All  

Ancient Origins IRAQ Tour

Store Banner Mobile

Here you can navigate quickly through all comments made in any article sorted by date/time.

  • Reply to: Revealing the Face and Identity of the Controversial Mummy KV55   3 years 1 month ago
    Comment Author: Senowsret

    Hi Charles Hotep,

    Consider this a Requiem mass:

    https://youtu.be/QluegJ4FgRw

     

     

     

     

  • Reply to: The Mystery of the Four Golden Hats of the Bronze Age   3 years 1 month ago
    Comment Author: Byron Johnstad

    I am struck by the similarities of the pattern and workmanship of the famous Golden Cape found in Britian and the work on these hats of gold...https://www.dailypost.co.uk/news/local-news/mold-gold-cape-goes-show-567...

  • Reply to: The 800,000-Year-Old Gran Dolina Boy Just Became A Girl   3 years 1 month ago
    Comment Author: Charles Bowles

    Truly amazing, 800,000 years ago, the boy who was really a girl..  So did the girl say that she was a boy in her ancient pre-historical language?

  • Reply to: Ancient Slavic Woman Warrior Buried In Viking Graveyard With Her Brutal Weapon Of Warcraft   3 years 1 month ago
    Comment Author: tony34

    Gunhilda of Wenden

  • Reply to: Vimanas: Greater Understanding on a Hotly Debated Topic   3 years 1 month ago
    Comment Author: granbo

    I LOVE THE DRAWINGS, ARE THERE MORE?

  • Reply to: What Prompted the Shellfish Extravaganza at an Iron Age Feast Site, Orkney?   3 years 1 month ago
    Comment Author: T1bbst3r

    Could have even been where an outcast lived, shunned by members of their tribe for perhaps killing somebody and forced to live at the already abandoned site for a period of time in isolation, possibly before moving on.
    Can't imagine these members of a 'feast' of second rate winter food being so tidy.

  • Reply to: Top Ten Giant Discoveries in North America   3 years 1 month ago
    Comment Author: kmoss221

    I would like to start with Sacsayhuamán. It Is one of many sites that the Incans were credited for building. But recently, some experts went there because they believed the Incans could not have built it because when you look at some parts of the structure, you can see that although the bottom consists of the original stone, there are some parts on top where you can clearly see that different stones were used to fix or add to the existing structure. And they were laid totally different on top so those parts had to have been made by people who didnt know the original building methods for the structure. Experts have always been baffled as to how such large structures could have been built by people of that time. But what I found to be the most interesting, is that when the Incan people were asked who built them, they clearly stated that it was the giants. And as we know, there are several other structures around the same area that were built in the same way with these giant stones. And there are many stories told by the Incans of giants being among them. But what bothers me, is that even though the Incans have said they didnt build it, people still to this day credit them for the building of those structures. Why is that? And if you really think about it, we have all this proof that they existed but no proof as to how they existed. And I get the feeling that had there not been as may of their bones found as there were, we would know even less about who they were. But what draws me in, is how little effort was and is being put into finding out where they came from and what happend to them. It makes me feel like adding them into evolution would contradict everything we know about our existence. 

  • Reply to: Ancient Indian Flying Machines –Truth in the Legends?   3 years 1 month ago
    Comment Author: granbo

    I was technically interrupted twice here under Comment so I will make it short. Thank you Chandra for the report, most interesting. Viper tv and Films is searchable on top of the start of youtube in an empty little space there and all their interesting videos on the Sumerians, Egyptologi, extraterrestials and what not with informed speaker and super immagery will come up for choosing. Please notice the advice from Prince regarding Ken Wheeler and translations of Indian texts from sanskrit. I will also undertake some searchings. Regards Anita

  • Reply to: Revealing the Face and Identity of the Controversial Mummy KV55   3 years 1 month ago
    Comment Author: Charles Bowles

