Main: Tampa Bay in Florida (pictured). Inset: Photograph of an ITE-2.

BREAKING NEWS: New Telescope Observes Otherwise Invisible Terrestrial Entities with Intelligent Movement

(Read the article on one page)

A new report published in the latest edition of the American Journal of Modern Physics has revealed a startling finding – a newly developed telescope with concave lenses has observed, for the first time, entities in our terrestrial environment that are invisible to our eyes and to conventional Galileo telescopes with convex lenses.  Even more surprising is the fact that these entities have been observed to move ‘intelligently’ in the night sky in a manner suggesting unauthorized surveillance of the area.

Revolutionary New Santilli Telescope

The discovery was made by Dr Ruggero Santilli, a highly-regarded expert in mathematics, cosmology, and physics, who has been nominated for Nobel Prizes in physics and chemistry. Dr Santilli developed a new type of telescope that was designed to observe antimatter-light.  This form of light has a negative index of refraction, thus requiring concave lenses to focus it, rather than the traditional convex lenses used in conventional Galileo telescopes.

Top: A conventional Galileo telescope with convex lenses designed to observe ordinary matter-light. Bottom: The new Santilli telescope with concave lenses designed to observe antimatter-light.

Top: A conventional Galileo telescope with convex lenses designed to observe ordinary matter-light. Bottom: The new Santilli telescope with concave lenses designed to observe antimatter-light.   Credit: Dr Santilli

Using a pair of Galileo and Santilli telescopes, Dr Santilli found the first known evidence of the apparent existence in our universe of antimatter galaxies, antimatter asteroids and antimatter cosmic rays. These results were published in the journal Clifford Algebras and their Applications in 2014. But that is not all the new telescope observed…

Detection of Invisible Terrestrial Entities

In his paper, Apparent Detection via New Telescopes with Concave Lenses of Otherwise Invisible Terrestrial Entities (ITE) , Dr Santilli relates the moment his new telescope found a lot more than he anticipated:

“On September 5, 2015, at 9.30 pm the author aimed a pair of 100 mm Galileo and Santilli telescopes at the night sky over Tampa Bay, Florida, as seen from the NE orientation of the terrace of room 775 of the Vinoy Renaissance Hotel in St. Petersburg… The tests were merely intended for the search of antimatter galaxies and, consequently, the paired telescopes were aimed at the sky, but sudden clouds halted the tests and the author oriented the pair of telescopes horizontally over Tampa Bay.

To his great surprise, unidentified yet clearly visible entities immediately appeared in the screen of the camera attached to the Santilli telescope, without any enlargement, without the same entities being visible to the naked eyes, and without any corresponding image existing in the screen of the camera attached to the Galileo telescope.

This unexpected discovery triggered a novel systematic use of the pair of Galileo and Santilli telescopes, this time, for the search of entities, here called Invisible Terrestrial Entities, that are invisible to our eyes as well as to our optical instruments with convex lenses, but are otherwise fully visible via the Santilli telescope with concave lenses, and are located in our terrestrial environment.”

Dr Santilli’s observations were made over Tampa Bay in Florida.

Dr Santilli’s observations were made over Tampa Bay in Florida (pictured). ( public domain )

Invisible Terrestrial Entities of the First Kind (ITE-1)

Following his first observation, Dr Santilli carried out systematic tests and observations, and came to identify two different types of Invisible Terrestrial Entities (ITEs), though he acknowledges that further types may be identified in the future. Both types have been independently verified by colleagues, and their existence was disclosed for the first time at an invited lecture delivered at the St. Petersburg Astronomy Club on September 25, 2015.

He defines the First Kind (ITE-1) as entities that:

  1. are not visible to the human eye or to conventional optical instruments with convex lenses, but are otherwise fully visible via Santilli telescopes with concave lenses;
  2. exist in our terrestrial environment, rather than in deep astro-physical spaces; and
  3. leave “dark images” in the background of digital cameras attached to Santilli telescopes.

Dr Santilli notes that the entities moved slowly and rotated. This particular type of motion excludes impurities in the telescope lens or in the camera as possible interpretations.

He further notes that “the emission of antimatter light does not mean that the entity is made up of antimatter, because the existence of the entities within our atmosphere would imply a cataclysmic explosion due to matter-antimatter annihilation.”

