The Great Pyramid at Giza and Noah’s Ark:  Are we coming closer to an understanding of the Ancient Mind? Part I

The Great Pyramid at Giza and Noah’s Ark: Are we coming closer to an understanding of the Ancient Mind? Part I

(Read the article on one page)

Two phenomena that have been haunting humanity for a long time are Noah’s Ark and the Great Pyramid of Giza. It has however rarely been suggested that these two are connected. One, the Ark, is part of the Biblical Flood Story and would by many be considered as merely mythological. The other, the Great Pyramid is probably the most impressive megalith on our planet, whose existence no one doubts. In this article I will argue that the Ark and the Great Pyramid are connected through the consciousness shifts, which gave rise to human civilization and history. To demonstrate this connection, I will base myself on the Mayan calendar but also on an interesting recent translation of a Dead Sea Scrolls pertaining to the Ark.

The idea that the rise of human civilization was caused by a shift in consciousness in the global mind is a central idea in my most recent book The Global Mind and the Rise of Civilization (Inner Traditions, 2016). This idea differs in significant regards from the other two chief ideas (outside of the mainstream) that seek to explain the rise of civilization, that is to say, Ancient Aliens and Atlantis. The ancient alien idea is that humans on this planet began to create civilizations at the instigation of extraterrestrials, who visited from distant stars and galaxies and shared their knowledge. The Atlantis, or “lost civilization” idea on the other hand is that there must have been a “lost” civilization much older than those we actually know of and that survivors from this civilization helped spawn the ones in Egypt, Mesopotamia and the Indus Valley that emerged about 5,000 years ago.

The third alternative – the one that I propose – is that civilizations arose on our planet because of precisely timed shifts in consciousness early on. This would immediately explain why the rise of civilization seems to have been such a sudden event with so few preceding forms. Egypt, for instance seems to have gone from the Stone Age to a sophisticated monarchy capable of erecting pyramids within the time span of only a few generations. If there was a collective consciousness shift, there would however be no reason to assume that this evolution would have to be a result of a slow and gradual process of learning. In my view, the most significant such shift took place as the global mind was activated at the beginning of the Mayan Long Count (or Sixth Wave) in 3115 BCE. As a result of this, the people in resonance with this global mind became endowed with the capabilities of creating civilizations.

The Mayan calendar is based on different time periods characterized by different spiritual qualities and when we go from one of these periods to another, a shift in consciousness takes place. Up until the year 2011 the Long Count wave consisted of thirteen so-called baktuns (time periods of 144,000 days or 394.3 common years), which shifted between seven peaks (or days) and six valleys (or nights). We can learn about historical events from the different consciousness shifts generated by this wave and especially from its very starting point.

The Downloading of the Human Mind and the Rise of Civilization

This Long Count was the calendar that the Maya used for dating all of their own pyramids and so it was very significant to them. I will argue that we have reasons to assume that its beginning in 3115 BC did mean a significant shift in consciousness and that the Maya had something to say about what this meant to the humans. Hence, the most pertinent inscription about this beginning is probably the one at the Tablet of the Cross in Palenque, which states that at the beginning of the Long Count: “the First Father erected the World Tree” so that “the light could enter.” “It was made proper, the Raised-up Sky-Place, the Eight-House-Partition, is its holy name, the House in the North .” From this, the beginning of the Mayan Long Count seems to have meant a metaphysical shift on a global scale brought about by the First Father (what we would call God), who erected the World Tree (what most cultures refer to as the Tree of Life) in the North.

At first this may sound cryptic, but not so if you place it in the context of Mayan and Aztec cosmology in which the world is often portrayed as an eight-partitioned cosmogram with the Tree of Life at its center (see Figure 1). What I believe the Maya in Palenque then were saying was that in 3115 BCE a global grid of eight directions was activated emanating from the North Pole (the Tree of Life). As human beings were in resonance with this Tree of Life and the eight partitioning this created, they were totally transformed by this and compelled to create civilizations. The activation of a grid of straight and perpendicular lines amounted to a very profound shift in consciousness, which for the first time endowing humans with a structured and rational, or if you like compartmentalized, mind, which allowed them to create civilizations.

