As mentioned early on, it raises questions as it answers some. But that doesn't mean Europeans didn't come over. Haha, sheesh. Oh, and "I deliberately omitted this skeleton from my research because of the controversy and uncertainty which surrounded it," says it all about these cowardly scientists.
Gee, it's too bad that the "Spirit Cave Man" wasn't born in the later part of the 20th century. If he had been he could be the proud owner of an Indian casino today.
The famous Finnish researcher Simo Parpola claims in his latest book that Sumerian language is related to Finnish. And Hungarian is part of Finno-Ugric language group, that would make Sumerian and Hungarian are also related.
This article is completely fake news. Hungarian language is 100% part of the Finno-Ugric language group. Same group as Finnish and Estonia. I know there are nowadays some “researchers” in Hungary trying to deny this fact for some weird reason.
The Veles book is Mirolyubov's fake. Even neo-pagans now see no credibility in it. Here are some reasons to point out:
The first original does not have it.
Second, the wise men of the Slavs, like the Druids in the Celts, were not allowed to write according to the laws of the gods. Everything was transmitted orally from generation to generation. It's harder than writing, but for priests it's just right. For the priest is a person who does not go easy. Initiates in the priest neophytes must go through a difficult path.
According to the third prince, Cyrus from Veles book did not live in the 7th century BC, as VK writes. He lived in the 5th-6th centuries BC when King Arthur. There is a theory that I am developing right now, although it is not mine, that Prince Kyi, who founded the city of Kiev, is none other than the Knight of King Arthur and his sensual, Kay or Kai. And this contradicts the Veles book, because there are more proofs of the theory of Cyrus under the King Arthur than Cyrus the son of Aria, who comes out somewhere in Asia.
If the Society of Jesus (SJ) is involved you can be sure that corruption, thievery, and murder is close at hand. The Jesuits are the Popes "shock troops". They are called on whenever "negotiations" break down and everything else has failed. What follows is usually a bloody trail...
Interesting article, but it is all meaningless. Did you forget about the flood? I think that would pretty much ruin any theory of current rivers being the same rivers as mentioned before the flood. So it would be an essentially meaningless study. Any river existing today of the same name would simply be a re-use of a well-known river before the flood, just as we reuse names today, for example, there are many cities and rivers, etc named after their European counterpart.
I wrote this as a proper reply to a recently published article I viewed here on Ancient Origins: Baphomet: Was the Diabolical Demon Really Worshipped by Knights Templars? 4 November, 2018 – 19:00 by dhwty Since the actions and event occurred at the same point in time.
Baphomet:
The story of Baphomet begins in the known history of the Templar Knights. In and about 1160 years after King Solomons rule, the Templar who was originally The Poor Fellow-Soldiers of Christ, began to protect the pilgrims on their travels in the middle east. This was in agreement with Prince Edwin, the son of King Athelstan and the Vatican. The Poor Fellow-Soldiers of Christ believed that Solomon was the bloodline of Christ. Over one thousand years after Christ Crucifixion in 1118A.D., eight of The Poor Fellow-Soldiers of Christ began to excavate the temple of Solomon. These eight men were later known as the the Order of Solomon's Temple and recognized as the Templar Knights in 1139A.D., when Pope Innocent II issued a Papal Bull allowing the Knights Templar special rights.
Baphomet was the word in association with St. John the Baptist. The man who had his head severed and put on a platter by Herodias. In fact, there are several alleged heads of John the Baptist still around. The Templar viewed St. John the Baptist as a prophet of wisdom. The ritual is to be left out of the story, but the memorial was about skull and bones, later charged in 1307 by King Philip of France as heresy for worshiping Baphomet as an idol.
