More evidence of what appears to be an anti-Christian bias on this website, proving, once again, that there is no separation of history and religion, namely, the religion of he who wishes to be divine.
The target is not Judaism, for that is more captured than even Christianity is.
Another brilliant piece of what appears to be anti-Christian propaganda masquerading as history...
Religion and intellectualism don't always clash. The Devil uses intellectualism, for example, to promote his own religion by undermining the real competition, which is Christianity. As such, some intellectualism is very definitely religiously motivated.
Solon was actually a greek law maker and poet who was a decendant of Plato , it was he who had been told the story of Atlantis ( What the Greeks called it ) by the priests in Egypt , referring to the edfu text's.They spoke of the primeval ones who lived in prosperity on an island until there demise.
"Inmates were required to pray for the souls of those who funded the hospital, as a way to speed the latter’s post-life entrance into heaven."
I have no doubt this was so. However, I genuinely doubt it actually works that way, always. If one was to become obscenely rich through ripping people off, for example, giving a fraction of the proceeds to a hospital charity may have made one seem philanthropic, but the love was not of people, rather of Mammon and self, which is still sinful.
Heavenly judgement is not as easily fooled as some people are. This applies today, as it did in Medieval times.
Aboriginal agriculture was not "sophisticated". What is sophisticated is the rewriting of history. One doesn't even need a single real Aboriginal ancestor to claim Aboriginal descent as an historian. One doesn't even need to be an historian either, just a good yarn-teller. Nobody much seems to check the sources are correct and the appointed fact-checkers are part of the same propaganda exercise anyway.
Australian anthropology is all about the never-ending apology. I would be reticent to trust anything about it these days. Anyone who trusts it explicitly is a fool. But not a lone fool. There are plenty of such fools for company.
There is a book called “History of Free Smiths” available in Internet Archive. It explains the secret of crucible (wootz) steel how it was leaked by the Nine Unknown into Europe in the Viking Ages. It gives a lot of evidence to support the Nine Unknown having been a secretive organization that was not just effectual in Asia but controlled the distribution of technology into the rest of the world. The argument is put forth that the Free Smiths possess some or all of the Books and are the same Secret Society that used to be known as the Nine Unknown. The Free Smiths were a German Secret Society but I couldn’t find anything about whether they still exist. I asked on Reddit but no answers were forthcoming.
It’s hard to understand how anyone could use the mausoleum as a residence; there is a massive round center column surrounded by limited open space where the ossuaries laid between the column and the wall. Possibly the double-wall enclosure surrounding the mausoleum could have been used as the residence of the Colonnas.
For those who like exploring with Google streetview, you have a short look inside by dropping the ‘yellow man’ on the center section. The marker stones on the wall show where the ossuaries of Germanicus, Nero, and Tiberius laid, beside each other.
Poppea: you can also check out her villa about 7 miles east of Pompeii. Very posh, and a collection of jewellery, likely Poppea’s, was found there during excavation. As someone commented: ‘It probably didn’t belong to her maid’.
“and possibly a form of language” I take issue with this assumption. Of course they had languare capabilities and a spoken language. How dare we make the assumption that they didn’t. Our egocentric and ethnocentric prejudices are still evident today.
It wouldn’t be possible for them to make these technological advances, and for tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands of years, without language capabilities.
It’s time we admitted that Neanderthals were just as advanced as we Homo Sapiens were.
Ancient Rome is actually a good facsimile of what we see today. The difference being, the plebeians today tend to not believe the elite evil decadence and sacrifices exist. Whether or not Elagabalus truly identified as female is rather less relevant than his probable self-identification as a god on Earth. Today, we have billionaires who think likewise and who think nothing of sacrificing us. Given the scale of this, the evil of Ancient Rome seems almost tame.
Ultimately, the average person today is the equivalent of a self-identified plebeian going to the Colosseum firm in the belief that nothing bad ever happens there, only to end up as the entertainment, still in denial to the bitter end. Except such are truly slaves, not free men at all.
We do not know this is how he saw himself. Roman historians are better described as propagandists, for the purposes of the rulers and the religion of the state.
Modern historians are better described as that too. The modern religion is Occultic. Statues of Baphomet routinely show a male deity with a female chest. This is whom we are being respectful towards.
The Occult forces probably tolerate my comments because they too want you to know what they're up to. They want you to join in or, to at least, go along with it, however ignorantly.
Go along with it people do. This is because humanity will do anything for an easy life in the present, irrespective of how hard it gets later.
This reeks of junk science. The numbers in the study are too low to reveal the true fate of tiny minorities.
However, the trending pretence is that this cohort was not a tiny minority anyway.
Who is behind this pretence? Ultimately, the same as that behind most such pretence - Devil-worshippers who seek to destroy Christian and, therefore, European civilisation. Rewriting history is a favourite past-time of theirs and most 'learned' history buffs have literally no idea that this is even happening.
