Welcome to the Ancient-Origins.net Forums. In order to avoid spam messages, we require all users of the forum to register first.

If you are not registered please click on the Register link from the top menu. If you are registered LOGIN here.

7 posts / 0 new
Last post
Velikovsky and modern discoveries.

I have been reading "The Velikovsky Heresies.” It talks about his book “Worlds in Collision.” In that book he claims that Venus is a comet that became a planet in a fixed orbit. Scinetists have scoffed at his ideas and said they are impossible. 

Recently, I found out that astronomers have discovered a planet that acts as a comet in the same manner as Venus. I think there may be some truth to Velikovsky's theories.


Its not Venus though. It was

Its not Venus though. It was the plantet that was mentioned in the article as well as Pluto –  I think. They have also discovered that Venus has a “tail”. What Velikovsky also said in his book, there is writing / documentation from the Ancients that possibly verify this fact. This is shown in the way Venus is represented in symbology. I love him, have read most of his books. The more you read the more you will see that he was right on a lot of accounts, but the scientific world – we all know whom in particular – is still not admitting or they are playing around with the facts of their new discoveries, so that Velikovsky still wont come out looking better than the “others”.

Moon dust revisited

A revisited trove of data from NASA's Apollo missions more than 40 years ago is helping scientists answer a lingering lunar question: How fast does moon dust build up? The answer: It would take 1,000 years for a layer of moon dust about a millimeter (0.04 inches) thick to accumulate, the researchers found. That rate may seem slow by the standards of Earth but it's 10 times faster than scientists had believed before, and it means moon dust could pose big problems for astronauts and equipment alike. "You wouldn't see it; it's very thin indeed," Brian O'Brien, a physicist at the University of Western Australia, said in a statement. "But, as the Apollo astronauts learned, you can have a devil of a time overcoming even a small amount of dust."


How deep is the dust?  MAYBE an inch?  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_soil#/media/File:Apollo_17_orange_so...

Some neo-darwinist site claims 2.5"....ok even using that 2.5 divided by .04 = 62.5 or 62,500 years.

Velikovsky seems to have hit the nail on the head in claiming the event took place in semi historical times.

Velikovsky´s Mythical Confusions

Immanuel Velikovsky thought the ancient myths death with planets – and so do all his followers. They are all fooled by the Roman Empire which dubbed the planets (When adopting Christianity) AFTER their Pantheon Deities  which belongs to the pre-creation and the creation itself of the ancient known part of the Universe, our Milky Way and our Solar System.

This confusion also takes place with the founder of the “ThunderBoltsProject”, (TBP) David Talbott, author of the “Saturn Myth”, who inherited most of the Velikovsky confusion.


The stars and planets as gods long precede the ‘Johnnie Come Lately’ Romans. In Egypt, they named planets as living, ruling pharaohs from c3100 – 200BC, Chiselling their actions into temple walls. This practice of naming the Sun etc as living humanoid gods or as the spirits of the deceased has no known initial source or time. We probably always did it. The Romans simply renamed them. I applaud support of the very great Immanuel Velikovsky. He was an ‘original’ – spot on in identifying our cosmic history, perhaps less so with ancient history, although even when mistaken, his contributions were the much-needed spur for a new, more enlightened re-examination of huge amounts of questionable historical research

The Tail of Venus

Yes, the planet Venus does have a “tail” of sorts. It is simply it’s Ionosphere being blown outward on the night side of the planet, from the pressure of the Solar Wind. Unlike Earth, Venus has no magnetic properties, and therefore, no magnet fields surrounding the planet to buffer the effects of the solar wind. 

I do not believe that Venus is, or was, by any stretch of the imagination, a Comet. Comets are formed within the Oort Cloud, and enter the inner solar system due to the gravitational pull of the Sun. For it to have been a Comet, it would have needed to have entered it’s current position long after the formation of the other planets and in doing so would have caused tumult with the already existing planetary bodies and their orbits.

Velikovsky was, no doubt, a highly intelligent man, and I believe as time goes on, many of his theories many be shown to have some degree of merit. 

Just not this one.