“In short,” writes Dr Santilli, “it appears that ITE-1 consist of matter-entities in our terrestrial environment achieving locomotion via the acquisition of antimatter in their interior with consequential use of matter-antimatter propulsion, and achieve invisibility via the emission of antimatter-light as a sort of exhaust.”

  Photographs of ITE-1s. Left and Middle: Captured by Dr Santilli in the night sky over Tampa Bay, Florida on September 5, 2015. Right: Captured by K Brinkman in the night sky over St Petersburg, Florida on September 20, 2015.

Photographs of ITE-1s. Left and Middle: Captured by Dr Santilli in the night sky over Tampa Bay, Florida on September 5, 2015. Right: Captured by K Brinkman in the night sky over St Petersburg, Florida on September 20, 2015. Credit: Dr Santilli.


And so the "Revelation" begins...

Just thought I'd point out a massive comment below. It says a bunch of stuff about the paper, some of which I couldn't verify and some of which was contradicted in the article, and then there's this massive flood of thanks from grateful skeptics who don't want to check it out themselves. It's really funny, as all skeptics ever have to offer is an argument from incredulity, which is a logical fallacy that, on available evidence, should be taught at school.

Truly amazing discovery. Seems a bit of a slant towards security concerns though. Maybe find out what it is first before you determine if it's a threat. A life form or atmospheric anomaly? Hope to hear more about it.

I’ve watched video on youtube about this, and checked some information about Dr. Ruggero Maria Santilli, and ,despite i want this to be true, this might be just made up. But similiar topic is included in UFO-Greatest Story Ever Denied document, check it.


This is not how it works... really look it up. Concave lenses wold have the focal point on the other side.
Physics is dead :( (antimatter light :)))...nice)

I believe something was lost in translation - he was actually using a kaleidoscope.

Thanks for the laugh. Cleaning coffee off desk now.

Astrophysics generally discounts the possibility of widespread occurrence of antimatter in the universe as it would be expected to interact with ordinary matter, leading to large fluxes of gamma rays which would be easily detectable, and is not detected at all. Thus, the announcement the Dr Santilli had succeeded caught my attention. He presents his (copious) findings on the website of the Santilli Foundation ( Checking possible references on Google Scholar, the first (and only) announcement of antimatter detection using Santilli’s apparatus is:
Preliminary confirmations of antimatter detection via Santilli's telescope with concave Lenses
By PM Bhujbal, JV Kadeisvili, A Nas, S Randall & T. R. Shelke. Checking the academic credentials of the authors, I find that two are from small, presumably non-research, Indian institutions, one is from Night Fox Productions, a Florida based wedding video company, one from the Institute for Basic Research ( which exists to support Dr Santilli’s research and one from Thunder Energies Corporation. Since the bio states that ‘Currently, Dr. Santilli is the Chairman of the Board and Head Scientist of the new publicly traded company, Thunder Energies Corporation’ it seems that none of the authors have the scientific training needed to conduct what must be a difficult study.

This paper purports to have been published in CLIFFORD ANALYSIS, CLIFFORD ALGEBRAS AND THEIR APPLICATIONS (to give it its correct title) at . But in their paper, the ‘ff’ of this url is replaced by an applet causing to a redirect to the Santilli Foundation. I find this behaviour impossible to understand and makes me suspicious of the motives of this group. By claiming to publish in a well established journal, it gives the claim spurious support, which cannot be substantiated.

The paper itself is appallingly written, by a group who are astronomically illiterate. The repeated claim to have photographed the ‘Epsilon Alpha and Beta region of the night sky’ means nothing at all (these Greek letters are sued to designate bright stars in constellations, but since no further information is forthcoming, on their own these statement is meaningless). Further, they claim to have photographed ‘antimatter galaxies, asteroids and cosmic rays’. No competent astronomer could write such a thing as these three classes of astronomical objects have very different characteristics and cosmic rays are not detectable using imaged light. Moreover, they claim to be using only a 55mm lens with a 15 minute exposure, which is inadequate for the observations they claim to make.

