so a 300 billion year old god had nothing better to do than bring harmony to the minds of earthlings...makes a guy wonder if that was before breakfast or did it take clear till supper time?
well y'all still argue which came first, chicken or egg... glad to read the article though and hope i can go see the pyramids in mexico some day! i have no agenda to prove here but i am sure any pyramid in chiapas would beat the smog of mexico city any day.
I am elated to learn that you might have made some correlations in your Navigational projections and the Far North. Without giving away too much here, I would like to share that when looking at the expansion of Humans and early Sea Travel we tend to subconsciously use the Mercator Projection as a perspective of how difficult this feat might have been. Yet here is a very simple different perspective and view point that does indeed make the world a whole lot smaller and it could explain a whole lot of questions still unanswered.
To find that your Navigational Theory and figures may correlate with this differing Earth view perspective might just be a huge game changer. Using known Petroglyph and Geoglyph similarities as an example, I truly think we may all be overlooking a very simple and plausible explanation for a lot of "Mysteries" in Prehistoric Human Expansion. I absolutely think the Earth was Circumnavigated long before any of the "known examples". Get my "Drift" ?
I will get over to MS and drop you a line and presentation about this concept in the next couple days, Thank you...Your Hard Work, Knowledge and Objectiveness are greatly appreciated!
Yep please fell free to drop a line a Midnight Science….
Regarding the North Pole Moving in the proposed map of Earth? That does not happen in my theory.
In the proposed star map of earth theory…. it is not the actual physical North Pole shifitng, but that the Stone Age astronomers were simply realigning the map of the stars so that they could best take the shape of the underlying continents.
It has to be remember this was a time when there were no libraries, so they needed a very simple idea that could be used by the astronomers to quickly and easily reconstruct a map of Earth. The star map so drawn then easily explains both the Mayan Reset and the layout of the Great Pyramids, as well as the location of numerous ancient geoglyph fields, as well as all the many archaic geoemetric drawings found worldwide…..
Here many anthroloologists have been puzzled by why abstract drawings are older than drawings of animals. The theory proposed here that they were creating a map of Earth would give the motivation for drawing these geoemetrics, and the locations of ancient sites then gives the possibility to structurally test the theory.
Regarding the accurate plotting of stars further north than circa 60 degrees when time dependent distortions occur in Mercator maps (I think that is what you are asking in the query about the 66th parallel? – correct me if I’m wrong) that problem was specifically addressed in my book, as well as the question which “North Pole” star would best be used for normalising the proposed Map….the North Pole star changes with time.
This complexity of replotting to Mercator is actually one of the key components in determining the approximate age of the proposed star map…..
So far in my plots of stars north of circa 60 degrees I have found, by normalising the data to the layout argued by the Great Pyramids, that the map does accurately locate both the geoglyphs in the Amazon, and also the Irkutsk Geoglyph field in Russia (the only geoglyph field that extends into the Arctic circle). The stars also map quite accurately the primary religious centres in the Himalayas, as well as those found in other regions of the world. ….Remember this map was used primarily as a navigational aid…..it was as I mentioned in my book only a mirror image of the heavens. It did not actually represent the heavens. It was the Greek Myths that mixed up the two.
mark lehner is a hack along with hawass. even when they find these passages and realize that they were there to service the power plant they will still be scrambling to explain thier copper chisels, round pounders and wooden mallets.
I am particularly interested in learning more about human origins, previous societies, and mysterious places. No spam please. I will buy books from you when I have finished reading the ones I already have.
I caught that...so your words here are acknowledged. Your Concepts shared here at AO has sent me on an in depth search of Possibilities. I am just a Novice with no formal education but I come from a long lineage of Anthropology and Archaeology experience in my family so these things have become a great passion and hobby over the years as an Apprentice.
This being true, I have the luxury of not being influenced by "In the Box" formal Indoctrination designed only to educate one on how to scheme up Financial Grants. So with no drive for monetary gain, I am a Blank Slate when it comes to viewing Theories of possibility with no predetermined assumptions.
As I mentioned, your posts and comments here have sent me on a Journey of discovery. Even though I think it is possible that you may have found a couple coincidences in example, after digging around the last 4 Weeks I fully support and appreciate your Concepts and Theories of Prehistoric Seafaring and the possibility that the North Pole has moved based your Map theory and Ancient Alignments.
Your comment about the Picts fell into the exact research I have been working on the last 4 weeks and it compelled me to drop you a line with a question. Have you found time yet to apply your Map figures in comparison to north of the 66th Parallel? I have formulated a very possible and plausible Theory based on a fresh perspective and view point. May I contact you at MS and drop my "Out of the Mouth of Babes" Theory?