R. Lee Bowers

Hypotheses are not Facts

Whoa, whoa. Comets are hypothesized to form in the Oort cloud, which is itself hypothetical, and they are hypothesized to fall into the outer and inner solar system not because of the sun, but due to some form of gravitational disturbance of their orbit, variously hypothesized to be caused by close passage of some unknown massive object also orbiting way out there, or by the alignment of multiple outer planets, or even by transitions of the solar system across the galactic plane. Point is, all that is purely hypothetical, so it doesn't really work as a falsification of Velikovsky.

It is true that if Venus originally had a cometary orbit, it would have caused tumult with existing planets, and it would only have taken its current orbit relatively recently. This doesn't really work as a falsification of Velikovsky either, because it is exactly what Velikovsky proposed happened.

Interestingly, he predicted that if his hypothesis were correct, Venus would be extraordinarily hot and have a very young surface, geologically speaking. His predictions were vastly different than those of the mainstream, which predicted Venus would be warmer than earth but not by a lot, and would have a surface whose geological age was similar to that of earth.

It was Velikovsky's predictions that turned out to be correct.

Also, there is the very strange problem of the movements of Venus as recorded by ancient astronomers, which show Venus in a highly erratic orbit that became gradually less erratic over the centuries until it stabilized fully as it is today. Of course, modern astronomers want to dismiss this as being sloppy work by humans working in primitive conditions, but the high quality of all the other measurements made by these ancient astronomers makes that argument rather flimsy. Instead, what actually appears to be true is that the measurments of the erratic nature of Venus' motion made by these ancient astronomers was of similar high quality as their other work, and that Venus was once in a highly eccentric orbit, similar to a cometary one.

Top New Stories

Aristotle’s Masterpiece Completed in Two Parts.
A perverted "sex manual" featuring shocking magical and mythical X-rated content will be sold at a UK auction next month. The first edition of this sordid book entitled Aristotle's Masterpiece Completed In Two Parts, The First Containing the Secrets of Generation, was published in London in 1684.

Myths & Legends

An illustration of Vasilisa the Beautiful, by Ivan Bilibin.
[…] In the evening the girl laid the table and began waiting for Baba-Yaga. It grew dark. The black horseman swept by and it was night. The skulls’ eyes began to shine. The trees creaked, the dead leaves crunched, the earth trembled, and there was Baba-Yaga…

Human Origins

Silhouettes (Public Domain) in front of blood cells (Public Domain) and a gene.
Most people who have the Rh blood type are Rh-positive. There are also instances, however, where people are Rh-Negative. Health problems may occur for the unborn child of a mother with Rh-Negative blood when the baby is Rh-Positive.

Ancient Technology

The Lycurgus Cup.
A strange chalice made its way into the British Museum’s collection in the 1950s. It is a 1,600-year-old jade green Roman artifact called the Lycurgus Cup. The image on the chalice is an iconic scene with King Lycurgus of Thrace...

Ancient Places

The highly-decorated tomb is built in a distinctive ‘L’ shape
A mysterious ancient tomb with “unusual and rare” wall paintings has been discovered in Egypt. Antiquities Minister Khaled al-Enany told BBC reporters the discovery of a 4,400-year-old tomb found during excavation work in Giza’s western cemetery “likely belonged to Hetpet, a priestess to Hathor, the goddess of fertility, who assisted women in childbirth.”

Our Mission

At Ancient Origins, we believe that one of the most important fields of knowledge we can pursue as human beings is our beginnings. And while some people may seem content with the story as it stands, our view is that there exists countless mysteries, scientific anomalies and surprising artifacts that have yet to be discovered and explained.

The goal of Ancient Origins is to highlight recent archaeological discoveries, peer-reviewed academic research and evidence, as well as offering alternative viewpoints and explanations of science, archaeology, mythology, religion and history around the globe.

We’re the only Pop Archaeology site combining scientific research with out-of-the-box perspectives.

By bringing together top experts and authors, this archaeology website explores lost civilizations, examines sacred writings, tours ancient places, investigates ancient discoveries and questions mysterious happenings. Our open community is dedicated to digging into the origins of our species on planet earth, and question wherever the discoveries might take us. We seek to retell the story of our beginnings. 

Ancient Image Galleries

View from the Castle Gate (Burgtor). (Public Domain)
Door surrounded by roots of Tetrameles nudiflora in the Khmer temple of Ta Phrom, Angkor temple complex, located today in Cambodia. (CC BY-SA 3.0)
Cable car in the Xihai (West Sea) Grand Canyon (CC BY-SA 4.0)