All  
Like a Virgin? The Secret and Controversial Account of Mary, Mother of Jesus

Like a Virgin? The Secret and Controversial Account of Mary, Mother of Jesus

The Virgin Mary is one of the key symbols of Christianity, and a woman whose cult changed the world. However, she may be one of the most misunderstood biblical people. According to some researchers, the famous story of a woman who had never had sexual contact with a man yet gave birth was caused by a mistake in the translation of ancient text.

The Virgin Mary is well known from the Bible, but there are not too many pieces of archaeological evidence about her life. Through the centuries, the story of the woman whose real name was Miriam, has changed the world. Her greatest claim to fame was delivering a boy named Joshua, who became known as Jesus. As the Holy Mother in Christianity, she was described as a symbol of purity and humbleness.

‘Virgin and Child with Balaam the Prophet’

‘Virgin and Child with Balaam the Prophet’ (Public Domain) This fresco from the late 2nd century is the earliest known image of Mary and the Infant Jesus independent of the Magi episode.

Differing Stories About Mary

The famous story from in bible says that Miriam (Mary) was a young, perhaps single lady, who met an angel and discovered by a message from god that she would give birth to his son. However, the story from Toledot Yeshu, an ancient Jewish book, presents a very different version of this story.

The unknown Jewish writers claim that Miriam was married to a man named John, but met a Roman soldier named Tiberius Panthera. She fell in love and betrayed John with the Roman warrior. When John discovered the lovers, she was already pregnant and John decided to divorce her.

Tiberius took the name Josephus and created a family with Miriam and their little son Joshua (Jesus). The boy was famous for making all sorts of miracles, which he had learned from the old masters. Some of his abilities were said to be walking on water, changing water into wine, and many more. But the scandalous story of Miriam and the two men may explain why some felt it was better if she was called ''the virgin''.

Joseph’s dream’ (1645) from the workshop of Rembrandt. (Public Domain)

Translations Revealing the Truth

The greatest misunderstanding in the Virgin Mary’s story comes from a mistake in translation. It is common for translations to be based on former translations and the meaning behind words is often decoded by specialists in specific languages. Moreover, many translations were made of this story based on dictionaries created by specialists in Latin - which is the key to the mystery behind the word ''virgin''.

The word ''virgin'' comes from the Latin ''virgo'', which means ''maiden'' or a sexually inexperienced woman. This word was the basis for the stories about Mary as a woman who had never had intercourse with a man.

However, historically the term virgin meant ''one-in-herself'' - a woman who didn't need a man. It didn't necessarily mean that she didn't have one, however. This interpretation better represents a woman who was independent, financially free, mentally strong, and not overly dependent on her lover or partner.

Woodcut illustration of the zodiac sign Virgo used by Alexander and Samuel Weissenhorn of Ingolstadt.

Woodcut illustration of the zodiac sign Virgo used by Alexander and Samuel Weissenhorn of Ingolstadt. (POP/CC BY 2.0)

In ancient times, women were sometimes believed to be very strongly attached or even mentally addicted to their first sexual partner. Therefore, to avoid this problem, an ancient society of the Mediterranean area (and also other parts of the Middle East and Persia) decided to create a custom which became a part of religious ceremonies.

It was once common for women in these locations to go to the temples of Ishtar or Aphrodite, for example, to have sexual intercourse with the priest. They could never meet again, but this act, which was seemingly approved of by the goddess of the temple, allowed the woman to avoid becoming too attached to her lover. The visit in the temple was usually a suggestion given by her family and it was not seen as a betrayal or scandal.

Detail of ancient Mesopotamian so-called "Ishtar Vase", terracotta with cut, moulded, and painted decoration, from Larsa, early 2nd millennium BC.

Detail of ancient Mesopotamian so-called "Ishtar Vase", terracotta with cut, moulded, and painted decoration, from Larsa, early 2nd millennium BC. (Public Domain)

However, researchers also suggest that the word ''virgin' could be applied by ancient societies to women who were independent in different fields. It is possible that Mary could have been autonomous in other ways, but neither the Bible nor other texts speak about this idea.

A Symbol for Many Things

Mary became a symbol for many things, including the famous Ark of the Covenant. As the specialists from the website Catholic Bible 101 explained:

''The Old Testament Ark of the Covenant contained three items – The Word of God in the form of stone tablets (the 10 Commandments), manna (bread) from Heaven, and the rod of Aaron that resprouted and came back to life (Hebrews 9:4).  Just so, the womb of the Blessed Virgin Mary contained Jesus Christ – The living Word of God (John 1:1), the bread of life (John 6:48), and the ruler with a rod of iron who also came back to life (Rev.12:5). At the Annunciation of Mary, Gabriel told her that the power of the most high would “overshadow” her (Luke 1:35).  The term “overshadow” is significant, because it was also used to refer to the cherubim “overshadowing” the mercy seat of the Ark of the Covenant (Hebrews 9:5).  The Ark was made with pure gold (Exodus 4ff), and was very holy, which parallels the Catholic teaching that Mary is also pure and holy.  The Ark of the Covenant was so holy, that no ordinary person could even touch it.  Uzzah reached out to steady it, and was instantly struck dead (2 Samuel 6:7).''