Since that time period, Baphomet has taken on many descriptions and myths-
An idol with a human skull
Ahead with two faces
With a beard
Without a beard
With the head of a man
In reality, the modern Baphomet has become an idol that has no affiliation of the Templar Order. Quite simply, the Templar do not view Baphomet as a deity. The ones that do have turned that story beyond recognition in self gain such as Elphias Levi’s illustration. This more popular appearance did not emerge until the 1850's-
The head of the goat
The upper body of a woman (maternity)
Cloven feet
A pair of wings
This modern illustration in which Esoterica, Gnosticism,Witchcraft, Magick and Satanist are ascribed some 600 years after the attributed Friday the 13th.. Baphomet from one source with developed in some cases opposite sums. Baphomet is a great story of man's nature in a baptism of wisdom. -Frank A. Tytar
Jesus is not the lamb of God because of the time that he was born, but because he was the final sacrifice (sacrificial lamb) to pay the penalty of the sins for God's people (and all who would come to believe). He was also the fulfillment of the lambs slain whose blood was put on the doorposts of the Hebrews in Egypt so the angel of death would pass over their homes when it came to kill all the first born of Egypt. Jesus was also never called a fisher of men. He told Peter and his brother, who were fishermen, that if they followed him he would make them fishers of men. This is all very easy to find in the Bible and on Google if you don't want to search the Bible! There's no reason to make such obvious and ridiculous errors just to try to support some hypothesis.
The middle ages were a long period, my people went from a strong proud people to ill deformed people due to poverty in less than 100 years, having to rely on a diet of grain and seafood because other meat were too valuable. The lack of food and men usually being miners meant this resulted in stunted growth, so maybe we should be looking at the physical builds of the actors too?
The article is great except nationalistic Spanish attribution in the article. It seems reasonable at say the truth that archealogical find in Spain the current territory but not original peoples that actually used this common ingredient used all over the world. Why gloss over the actual many tribes that existed long before the conglomerate of territories now Spain ever existed? Who used this in that place and at which time? We’re they Greek, Roman, another empire, pre empire ancient like the ice man? Was this a tooth remedy to built up enough material to stain teeth? What teams did the evidence building? Facts prevent shoddy reporting and watered down hard work turning it into pathetic untrustworthy research.
What's with all the talk about 'crutches'? You can't possibly mean 'churches'? If so, then your apparent lack of education discredits your comment much more cogently than any comment of mine could ever do.
Here you can navigate quickly through all comments made in any article sorted by date/time.
Arrrrrgh! You'll walk the plank for this article!
As mentioned early on, it raises questions as it answers some. But that doesn't mean Europeans didn't come over. Haha, sheesh. Oh, and "I deliberately omitted this skeleton from my research because of the controversy and uncertainty which surrounded it," says it all about these cowardly scientists.
Gee, it's too bad that the "Spirit Cave Man" wasn't born in the later part of the 20th century. If he had been he could be the proud owner of an Indian casino today.
The famous Finnish researcher Simo Parpola claims in his latest book that Sumerian language is related to Finnish. And Hungarian is part of Finno-Ugric language group, that would make Sumerian and Hungarian are also related.
This article is completely fake news. Hungarian language is 100% part of the Finno-Ugric language group. Same group as Finnish and Estonia. I know there are nowadays some “researchers” in Hungary trying to deny this fact for some weird reason.
The Veles book is Mirolyubov's fake. Even neo-pagans now see no credibility in it. Here are some reasons to point out:
The first original does not have it.
Second, the wise men of the Slavs, like the Druids in the Celts, were not allowed to write according to the laws of the gods. Everything was transmitted orally from generation to generation. It's harder than writing, but for priests it's just right. For the priest is a person who does not go easy. Initiates in the priest neophytes must go through a difficult path.
According to the third prince, Cyrus from Veles book did not live in the 7th century BC, as VK writes. He lived in the 5th-6th centuries BC when King Arthur. There is a theory that I am developing right now, although it is not mine, that Prince Kyi, who founded the city of Kiev, is none other than the Knight of King Arthur and his sensual, Kay or Kai. And this contradicts the Veles book, because there are more proofs of the theory of Cyrus under the King Arthur than Cyrus the son of Aria, who comes out somewhere in Asia.
Very interesting, thank you. Would be interesting to reflect on this use of three and the three of the Catholic trinity. Thanks again!
Please contact me in private email.
This is important.
I know where he is
Didn't mean to say you were correct. Please respect other religions, and make a comment after you're well educated about something.
You're 100% correct. These lies do not affect Islam, at all!
If the Society of Jesus (SJ) is involved you can be sure that corruption, thievery, and murder is close at hand. The Jesuits are the Popes "shock troops". They are called on whenever "negotiations" break down and everything else has failed. What follows is usually a bloody trail...