Comments

William Bradshaw's picture

The common thread to all of these mysteries is the fact that they are not myths and tetraploid humans were responsible for the Great Flood and building the Pyramids, as well as writing the Bible. Enlil, son of Anu, caused the flood which was local to the Black Sea. Noah only brought certain animals on board the Ark as not all perished. My book proves everything and shows that your government is part of the Great Deceivers, the Luciferians, not Satanists. They work with the Hidden Ones (Shining Ones who are tetraploid humans) also known as the Serpent People, the thirteenth and hidden astrological sign, the Serpent Bearer. The serpent in the Garden of Eden, Satan (Semjaza at that time), was actually one of these Serpent People, a tetraploid human and not an actual snake. They were the Rephaim classs giants mentioned in the Old Testament while Nephilim were sterile triploids, the result of “gods” mating with humans. If anybody tries to tell you different, they are liars. This is the truth.

William H. Bradhaw, Dipl. T, CPIM
http://SecretsPinkKush.ZapperSoftware.com

Thankyou I have read Carl Callamen's other book, The Mayan calender's and the evolution of consciousness, which was wonderful and totally resonated with me. I have overlaid the astrological calendar onto the Mayan Calender's and got an even clearer picture of the evolution of consciousness on planet earth and the cycles of time and evolution and the spiritual lessons that are learnt in different ages. This was a lot of fun for me.

When is Ancient Origin's going to have Carl Calleman to do a monthly webinar. I would definitely find the time to tune into a webinar given by Carl Calleman.

Carl Johan Calleman's picture

Thank you starlady. I like the idea of a webinar through Ancient Origins. We are now in the era after the shift in the Mayan calendar and this has given a lot of new ideas as to what is happening not only in the past of humanity, but also in our current time where nine different waves are creating an interference pattern for evolution unlike at any previous time in history.

 

Carl J Calleman

Wow

Ironicly the pyramids of the America's (Maya's and others) don't fit in your argumentation. They are at least some 1000 years younger than those of Sumer, Egypt and so on.
I think 'proximitiy' is much better as explanation: it takes only a couple days to get from Sumer to the Indus region. Especially if you take into account that the Sumerian coast extended much more southward in the days of Sumer! The same goes for Egypt: the distance between Egypt and Sumer is only a couple of weeks...

Carl Johan Calleman's picture

I do not necessarily think it is ironic that the Mayan pyramids, most of which were built more than three thousand years after the Egyptian pyramids do not fit into this argumentation. The Giza pyramid was built relatively shortly after the downloading of the rational global mind and hence it is a much more pure expression of this mind. Also from Sumer and the Indus Valley you have symbols of the downloading of the global mind from this time as I detail in my book. The chief message of the Mayan pyramids is different. It is that this creation has nine different levels, each developed by a particular creation wave, out of which the Long Count is only one.

Carl J Calleman

Charles Dan's picture

As we all know pyramids of eqypt are part of world’s most famous 7 wonders so ovbiously there should be no dpubt they are best at this places but time to time International organisation decide new places in historical category or in other different categories.

Download Mp3 juice songs app to listen music and download mp3 songs.<a href="https://goo.gl/VRpNse" >MP3 Juice</a> 

This is a good article so far. Unless the pyramids were built in 10,000BC like Graham Hancock suggests, then there could have also been some communication between civilizations.

Troy Mobley

Carl Johan Calleman's picture

I wonder if Hancock still suggest that. Regardless, I do not undestand why people suggest that the pyramids in Egypt are 10,000, 50,000 or 100,000 years old when they have been carbon 14 dates in two separate studies which have given results consistent with what historians have  been saying for some time. All solid evidence points to civilization starting around 3100 BCE and this is when the Mayan Long Count (3114 BC) and the Kali Yuga (3102 BCE) began and I think we ahev every reason to take this connection seriously. This meant a significant shift in the global mind affecting people everywhere and so I see no reason to postulate that contacts between remote cultures played a role for this rise of civlization.

