"What’s more, as we face more existential threats there is a greater tendency to look to the distant past for inspiration for how we should live, both physically and emotionally."
We are facing an existential threat. They come from those ultimately behind The Conversation. Yet, I do not refer to mad leftists and Communism. They are a distraction from the real threat, just as Fascism and Trumpism is, as well as a clever ploy to divide and conquer.
So is this article. It adds nothing but mind control. Neanderthals were probably people, much like us. People don't change all that much. They tend to lead sinful, self-obsessed lives largely in ignorance of the God who created them.
The human timeline we are being constantly drip fed about is a lie. That is why we need to constantly hear about it, so that we never stop to really think about it. And if we do, peer pressure is usually sufficient to silence us.
This is how mind control works. Being mind control, most shall never see it for what it is, for their thoughts on the matter are controlled.
If one sees the likes of The Conversation as journals of truth, one is controlled. If one sees them as journals of mistruth, one is still likely controlled anyway.
The truth is in the Bible, but those in charge do not want us to know that. We should look to it for inspiration on how we should live, not just physically and emotionally, but spiritually as well.
Those ultimately behind journals like The Conversation are not Atheists. But some pretend they are thus, whilst almost none of them do not pretend on matters of religion. They pretend because who they worship and how they do it is too likely to threaten the bonds of the mind control. For now, at least.
Not only is there no evidence at all, the whole theory of evolution as a suppossed science based system is in fact the greatest ‘faith based’ beleif system in the world and as one who believes in creation, I am in real awe at the level of blind faith of those have who believe in the TBBT.
Not only is there no evidence at all, the whole theory of evolution as a suppossed science based system is in fact the greatest ‘faith based’ beleif system in the world and as one who believes in creation, I am in real awe at the level of blind faith of those have who believe in the TBBT.
Maybe the Roman dodecahedrons were projectiles utilized in war. They are hollow, which makes them light and easy to handle (eject/project). The knobs on the dodecahedrons were probably brutal if a person was struck by one. Also, the holes in the sides probably made the dodecahedrons rapidly rotate as they traveled through the air ... making them even deadlier. Since they are hollow, they could have also been filled with incendiary contents (fire).
The Phoenicians were the first to use Ursa Minor as an orientation reference, since they used to sail a lot during night to avoid been followed by competitors. Homer presents then as cunning merchants / slave traders.
I must have missed the bits about sacred prostitution and child sacrifice...
Or do they not fit the narrative?
As for the Phoenecians invention of the alphabet, this may simply be another falsehood of history. As a maritime trading power, the Phoenecians popularised the alphabet, but they may not have invented it. They may have merely copied their literate Hebrew neighbours.
However, as old-time Hebrews wotshipped God and Phoenecians worshipped Baal instead, the latter are the preferred ones today in a world where Baal-worshippers rule. Pretend Jews are fine, though, because Baal likes pretence. Thus, much of accepted 'history' would be agreeable to Baal.
Yes. The Scientism is a religion. They have saints like Sagan, prophets like Darwin, High Priests and Priestesses like DeGrasse Tyson and Jane Goodall. They're dogmatic and evangelical about it. We cannot escape these paradigms. They are ingrained in our psyche whether or not we choose an organized religion or not (I personally do not. I'm simply counter-atheist). The Science™️ is a worldview of which the basis is nihilism. They very ironically have strict moral codes based on nothing but it's nothing to do with their personal behavior but whatever quasi-Marxist social order beliefs.
Darwin was not an Atheist. He was a Theist. His God was Satan.
His theory cones from that. Like much that does come from that community, his theory is a half-truth taken beyond truth quite deliberately.
Micro-evolution exists. Today, we have almost a thousand terminal taxa of the genus Eucalyptus and the closely allied genera of Corymbia and Angophora as botanical taxonomy regards them. There could easily be at least six genera there, rather than three. Equally, there could be a few hundred species. Or even one hundred, depending upon whether one lumps or splits taxa.
Some of these species are so similar that even botanists cannot tell them apart. They hybridise and intergrade and confuse even the most expert.
However, clearly differentiation and adaption happens. Yet, this does not turn a Eucalyptus gum tree into a rose, for example. It is micro-evolution within a type, something that genetics wholly backs up.
