Triceratops Horn Dated to 33,500 Years

Did Humans Walk the Earth with Dinosaurs? Triceratops Horn Dated to 33,500 Years

(Read the article on one page)

A Triceratops brow horn discovered in Dawson County, Montana, has been controversially dated to around 33,500 years, challenging the view that dinosaurs died out around 65 million years ago.  The finding radically suggests that early humans may have once walked the earth with the fearsome reptiles thousands of years ago.

The Triceratops brow horn was excavated in May 2012 and stored at the Glendive Dinosaur and Fossil Museum. The Museum, which has since 2005 been in cooperation with the Paleochronology Group, a team of consultants in geology, paleontology, chemistry, engineering, and education, sent a sample of the outer portion of the Triceratops brow horn to Head of the Paleochronology Group Hugh Miller, at his request, in order to carry out Carbon-14 dating. Mr Miller sent the sample to the University of Georgia, Center for Applied Isotope Studies, for this purpose. The sample was divided at the lab into two fractions with the “bulk” or collagen break down products yielding an age of 33,570 ± 120 years and the carbonate fraction of bone bioapatite yielding an age of 41,010 ± 220 years [UGAMS-11752 & 11752a]. Mr Miller told Ancient Origins that it is always desirable to carbon-14 date several fractions to minimize the possibility of errors which Miller requested and that essential concordance was achieved in the 1000's of years as with all bone fractions of ten other dinosaurs.

Triceratops, a name meaning “three-horned face”, is a genus of herbivorous ceratopsid dinosaur that is said to have first appeared during the late Maastrichtian stage of the late Cretaceous period, about 68 million years ago in what is now North America, and became extinct in the Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event 66 million years ago. However, scientists from the Paleochronology Group, who perform research relating to “anomalies of science”, maintain that dinosaurs did not die out millions of years ago and that there is substantial evidence that they were still alive as recently as 23,000 years ago.

Classical reconstruction of a Triceratops

Classical reconstruction of a Triceratops ( Wikimedia Commons )

Until recently, Carbon-14 dating was never used to test dinosaur bones, as the analysis is only reliable up to 55,000 years. Scientists never considered it worthwhile to run the test since it is generally believed that dinosaurs have been extinct for 65 million years, based on radiometric dating of the volcanic layers above or below fossils, a method which the Paleochronology Group states has “serious problems and gross assumptions must be made”.

"It became clear years ago that paleontologists were not just neglecting to test dinosaur bones for C-14 content but were refusing to. Normally a good scientist will be curious about the ages of important fossil bones,” Mr Miller told Ancient Origins in an email.  

YouTube video explaining results of carbon testing on dinosaur bones

The results of the Triceratops Horn analysis are not unique. According to Mr Miller, numerous C-14 tests have now been carried out on dinosaur bones, and surprisingly, they all returned results dating back in the thousands rather than millions of years.

“I organized the Paleochronology group in 2003 to fill a void with regards fossil wood and dinosaur bones as I was curious as to their age by  C-14 dating.  We thus have used C-14 dating to solve the mystery why soft tissue and dinosaur depictions exist world-wide. Our model predicted dinosaur bones would have significant C-14 and indeed they did in the range of 22,000 to 39,000 years BP,” Mr Miller added.

Results of C-14 tests on dinosaur bones

Results of C-14 tests on dinosaur bones provided by the Paleochronology Group .

Numerous independent researchers have long argued that there is evidence man and dinosaur once walked the Earth together, such as hundreds of ancient artworks and artifacts that appear to depict dinosaurs, long before modern science had pieced together dinosaur fossils and conducted analyses to produce detailed reconstructions of their appearance.

Top left: Relief carving at Angkor Wat, Cambodia (1186 AD). Top Right: Textile from Nazca, Peru (700 AD). Bottom: Tapestry in the Chateau de Blois (1500 AD)

Top left: Relief carving at Angkor Wat, Cambodia (1186 AD). Top Right: Textile from Nazca, Peru (700 AD). Bottom: Tapestry in the Chateau de Blois (1500 AD)

However, even more intriguing is the discovery of soft tissue in dinosaur fossils. In the March 2005 issue of Science , paleontologist Mary Schweitzer and her team announced the discovery of soft tissue inside a 68-million-year-old Tyrannosaurus rex leg bone from the Hell Creek Formation in Montana, a controversial finding considering scientists had thought soft tissue proteins degrade in less than 1 million years in the best of conditions. After recovery, the tissue was rehydrated by the science team and testing revealed evidence of intact structures such as blood vessels, bone matrix, and connective tissue. 


It is a Pleistocene bison horn -- very easy to identify, if you care about what you're doing. These folks are not real investigators.

Tsurugi's picture

Excellent comment, concise and complete. Thank you very much for this, it is a cool breeze of reason amidst an inferno of ignorance.

Amazing - every criticism above was made from ignorance, often with great confidence. Here is the reality:

The horn that Mark Armitage found and reported on in Acta Histochemica was excavated from Upper Cretaceous rock in the Hell Creek formation. There are zero bison, aurochs, and woolly rhinos there, but there are lots of triceratops. Other dinosaur bones listed in the table above were found in the Upper Jurassic Morrison formation. These and others are vast dinosaur graveyards. Many dinosaur bones are not petrified (by permineralization or replacement).