Interesting article, but it is all meaningless. Did you forget about the flood? I think that would pretty much ruin any theory of current rivers being the same rivers as mentioned before the flood. So it would be an essentially meaningless study. Any river existing today of the same name would simply be a re-use of a well-known river before the flood, just as we reuse names today, for example, there are many cities and rivers, etc named after their European counterpart.
I wrote this as a proper reply to a recently published article I viewed here on Ancient Origins: Baphomet: Was the Diabolical Demon Really Worshipped by Knights Templars? 4 November, 2018 – 19:00 by dhwty Since the actions and event occurred at the same point in time.
Baphomet:
The story of Baphomet begins in the known history of the Templar Knights. In and about 1160 years after King Solomons rule, the Templar who was originally The Poor Fellow-Soldiers of Christ, began to protect the pilgrims on their travels in the middle east. This was in agreement with Prince Edwin, the son of King Athelstan and the Vatican. The Poor Fellow-Soldiers of Christ believed that Solomon was the bloodline of Christ. Over one thousand years after Christ Crucifixion in 1118A.D., eight of The Poor Fellow-Soldiers of Christ began to excavate the temple of Solomon. These eight men were later known as the the Order of Solomon's Temple and recognized as the Templar Knights in 1139A.D., when Pope Innocent II issued a Papal Bull allowing the Knights Templar special rights.
Baphomet was the word in association with St. John the Baptist. The man who had his head severed and put on a platter by Herodias. In fact, there are several alleged heads of John the Baptist still around. The Templar viewed St. John the Baptist as a prophet of wisdom. The ritual is to be left out of the story, but the memorial was about skull and bones, later charged in 1307 by King Philip of France as heresy for worshiping Baphomet as an idol.
Since that time period, Baphomet has taken on many descriptions and myths-
An idol with a human skull
Ahead with two faces
With a beard
Without a beard
With the head of a man
In reality, the modern Baphomet has become an idol that has no affiliation of the Templar Order. Quite simply, the Templar do not view Baphomet as a deity. The ones that do have turned that story beyond recognition in self gain such as Elphias Levi’s illustration. This more popular appearance did not emerge until the 1850's-
The head of the goat
The upper body of a woman (maternity)
Cloven feet
A pair of wings
This modern illustration in which Esoterica, Gnosticism,Witchcraft, Magick and Satanist are ascribed some 600 years after the attributed Friday the 13th.. Baphomet from one source with developed in some cases opposite sums. Baphomet is a great story of man's nature in a baptism of wisdom. -Frank A. Tytar
Jesus is not the lamb of God because of the time that he was born, but because he was the final sacrifice (sacrificial lamb) to pay the penalty of the sins for God's people (and all who would come to believe). He was also the fulfillment of the lambs slain whose blood was put on the doorposts of the Hebrews in Egypt so the angel of death would pass over their homes when it came to kill all the first born of Egypt. Jesus was also never called a fisher of men. He told Peter and his brother, who were fishermen, that if they followed him he would make them fishers of men. This is all very easy to find in the Bible and on Google if you don't want to search the Bible! There's no reason to make such obvious and ridiculous errors just to try to support some hypothesis.
The middle ages were a long period, my people went from a strong proud people to ill deformed people due to poverty in less than 100 years, having to rely on a diet of grain and seafood because other meat were too valuable. The lack of food and men usually being miners meant this resulted in stunted growth, so maybe we should be looking at the physical builds of the actors too?
I've wondered as well. Sometimes I wonder if I'm the only one that hears the strange sounds here, because no one else ever mentions it...so I don't.
The article is great except nationalistic Spanish attribution in the article. It seems reasonable at say the truth that archealogical find in Spain the current territory but not original peoples that actually used this common ingredient used all over the world. Why gloss over the actual many tribes that existed long before the conglomerate of territories now Spain ever existed? Who used this in that place and at which time? We’re they Greek, Roman, another empire, pre empire ancient like the ice man? Was this a tooth remedy to built up enough material to stain teeth? What teams did the evidence building? Facts prevent shoddy reporting and watered down hard work turning it into pathetic untrustworthy research.
This is moronic, between this article and the ones on the Bosnian pyramids I worry for this site.
What's with all the talk about 'crutches'? You can't possibly mean 'churches'? If so, then your apparent lack of education discredits your comment much more cogently than any comment of mine could ever do.
Lately, the Subject Page doesn't stand alone as a Subject Page should. Why not? What has changed?
Pages