One may compare a eucalypt with a myrtle and conclude they are part of the same Family, despite a myrtle having superficial similarity to a blueberry. Yet, this doesn't prove evolutionary theory. Neither does the fact that a eucalypt shares traits with algae, such as photosynthesis. Neither does a finch population developing larger bills so as to eat different food.
Nothing proves Evolutionary theory. I came to Evolutionary disbelief after coming into contact with religion, but I don't refer to my Christianity. I refer to the religion practised by Darwin which caused him to write a theory he knew full well to be false.
"Consider Halloween, its origins stretching back to the ancient Celtic festival of Sawan, marking the end of the harvest season and the beginning of winter."
Or one could consider that Samhain was the Celtic Day of the Dead which is far beyond the status of seasonal marker and harvest celebration... And far darker too.
That why it is celebrated by those who worship Satan today in ways that no historian shall talk about. Instead, we get the children's version here. This does not surprise me at all.
In the end many will quote from knowledge they themselves have not personally aquired or openly and honestly investigated... and I include myself.... But to be fair, let Michael Behe a Biochemist speak as well.…
It's fair to question evolution. It's simply a replacement religious worldview for atheists. It's inherently anti metaphysical. Similar morphology is not proof of relationship. It does suggest it and could be true. A platypus, some aquatic species not related by morphology, and birds have beaks or bills. Does this mean along the evolutionary chain narrative there existed a common species that randomly developed a proto-beak? Let's not dismiss evolutionary or metaphysical speculation. Speculation is all we have. All beliefs are narratives.
Words like “diversity” and “enrichment” among many other postmodern tropes are inherently anti-white. Kali Yuga is real. We can't stop this madness but we can liberate ourselves and help others realize but keep in mind only people who can will. Most people are sheep. This is culture war but it's an ontological reality. As above, so below.
Here you can navigate quickly through all comments made in any article sorted by date/time.
"What’s more, as we face more existential threats there is a greater tendency to look to the distant past for inspiration for how we should live, both physically and emotionally."
We are facing an existential threat. They come from those ultimately behind The Conversation. Yet, I do not refer to mad leftists and Communism. They are a distraction from the real threat, just as Fascism and Trumpism is, as well as a clever ploy to divide and conquer.
So is this article. It adds nothing but mind control. Neanderthals were probably people, much like us. People don't change all that much. They tend to lead sinful, self-obsessed lives largely in ignorance of the God who created them.
The human timeline we are being constantly drip fed about is a lie. That is why we need to constantly hear about it, so that we never stop to really think about it. And if we do, peer pressure is usually sufficient to silence us.
This is how mind control works. Being mind control, most shall never see it for what it is, for their thoughts on the matter are controlled.
If one sees the likes of The Conversation as journals of truth, one is controlled. If one sees them as journals of mistruth, one is still likely controlled anyway.
The truth is in the Bible, but those in charge do not want us to know that. We should look to it for inspiration on how we should live, not just physically and emotionally, but spiritually as well.
Those ultimately behind journals like The Conversation are not Atheists. But some pretend they are thus, whilst almost none of them do not pretend on matters of religion. They pretend because who they worship and how they do it is too likely to threaten the bonds of the mind control. For now, at least.
Not only is there no evidence at all, the whole theory of evolution as a suppossed science based system is in fact the greatest ‘faith based’ beleif system in the world and as one who believes in creation, I am in real awe at the level of blind faith of those have who believe in the TBBT.
Not only is there no evidence at all, the whole theory of evolution as a suppossed science based system is in fact the greatest ‘faith based’ beleif system in the world and as one who believes in creation, I am in real awe at the level of blind faith of those have who believe in the TBBT.
Maybe the Roman dodecahedrons were projectiles utilized in war. They are hollow, which makes them light and easy to handle (eject/project). The knobs on the dodecahedrons were probably brutal if a person was struck by one. Also, the holes in the sides probably made the dodecahedrons rapidly rotate as they traveled through the air ... making them even deadlier. Since they are hollow, they could have also been filled with incendiary contents (fire).
The Phoenicians were the first to use Ursa Minor as an orientation reference, since they used to sail a lot during night to avoid been followed by competitors. Homer presents then as cunning merchants / slave traders.
I must have missed the bits about sacred prostitution and child sacrifice...
Or do they not fit the narrative?
As for the Phoenecians invention of the alphabet, this may simply be another falsehood of history. As a maritime trading power, the Phoenecians popularised the alphabet, but they may not have invented it. They may have merely copied their literate Hebrew neighbours.
