Noone wants to know the real history of Arthur, Tintagel is maybe the main reason the story is so big. The real Arthur wouldn't meet the modern trend of bravery and chivalry, and he might actually be recognised as a Breton. I wonder if Arthur knew Doniert or Tewdwr?Or even Meriasek?
I would like to thank that if African medicine had not been stunted and it's growth that maybe there would have been many discoveries that could have been beneficial to multiple diseases and illnesses in the world today.
It is not hard to believe that there could have been some sort of medicine concocted by humans early in history that is similar to what we have now they were not stupid basically the same humans that we are now just in a different time it would be nice to think that that did occur however it would be sad to think that all that technology and information and education has lost
Historians continue to rubbish Monmouth, calling his account “fictional”. Flinders Petrie lambasted the Royal Society for this in 1917, when he correctly identified the Tysilio Chronicle, sitting in the Bodleian Library in Oxford, as the clear source material for Geoffrey’s work.
Modern Scholars still refuse to re-consider their position, and will not allow any modern translation of Tysilio to be published (though Bill Cooper did one anyway – search for it). Tysilio makes up the vast majority of Monmouth’s story, from the establishment of a colony of expat Trojans in 1103BC, through to the Anglo-saxon supremacy of the early 600s, due to a pandemic wiping out 90% of the Britons.
And yet...the Pyramid-building machines were re-discovered by Ron Wyatt and team in the early 90s and demonstrated to members of the Dept of Antiquities including Ali Nasser Hassan, using actual pyramid stones. After this, the guidebooks at the pyramids changed, and started to quote Herodotus’ description of the banked-windlass style machines, that lifted the stones level by level.
Wow oh wow - such wonderful history, and now this magnificent woman's descendants are Royalty.... but this history does not get told to the Brits...so much to learn ! Be very proud Will&Harry !
I think the author understands that, however the fact that the bible would have to denounce such practices implies that they were common to the area and needed correction,
We learn in KINGS 15:12,
"He expelled the male shrine prostitutes from the land and got rid of all the idols his ancestors had made."
Referring to a time when prostitutes (male ones at that) were kept inside the temples of the Israelites.
Even with its feats and relics, the mightier weapon at Roland's disposal was his olifant, the Song of Roland stresses that had he blown his horn, Roland might have saved his army
Ivar despite being born cursed and possibly having a bone disease that weakened his body over time became a legend among his people, with stories that are repeated even today. Makes you wonder how many great leaders had a deficiency that they simply performed well in spite of
Funnily the Epic of Gilgamesh, the oldest surviving story, speaks of one of these divine kings and shows him as a tyrant needing to be placated by someone to contend with him
It surprises me to see so many people deny this information with fervor. Even if Asherah was no more than a sacred tree it's possible that it was worshipped alongside Yahweh. The bible itself denounced the Israelites several times for their polytheistic tendencies they worshipped the idols left by both Gideon and Moses (Moses brazen serpent)
I found this article to be informative and fascinating, but would like to make an observation: people suggest that St. John – as depicted in the stained glass window seen in this article, or in Da Vinci’s “Last Supper”, is actually a woman, because of his hair. Women in Biblical did not wear their hair to their shoulders. They wore it to their waists, so hair going to the shoulder, by Biblical standards, would not be “long” or “feminine”. Jesus has also been depicted since the time of the early Church with long hair, but not long in the Biblical sense ertgaining to women.
So if we were here at the same time as the Neanderthal how could we have evolved from them? I think that is where the ancient astronaut theory makes a lot more sense.
I agree. Although Nichola Tesla rediscovered a lot of things such as free energy. But all these technologies have been surpressed because it limits the power of the controllers of the world if the public was aware of some of these ancient technologies.
All of the current and past theories regarding the methods of building are based upon our acceptance of evolution as being real.
The paradigm, that man has come from being primitive to having supreme intelligence today or that our technology is more advanced than yesterday, limits our thinking.
What if there have been many (many, many) civilisations before ours that have had technologies that are different to ours today, technologies that would astound the average technologist today.
We have not discovered these technologies because we cannot see the evidence and even if we could see we would not recognise as it would not fit with the current paradigm..
Here you can navigate quickly through all comments made in any article sorted by date/time.
Noone wants to know the real history of Arthur, Tintagel is maybe the main reason the story is so big. The real Arthur wouldn't meet the modern trend of bravery and chivalry, and he might actually be recognised as a Breton. I wonder if Arthur knew Doniert or Tewdwr?Or even Meriasek?