The thing to realise is that whatever the primary optics of this telescope might be doing, the important thing is the detector. What is it? A photograph? Solid state? We are not told, but must presume that these will be using lenses working assuming the usual laws of optics. If his ‘antimatter light’ needs special optics to collect the light, why would a normal detector be expected to work for it? We are presented with a
series of images from this device. What are they supposed to show? There is no scale to show how much of the sky is photographed and no indication of what the contours of the detection mean. Given that these authors claim to have chosen an observing site in Sebring, Florida chose ‘for the clarity of the sky due to the absence of nearby large cities’, but then indicate they observed from a hotel window in the middle of a holiday resort. I can only think they are detecting stray light reflected into the optics. There is absolutely no analysis of the images which can be considered competent.

In short, the claim made has not been substantiated in their publications, dodgy practices worthy of scammers are used to further their aims and no independent verification of the claims has been made. All in all: a very poor effort. A lot more work, of competent standard will have to be done to convince anyone that these claims are true.

Excellent job! You really did your homework. I thought it was a fast announcement of something too good to be true. Thanks!

You're welcome. It was too good to be true.

The American Journal of Modern Physics is not a scientifically rigorous publication.

Thanks for thoroughly checking the credentials. The mention of the "academic" journal was enough for me to believe what was said. :(

This is an interesting finding, and surely worthy of additional investigation via the scientific method.

On a separate but related note, do keep in mind that the Santilli mafia possesses the most powerful nuclear tech on the planet, and Santilli himself is a mad f*cking scientist. I.e. see trust me, I know him lmfao

moreover, note that the santilli cartel includes (but may not be limited to) the following organizations:
[1] MagneGas Corporation (
[2] Thunder Energies Corporation (
[3] International Committee on Scientific Ethics and Accountability (
[4] Hadronic Press (
[5] Santilli Foundation (

in any case, this is also a magnegas video worth watching with good explosions and 50 caliber rifles lol

I could not find the paper this guy's been reading, but I note that everyone so far HAS THANKED HIM SO THEY HAVEN'T HAD TO DO THE WORK THEMSELVES. Not impressive. I read the paper, found some opportunities where, were I so minded, I could poke some holes... but I DIDN'T find ANY claims, let alone repeated claims, that they were photographing the "epsilon alpha and beta" area, rather I found they gave the date, location, and general direction of the telescope.

As for the detector, WE ARE TOLD. Did no-one notice repeated references to digital cameras? Cognitive bias much, everyone? What the hell? And when I said "poke some holes", I meant that the paper sidesteps the maths of the whole thing, which could be perfectly sound, for all I know.

I'm a layman, but your arguments are not founded in fact, rather in the all-too-common logical fallacy, "the argument from incredulity". You should look that up.

very interested

If the American Journal of Modern Physics had ANY credibility as a scientific journal, this might be an interesting story. But as an "author paid" publication with a dodgy record of shoddy research and/or plagiarized content, I'll save my marvelling at this discovery when I read about this in a more reputable journal, thanks.

If this article was accurate, one would expect a veritable avalanche of demand for these telescopes and a landslide of similar observations....wheres the beef?

There is always resistance to new findings and demands for PROOF.That proof being having your theories published in the peer accepted journals.Louis Pasteur was vilified for his theories of microbiological cleansing.He was ultimately proven correct after much derisive poo-pooing and actual research, not intellectual contemporizing and was finally published.There remains a large gap between what we know and what we are allowed to know.

HILARIOUS that before the author mentions that this telescope can see "antimatter," he feels the need to buttress the Santilli's credentials with the following sentence--just so the reader doesn't leave the page: "The discovery was made by Dr Ruggero Santilli, a highly-regarded expert in mathematics, cosmology, and physics, who has been nominated for Nobel Prizes in physics and chemistry."

LMAO!! Obama WON the Nobel Peace Prize. Um...let's just say the Nobel organization doesn't hold as much weight as it once did.

I'm confident that a simple convex lens configuration isn't allowing anyone to see antimatter. LOL!

the nobel prize and the nobel peace prize are completely different

I looked at Ted Cruz through a convex lens and the words "Zodiac Killer" appeared on his forehead. Proof enough for me.