Carl J Calleman

William Bradshaw's picture

Based upon my research the pyramids were built around 4,500 years ago. They were built by tetraploid humans, not aliens. They were our ancient gods and are now our modern aliens. They have doubled chromosomes wtih 92 gametes surrounding their nuclei versus our 46. See my book Secrets of the Pink Kush for a complete and truthful explanation. Hankcock, Childress, Von Daniken, Sitchin and some others are on the right track but do not provide the complete or correct answers. Tetraploid humans have a cranial capacity of around 2300 CC which is almost double that of a normal diploid human. They believe in ancient aliens which is false. There are aliens out there, most likely, but they cannot come here and vice versa. They also believe the Sumerian Kings List and that list contains obvious lies. The tetraploid humans lie about their immortality, they are not immoratal. e.g. Medusa of the Gorgan sisters. The tetraploid humans are the HIDDEN ONES and the occult is knowledge gifted from them or about them. They are VERY DANGEROUS, very advanced and very big, about 12 feet tall or even up to 14 feet tall. They surveyed the Earth, found the center of land mass and built the pyramids at that point. There may be tunnels underneath the pyramids leading to the Hollow Earth where some now reside. I prove everything in Secrets of the Pink Kush using the scientific method. I also provide the mathematical polyploid formula and the chemicals (found in nature) to actually create a giant plant, animal or HUMAN. Nobody can disprove the book because it is the truth.

William H. Bradhaw, Dipl. T, CPIM
http://SecretsPinkKush.ZapperSoftware.com

Tsurugi's picture

Actually I believe the C14 dates were about 600 years older than what Egyptologists have been saying, which is why they rarely mention it. Also, according to the C14 dates, the top parts of the Great Pyramid are older than the lower parts, which, if we are to take the dates as indicative of original construction, seems rather impossible, as they would have had to build it starting from the top...??
On the other hand, if we consider that what was being dated was material from a massive restorative effort during the old dynastic period, it makes perfect sense. The work began at the top and worked downward, that way the restored parts would not be marred by having workers climbing all over it and dropping things on it, etc.

Of course, if the GP was already old and in need of restoration at that point, that pushes the original construction back far enough that it is completely out of reach of advanced Egyptian culture. That leaves us with the culture who constructed Gobekli Tepe as possible builders of the pyramid, and they were doing their work right around 10,000 years ago.

Carl Johan Calleman's picture

Well, two sets of measurements were made of wood used inside the pyramids. One showed about 200 years and the other 400 years older than the consensus age of 2560 BC for the building of Khufu's pyramid. The most common explanation to this is that old wood was used and also that the planning of the giza plateau began already around the activation of the Global Mind in 3115 BCE. If you do not take into consideration the evolutionary waves that drive history people can make up any kind of date for the building of the pyramids and because it is more msyterious to have them be old this is what most people are making up. According to my estimate based on the evolution of the human mind presented in The Global Mind and the Rise of Civilization the most likely date for the building of the Great Pyramid is 2600 BCE.

Carl J Calleman

William Bradshaw's picture

I totally concure wth your conclusion. I came at it from another angle, in my book. I based the dating upon the date for the Exodus of the Hebrews (Hyksos) and the time of Moses. The Hyksos (Akkadians/Hebrews) were enslaved, according to Manetho, for 430 years after they were successfully usurped. Prior to that period the Hyksos had enslaved the real native Egyptians for 511 years. You arrive at a date similar to what you state, maybe a bit later because dating Moses accurately is also a bit difficult. Estimates for Moses and the Exodus are circa 1200 BCE to 1400 BCE. Remember that it is also said that Moses killed King Og of Bashan who was one of last tetraploid humans in that area although they still exist to this day. My book divulges some of their current locations around the world and within the world, literally.

