Bruce Nowakowski

    that last paragraph or so is really so poignent.  Terms that are understood in context today would not have been understood 100 years ago or 100 years from now let alone something from 6,000 years ago.  in the Old Testament when they mention the 7 days it used to mean ages not a 24 hour period for example. 

Pages