    Hi Senowsret,    The ancient Egyptians/Nubians are members of the same Black African race, and only had “Ethnic Differences”.  According to the ancient Egyptian “BOOK OF THE DEAD”,it states with clarity who they were, and where they came from:   “WE CAME FROM WHERE THE NILE BEGAN, AND WHERE GOD HAPI DWELL, AT THE FOOTHILLS OF THE MOUNTAIN OF THE MOON”….   hunefer papyrus                                                                                   In regards to which of these two MOST VERY POWERFUL countries on earth from Africa, it was normal for one of them to be more powerful than the other during different timelines in their competitive histories, and that is quite understandable?  It is a fact that when Egypt became dominated by foreigners outside of Africa, IT WAS THE MOST POWERFUL NUBIANS WHO CAME TO THEIR NEXT DOOR BLACK EGYPTIAN NEIGHBORS RESCUE AND DEFEATED THE FOREIGN ADVERSARIES AND RESTORED ALL OF ANCIENT EGYPT BACK TO ITS ORIGINAL BLACK AFRICAN INDEPENDENCE UNDER THE 25TH DYNASTY THAT INCLUDED BOTH UPPER AND LOWER EGYPT..  It is a fact that the 1st thru the 25th Egyptian Dynasty;s were all of the same race from the era of King Narmer to King Taharka of the 25th Dynasty who often referred to himself as “KING OF THE WORLD”, which indicates that he thought VERY LOW of all countries OUTSIDE OF AFRICA, because there were absolutely no countries on any continent as powerful as the 25th Dynasty Black Egyptian empire.   By the way, even when Egypt could not be used as a “BUFFER STATE” several centuries later after the Romans conquered Egypt, even the so call mighty Romans could not defeat the MIGHTY NUBIANS to the South, which goes to show us just how POWERFUL the Nubians were at that time.  Each time the Romans attempted to conquer NUBIA as it had against Egypt, it seemed as if THEY RAN INTO A HARD STONE WALL,  and they could not penetrate any farther.  Black Nubian (Ta-Seti) “Land Of The Bow” soldiers were trained to shoot Romans invaders on sight with thousands of swarming arrows, and to trample over them with their “WAR ELEPHANTS”, lead by their most powerful female Queen “A” who dared the Romans to cross into Nubia..  To this present day, the largest Egyptian land area known as UPPER EGYPT is most largely populated by Black Egyptians, and most of the foreign mixed Black race (lighter skin) remains in lower Egypt in cities like Cairo where TV media mostly show them on TV to give a false sense about what most Egyptians look like, when that is not what most Egyptians look like outside the northern city areas..  later Mr. “wanna be” Egyptian

  • Reply to: Revealing the Face and Identity of the Controversial Mummy KV55   3 years 1 month ago
    Comment Author: Senowsret

    Charles purveyor of isfet,

    Regarding their race Egyptians referred to their’s as Reth(Caucasians), Nubians are Black(Nehesu)

    RegardingThe Nubians:

    During almost the entire Dynastic Period of Egypt's history, the Nubians (or Nehesyw) were considered by the Egyptians to be "vile" and "wretched". The official view of the Nubians was clear from a Middle Kingdom boundary stele of Senusret III from Smna which denounces them:

    "They are not people one respects; they are wretches, craven hearted. My majesty has seen it, it is not an untruth. I have captured their women, I have carried off their dependents..."

    Military campaigns and trading expeditions were sent to Nubia at regular intervals in order to sustain a regular supply of prisoners, herds of cattle and exotic products from the south such as ivory, ostrich feathers and ebony. And of course there were also the mining operations in Nubia, where the Egyptian's obtained much of their gold. Many of these expeditions were recorded in the tombs of the nobles at Elephantine (at modern Aswan). However, by the New Kingdom, Nubia had effectively become a province of Egypt, at least between Aswan and Napata, under the control of a viceroy known as "King's Son of Kush". Yet even then, the iconography of the Nubian as a defeated enemy never lost its popularity as a symbol of Egyptian supremacy. Even during the Meroitic Period, when the Nubian's controlled Egypt with A Nubian as Pharaoh, this motif of the defeated Nubian was still depicted in the royal regalia, with no apparent sense of contradiction.