According to the Nobel prize website
Nobody named "Santilli" has ever been nominated for a prize.
According to the Santilli Foundation website, he has "to the Foundation's best knowledge" been nominated for the prize in physics "hundreds of times" and for chemistry several times. It says the nominations were previous confidential but he felt the need to release proof of them due to "political shadows" at the committee.

This is the same guy who claims that covalent bonds are impossible in quantum mechanics, and has tried to push the idea of a "magnecular bond". He also claims that electrolysis of water doesn't create hydrogen and oxygen gas, but an "HHO gas".

He's pretty much the typical quack, and also has a streak of anti-Semitism with claims of various Jewish scientists suppressing his work from being made public.

Hopefully they can try this again with an HD video camera attached to capture this.

They`re just laundry bags full of swamp gas.

These entities follow along the lines of Roswell Rods which appear to be alive. Who knows? Fascinating subject matter regardless.

Ridiculous. Lenses do not work this way. Concave lenses make objects appear smaller, they do not look into some kind of negative light void. Is this a joke?

It's not an image of void it's infra red you can even use your iPhone and see that this is all true this has been in the Vaticans view for years that is why they are also in hot pursuit of these terrestrial beings that just so happen to be all around us in all forms literally all around us and apparently they have always been there we were just not able to see them but now we are learning how.

Photons are their own antiparticles. Electrons have Positrons. Protons have Antiprotons. Photons just have other Photons. Not sure what "antimatter light" is supposed to be, exactly.

parts make sense. Remember the "lights" on moon and flitting about background in near space videos. Energy beings might exist what they "eat" may be ethereal energy from life forms??? The thing is we may not be the top of food chain ...due to higher lifeforms ethics they might have to limit feeding to people with evil [negative] traits. Some think they are composed of say 13 [sort of like a Viking longboat] souls condemned to become part of these clouds of energy. Or not just theory.

This is true. If you watch the Republican debate through a convex lens, you will see evil entities attached to all of them, like great, floating suckerfishes from hell.

Or we could just ask NASA to stop Photoshopping out the UFOs.

"Gary McKinnon Interview 2015 - Why he thinks, his case was a Psy-Op (full) - Richplanet TV (2015)"

I don't know about the optics or physics of Santilli's claims, but there have been "sightings" before of aerial "entities" that seem to be invisible normally. Trevor James Constable photographed them many years ago with infrared filters and film. Jose Escamilla repeated and improved his work. Might Santilli's observations be similar? Another thought, for those who believe in spiritual reality: perhaps Santilli imaged angelic beings. . . .

Register to become part of our active community, get updates, receive a monthly newsletter, and enjoy the benefits and rewards of our member point system OR just post your comment below as a Guest.

Ancient Places

Main: Temple of Aton in Amarna (CC by SA 3.0). Inset eclipse (public domain)
The ancient Egyptian civilization was wedded to the Sun, and yet, extant records only ever mention the solar aspect as the giver and sustainer of life that shines brightly for all eternity. Sterling astronomers, the Egyptians, unlike the Mayans, never left us details of the times...

Our Mission

At Ancient Origins, we believe that one of the most important fields of knowledge we can pursue as human beings is our beginnings. And while some people may seem content with the story as it stands, our view is that there exists countless mysteries, scientific anomalies and surprising artifacts that have yet to be discovered and explained.

The goal of Ancient Origins is to highlight recent archaeological discoveries, peer-reviewed academic research and evidence, as well as offering alternative viewpoints and explanations of science, archaeology, mythology, religion and history around the globe.

We’re the only Pop Archaeology site combining scientific research with out-of-the-box perspectives.

By bringing together top experts and authors, this archaeology website explores lost civilizations, examines sacred writings, tours ancient places, investigates ancient discoveries and questions mysterious happenings. Our open community is dedicated to digging into the origins of our species on planet earth, and question wherever the discoveries might take us. We seek to retell the story of our beginnings. 

Ancient Image Galleries

View from the Castle Gate (Burgtor). (Public Domain)
Door surrounded by roots of Tetrameles nudiflora in the Khmer temple of Ta Phrom, Angkor temple complex, located today in Cambodia. (CC BY-SA 3.0)
Cable car in the Xihai (West Sea) Grand Canyon (CC BY-SA 4.0)
Next article