Moses and Joshua in the Tabernacle, bowing before the Ark, (1896-1902) By James Tissot.

Moses and Joshua in the Tabernacle, bowing before the Ark, (1896-1902) By James Tissot. (Public Domain)

These suggestions support the idea that Mary was depicted as a symbolic holy vessel, which brought Jesus to life. But it also became the beginning of an interesting story. It may be nothing to do with being inexperienced as a sexual lover. Mary could have been called a virgin because of her charisma, strength, and power to support her son. Ancient people living in the Middle East during her lifetime didn't see virginity in the same way as the Romans did, for example.

The Virgin Mary from the Ghent Altarpiece – called “The adoration of the lamb” (1432) by Jan van Eyck.

The Virgin Mary from the Ghent Altarpiece – called “The adoration of the lamb” (1432) by Jan van Eyck. (Public Domain)

Is Mary Really Holy?

Over the centuries, some priests and bishops have wondered if Christians should really worship Mary, the mother of Jesus. Perhaps they were aware of the mistake which appeared in the translations of the early texts, but felt that there was nothing they could do to change that error.

However, this doesn't change Mary’s position in history. Some maintain that the stories in the Bible cannot be read as real historical accounts, but as symbolic legends. This idea creates even more debates between religious people and some researchers. Nonetheless, as time passes by and new discussions reveal more about her, the story of Mary becomes even more fascinating.

The Virgin Mary.

The Virgin Mary. (Waiting For The Word/CC BY 2.0)

Top Image: ‘Annunciation’ (1489-1490) by Sandro Botticelli. Source: Public Domain

By Natalia Klimczak

References:

W. Eichelberger, Kobieta bez winy I wstydu, 2015.

The Blessed Virgin Mary, available at:
http://www.catholicbible101.com/theblessedvirginmary.htm

Should we worship Mary, available at:
https://bible.org/question/should-we-worship-mary

Toledot Yeshu, available at:
http://jewishchristianlit.com//Topics/JewishJesus/toledoth.html

Comments

This article certainly needs more note giving a reference for its assertions. The arguments from Latin have no meaning in the biblical text concerning the virginity since the New Testament was written in Koine Greek, the text from which Protestant bibles are translated. There could be some validity for Roman bibles. Pagan practices were not the practices of Jews or Christians and are wrongly placed in a Christian or Jewish context. Pagan religions were a world apart from Judeo Christianity. The Greek text makes it clear that Mary's virginity was the absence of sexual encounter before the birth of Jesus (Matt. 1:18). The pseudographic writing of Jesus having a Roman lover is just that a false writing with no attributed authority and nothing to back it us, unless one believes the movie "Life of Brian" is authentic scripture. A great deal more thought should have gone into this article. There is a real debate in Christianity as to the place of Mary but it is not anything that this article mentions. The veneration and worship of Mary is not taught in the Bible and not practices among Protestants; it is in the Roman church and among the Orthodox churches.

yeah, but don't just simply discount it because of your beliefs or teachings whatever. when they were deciphering the dead sea scrolls they came across a similar story of Mary and it explained that they took a future wife like a consignment and if there was a pregnancy then it was considered a virgin birth
I read of that back when they were trying to get copies out of the country of the scrolls and it wasn't being allowed.

The "Toledo Yeshu" is nothing new. Manuscripts of it date from the 11th century AD. From the internal evidence it could not have been written before the 4th century AD. Three centuries after the event that it is telling about. The event from the internal evidence takes place about 90 BC. A little bit off. Now you suggest that I am discounting this document because of "my belief." Since I have not discussed my belief, you do not know what I believe. And it is irrelevant to what I am saying about the article. But apparently your belief about my beliefs are coloring your reading of my post. Knee jerk reactions are not helpful in adult discussions. Back to the "Toledo Yeshu"; it was well known in the Middle Ages and is not a newly found document. The assertion that Christians are wrong about the meaning of "virgin" because of the Toledo Yeshu is poor scholarship. Basing the etymology of the word "virgin" in this article from the Latin is flawed. Since the word translated as modern English "virgin" is from documents written in Hebrew and Koine Greek. She should have the etymology of the Hebrew and Koine Greek words instead.

If that were the case, why does the accepted version go on to say that Joseph was going to repudiate her until God sent him a message otherwise? The dead sea scrolls were written by an alternative sect to traditional Judaism. They were so alternative that they had completely separated themselves from their culture of origin. Why would any of their beliefs or practices reflect on mainstream society?

Than you for this article. It makes so MUCH MORE SENSE than any other biblical account. I wish the whole bible would be re-translated.

Pages

Register to become part of our active community, get updates, receive a monthly newsletter, and enjoy the benefits and rewards of our member point system OR just post your comment below as a Guest.

Next article