     

     

  • Reply to: Ancient Indian Flying Machines –Truth in the Legends?   3 years 1 month ago
    Comment Author: Prince

    Check out and make contact with Ken Wheeler YouTube Theoria Apophosis.

    https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCVcxJ9k14bi__-uA1cGkEcA

    He has 40+ years in the original texts, and might be willing to do some “valid” translations.  His translations have mostly covered all the spiritual texts and related to ascendancy, but he would be the person who could truly break open (without prejudice) the real words and word definitions … and have a true rendition of the ancient texts.

  • Reply to: What did the Egyptians think of Cleopatra?   3 years 1 month ago
    Comment Author: rwthless.hunt@b...

    Which historical summaries do you mean?  Were they contemporaneous? Victorian and C20th academics regularly got their jollies by denigrating women.  

    Many royals whiled away the hours by getting educated and they could gain access to brilliant teachers. Roger Ascham became Elizabeth I Latin secretary, and she spoke Latin fluently. 

    Cleopatra was clearly clever and clever people don’t usually like to be idle.  They have to entertain themselves in the prison of their circumstances. Her brother was co-ruler with her and this was an equal partnership. Siince he was in the grip of priests and was 7 years younger than she was, she was more equal than he was.

    I was never that much interested in Egypt and was mostly aware of the Amarna period and Hapshepsut who was almost obiterated by subsequent parties, I don’t have much detail, but it IS common knowledge that Cleopatra was very clever, brilliant even, and captured the interest of Julius Caesar who was probably the greatest genius Rome ever produced.

  • Reply to: Revealing the Face and Identity of the Controversial Mummy KV55   3 years 1 month ago
    Comment Author: Charles Bowles

    Hi Senowsret,   Only a very ignorant individual would suggest that a possible derogatory name such as “Nehesu” has anything to do with race, especially when the ancient Black Egyptians were the same race as the term Nehesu directed at Nubians ha ha ha?   What about when white racist people refer to Italians as “Wops” and “Dagos”, and when white racists also refer to Polish people as “Pollocks”, SO DOES THAT MEAN THAT THEY ARE OF THE SO-CALL WOP, DAGO, AND POLLOCK RACE,OR ARE THEY STILL MEMBERS OF THE WHITE RACE, AND THAT THOSE NAMES ARE ALL ETHNIC RELATED BASED ON COMPETITIVE ANGUISH, SAME AS THE NEHESU TERM WHICH YOU STATED WAS USED BY ANCIENT BLACK EGYPTIANS TOWARD THEIR NEXT DOOR BLACK NEIGHBORS WHOM THEY HAD BATTLES ha ha ha..   You are certainly lacking in the category of formal education when it come to understanding sociological analysis in regards to derogatory name calling between different cultural ethnicity’s (Ethnocentrism) who are of the same race?  I bet that your mother has called you a “Lazy Slug” many times when you would not make the bed, take out the trash cans, and forget to raise the toilet seat when using the restroom, and leaving germs/bacteria on the floor.  I would not consider you a member of the “Slug race”..   later Mr.Wanna Know-it-all

  • Reply to: Ancient Indian Flying Machines –Truth in the Legends?   3 years 1 month ago
    Comment Author: Chandra

    Hello Anita,

    On the subject of taking up more translation, interpretation work…  the problem is not the lack of adequate scholars in Sanskrit. Till recently the prevailing political philosophy  and the consequent cultural atmosphere  was not at all conducive to doing this kind of work of deciphering our ancient culture. Things have changed  in recent years and things are happening.
    I would definitely like to know more about the kind of work being done in Israel  with respect to Sanskrit texts etc. May be you can give me some references to look up.
    The full report of the official committee is available at the following site:

                         https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/vimanas/vimanas18.htm

    I am afraid I am not sure what you are referring to when you  talk about ‘Viper’. If you are referring to  the  ‘Viper videos’  on Youtube I must confess my ignorance. Will appreciate  clarification
    Regarding your experience of watching a person being raised against gravity….I  cannot comment about that street-side show. But I  believe it is definitely doable and is explained on the basis of the understanding of the human body system in our culture. In this understanding the system consists of two distinct components—the physical body  and  a non-physical body (called sukshma-sarira in Sanskrit). The physical body is animated and energized  by five types of “Pranas” which are part of the sukshma sarira. Suitable manipulation of these pranas  can lead to the type of levitation you are talking about. Highly spiritually evolved persons  can achieve this.

    Regards

    Chandrasekhar

     

  • Reply to: Native North Americans Were Making Copper Tools in 7,500 BC   3 years 1 month ago
    Comment Author: Crasslee

    Already sorted that out thanks. Maybe go peddle your pet theories somewhere else.

  • Reply to: Native North Americans Were Making Copper Tools in 7,500 BC   3 years 1 month ago
    Comment Author: Andrew LB

    Racist for speaking the truth? The copper that fueled the Bronze Age definitely came from North America and the copper found in that shipwreck off Turkey proves it. Had the metal been mined and smelted by native Americans, such artifacts would be far more common and widespread across the continent. Not only that, but the lack of European DNA in  Native American peoples would further reinforce my point. I'd wager it was the minoans who came to North America and mined the copper. if we can ever figure out Linear A, we may get some answers. It's been found carved into rocks near silver deposits in Norway and we know their ships were quite capable based on wall paintings in alrotrini, on Thera. Many estimate their length at around 30 meters. 

  • Reply to: Revealing the Face and Identity of the Controversial Mummy KV55   3 years 1 month ago
    Comment Author: Senowsret

    Dear Hsy Nehesu,

    You only got one ruler from the Nehesu race correct...Taharqa from the illegitimate 25th dynasty. The rest on that list are Reth. Taharqa isn't even an Egyptian name.

    If you run out of TP, you can substitute with any bargain basement 49er diploma.

  • Reply to: Revealing the Face and Identity of the Controversial Mummy KV55   3 years 1 month ago
    Comment Author: Charles Bowles

    Hi Senowsret  Well it is quite obvious that your ancestors from Europa did not transform themselves into becoming ancient Black Egyptians and came from East Central Africa where the first Nile River began as stated in the Egyptian “Book of the Dead”, and where God Hapi dwell, at the foothills of the mountain of the moon.  It appears that all of your ancestors were pale white people with “Razor Thin” lips and small Oscar Mayer breakfast sausage noses  You can keep on dreaming about how you wish you had the same bloodline and Thick Lips like King Tut, Akhenaten, Thutmosis, Taharka, Hatshephut, and Nefertiti..  Maybe you should have had your big head deformed as a baby into a “cone shape” so that you could walk up to people and say to them “I HAVE ROYAL EGYPTIAN BLOODLINE, AND MY CONE SHAPED HEAD PROVES IT” ha ha ha..    later Mr. white Senowsret...lol

  • Reply to: Revealing the Face and Identity of the Controversial Mummy KV55   3 years 1 month ago
    Comment Author: Senowsret

    Sir Charles,

    Not much of a stretch for my ancestors to believe they came from the south, as they observed the life giving waters of the Nile, without which Egypt would never have existed, is the world’s only river to flow south to north. We never recorded or depicted ourselves as other than Reth, while we depicted your people as the Hsy(Egyptian for vile)Nehesu. The real foreigners are ignorant black supremacists whose ancestors never spoke or recorded in Egyptian like we the Copts(The Undisputed Direct Descedants of the Pharaohs), still do!

  • Reply to: Native North Americans Were Making Copper Tools in 7,500 BC   3 years 1 month ago
    Comment Author: Crasslee

    Hi.
    Sorry that I jumped to the wrong conclusion. You make some interesting points. Thanks.

Pages