Only the horn was uncovered because it was found on the last day of the dig and took hours to remove from the surrounding stone. The photograph is accurate, not doctored. Dinosaur bones are often found separated (disarticulated) from one another, indicating rapid catastrophic burial that smashed and tore the body apart. A carcass would have to be covered quickly or it would soon decompose. Large dinosaurs could be 6 or more feet wide. Mark Armitage has since excavated two more bones, including the protective frill, and his findings will be published in Acta Histochemica and Microscopy Today in the near future. Judging from similar excavations, much of the rest of the skeleton is encased in the rock in that area.

Carbon-14 is ingested during an animal’s lifetime and decays steadily after it dies with a half-life of 5730 years. No detectable amount remains by 250,000 years. Carbonates (with Carbon-14 in them) carried in water and bacteria infiltrate fossils of all ages. If pretreatment could not remove this "modern carbon", radiocarbon dating would be useless for dating anything, including human or mammoth bones. But repeated treatment with mild acid is effective, and is standard procedure in laboratories that carbon date samples. Accelerator Mass Spectrometry (AMS) is the state of the art, and it requires very small samples. AMS counts the number of atoms of each isotope to determine the C-14/C-12 ratio. There would be no detectable original Carbon-14 in a bone sample 65 million years old.

Most of the testing was done by the Center for Applied Isotope Studies (CAIS) at the University of Georgia. Their pretreatment protocols and AMS equipment are first rate. None of the labs were aware that they were processing dinosaur bone samples.

The reliable range for AMS is 45,000 to 55,000 years before present (BP), depending on the equipment. As shown in the table above, every dinosaur bone tested, not just the triceratops horn, registered detectable Carbon-14 in the reliable range, including some not listed in the table from Europe and China. Notice that more than one sample was tested from different parts of some of the bones. The amount of Carbon-14 in them varies due to the amount of collagen, organics (osteocytes etc.), and bioapatite in the sample, as well as preservation and weathering to yield different dates, but all are within the reliable range. A triceratops horn is structured differently than other bones, such as a femur. Armitage described the horn as "friable" (tending to crumble) probably due to its position near the surface. So for this bone, "bulk bone" with its organics is preferable to bioapatite for dating.

These radiocarbon dates obviously contradict long half-life radioisotope dating of igneous rocks and the geologic time scale. However, bones can only be dated with Carbon-14. Combined with the presence of osteocytes, blood vessels, collagen, and other biomolecules and soft tissue, which cannot possibly survive heat and chemical disintegration for 65 million years, the evidence is clearly telling us that the Carbon-14 dates are closest to the true age of the dinosaur bones. The rocks in which they are buried must be the same age as the bones they encase. And so far, every dinosaur bone dates to the same reliable range…

I find it interesting that no one seems to be considering the food chain problem inherent within the idea that dinosaurs existed with mankind. There were some extremely lethal predators in dinosaur times. Unless man only walked with herbivore dinosaurs, I don't think man would stand a chance existing in a world of T-Rex and other, more versatile carnivore dinosaurs. And plus, the creatures of the last 500,000 years just do not fit the bill in terms of shape and size for living in a world of dinosaurs. That's one reason why enormous size was an evolutionary defense mechanism for dinosaurs like brachiosaur. If you are big enough to swat a T-Rex with your tail then you survive. But the problem with being that big is you need to eat massive amounts of vegetation to survive. After a massive asteroid impact that clouds the atmosphere and kills off vegetation, you're just not going to have enough food to survive being that big. Which then cascades into predators not being able to find food. It's an evolutionary dead end. At that point the advantage goes to the quick and agile mammals that don't need as much food. But it's surprising that even mammals survived as little rodents scavenging on random crap.

so another proof that we dont know a thing about our far history,just speculations and agendas,we are really an advanced civilisation indeed


Register to become part of our active community, get updates, receive a monthly newsletter, and enjoy the benefits and rewards of our member point system OR just post your comment below as a Guest.

Ancient Technology

The four-handled tureen adorned with dragons, birds and spikes
Chinese archaeologists have discovered ritual tureen and “soup bowls” next to a badly decomposed body in a Zhou dynasty-era tomb. Among the remains there were also uncovered two wine vessels, which experts suggest were probably used as part of the funerary rituals.

Ancient Places

Healing Temple of Aesculapius (Asklepios) by Robert Thom
In the ancient world, many cultures built elaborate temple complexes dedicated to their healer gods - Imhotep in Egypt and Asklepios in Greece for example. These gods were recognized as having the power to cure supplicants from a variety of ailments within sleep and sacred dreams. Those who desired healing might travel many hundreds of miles to reach such a temple

Our Mission

At Ancient Origins, we believe that one of the most important fields of knowledge we can pursue as human beings is our beginnings. And while some people may seem content with the story as it stands, our view is that there exists countless mysteries, scientific anomalies and surprising artifacts that have yet to be discovered and explained.

The goal of Ancient Origins is to highlight recent archaeological discoveries, peer-reviewed academic research and evidence, as well as offering alternative viewpoints and explanations of science, archaeology, mythology, religion and history around the globe.

We’re the only Pop Archaeology site combining scientific research with out-of-the-box perspectives.

By bringing together top experts and authors, this archaeology website explores lost civilizations, examines sacred writings, tours ancient places, investigates ancient discoveries and questions mysterious happenings. Our open community is dedicated to digging into the origins of our species on planet earth, and question wherever the discoveries might take us. We seek to retell the story of our beginnings. 

Ancient Image Galleries

View from the Castle Gate (Burgtor). (Public Domain)
Door surrounded by roots of Tetrameles nudiflora in the Khmer temple of Ta Phrom, Angkor temple complex, located today in Cambodia. (CC BY-SA 3.0)
Cable car in the Xihai (West Sea) Grand Canyon (CC BY-SA 4.0)
Next article