 

One should employ several starting points in an attempt to accurately date the construction of the pyramids. I suspect that their extended construction period would also obfuscate the actual date.

William H. Bradhaw, Dipl. T, CPIM
http://SecretsPinkKush.ZapperSoftware.com

Tsurugi's picture

Well that's fascinating. What wood? I was under the impression the dates were taken from organic material in mortar found between and on stones on the outer layers.

I like the explanations for the different ages, lol. "Yes, we are going to build this gigantic structure, and we are going to use this 400 year old wood to do it," said the Egyptians.

What that really shows is how pointless organic dating is for really determining the age of a structure built of stone. They got a date they didn't like, so they fudged it by exploiting the biggest weakness in the logic of such dating so that it matched what they already thought. Wow, science!
And yet, why didn't they date the other major piece of evidence used to uphold the conventional date of construction, the paint of the Khufu cartouche in Campbell's Chamber? It is supposed to be the ochre paint widely used by Egyptian masons at the time, which certainly had organic material in it. Yet it has never been officially dated. It is pointless to try, we are told, "because so much time has passed that any residual organics in the paint will have decayed and disappeared long ago" an audacious leap of reasoning that is far more faith that logic.
"Let's use science to determine the age of this paint!"
"Won't work."
"What, you already tried to do it?"
"No."
"Then how do you know it won't work?"
"Because it's too old"

It would be funny, but they aren't joking.

And of course there is the problem of the Sphinx and the Valley Temple and the quarry marks and the basalt flagstones and about a hundred other things in and around the plateau that individually and collectively indicate that something is dramatically wrong with the orthodox views of the entire complex.

The idea of a "global download" sounds interesting. What did they download that the builders of Gobekli Tepe or Gunung Padang didn't have?

Carl Johan Calleman's picture

Hello Tsurugu,

In my book The Global Mind and the Rise of Civilization I have the references to the original work of carbon 14-dating the Egyptian pyramids. What I think should be noted is that this work was paid for by people speculating about Atlantis and who believed that these were 12,500 years old based on visions of Edgar Cayce. The investigation was conducted by mainstream archeologists such as Mark Lehner and it turned out that this was not the case. I thus think that the important take home from this study is that even if the results were a little bit different from the established estimate it was far, far closer to this archeologists consensus date than to what the Atlantis people expected.

As you can see in Figure 3 in my article, Göbekli Tepe was built as a consequence of the downloading of a pre-wave of the Mayan Long Count. The Maya in other words wrote several inscriptions also about the time when this site was built. In general the Global Mind, whether at the beginning of this pre-wave in 8240 BC or at the real wave in 3115 BCE brought geometry to the human minds that were in resonance with it,which they expressed in their constructions. This geometry however became much more precise and advanced with the real wave and so even if we see first real rectilinear geometry created by humans in Göbeki Tepe it is not at all as precise as what comes later. The structures are “roundish” rather than at Stonehenge or Newgrange (laid out about 3100 BC) where they are pretty precise, not to mention the precision of the Egyptian pyramids.

Carl J Calleman

Tsurugi's picture

Yeah the entire situation with A.R.E., Lehner, Hawass et al is incredibly strange. How is it that Lehner, who was recruited by A.R.E. while still in school, and Hawass, whom A.R.E. sponsored to bring him to the states, get his degree in archaeology, and return with Lehner to Egypt to act on behalf of the A.R.E.....how is it that those two became the largest shills for conventional theory?? Hawass ruthlessly and publicly crushed anyone who had even slightly unconventional ideas....meanwhile he was quietly allowing A.R.E. sponsored teams work their various projects all over Egypt.

Hawass himself has always struck me as a very disingenuous guy. His mainstream absolutism combined with his connection to the Cayce society alone is confirmation of this; it is inescapable that someone in that situation was being lied to. Whether it was Hawass lying to the A.R.E. so they'd continue paying for everything or Hawass and the A.R.E. pulling a major public deception as they attempted to extract whatever ancient secrets they thought were hidden in Egypt remains to be seen. Meanwhile, I view everything that came from Egyptian archaeology during Hawass' reign as highly suspect, either ruthlessly dogmatic or part of a disinformation campaign.