That’s a solid point, Osiris. Andrew appears to forget that the intent of the Spanish — and intent is everything — was to go to the so-called New World and loot and conquer it in the name of the Spanish crown. Cortez and Co. were known to be nothing more than hired thugs and behaved accordingly, as facts prove. Cnetral Mexico was not a total nirvana in those days, and they had their own social ills, but certainly the Spanish imported deadly deseases from Europe, not the other way around.
The Aztec, on the other hand, had by then lost the plot themselves. They no longer understood the meaning of the ancient sacred teachings that had maintained American cultures in balance for thousands of years, and took to a blood lust in the mistaken idea it would appease unseen gods. In the end the Spaniards’ gold lust won.
As a researcher in my own right, I am always wary of the official dating of such monuments to fit them into a conveniently accepted time frame. This one being a case in point: how was this site dated? Was organic matter taken from under a foundation stone and subjected to Carbon 14? If the answer is no (a typical pattern in archaeology), then let us assume it was built by an earlier culture and adopted and adapted to the needs of a later civilization.
I am sure that if they were tombs then there would have been some remains but it would seem that none were found, so one intelligently concludes that they are not tombs. Yes or No?
The article sure hammers home that they were/are tombs as the word is used 31 times in the article. The over use of the word ‘tombs’ implies and inculcates that they are tombs but again we just don’t know their culture. So an average person would read the article and conclude that they are tombs and never be the wiser.
Refering to the first photo.They look to me like food (security) storage areas, a type of pantry perhaps. They don’t look like tombs.
1-As always we do not have a close up of the hole 2-It does not look like a round hole but more like a square hole 3- It just happen that in that time they were using stone point that was more square then round 4- But because we are in 2016 , it sad , but here we could not post a picture of the square point
Abscess/Infection of the soft tissue leading into the bone of both skulls. Skull could have been damaged much later in a rock fall or during transport to the museum. Also there are other holes obvious on the skulls. May be signs of leprosy or similar conditions.
Here you can navigate quickly through all comments made in any article sorted by date/time.
so a 300 billion year old god had nothing better to do than bring harmony to the minds of earthlings...makes a guy wonder if that was before breakfast or did it take clear till supper time?
Nephilim
well y'all still argue which came first, chicken or egg... glad to read the article though and hope i can go see the pyramids in mexico some day! i have no agenda to prove here but i am sure any pyramid in chiapas would beat the smog of mexico city any day.
Hi Julie, make sure you are signed in on the Premium Site to be able to read the article.
All the best,
Why is this article telling me I have to join Premium to read more when my membership IS Premium?
Vines= Vinland, which refers to grassy meadows. I can't believe you still discuss grapes!!!
I am elated to learn that you might have made some correlations in your Navigational projections and the Far North. Without giving away too much here, I would like to share that when looking at the expansion of Humans and early Sea Travel we tend to subconsciously use the Mercator Projection as a perspective of how difficult this feat might have been. Yet here is a very simple different perspective and view point that does indeed make the world a whole lot smaller and it could explain a whole lot of questions still unanswered.
To find that your Navigational Theory and figures may correlate with this differing Earth view perspective might just be a huge game changer. Using known Petroglyph and Geoglyph similarities as an example, I truly think we may all be overlooking a very simple and plausible explanation for a lot of "Mysteries" in Prehistoric Human Expansion. I absolutely think the Earth was Circumnavigated long before any of the "known examples". Get my "Drift" ?
I will get over to MS and drop you a line and presentation about this concept in the next couple days, Thank you...Your Hard Work, Knowledge and Objectiveness are greatly appreciated!
Yep please fell free to drop a line a Midnight Science….
Regarding the North Pole Moving in the proposed map of Earth? That does not happen in my theory.
In the proposed star map of earth theory…. it is not the actual physical North Pole shifitng, but that the Stone Age astronomers were simply realigning the map of the stars so that they could best take the shape of the underlying continents.
It has to be remember this was a time when there were no libraries, so they needed a very simple idea that could be used by the astronomers to quickly and easily reconstruct a map of Earth. The star map so drawn then easily explains both the Mayan Reset and the layout of the Great Pyramids, as well as the location of numerous ancient geoglyph fields, as well as all the many archaic geoemetric drawings found worldwide…..
Here many anthroloologists have been puzzled by why abstract drawings are older than drawings of animals. The theory proposed here that they were creating a map of Earth would give the motivation for drawing these geoemetrics, and the locations of ancient sites then gives the possibility to structurally test the theory.