'Alice in Wonderland' was not really a children's book. It was a revealing of the future by a Devil-worshipper.
Forget fictionalising true accounts for entertainment value. Although, this certainly happens in Hollywood, fictionalising history for propaganda purposes is just as common and far more sinister.
History is captured by the Church of Satan, whether on-screen or off.
"In 1738, Pope Clement XII banned Catholics from becoming Freemasons..."
It is worth rembering that, with his papal brief, Dominus ac Redemptor, a later Pope, Clement XIV, suppressed the Jesuits in 1773.
The 18th century Papal ban of Masonry amongst the Catholic faithful may therefore have nothing in common with the modern posturing, for it may have been about combating Jesuit control in Catholicism, while modern Catholicism is utterly Jesuit-controlled, as is Freemasonry.
Indeed, the modern posturing is similar to what one sees in popular writings about the Knights Templar etc, being nothing more than a serious stirring to muddy the waters of truth to beyond the capacity of most to peer through.
Taken at murky face value, it can lead one to believe untruth to be truth and vice versa.
Neither 18th century ban actually worked, to mankind's detriment. The Devil is extremely crafty.
On the subject of female sustained energy over a long period, it has been shown that women who get down on the ground then get up and run on a repeat cycle, in infantry-like training scenarios for example, fatigue and pull out about ten times quicker than men do.
This is what happens when strength is required and not just endurance.
Consider how solid and, therefore, heavy a spear must be for very large game with very tough hides. Consider the weight of such a spear, how many may need to be carried, plus the spear-thrower itself, and the endurance angle disappears into the ether of gender studies masquerading as science amd strength rears its masculine head.
I saw, whilst waiting for my previous comment to load, that pregnancy was briefly and dismissively mentioned.
What should not be dismissed is that hunting large game required strength. Hunting small game didn't require the same strength, but neither did it require great endurance. Who would bother spending a whole day running after small game? A day running after large game could be worthwhile however. If women participated in hunting large game in any way, it was probably more in the location of the game, which could include following wounded game carefully from a distance. This is scouting. It is not full-on hunting, however, and it is a long way from the perceived reality of the image at the top of this article.
Here you can navigate quickly through all comments made in any article sorted by date/time.
"...attributing the inexplicable to the divine."
More evidence of what appears to be an anti-Christian bias on this website, proving, once again, that there is no separation of history and religion, namely, the religion of he who wishes to be divine.
The target is not Judaism, for that is more captured than even Christianity is.
Another brilliant piece of what appears to be anti-Christian propaganda masquerading as history...
Religion and intellectualism don't always clash. The Devil uses intellectualism, for example, to promote his own religion by undermining the real competition, which is Christianity. As such, some intellectualism is very definitely religiously motivated.
A fascinating article. Thank you for the in-depth analysis.
Solon was actually a greek law maker and poet who was a decendant of Plato , it was he who had been told the story of Atlantis ( What the Greeks called it ) by the priests in Egypt , referring to the edfu text's.They spoke of the primeval ones who lived in prosperity on an island until there demise.
"Inmates were required to pray for the souls of those who funded the hospital, as a way to speed the latter’s post-life entrance into heaven."
I have no doubt this was so. However, I genuinely doubt it actually works that way, always. If one was to become obscenely rich through ripping people off, for example, giving a fraction of the proceeds to a hospital charity may have made one seem philanthropic, but the love was not of people, rather of Mammon and self, which is still sinful.
Heavenly judgement is not as easily fooled as some people are. This applies today, as it did in Medieval times.
Well, if it was Occultic and useful for control, then it would have something in common with a large number of smart-phone apps...
Aboriginal agriculture was not "sophisticated". What is sophisticated is the rewriting of history. One doesn't even need a single real Aboriginal ancestor to claim Aboriginal descent as an historian. One doesn't even need to be an historian either, just a good yarn-teller. Nobody much seems to check the sources are correct and the appointed fact-checkers are part of the same propaganda exercise anyway.
Australian anthropology is all about the never-ending apology. I would be reticent to trust anything about it these days. Anyone who trusts it explicitly is a fool. But not a lone fool. There are plenty of such fools for company.
It’s news to me that Neanderthals ate Home Sapiens...where did you find this information?
There is a book called “History of Free Smiths” available in Internet Archive. It explains the secret of crucible (wootz) steel how it was leaked by the Nine Unknown into Europe in the Viking Ages. It gives a lot of evidence to support the Nine Unknown having been a secretive organization that was not just effectual in Asia but controlled the distribution of technology into the rest of the world. The argument is put forth that the Free Smiths possess some or all of the Books and are the same Secret Society that used to be known as the Nine Unknown. The Free Smiths were a German Secret Society but I couldn’t find anything about whether they still exist. I asked on Reddit but no answers were forthcoming.