I would like to thank that if African medicine had not been stunted and it's growth that maybe there would have been many discoveries that could have been beneficial to multiple diseases and illnesses in the world today.
It is not hard to believe that there could have been some sort of medicine concocted by humans early in history that is similar to what we have now they were not stupid basically the same humans that we are now just in a different time it would be nice to think that that did occur however it would be sad to think that all that technology and information and education has lost
Historians continue to rubbish Monmouth, calling his account “fictional”. Flinders Petrie lambasted the Royal Society for this in 1917, when he correctly identified the Tysilio Chronicle, sitting in the Bodleian Library in Oxford, as the clear source material for Geoffrey’s work.
Modern Scholars still refuse to re-consider their position, and will not allow any modern translation of Tysilio to be published (though Bill Cooper did one anyway – search for it). Tysilio makes up the vast majority of Monmouth’s story, from the establishment of a colony of expat Trojans in 1103BC, through to the Anglo-saxon supremacy of the early 600s, due to a pandemic wiping out 90% of the Britons.
Read it and Judge for yourselves….
And yet...the Pyramid-building machines were re-discovered by Ron Wyatt and team in the early 90s and demonstrated to members of the Dept of Antiquities including Ali Nasser Hassan, using actual pyramid stones. After this, the guidebooks at the pyramids changed, and started to quote Herodotus’ description of the banked-windlass style machines, that lifted the stones level by level.
Wow oh wow - such wonderful history, and now this magnificent woman's descendants are Royalty.... but this history does not get told to the Brits...so much to learn ! Be very proud Will&Harry !
I think the author understands that, however the fact that the bible would have to denounce such practices implies that they were common to the area and needed correction,
We learn in KINGS 15:12,
"He expelled the male shrine prostitutes from the land and got rid of all the idols his ancestors had made."
Referring to a time when prostitutes (male ones at that) were kept inside the temples of the Israelites.
Even with its feats and relics, the mightier weapon at Roland's disposal was his olifant, the Song of Roland stresses that had he blown his horn, Roland might have saved his army
Many of such architectures have been turned into heritage sites in Asian countries. This looks amazing.
Ivar despite being born cursed and possibly having a bone disease that weakened his body over time became a legend among his people, with stories that are repeated even today. Makes you wonder how many great leaders had a deficiency that they simply performed well in spite of
Sounds similar to the Sumerian invocations of ghosts and love charms. The spirits were typically invoked for other tasks though
Funnily the Epic of Gilgamesh, the oldest surviving story, speaks of one of these divine kings and shows him as a tyrant needing to be placated by someone to contend with him
I can only urgently advise not to recite ancient spells. Read here what can happen:
http://www.eldritchdark.com/writings/short-stories/53/the-double-shadow
It surprises me to see so many people deny this information with fervor. Even if Asherah was no more than a sacred tree it's possible that it was worshipped alongside Yahweh. The bible itself denounced the Israelites several times for their polytheistic tendencies they worshipped the idols left by both Gideon and Moses (Moses brazen serpent)
I found this article to be informative and fascinating, but would like to make an observation: people suggest that St. John – as depicted in the stained glass window seen in this article, or in Da Vinci’s “Last Supper”, is actually a woman, because of his hair. Women in Biblical did not wear their hair to their shoulders. They wore it to their waists, so hair going to the shoulder, by Biblical standards, would not be “long” or “feminine”. Jesus has also been depicted since the time of the early Church with long hair, but not long in the Biblical sense ertgaining to women.
So if we were here at the same time as the Neanderthal how could we have evolved from them? I think that is where the ancient astronaut theory makes a lot more sense.
"Gnosticism was an ancient religion that incorporated elements of Christianity"
Excuse me but would you mind very much correcting this statement.
Yes the spell does work but firstly you must study Astrology
I have had as much beautiful sex as I have ever wanted most of my life.
I agree. Although Nichola Tesla rediscovered a lot of things such as free energy. But all these technologies have been surpressed because it limits the power of the controllers of the world if the public was aware of some of these ancient technologies.
All of the current and past theories regarding the methods of building are based upon our acceptance of evolution as being real.
The paradigm, that man has come from being primitive to having supreme intelligence today or that our technology is more advanced than yesterday, limits our thinking.
What if there have been many (many, many) civilisations before ours that have had technologies that are different to ours today, technologies that would astound the average technologist today.
We have not discovered these technologies because we cannot see the evidence and even if we could see we would not recognise as it would not fit with the current paradigm..
i have no degrees but to me its ancients’ art. It may be a natural formation, but for sure cleverly modified. i will bet my reputation on it!
Pages