recently two Bricked up doors have been found in Tutankhamun's tomb,its possible that it's the tomb of Nefertiti, I wonder if this is why she laughed and thought no one would think to look in an alreadfy well explored tomb?

The Egyptians did write an account of the Exodus.

Firstly, there is a complete Egyptian record of the Exodus, inscribed on the Tempest Stele of Ahmose I. This records the giving of tribute, in the form of gold, silver, cloth and oil, to the Hyksos leaders to induce them to leave Egypt - exactly as the Book of Exodus says. And since this stele was buried for 3000 years, we know it is original and independent from the biblical account.

Secondly, Manetho via Josephus, gives TWO exodus accounts, not one. And Josephus is adamant that the first exodus out if Egypt was the Hyksos exodus, and that the Hyksos were the Israelites (our people, as he calls them). So the Israelites are the Hyksos Egyptians.

The quote in this article is from the second exodus, which was indeed the Akhenaton exodus. Which is why the Israelite god was called Adon - the god of Akhenaton.

The biblical account has conflated these two events into a single exodus. See 'Jesus, Last of the Pharaohs', and 'Tempest & Exodus'.

Ralph

Thanks Ahmed, good to see you still researching.
To reinforce your argument, This is an account of the Great Hyksos Exodus.

The people were called shepherds.
They were circumcised and wore earrings.
Their leader was called Pharaoh Jacoba.
There was an ashfall.
There was three days of darkness, and hail.
Many Egyptians perished.
There was a war with the Egyptians.
A million people were pushed out of Egypt on an exodus.
The Egyptians gave them gold, oil and cloth to leave.
They left from Pi Ramesse (Avaris)
They travelled to The Levant.
They destroyed Jericho en-route.

Sound familiar? Yes, indeed, but these are the historical events of the Hyksos Exodus from Egypt, not the biblical story. So the Israelites and the Hyksos were the same people - just as Josephus Flavius himself claims.

See Jesus, Last of the Pharaohs.

Ralph

These structures are intruiging to say the least. I've thought that perhaps the dolman was to protect children. While the main group was away hunting/gathering/etc., a few teens would be left to watch toddlers and babies, who could enter and hide in the structure which looks to be wild animal proof, until help came back. The little courtyard in front would keep them close by and easier to watch over.

"As demons are eternal they exist through all the ages, see everything and can provide information to a willing host they would not otherwise know."

Um, how do you know? You couldn't possibly have the personal experience to make that statement. So where did you get it? You don't accept the experience of this woman but you accept the experience of someone else in the matter of "demons", something you couldn't possibly know yourself, so you probably heard it or read it somewhere, or maybe you dreamed it? You aren't even consistent. You trust one metaphysical source but not another. Eady inspires far more confidence than you do, with your limited imagination and inconsistent faith in sources.

Actually, for the majority of the history of enslavement, money had only a secondary role in its prevalence around the world. Slaves were almost exclusively taken after a battle- because the men were dead and the victors began taking the surviving women and children- not as a means to make money or increase personal wealth, but because at some point, they discovered that doing so solved two huge problems in early human history- genetic diversity and a brain growing large enough to make the connection of birth defects resulting from in-breeding, and the second problem was the dawning of a sense of morality, believe it or not. Women with young children couldn't hunt and forage effectively while caring for children, so the victors of conflicts began to take the women and children home with them, rather than simply killing them along with their men. So no, slavery didn't always occur as a result of greed or even a belief in their enemy's inferiority. Slavery most likely began as a way to acquire fresh genetic material, while assuaging a blossoming conscience.

Information is amazing.

" diffusionists belittle indigenous American populations  "  – that is plain silly – we all want to know the truth – this is or should NOT be about the White man being top dog & nothing was invented by anybody else – if all of our ancestors moved about the planet we obviously all learned from each other, and noone is claiming anything but that. The indigenous American Indians & Australians had developed unique ways of viewing the world, the Europeans have currently developed a technological streak which some say is totally destructive & NOT necessarily what we as humans actually need. That is the current pinnacle(?) of our development, and we may end up discarding all of it and starting again, or may end up being forced to start again if we destroy the planet ! So – American Indians – you have stuff to teach us, sorry about our conceit, will you help us to realize what we may have lost altogether & help us to learn how it all developed – we need you all, and respect your culture. Some of our kind may be a bit ignorant and actually dangerous, but we hope to educate them eventually !  

You will find the answer here: https://youtu.be/ee6qv9oOkyA