However, as old-time Hebrews wotshipped God and Phoenecians worshipped Baal instead, the latter are the preferred ones today in a world where Baal-worshippers rule. Pretend Jews are fine, though, because Baal likes pretence. Thus, much of accepted 'history' would be agreeable to Baal.
The Easter evolved from Eoster internet trope is long debunked. This is not serious journalism.
Thank you Gary, a thought provoking article.
I tend to agree with Tucker, we have been programmed for centuries to accept “theories”
as truths when they often have not been fully validated.
Yes. The Scientism is a religion. They have saints like Sagan, prophets like Darwin, High Priests and Priestesses like DeGrasse Tyson and Jane Goodall. They're dogmatic and evangelical about it. We cannot escape these paradigms. They are ingrained in our psyche whether or not we choose an organized religion or not (I personally do not. I'm simply counter-atheist). The Science™️ is a worldview of which the basis is nihilism. They very ironically have strict moral codes based on nothing but it's nothing to do with their personal behavior but whatever quasi-Marxist social order beliefs.
I should clarify that I am not referring below to The Elder.
Yours is the very attitude that many in the thrall of a particular religion has.
There is a religion that promotes Atheism, not for them but for others.
They promote your scientific world view.
You ask a very good question.
I know who would finance Ancient Origins. They have both motive and means. They also have a track record of this type of activity.
Yet, most historians are oblivious to such activity.
Darwin was not an Atheist. He was a Theist. His God was Satan.
His theory cones from that. Like much that does come from that community, his theory is a half-truth taken beyond truth quite deliberately.
Micro-evolution exists. Today, we have almost a thousand terminal taxa of the genus Eucalyptus and the closely allied genera of Corymbia and Angophora as botanical taxonomy regards them. There could easily be at least six genera there, rather than three. Equally, there could be a few hundred species. Or even one hundred, depending upon whether one lumps or splits taxa.
Some of these species are so similar that even botanists cannot tell them apart. They hybridise and intergrade and confuse even the most expert.
However, clearly differentiation and adaption happens. Yet, this does not turn a Eucalyptus gum tree into a rose, for example. It is micro-evolution within a type, something that genetics wholly backs up.
One may compare a eucalypt with a myrtle and conclude they are part of the same Family, despite a myrtle having superficial similarity to a blueberry. Yet, this doesn't prove evolutionary theory. Neither does the fact that a eucalypt shares traits with algae, such as photosynthesis. Neither does a finch population developing larger bills so as to eat different food.
Nothing proves Evolutionary theory. I came to Evolutionary disbelief after coming into contact with religion, but I don't refer to my Christianity. I refer to the religion practised by Darwin which caused him to write a theory he knew full well to be false.
"Consider Halloween, its origins stretching back to the ancient Celtic festival of Sawan, marking the end of the harvest season and the beginning of winter."
Or one could consider that Samhain was the Celtic Day of the Dead which is far beyond the status of seasonal marker and harvest celebration... And far darker too.
That why it is celebrated by those who worship Satan today in ways that no historian shall talk about. Instead, we get the children's version here. This does not surprise me at all.
Nice headset
Religion is simpy a replacemnt sceintific worldview for religious people.
https://falkenblog.blogspot.com/2024/04/why-evolution-is-false.html
In the end many will quote from knowledge they themselves have not personally aquired or openly and honestly investigated... and I include myself.... But to be fair, let Michael Behe a Biochemist speak as well.…
Who finances Ancient Origins?
Peace to all
It's fair to question evolution. It's simply a replacement religious worldview for atheists. It's inherently anti metaphysical. Similar morphology is not proof of relationship. It does suggest it and could be true. A platypus, some aquatic species not related by morphology, and birds have beaks or bills. Does this mean along the evolutionary chain narrative there existed a common species that randomly developed a proto-beak? Let's not dismiss evolutionary or metaphysical speculation. Speculation is all we have. All beliefs are narratives.
Words like “diversity” and “enrichment” among many other postmodern tropes are inherently anti-white. Kali Yuga is real. We can't stop this madness but we can liberate ourselves and help others realize but keep in mind only people who can will. Most people are sheep. This is culture war but it's an ontological reality. As above, so below.
The UK refugee program could bring in persecuted Indian Christians, who can even be killed by Hindu nationalists. Does it?
No. They're Christians.
Pages