It’s hard to understand how anyone could use the mausoleum as a residence; there is a massive round center column surrounded by limited open space where the ossuaries laid between the column and the wall. Possibly the double-wall enclosure surrounding the mausoleum could have been used as the residence of the Colonnas.
For those who like exploring with Google streetview, you have a short look inside by dropping the ‘yellow man’ on the center section. The marker stones on the wall show where the ossuaries of Germanicus, Nero, and Tiberius laid, beside each other.
Poppea: you can also check out her villa about 7 miles east of Pompeii. Very posh, and a collection of jewellery, likely Poppea’s, was found there during excavation. As someone commented: ‘It probably didn’t belong to her maid’.
“and possibly a form of language” I take issue with this assumption. Of course they had languare capabilities and a spoken language. How dare we make the assumption that they didn’t. Our egocentric and ethnocentric prejudices are still evident today.
It wouldn’t be possible for them to make these technological advances, and for tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands of years, without language capabilities.
It’s time we admitted that Neanderthals were just as advanced as we Homo Sapiens were.
They look like inscense burners to me.
Ancient Rome is actually a good facsimile of what we see today. The difference being, the plebeians today tend to not believe the elite evil decadence and sacrifices exist. Whether or not Elagabalus truly identified as female is rather less relevant than his probable self-identification as a god on Earth. Today, we have billionaires who think likewise and who think nothing of sacrificing us. Given the scale of this, the evil of Ancient Rome seems almost tame.
Ultimately, the average person today is the equivalent of a self-identified plebeian going to the Colosseum firm in the belief that nothing bad ever happens there, only to end up as the entertainment, still in denial to the bitter end. Except such are truly slaves, not free men at all.
We do not know this is how he saw himself. Roman historians are better described as propagandists, for the purposes of the rulers and the religion of the state.
Modern historians are better described as that too. The modern religion is Occultic. Statues of Baphomet routinely show a male deity with a female chest. This is whom we are being respectful towards.
The Occult forces probably tolerate my comments because they too want you to know what they're up to. They want you to join in or, to at least, go along with it, however ignorantly.
Go along with it people do. This is because humanity will do anything for an easy life in the present, irrespective of how hard it gets later.
This reeks of junk science. The numbers in the study are too low to reveal the true fate of tiny minorities.
However, the trending pretence is that this cohort was not a tiny minority anyway.
Who is behind this pretence? Ultimately, the same as that behind most such pretence - Devil-worshippers who seek to destroy Christian and, therefore, European civilisation. Rewriting history is a favourite past-time of theirs and most 'learned' history buffs have literally no idea that this is even happening.
'Alice in Wonderland' was not really a children's book. It was a revealing of the future by a Devil-worshipper.
Forget fictionalising true accounts for entertainment value. Although, this certainly happens in Hollywood, fictionalising history for propaganda purposes is just as common and far more sinister.
History is captured by the Church of Satan, whether on-screen or off.
"In 1738, Pope Clement XII banned Catholics from becoming Freemasons..."
It is worth rembering that, with his papal brief, Dominus ac Redemptor, a later Pope, Clement XIV, suppressed the Jesuits in 1773.
The 18th century Papal ban of Masonry amongst the Catholic faithful may therefore have nothing in common with the modern posturing, for it may have been about combating Jesuit control in Catholicism, while modern Catholicism is utterly Jesuit-controlled, as is Freemasonry.
Indeed, the modern posturing is similar to what one sees in popular writings about the Knights Templar etc, being nothing more than a serious stirring to muddy the waters of truth to beyond the capacity of most to peer through.
Taken at murky face value, it can lead one to believe untruth to be truth and vice versa.
Neither 18th century ban actually worked, to mankind's detriment. The Devil is extremely crafty.
The graffiti representing a royal scene with what looks like a king and queen is quite significant, I think. I wonder what it means.
On the subject of female sustained energy over a long period, it has been shown that women who get down on the ground then get up and run on a repeat cycle, in infantry-like training scenarios for example, fatigue and pull out about ten times quicker than men do.
This is what happens when strength is required and not just endurance.
Consider how solid and, therefore, heavy a spear must be for very large game with very tough hides. Consider the weight of such a spear, how many may need to be carried, plus the spear-thrower itself, and the endurance angle disappears into the ether of gender studies masquerading as science amd strength rears its masculine head.
I saw, whilst waiting for my previous comment to load, that pregnancy was briefly and dismissively mentioned.
What should not be dismissed is that hunting large game required strength. Hunting small game didn't require the same strength, but neither did it require great endurance. Who would bother spending a whole day running after small game? A day running after large game could be worthwhile however. If women participated in hunting large game in any way, it was probably more in the location of the game, which could include following wounded game carefully from a distance. This is scouting. It is not full-on hunting, however, and it is a long way from the perceived reality of the image at the top of this article.
Pages