An extraordinarily beautiful ring. A few years back I attended a lecture by archaeologist, Mark Olly who gave a persuasive and engaging presentation on the historical reality of Robin Hood. Be nice to see him providing content on Ancient Origins. http://www.wilmslowguild.org/about-us/tutors/mark-olly/
Hello, i would love to use your comment for a little art project. I'd like to give it more exposure, post it on my Facebook if I have your permission. I will crop yur name off of course for privacy.Unless you'd like me to credit you, I absolutely will. Thanks!!
Looking at the house @ 49 secs of the vid' could well be in a village in South Africa. The roof overhang, giving a cool porch, is typical, the house colour and the dust road. Even down to the branch laced fence, the pillars and the deep blue sky and sunshine, are the are norm, here in S.A.
And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.
27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.
Its very clear very simple, we look like him inside and out, we were supposed to act like him by governing like him.
The big mysteries are solved for them who read
Is God male or female, singlular or plural, where is the mystery?, where is the confusion?
Mystery confusion deceit is the fruit of religion, which has only one purpose, that to becomes very clear to the reader.
I have read alot about King Tut. They found him with no heat or front ribs, they said it was probably from hunting rinorsaursaurous , I'm sure I spelled that wrong,. Then in this article they said there was a piece of his skull missing and the there was no murder. Well, never in my life have I ever heard of your skull just falling apart not even a piece. How many skulls have you seen full in tack. Tje whole leg thing is totally brand new, first time ever heard ofit. I know back in Those days they loved to hunt rhinhoursourses , spelled wrong again and alot of people died back then hunting them. That's why King tut had no heart or rib cage. He loved hunting rhinhoursaurses , spelled wrong again. .
Well, I expect there was at least a large colony of insects, perhaps dragonfly's in there, maybe frogs etc. So it's not ridiculous to assume that the local fauna has suffered. The land doesn't look overgrazed either, which is probably a rarity. Could even have got snakes going in there after the frogs..... In the UK that would be classed as an area of natural beauty.
It looks like a small crater. Seriously, how do they know this puddle is from the ice age. If no wildlife was harmed or history damaged, what difference does it make? Another case of fake outrage.
She could well have been born to a warrior class.
Yet, it may not stop there. Her facial features are hardly hyper-feminine, which could well mean that she was a warrior also because of a same sex-attraction background. The represention of such backgrounds in elite female sports today is at a far higher rate than would be suggested merely by chance.
One cannot think how things would have been much different a millennium ago, other than the 'sports' being a matter of life or death.
That doesn't mean that I believe that such a situation is necessary to explain warrior women per se, rather that I would be surprised if such matters never played a part.
We become consumed with what we see in our media “box”. All around the world, right now, rulers are having upsets in their own countries. Even in Canada to the North, and Mexico to the South, the world is in an upset. Venezuela has no electricity because of socialism, and the entire DNC is filled with socialist candidates while they try to impeach President Trump because of a clash over the same values.
The point is I wonder the margin of error if we had different data sets to compare to, but we don’t. We really will never know the answer, but we don’t have a “control”. All we have his human history with our pride and prejudice, mistakes and failures. We have to remember these statistics are merely the “historical” statistics and do not reflect human character nor are they scientific. They neither prove nor disprove the professor. They are mere, history...
Here you can navigate quickly through all comments made in any article sorted by date/time.
Yes but he happens to be dead and a long time ago. How he died is of absolutely no value other than to redirect our attention from current realities.
An extraordinarily beautiful ring. A few years back I attended a lecture by archaeologist, Mark Olly who gave a persuasive and engaging presentation on the historical reality of Robin Hood. Be nice to see him providing content on Ancient Origins.
http://www.wilmslowguild.org/about-us/tutors/mark-olly/
Hello, i would love to use your comment for a little art project. I'd like to give it more exposure, post it on my Facebook if I have your permission. I will crop yur name off of course for privacy.Unless you'd like me to credit you, I absolutely will. Thanks!!
Looking at the house @ 49 secs of the vid' could well be in a village in South Africa. The roof overhang, giving a cool porch, is typical, the house colour and the dust road. Even down to the branch laced fence, the pillars and the deep blue sky and sunshine, are the are norm, here in S.A.
Why complicate simplicity:
And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.
27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.
Its very clear very simple, we look like him inside and out, we were supposed to act like him by governing like him.
The big mysteries are solved for them who read
Is God male or female, singlular or plural, where is the mystery?, where is the confusion?
Mystery confusion deceit is the fruit of religion, which has only one purpose, that to becomes very clear to the reader.
Speculation, speculation and more lies
Agreed it appears to be a needlessly destructive act. My objection is petty… merely to the hyperbole of the headline.
Zero trust in Hawass. Zero. None. Nadda. He has done more than any other individual in our human history to mess up our research into human history.
I have read alot about King Tut. They found him with no heat or front ribs, they said it was probably from hunting rinorsaursaurous , I'm sure I spelled that wrong,. Then in this article they said there was a piece of his skull missing and the there was no murder. Well, never in my life have I ever heard of your skull just falling apart not even a piece. How many skulls have you seen full in tack. Tje whole leg thing is totally brand new, first time ever heard ofit. I know back in Those days they loved to hunt rhinhoursourses , spelled wrong again and alot of people died back then hunting them. That's why King tut had no heart or rib cage. He loved hunting rhinhoursaurses , spelled wrong again. .
Well, I expect there was at least a large colony of insects, perhaps dragonfly's in there, maybe frogs etc. So it's not ridiculous to assume that the local fauna has suffered. The land doesn't look overgrazed either, which is probably a rarity. Could even have got snakes going in there after the frogs..... In the UK that would be classed as an area of natural beauty.
My comment was too contra and I changed my mind about posting but this site does not allow one to change ones mind.
See Subject
Agreed. It’s pond… barely.
The first time I heard of someone buried sitting up, how unique, she was definitely someone special.
It looks like a small crater. Seriously, how do they know this puddle is from the ice age. If no wildlife was harmed or history damaged, what difference does it make? Another case of fake outrage.
That is not a lake, it isn't even a big pond. People make and fix ponds all the time, just fix it. This is not significant.
how they do it.
She could well have been born to a warrior class.
Yet, it may not stop there. Her facial features are hardly hyper-feminine, which could well mean that she was a warrior also because of a same sex-attraction background. The represention of such backgrounds in elite female sports today is at a far higher rate than would be suggested merely by chance.
One cannot think how things would have been much different a millennium ago, other than the 'sports' being a matter of life or death.
That doesn't mean that I believe that such a situation is necessary to explain warrior women per se, rather that I would be surprised if such matters never played a part.
There you see… Communication between people is the best way to be educated ;)
We become consumed with what we see in our media “box”. All around the world, right now, rulers are having upsets in their own countries. Even in Canada to the North, and Mexico to the South, the world is in an upset. Venezuela has no electricity because of socialism, and the entire DNC is filled with socialist candidates while they try to impeach President Trump because of a clash over the same values.
The point is I wonder the margin of error if we had different data sets to compare to, but we don’t. We really will never know the answer, but we don’t have a “control”. All we have his human history with our pride and prejudice, mistakes and failures. We have to remember these statistics are merely the “historical” statistics and do not reflect human character nor are they scientific. They neither prove nor disprove the professor. They are mere, history...
Pages