Regarding the accurate plotting of stars further north than circa 60 degrees when time dependent distortions occur in Mercator maps (I think that is what you are asking in the query about the 66th parallel? – correct me if I’m wrong) that problem was specifically addressed in my book, as well as the question which “North Pole” star would best be used for normalising the proposed Map….the North Pole star changes with time.
This complexity of replotting to Mercator is actually one of the key components in determining the approximate age of the proposed star map…..
So far in my plots of stars north of circa 60 degrees I have found, by normalising the data to the layout argued by the Great Pyramids, that the map does accurately locate both the geoglyphs in the Amazon, and also the Irkutsk Geoglyph field in Russia (the only geoglyph field that extends into the Arctic circle). The stars also map quite accurately the primary religious centres in the Himalayas, as well as those found in other regions of the world. ….Remember this map was used primarily as a navigational aid…..it was as I mentioned in my book only a mirror image of the heavens. It did not actually represent the heavens. It was the Greek Myths that mixed up the two.
Beautiful calligraphy.
Give it a rest, Tom.
You must positively loathe Muslims then.
mark lehner is a hack along with hawass. even when they find these passages and realize that they were there to service the power plant they will still be scrambling to explain thier copper chisels, round pounders and wooden mallets.
I am particularly interested in learning more about human origins, previous societies, and mysterious places. No spam please. I will buy books from you when I have finished reading the ones I already have.
amusing name. bastard slang Spanish for short, direct from english for chopped. But in Ladino, Bayuk, Yama & Mobilian trade pidgin for hat.
I caught that...so your words here are acknowledged. Your Concepts shared here at AO has sent me on an in depth search of Possibilities. I am just a Novice with no formal education but I come from a long lineage of Anthropology and Archaeology experience in my family so these things have become a great passion and hobby over the years as an Apprentice.
This being true, I have the luxury of not being influenced by "In the Box" formal Indoctrination designed only to educate one on how to scheme up Financial Grants. So with no drive for monetary gain, I am a Blank Slate when it comes to viewing Theories of possibility with no predetermined assumptions.
As I mentioned, your posts and comments here have sent me on a Journey of discovery. Even though I think it is possible that you may have found a couple coincidences in example, after digging around the last 4 Weeks I fully support and appreciate your Concepts and Theories of Prehistoric Seafaring and the possibility that the North Pole has moved based your Map theory and Ancient Alignments.
Your comment about the Picts fell into the exact research I have been working on the last 4 weeks and it compelled me to drop you a line with a question. Have you found time yet to apply your Map figures in comparison to north of the 66th Parallel? I have formulated a very possible and plausible Theory based on a fresh perspective and view point. May I contact you at MS and drop my "Out of the Mouth of Babes" Theory?
That’s a solid point, Osiris. Andrew appears to forget that the intent of the Spanish — and intent is everything — was to go to the so-called New World and loot and conquer it in the name of the Spanish crown. Cortez and Co. were known to be nothing more than hired thugs and behaved accordingly, as facts prove. Cnetral Mexico was not a total nirvana in those days, and they had their own social ills, but certainly the Spanish imported deadly deseases from Europe, not the other way around.
The Aztec, on the other hand, had by then lost the plot themselves. They no longer understood the meaning of the ancient sacred teachings that had maintained American cultures in balance for thousands of years, and took to a blood lust in the mistaken idea it would appease unseen gods. In the end the Spaniards’ gold lust won.
As a researcher in my own right, I am always wary of the official dating of such monuments to fit them into a conveniently accepted time frame. This one being a case in point: how was this site dated? Was organic matter taken from under a foundation stone and subjected to Carbon 14? If the answer is no (a typical pattern in archaeology), then let us assume it was built by an earlier culture and adopted and adapted to the needs of a later civilization.
I am sure that if they were tombs then there would have been some remains but it would seem that none were found, so one intelligently concludes that they are not tombs. Yes or No?
The article sure hammers home that they were/are tombs as the word is used 31 times in the article. The over use of the word ‘tombs’ implies and inculcates that they are tombs but again we just don’t know their culture. So an average person would read the article and conclude that they are tombs and never be the wiser.
Refering to the first photo.They look to me like food (security) storage areas, a type of pantry perhaps. They don’t look like tombs.
1-As always we do not have a close up of the hole 2-It does not look like a round hole but more like a square hole 3- It just happen that in that time they were using stone point that was more square then round 4- But because we are in 2016 , it sad , but here we could not post a picture of the square point
Abscess/Infection of the soft tissue leading into the bone of both skulls. Skull could have been damaged much later in a rock fall or during transport to the museum. Also there are other holes obvious on the skulls. May be signs of leprosy or similar conditions.
Pages