Look at Hawass' reaction to the German scientists who took samples of the Khufu cartouche paint. He flew off the rails, claiming they thought the paint would date the GP as being 25000 years old as some part of an Israeli plot to "steal" the GP from the heritage of the Egyptian people. That is a fascnating reaction given that he surely knew what they really wanted to check was whether the paint would actually return a date of around 200 years or so, which would conclusively demonstrate that the cartouche and associated marks were a hoax perpetrated by Howard Vyse in 1837. So where did this 25,000 year thing come from?

As for Gobekli Tepe showing evidence of less advancement than stonehenge or Egypt, I respectfully disagree. All of the same engineering, mathematical, and astronomical techniques we see demonstrated in Egypt are present in Gobekli Tepe. It could be argued that they were less skillfully executed in some cases at Gobekli Tepe, but then again less than 10% of that site has been excavated, so it remains to be seen. Also, it has been postulated that GT was a kind of school where these techniques were being taught, so what we're looking at are the equivalent of graduate term papers, work of students who have yet to fully mature into their discipline. Journeyman work.
Additionally, there is Gunung Padang, whose earliest(and most massive, as always seems to be the case) layers have been dated to 25-30 thousand years BP(there's that 25,000 number again, how strange!)

I still find the global download concept interesting. I've found your book on Amazon, gonna give it a go. Then I'll really be able to argue with you, haha. (I'm joking. So far it is fascinating.)

Thank you William and Carl for responded to my questions I had about the 10,000 year theory. I have made a list of the books and will be reading them to further my understanding.

Troy Mobley

Carl Johan Calleman's picture

Thank you, I am looking forward to hearing more from you when you have read my book. I just want to point out that when it comes to ancient monuments the Global Mind does not detemine some general concept of “advancement”. What we can see clearly is that with the Sixth Wave in 3115 BCE there is a jump in the sharpness of the geometry of the structures and in that respect one would be hard pressed to argue that Göbekli Tepe is comparable to the Egyptian pyramids.

Carl J Calleman

Tsurugi's picture

So the Peruvian structures like Ollantaytambo and Sacsayhuaman, which feature rounded, pillowed stonework, are older than the 3115 download?

I'm not disagreeing, just asking.

Carl Johan Calleman's picture

No, they are estimated to have been built about 500-600 years ago by the Inca.

Especially Ollantaytambo is quite remarkable.

Carl J Calleman

Register to become part of our active community, get updates, receive a monthly newsletter, and enjoy the benefits and rewards of our member point system OR just post your comment below as a Guest.

Related Ancient Origins Articles

Our Mission

At Ancient Origins, we believe that one of the most important fields of knowledge we can pursue as human beings is our beginnings. And while some people may seem content with the story as it stands, our view is that there exists countless mysteries, scientific anomalies and surprising artifacts that have yet to be discovered and explained.

The goal of Ancient Origins is to highlight recent archaeological discoveries, peer-reviewed academic research and evidence, as well as offering alternative viewpoints and explanations of science, archaeology, mythology, religion and history around the globe.

We’re the only Pop Archaeology site combining scientific research with out-of-the-box perspectives.

By bringing together top experts and authors, this archaeology website explores lost civilizations, examines sacred writings, tours ancient places, investigates ancient discoveries and questions mysterious happenings. Our open community is dedicated to digging into the origins of our species on planet earth, and question wherever the discoveries might take us. We seek to retell the story of our beginnings. 

Ancient Image Galleries

View from the Castle Gate (Burgtor). (Public Domain)
Door surrounded by roots of Tetrameles nudiflora in the Khmer temple of Ta Phrom, Angkor temple complex, located today in Cambodia. (CC BY-SA 3.0)
Cable car in the Xihai (West Sea) Grand Canyon (CC BY-SA 4.0)
Next article